Obama: "Trayvon Martin could have been me."

Status
Not open for further replies.

sangreal

Member
Except there was a string of robberies by criminals who happened to be young, black males. Would his calls target, for instance, whites if those criminals were young, white males? You don't know and neither do I. This is not the case to pick for a case against racial profiling.

That is the definition of racial profiling. Some crimes are committed by young black guys, so therefore all young black guys are suspicious without doing anything else wrong.
 

commedieu

Banned
Except there was a string of robberies by criminals who happened to be young, black males. Would his calls target, for instance, whites if those criminals were young, white males? You don't know and neither do I. This is not the case to pick for a case against racial profiling.

You don't know what profiling is, at the same time saying that he is racially profiling.

Are you confused about any of this?
 
Except there was a string of robberies by criminals who happened to be young, black males. Would his calls target, for instance, whites if those criminals were young, white males? You don't know and neither do I. This is not the case to pick for a case against racial profiling.

So in your opinion all young black males would be suspects, because they were walking in the area?
 

Shrennin

Didn't get the memo regarding the 14th Amendment
So in your opinion all young black males would be suspects, because they were walking in the area?

No. I'm not defending Zimmerman in the slightest, but does the reaction to this case not revolve around black racial profiling in particular? I'm not saying racial profiling wasn't done, but the question is if Zimmerman specifically and only targets blacks and would exclude all other races all things being equal. I don't think there's evidence to point to that.

As far as the case - I agree with the verdict (only because of the lack of evidence), but I think Zimmerman is a bad person.
 

bob_arctor

Tough_Smooth
No, it couldn't have been him and I honestly think he has no reason to even give an opinion. This is just going to increase the "Obama hate".

Sweet Mary Moses! Not the Obama Hate!! Anything but that!!!

Some of you guys are fuckin amazing. And not in the good, Las Vegas way.
 

commedieu

Banned
If I was black I would be absolutely appalled reading some of the shit I see in this thread.

Oh I am. But, we have to try to have a discussion. We can't get upset. We have to calmly discuss this with people. Trying to get that message out to everyone.

For example:

A few posts above yours I have a member telling me that Zimmerman didn't racially profile anyone, he was just considering Trayvon a problem because he was black. And blacks commit crimes in Zimmerman's community. But that isn't profiling, because "what if it was a white person!" Which would still be racially profiling.

How can you really get upset at this sort of ignorance?
 

No Love

Banned
Trayvon Martin could've been me as well.

I have brown skin, dark eyes, dark hair. Who's to say another Zimmerman wouldn't profile me as well? I get mistaken for being Middle Eastern all the time (I'm not), who's to say someone doesn't racially profile me as a "terrorist" or "Arab" and blow my brains out too, then claim I was planting a bomb or plotting something? Hell, I live in a neighborhood/suburb in SoCal that is predominantly white, I think something like 95% of my neighborhood is white!

Cases like the Zimmerman case just show me that despite me just being a "person" and a "citizen" (just like Trayvon was), I too can be targeted and brutally murdered by a racist, trigger-happy nutjob. Hell, for all I know there's someone in my neighborhood that already watches me closely and suspects me of being up to no good because of my outward appearance.
 

commedieu

Banned
No. I'm not defending Zimmerman in the slightest, but does the reaction to this case not revolve around black racial profiling in particular? I'm not saying racial profiling wasn't done, but the question is if Zimmerman specifically and only targets blacks and would exclude all other races all things being equal. I don't think there's evidence to point to that.

As far as the case - I agree with the verdict (only because of the lack of evidence), but I think Zimmerman is a bad person.

Shrinnan, you can't just say he didn't racially profile. Then explain that he racially profiled trayvon due to the blacks committing crimes
 
And it kills me that people don't realize this already. We are free to assume guilt of anyone, as we are also allowed to do to them (Zimmerman's assumed racial profiling), we have freedom of speech so we can tell a person to fuck off because we want to, and following - especially one so short lived as to be like this - does not warrant a physical beating by law. It may sound like justice to kick a guy's ass for calling you a name or something but the physical fight initiation is an issue in itself.

