sangreal said:
Not really the contradiction you're trying to paint. There are several actions being undertaken by the protesters. The occupations are generally not inconvenient except to those who live/work nearby. The current 'disruption' activities are inconvenient to many more.
All of those actions are in reality not all that inconvenient, and additionally aren't being caused by the protesters but instead by the city/NYPD's reaction to them.
Why do you need to shut down the subway stations for above-ground protests? Why do you need to shut down stations that aren't even Wall St station/s? Why do you need to prevent a peaceful protest from marching to/through a public space? Why do you need 1,000 cops to do it?
If it's taking you longer to get to work, why not leave earlier? Why not find another route to get to work? If your favorite food truck isn't located where it usually would be, why not get something else for lunch? Again, it's not really all that inconvenient.
This movement can't be both inconvenient and immaterial. That's not going to be the angle by which it can be attacked, just like public hygiene wasn't really it. People are going to have to eventually face the issues it is addressing - and eventually, they're going to have to do research to learn what those issues are (if they don't already know).