Man Called Aerodynamics
Member
So do any of the Trump fans who liked "drain the swamp" want to try and explain why they voted to enable this?
I asked a couple. No response except, "He's not in office yet, let's wait and see what happens."
So do any of the Trump fans who liked "drain the swamp" want to try and explain why they voted to enable this?
I don't disagree, but I do see this reasoning most vocally from a group of people who think the solution to this problem is running more aggressively progressive candidates when the numbers show that downticket left of Hillary actually performed worse than her in November. Like...what do you do when it turns out the electorate apparently just doesn't want progressivism?There is plenty of blame to go around, but blaming the electorate is like blaming the gravitational constant for airplane crashes. You can't dissolve the people and elect another.
In a democracy, it's the job of political operators to adapt to voters, not the other way around. I know that's a really sad concept for some people, but it has always been this way.
I asked a couple. No response except, "He's not in office yet, let's wait and see what happens."
We're going to see a lot of this I expect. It will move to, well let's wait another year, then well let's wait until his next term when he can really get things done. Then when he doesn't get that second term, it will be confirmation in their minds that they were always right, and that Trump just wasn't given a fair chance because the world was out to get him and his beliefs which they all share.
Post-truth world
EDIT: Expect Trump to tweet something distracting soon.
Blaming republican voters is one thing.
Blaming non-voters? Ok.
But I want to aim at another target. Everyone who is not taking voter supression seriously. That non-voter count will increase in untold ways if we don't care to fix this issue.
I don't disagree, but I do see this reasoning most vocally from a group of people who think the solution to this problem is running more aggressively progressive candidates when the numbers show that downticket left of Hillary actually performed worse than her in November. Like...what do you do when it turns out the electorate apparently just doesn't want progressivism?
Double standards are the best standards. Too bad it doesn't seem to bite the Republicans in the ass during elections.They spent how many millions of dollars and wasted hundreds of man hours investigating Emails and Benghazi? But Ethics investigations targeting them are overzealous?
Fuck.
Off.
![]()
EDIT: It was unanimous consent too. Word has it all the ground work of calling in this morning work like gangbusters.
Jamie DupreeVerified account
‏@jamiedupree
House GOP now in closed door meeting. Rep Walter Jones R-NC says his office swamped with calls on ethics changes
Wow, genuinely surprised by this. Glad to hear that public pressure (and Trump) got them to back away.
Trump will take credit, but he had nothing to do with it. It was pissed off callers.
Yeah that's what it seems like and is actually the best result. This will be useful as they try to attack Medicare/Medicaid/Social Security.
Wow, genuinely surprised by this. Glad to hear that public pressure (and [maybe?] Trump) got them to back away.
So do any of the Trump fans who liked "drain the swamp" want to try and explain why they voted to enable this?
Trump will take credit, but he had nothing to do with it. It was pissed off callers.
For now
Expect it to re-emerge when something else can distract us
We all know they will eventually secretly push it through as a last minute piece to another bill.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_elections,_2006
But yes, historically Dems have a hard time showing up for Midterms. I do have hope that they'll show up 2018 since they have a very clear reason to. They often need a face to vote for or against, and having Trump in office will put a fire under people to come out and vote.
Hopefully, anyway.
It's technically correct, the best kind of correct!Look at this shit:
![]()
It's technically correct, the best kind of correct!
Trump gets clicks. Whether for negative or positive reasons.
Press are fucks.
Totally. If people get the idea that calling in works, it could be a game changer.
I don't understand. Are we glad they reversed course or nah?Look at this shit:
![]()
I don't understand. Are we glad they reversed course or nah?
I don't understand. Are we glad they reversed course or nah?
How about mis-attributing the reason for the turnaround to artificially make it about TRUMP.
Or that they mis-quote and fail to mention that he's fine with the action, just against the timing.