You've said that there's no point in discussing whether Zimmerman was racist/profiling based on race since we can't know for certain what happened. Going by that same logic, there's no point in focusing on the fight itself since we don't know what happened. We have Zimmerman's (varying) recounts of the fight and a couple eyewitnesses who didn't see the entire confrontation. Why keep shifting focus to the physical fight that Martin may or may not have started when we know Zimmerman spotted and followed Martin to begin with, despite not doing nothing more than walking down the street?

And even if stalking, profiling, believing black people are inherently guilty of something and following them with this assumption while armed with a gun are legal, why should we accept that? Are you okay with living in a country where this is permissible? Do you believe there's nothing wrong with the above being considered legal?

You keep trying to shift discussion to the fight itself as if it exists in a vacuum, as if Zimmerman's actions leading up to it don't matter at all. That makes little sense if you're have the pretense of looking at this situation logically.
 
No. I'm not defending Zimmerman in the slightest, but does the reaction to this case not revolve around black racial profiling in particular? I'm not saying racial profiling wasn't done, but the question is if Zimmerman specifically and only targets blacks and would exclude all other races all things being equal. I don't think there's evidence to point to that.

As far as the case - I agree with the verdict (only because of the lack of evidence), but I think Zimmerman is a bad person.

Referring to Trayvon as one of the assholes who always gets away, is him profiling him because he associated a black teen as a criminal.
 
Except there was a string of robberies by criminals who happened to be young, black males. Would his calls target, for instance, whites if those criminals were young, white males? You don't know and neither do I. This is not the case to pick for a case against racial profiling.

It's still racial profiling. If there has been lewd and lascivious acts committed by white males in my neighborhood and I called the police because I saw a suspicious white male in my neighborhood, it would be racial profiling.
 

Aristion

Banned
Had a weird/ruff conversation with someone today and I'd love some thoughts on it. I live in New Hampshire. Very white state/area. I my self am middle eastern & European. Grew up in brooklyn most of my life. (flatbush & sunset park)

Was speaking to my ex sister in-law. She sometimes makes comments that are racists without actually knowing that they are racist. She has barley had any interaction with anyone black. Most of her views come from tv,movies & music.

Recently a black fellow moved in near my apartment. Dude sticks out obviously. Some people including her initially acted all weird, sometimes threatened, other times just confused, etc.

While we ere talking I asked her about how she acts around my black neighbor. She aware of how she was acting, shes even aware that its based on assumptions based on tv, music, etc. Problem is its out of conditioning and habit. Shes gotten to know the guy and has gotten MUCH better, but its going to take more time for her to adapt.

In these kind of situations I don't really know how to feel. I know her intent is not racist, but because of her perceptions, lack of experience she can come off that way and may even be that way out of genuine ignorance.

We are all conditioned to harbor some stereotypical views against certain types of people. Studies have even shown that several black people hold prejudiced views against their own racial group!

I don't think that this makes us racist, although we do subconsciously hold racist dispositions towards other people.

I've actually caught myself (on several occasions) behaving in a racist manner against other minorities. The fact that I can catch myself and correct my behavior is what should matter, not that I hold these conditioned dispositions in the first place.

I think that if I have subconscious racial dispositions towards whiteness and against non-whiteness (and I'm a brown Hispanic) then many white people must also have internalized aspects of white supremacy that they're not consciously aware of.
 

Daft_Cat

Member
Overly politicized issue getting more politicized.



Do the work Obama, don't talk about it.

Very stupid approach for a democracy, no?

What would you have him do besides talk about it? Sign a bunch of executive orders? Do you really want an all-in-one, executive solution instead of one that properly spreads through the public discourse?
 
The dismissive and generally bitter reactions of some people towards Obama's comments really highlight a closing of the mind that has been going on for decades. Race and racism are complex issues that have not gone away, and will not go away. Yet racism today is still seen through the prism or either slavery or the 1960s: beatings, lynchings, blatant segregation. Because most if not all of these major things are not happening in 2013, and because we now have a black president, some seem quite convinced race is no longer an issue. And because of that, race has been swept under a rug. Any discussion of differences among races or racism is liable to be attacked as fostering discontent or ill - as if the mere mention of racism today will suddenly revive it from its deep slumber.

As Obama mentioned, racial profiling is not some long dead practice. It happens every day, every hour in this country. And the Zimmerman case, right or wrong, is seen entirely through that lens by many black people. If a person has spent most of his life being blatantly racially profiled during trips to the corner store, or while walking late at night, it should not come as a surprise that they view Zimmerman confronting Martin as an issue of profiling. After all, Martin went to a corner store and then attempted to go home before being pursued by someone. Zimmerman called 911 and complained about "these assholes" always getting away with crimes. Is it any surprise that black people, specifically black men, identify with Martin? We have been "those assholes" for most of our lives.

The general retort to all of this is that Zimmerman had black friends, and therefore clearly was not racist. Which, again, goes back to the point about racism as a concept being simplified today. Zimmerman never lynched a black person, nor did he refuse to serve a black person at a restaurant - therefore he's clearly not racist. I don't know whether Zimmerman is racist or not. Nor do I believe every white woman who hurriedly crosses the street (in broad daylight) when I'm behind her is racist. But I believe that Zimmerman assumed Martin was up to no good due to who he was: a young black male. Or, a young "dark" male if you want to harp on Zimmerman telling the operator that he thought Martin was black; I think it's safe to say he knew he was not white.

As long as we continue to shrink discussions of race, and get outraged that we're even discussing racism in 2013, we will always have this problem. Racism will always be seen as a double edged sword to many white people: to them, they feel as if they're being accused of something, as if racism is their fault or their grandfather's fault, as if we cannot discuss racism without putting white people on trial. And to those people I would simply say, imagine that feeling of assumed guilt nagging at you every day, every hour, every minute, for years. Decades. Every time you go into a store late at night, or every time you're driving in a nice car, or every time you accidentally lock yourself out your house and are outside looking for the key. Perhaps then you will know how many black people feel to an extent, and why this case is so personal to us.
Ever see a post on GAF and think "what a stupid post"? This one provoked the exact opposite reaction.
 

Shrennin

Didn't get the memo regarding the 14th Amendment

Shrinnan, you can't just say he didn't racially profile. Then explain that he racially profiled trayvon due to the blacks committing crimes

I wasn't clear enough - I was under the assumption that we were talking about the problem that blacks have with racial profiling. I should have been more clear from the get-go and that was my fault. However, I'm not sure if Zimmerman specifically racial profiled Martin because he was black, or because of the recent robberies which made him target a specific race. In other words, I understand that Zimmerman racially profiled in part at the very least.
 

strobogo

Banned
What does skin tone have to do with the validity of his message, and the fact that it resonates with the black community, who is also compromised of different cultures, but for all intents and purposes, are socially and visually, black.

Nothing at all. It just seems weird to me that everyone, both positively and negatively, harps on his blackness, when half of his family are as white as can be. And he was raised by those super duper white people. I'd think the crazy racist right wingers would think of him as "one of the good ones" or some shit.

The comment I made didn't really pertain to the subject or topic at hand. Just something that's been bugging me for a while in that mixed people are almost always considered black, not mixed, not white, always black.
 
Yes, but how does it give traction to his agenda? Traction in what way? If Obama's aim is to gain traction with gun control, then it's to make it easier to pass it, and so I ask again: How would invoking Trayvon Martin make it easier to pass gun control? What's the point of making an issue gain traction if it doesn't make it easier to pass? I'm not seeing it, and it doesn't make much sense, so no, Obama didn't say it to forward his agenda.

I see what you're saying about institutionalized racism and everything else, but he doesn't have to mention that if his main goal here was to say how he felt about the situation.

I think you're reading too much into what I'm saying which btw is based off nothing but my opinion. I don't think what the man has said today is controversial in anyway, but I don't believe he'd say anything that wouldn't help him politically based soley on the fact that he's silent on so many things especially one's that at one time he took issue with.

Why does everyone seem to forget that roughly 70% of African Americans living in the US have European in them?
Segregation, oppression, etc. has basically caused a huge cultural rift that will likely not be healed anytime soon. White and black culture is like comparing apples and oranges in a lot of ways. It generally boils down to two things; Your appearance (whether you look black/white) which about 90% and who you identify with culturally.
 
I wasn't clear enough - I was under the assumption that we were talking about the problem that blacks have with racial profiling. I should have been more clear from the get-go and that was my fault. However, I'm not sure if Zimmerman specifically racial profiled Martin because he was black, or because of the recent robberies which made him target a specific race. In other words, I understand that Zimmerman racially profiled in part at the very least.

If you target a specific race you are racially profiling!
 

Jack_AG

Banned
Its not significant for non-blacks, for obvious reasons.

You just love making blanket statements about "non-blacks", don't you?

For people that go through what trayvon went through, yes its very important. You cant have a population that thinks its open season on them, with the law backing it up.

This bullshit does nothing to further the discourse that is NEEDED right now - it only serves to further muddy up the discussion by speaking as these are absolute facts.

Sorry, you're not helping the "racist" argument by making, DARE I SAY IT, racist fucking statements, genius. How is it right for ANYONE to make blanket absolute statements about another race? How is it justified to say all "non-blacks" lack the cognitive skills to find the President's words significant? What do you have against Hispanics, Asians, Whites, Indians, Native Americans, Middle Easterners, etc? What do you have against "non-blacks" that you think it's perfectly fine to profile them? Isn't that how this whole situation started? How fucking idiotic.

There are plenty of "non-black" folks who are on YOUR SIDE, which, you will never see or believe since you seem to have a predisposition against "non-blacks".

How shameful.

Edit:
racial profiling is 100% unacceptable in a free nation. Any part of it is unacceptable
But it's OK for you to do it, right?
 

casabolg

Banned
This is sorta my point. People associated with being pretty critical of black people, to the point of demonizing them, demonized Martin while holding Zimmerman aloft as if he were some hero. Everyone else tended to side with Martin, since he was an unarmed child that was killed. The breakdown, for me, in the media of this case was this: If you hated black people, even secretly, you defended Zimmerman. If you really really liked guns, to point where any questioning of a guns use in a situation made you fear that all guns would be taken away (and not, you know, just prompt a conversation on responsible use), then you sided with Zimmerman. All of the passions inflamed in this case for Zimmerman really appeared to come from those camps. (Note that I am not saying that anyone that defended Zimmerman was a racist or a crazy gun nut).

I actually wanted to talk with my husband about this case. When I mentioned that I thought, morally, that Zimmerman was guilty even if the law didn't back me up, he accused me of being a 'bleeding heart liberal who wants to take all the guns away'. THAT is the way this case was treated in the media. And it's disgusting.
Oh yes, and I do agree with that sentiment most definitely but I think that's just a part of the picture when there was. There was many blowing up things for those who believed it was racism and those who didn't. It's harmful and I don't like it either way but it's almost inescapable when it gets this much media attention.
I'm sorry your husband came at you like that. Give him a smack for acting like that to you, please.
 

Shrennin

Didn't get the memo regarding the 14th Amendment
If you target a specific race you are racially profiling!

I'm done. You didn't even read my whole statement where I clarified that I understand he racially profiled in part. I was under the assumption that we were talking about the specific problem that blacks have in regards to being racially profiled. In the sentence you bolded, I was clarifying the two different reasons Zimmerman may have racially profiled (because he was racist or because there were robberies that just so happened to done primarily by a certain race).
 

Oblivion

Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
The most surprising thing about this whole ordeal is how ZERO people on the right, especially the NRA, have used this situation as an excuse to peddle more guns.

It just goes to show how even something as sacred as the second amendment can take a back seat to Republican distaste for Black people. Though I guess this probably isn't surprising considering the Mulford Act, which banned guns in California, was only enacted when the Black Panthers started carrying them (and was even signed by the Lord Reagan himself!)
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
- Black people make up 50% of all inmates in prison even though we only make up 12% of the country’s population.

- Black people are incarcerated at 6 times the rate of white people.

- 5 times as many white people use drugs as black people, yet black people are sent to prison 10 times more for drug offenses.

- Black people serve the same amount of time in prison for non-violent drug offenses (4.8 years) as white people do for a violent offenses (5.1 years).

- Black people are 12% of all drug users, but they are 32% of all people arrested for drug possession.

- In 2002 black people constituted 80% of all people sent to jail for crack cocaine laws, even though 66% of people that due crack cocaine are white or “Hispanic”.

- In New Jersey 15% of all drivers are black, yet 42% of cars pulled over for a traffic violation are black. And 72% of all drivers arrested for a traffic violation are black.

- In New Jersey 77% of all traffic car searches were of minorities.

- In Maryland 17% of drivers are black, but 70% stopped and searched were black. These stats are where the term “driving while black” come from.

- But here’s the catch, whites who were pulled over were more likely to have illegal drugs in their cars. In New Jersey whites were 2 times more likely than blacks and 5 times more likely than Latinos to have illegal drugs in their cars.

- In America black people are convicted to death penalty sentences more than white people even though they committed the same crime.

- And also in America of all criminals that have been executed due to the death penalty, 84% of the victims have been white. Only 12% have been black since 1976. Even though 50% of all homicides have black victims.

- Also since 1976, 40% of all people executed were black even though we only make up 12% of the population.

- There have been studies that have shown that people with white “sounding” names get interview call backs quicker and easier than people with black “sounding” names. Examples of the names being: Keisha, Tamika, Latonya, and Ebony. And these resumes were literally the exact same, just different names.

- The names that sounded more white were 50% more likely to get a call back than the ones with black sounding names. The test was done in Boston and Chicago.

- And watch this video where they do a test of black kids and white kids vandalizing a car and what the white people do in response based on race. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQHdbW36XjE


*********************************************************************************

So explain to me again why Obama shouldn't have addressed this particular issue, considering the above stats?
 
I think you're reading too much into what I'm saying which btw is based off nothing but my opinion. I don't think what the man has said today is controversial in anyway, but I don't believe he'd say anything that wouldn't help him politically based soley on the fact that he's silent on so many things especially one's that at one time he took issue with.

Well, I'm just curious as to your thought processes. Obama is silent on a lot of things: I mean, aside from the win on his election night, he hasn't said much about voting problems in the country, especially in the wake of SCOTUS' ruling on the VRA. However, that doesn't mean what he said today thinks it'll help him politically.

I'm still trying to figure out why he thinks saying what he said helps him politically whether it be his agenda or anything else. Not everything a politician says is for their own benefit. Sure you could argue much of it is, but not everything.
 

commedieu

Banned
I wasn't clear enough - I was under the assumption that we were talking about the problem that blacks have with racial profiling. I should have been more clear from the get-go and that was my fault. However, I'm not sure if Zimmerman specifically racial profiled Martin because he was black, or because of the recent robberies which made him target a specific race. In other words, I understand that Zimmerman racially profiled in part at the very least.

The problem that us blacks have with racial profiling, is that we are associated with criminals. Trayvon, was associated with a criminal. Because Zimmerman racially profiled him, due to his skin color, and associated him with criminals.

You understand that he profiled, but you're still giving Zimmerman some sort of consideration that he possibly maybe wasn't. We have a record of his racial profiling, right there. All of his profiling finally led up to shooting Trayvon to death, He constantly racially profiled blacks.

Thats the problem blacks have with racial profiling. I dare say any sensible person can agree that its a significant problem in our country.

If you know Zimmerman racially profiled, you should know that racial profiling is 100% unacceptable in a free nation. Any part of it is unacceptable. Do you agree/disagree?
 
- In New Jersey 15% of all drivers are black, yet 42% of cars pulled over for a traffic violation are black. And 72% of all drivers arrested for a traffic violation are black.

- In New Jersey 77% of all traffic car searches were of minorities.

Yep happened to me parked at McDonalds at 3pm. Guns drawn on me and car searched for no reason.
 

Cyan

Banned
I'm done. You didn't even read my whole statement where I clarified that I understand he racially profiled in part. I was under the assumption that we were talking about the specific problem that blacks have in regards to being racially profiled. In the sentence you bolded, I was clarifying the two different reasons Zimmerman may have racially profiled (because he was racist or because there were robberies that just so happened to done primarily by a certain race).

I think you may be misunderstanding what racial profiling is. Would you mind explaining what you mean when you say "racial profiling"?

Edit:
Your clarification explains things a little better.
 

Shrennin

Didn't get the memo regarding the 14th Amendment
If you know Zimmerman racially profiled, you should know that racial profiling is 100% unacceptable in a free nation. Any part of it is unacceptable. Do you agree/disagree?

This is what I believe: I believe that making judgments about someone based on their race and nothing else is completely wrong no matter what race you are. I also believe that Zimmerman had no authority to try to stop Martin even if he were up to no good.

I think you may be misunderstanding what racial profiling is. Would you mind explaining what you mean when you say "racial profiling"?

Racial profiling is making an assumption of someone (or targeting someone, in this case) due to the color of their skin. Like I said, this is a misunderstanding that I can't really clarify so I'm done with the argument. I was trying to bring up "why" Zimmerman may have racially profiled and not whether or not he actually did racially profile (I think he did, at least in part).

Edit:
Your clarification explains things a little better.

I'm glad it helped. I made a couple of assumptions in regards to what this topic about that I think were wrong (or at least I didn't clarify where I was coming from). I think Zimmerman was completely in the wrong as soon as he started to follow Martin. As part of the community watch, if he thought Martin was looking into houses or acting suspicious he should have just called 911 and then he should have been done with it. Unfortunately, he didn't do that and a tragedy was created.
 

Angry Fork

Member
The most surprising thing about this whole ordeal is how ZERO people on the right, especially the NRA, have used this situation as an excuse to peddle more guns.

It just goes to show how even something as sacred as the second amendment can take a back seat to Republican distaste for Black people. Though I guess this probably isn't surprising considering the Mulford Act, which banned guns in California, was only enacted when the Black Panthers started carrying them (and was even signed by the Lord Reagan himself!)

Tavis Smiley suggested this semi-jokingly to Bill O'reilly, just to point out the hypocrisy, and O'reilly showed his true colors out loud by saying that 'would be a little extreme'. But of course it isn't extreme if all whites had guns.

http://youtu.be/AW4VT-C_XcE?t=6m3s
 

Doc Holliday

SPOILER: Columbus finds America
*********************************************************************************

So explain to me again why Obama shouldn't have addressed this particular issue, considering the above stats?

Uhm because jobs, and scandals!! derr...

Seriously excellent post. BTW the same people bitching about Obama commenting on this are probably the same ones that give him shit when he doesn't comment on something fast enough.
 

Kite

Member
That is the definition of racial profiling. Some crimes are committed by young black guys, so therefore all young black guys are suspicious without doing anything else wrong.
I never understood this type of thinking, it is asking me to go against logic and common sense. If there is an amber alert for a middle-aged Hispanic male in a red pickup truck suspected of kidnapping then I am going to racially profile every Hispanic male I come across as well as "color profile" every red truck I see. That type of racial profiling I have no problem with because obviously it is in response to actual events. Racial profiling that is obviously unacceptable are like NYC's stop and frisk laws or the whole "driving while Black" stops.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom