And he's kind of ok with racial discrimination.kame-sennin said:He wants to get rid of the department of education.
theBishop said:The #OccupyPhilly organization had an open meeting tonight to determine where and when the occupation would take place. It attracted over 1000 citizens in an old church downtown:
http://i.imgur.com/kFwfx.jpg
theBishop said:The #OccupyPhilly organization had an open meeting tonight to determine where and when the occupation would take place. It attracted over 1000 citizens in an old church downtown:
kame-sennin said:He wants to get rid of the department of education.
I think a good deal of the bankers should be in jail.
That is what Andrew Cole, an unemployed 24-year-old graduate of Bucknell University, told me Monday morning in Zuccotti Park, the epicenter of the Occupy Wall Street movement. Mr. Cole, an articulate young man dressed in jeans, a sweatshirt and with a blue wool beanie on his head, had just arrived by bus from Madison, Wis., where he recently lost his job.
There was nothing particularly menacing or dangerous about Mr. Cole. He said he had come to participate in Occupy Wall Street because he believed in its anticapitalist message. I see Wall Street as responsible for the mess were in.
Patriot Corps Field Staff
Progressive Patriots Fund
Political Organization industry
September 2008 Present (3 years 2 months)
Trained and dispatched by Senator Russ Feingold's PAC to work in the field for Eric Massa's congressional campaign in New York's 29th district. Responsibilities included volunteer recruitment, voter contact, and coordinating the GOTV push for a campaign satellite office in Canandaigua, NY.
The states already do run their own education systems. The US has one of the most decentralized education systems in the developed world. The Department of Education also happens to be one of the smallest cabinet departments. Most federal involvement deals with simply offering additional funding if states meet certain targets.unomas said:You mean the massively failing department of education? Let states run their own education systems, maybe we would actually get better results. We don't need so much government interference at the National level, leave more things up to the states.
Non-partisan and free of being co=opted. How many unions, who historically support and donate large sums to democrat politicians are joining this now.magicstop said:Also, Obama is a corporatist and he's a huge part of an even huger problem. There's no push to keep him around or to support him. He's in Sach's sack, so to speak, and that's a no go. Again, this movement is striving and succeeding thus far in being nonpartisan, apolitical, and free of being co-opted.
unomas said:You mean the massively failing department of education? Let states run their own education systems, maybe we would actually get better results. We don't need so much government interference at the National level, leave more things up to the states.
And kudos to the people that showed up in Philly! Very nice.
This isn't totally true. The state establishes school but the dept of education has huge influence on every state education system. Have you never heard of "No child left behind." They've also been against every school reform movement until very recently.Hokuten said:The states already do run their own education systems. The US has one of the most decentralized education systems in the developed world. The Department of Education also happens to be one of the smallest cabinet departments. Most federal involvement deals with simply offering additional funding if states meet certain targets.
This is why these kinds of concerns are a joke, even to many Republicans. You and Ron Paul apparently don't even know your own country.
Unions are a political machine. They can join, I don't care. Just don't say you are non-partisan and take no sides, and then on the other hand lean on a political machine. Is anyone asking these union members their views on the "corporatist" Obama administration?Why wouldn't the unions join in? This is an anti-corporatist backlash, and the unions have been hammered for dec...gibberish
Would they? A few hecklers booed at one of the most corrupt politicians in the country. All that says to me is that a few people there are well informedthey already turned Charles Rangel away, and have said they would do so to other politicians.
remnant said:Would they? A few hecklers booed at one of the most corrupt politicians in the country. All that says to me is that a few people there are well informed
I have, which is why I alluded to its function in my previous post. NCLB is about a state's actions determining their ability to receive federal education funding. States are not forced to do anything. They are more than welcome to handle their own affairs with their own funding. The federal government's actions in this regard are incentive-driven, not coercion.remnant said:This isn't totally true. The state establishes school but the dept of education has huge influence on every state education system. Have you never heard of "No child left behind."
You need to setup an Occupy Silicon Valley. You are the one we've been waiting for.hyp said:folks needs to setup an occupy silicon valley.
ToxicAdam said:
Except that the Dept of education passed NCLB during a time of various state budget crises, essentially controlling most of the states academic standards. To achieve the "carrot" states had to jump various hoops, spending more money than originally planned for essentially no pay off. This is especially harsh on poorer schools, which are punished by the act, have to jump through more hoops and spend more money.Hokuten said:I have, which is why I alluded to its function in my previous post. NCLB is about a state's actions determining their ability to receive federal education funding. States are not forced to do anything. They are more than welcome to handle their own affairs with their own funding. The federal government's actions in this regard are incentive-driven, not coercion.
A few trips to the Bahama's? Rangel used his position in the ways and means commitee(who deals with taxes) to curry favor with certain corporations. He lied on his tax return(again on the ways and means commission.) and has over 10 ethics counts against him. Yeah he is pretty corrupt.akira28 said:Pardon me. I'll be away a moment. My eyes rolled out of the room.
An apartment with a shady lease in NYC rent law land, and a few trips to the Bahamas that doubled as some kind of international community summit doesn't put him anywhere in the range of the most corrupt politicians in the country.
It's not going to be worth it, is it? Replying?
akira28 said:Hey unomas. Did you know the dirty liberals allow DiHydrogen Monoxide into our water systems? Our children drink that water. How does that make you feel? Don't you think the EPA should care about something like that? Well they don't. In fact they PURIFY the DHMO and leave it in. Insane. What will you do about it?
Hokuten said:I have, which is why I alluded to its function in my previous post. NCLB is about a state's actions determining their ability to receive federal education funding. States are not forced to do anything. They are more than welcome to handle their own affairs with their own funding. The federal government's actions in this regard are incentive-driven, not coercion.
unomas said:Complete idiocy doesn't deserve much of a response.
You sound incredibly petty. Not to mention this is the umpteenth time you've tried to pigeonhole the entire movement as just a bunch of Obama fans getting together for a librul pow wow.remnant said:Unions are a political machine. They can join, I don't care. Just don't say you are non-partisan and take no sides, and then on the other hand lean on a political machine. Is anyone asking these union members their views on the "corporatist" Obama administration?Code:
And this is the third or fourth time you've bitched about something like my tone? Why do you care? I see problems in this "movement" that I find worth discussing because I think it's interesting. Will you not be happy until i unilaterally praise them or something.DOO13ER said:You sound incredibly petty. Not to mention this is the umpteenth time you've tried to pigeonhole the entire movement as just a bunch of Obama fans getting together for a librul pow wow.
Discuss your problems all you want but so far your issues with the movement depend entirely on your own bullshit assumptions about what the movement stands for. To date, those assumptions don't jive with reality. Just because unions have thrown their support behind it doesn't make everyone in those crowds union supporters and hypocritical corporate hating Obama worshippers, as much as you seem to want that to be the case.remnant said:And this is the third or fourth time you've bitched about something like my tone? Why do you care? I see problems in this "movement" that I find worth discussing because I think it's interesting. Will you not be happy until i unilaterally praise them or something.
If you think i'm pigeonholing them becuase I dare to be critical, fine. Put me on ignore and pretend that a movement demanding a trillion dollars be spent to restore trees and establish a world bank is nonpartisan
AFL-CIO (AFSCME)Karma Kramer said:Why would occupywallstreet be in favor of Obama remnant?
What bullshit assumptions? What are they? I have posted in this thread plenty of times so there must be some you can cite. Are unions not a political machine? Does the government not give money to corporations that are lost in loans. Does the Occupy WallSt not support spending a trillion dollars on trees and creating a worldbank? it's on their website.DOO13ER said:Discuss your problems all you want but so far your issues with the movement depend entirely on your own bullshit assumptions about what the movement stands for. To date, those assumptions don't jive with reality. Just because unions have thrown their support behind it doesn't make everyone in those crowds union supporters and hypocritical corporate hating Obama worshippers, as much as you seem to want that to be the case.
remnant said:AFL-CIO (AFSCME)
United NY
Strong Economy for All Coalition
Working Families Party
TWU Local 100
SEIU 1199
CWA 1109
RWDSU
Communications Workers of America
CWA Local 1180
United Auto Workers
United Federation of Teachers
Professional Staff Congress - CUNY
National Nurses United
Writers Guild East
And:
VOCAL-NY
Community Voices Heard
Alliance for Quality Education
New York Communities for Change
Coalition for the Homeless
Neighborhood Economic Development Advocacy Project (NEDAP)
The Job Party
NYC Coalition for Educational Justice
The Mirabal Sisters Cultural and Community Center
The New Deal for New York Campaign
National People's Action
ALIGN
Human Services Council
Labor-Religion Coalition of New York State
Citizen Action of NY
MoveOn.org
Common Cause NY
New Bottom Line
350.org
Tenants & Neighbors
Democracy for NYC
Resource Generation
Tenants PAC
Teachers Unite
Those are the groups supporting OccupyWall St. That list is on the front page of their website. Dis a single one of the groups on that list not support the obama campaign financially, knowing full well he was the most "Wall St" funded candidate on the ticket last election cycle
Who are you voting for in 2012 then?Karma Kramer said:I voted for Obama, but I don't support him now. Your list doesn't correlate to Obama supporters in the sense that they equal votes in 2012.
Look I'm tired and this is giving me a sense of deja vu. Maybe some obama supporters in 2008 have become more critical or disillusioned by him. I don't believe any of those groups have.Karma Kramer said:I voted for Obama, but I don't support him now. Your list doesn't correlate to Obama supporters in the sense that they equal votes in 2012.
Speaking as a disappointed librul, Obama, because the alternative will likely be a cartoonish bible-thumping, science-hating, anti-intellectual, wealth-worshipping maniac of some variety.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:Who are you voting for in 2012 then?
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:Who are you voting for in 2012 then?
Right, let's take the silliest of long list of evolving demands and grievances and paint with that brush. I guess because some jackoff got photographed with a sign demanding zero taxes at a Tea Party rally it's safe to write the entire sentiment of that movement off as a bunch of malleable idiots lashing out at the system responsible for the public works and social services they depend upon more than anyone. And because I've made this judgment call, I deem the entirety of the Tea Party hypocritical and ultimately irrelevant.remnant said:What bullshit assumptions? What are they? I have posted in this thread plenty of times so there must be some you can cite. Are unions not a political machine? Does the government not give money to corporations that are lost in loans. Does the Occupy WallSt not support spending a trillion dollars on trees and creating a worldbank? it's on their website.
You wouldn't be on me so much if i was kissing their ass. Just be honest.
theBishop said:The #OccupyPhilly organization had an open meeting tonight to determine where and when the occupation would take place. It attracted over 1000 citizens in an old church downtown:
http://i.imgur.com/kFwfx.jpg
No. That's what Sunday morning looks like.empty vessel said:Excellent! That is truly what democracy looks like.
With the Phillies in the playoffs one should be happy a 1000 people attended.Dash27 said:Doesnt look very... diverse. I see a lot of white people. I also saw footage of Roseanne Barr saying they need to behead the bankers or some such.
I dont really give a damn about either of those things as it relates to this protest, but I thought it was worth mentioning this was how the Tea Party was branded racist and angry/violent.
I hope you're not trying to project what Roseanne Barr wants on this entire protest movement.... The Tea Party wasn't branded racist and angry because it was made up of white people. The rhetoric coming from some Tea Party members did a good enough job of that.Dash27 said:Doesnt look very... diverse. I see a lot of white people. I also saw footage of Roseanne Barr saying they need to behead the bankers or some such.
I dont really give a damn about either of those things as it relates to this protest, but I thought it was worth mentioning this was how the Tea Party was branded racist and angry/violent.
Anything organized online is going to have a problem with class/race diversity. I agree with you. But the group is committed to outreach, and they shouldn't have trouble attracting people at city hall.Dash27 said:Doesnt look very... diverse. I see a lot of white people. I also saw footage of Roseanne Barr saying they need to behead the bankers or some such.
I dont really give a damn about either of those things as it relates to this protest, but I thought it was worth mentioning this was how the Tea Party was branded racist and angry/violent.
theBishop said:Anything organized online is going to have a problem with class/race diversity. I agree with you. But the group is committed to outreach, and they shouldn't have trouble attracting people at city hall.
magicstop said:This, I hope. That Philly pic was very encouraging, but it was also a sea of white, and that's not good. However, there are POC/LGBTQ committees that are committed to insuring that POC/LGBTQ have a central position in this movement, and that the grievances that POC/LGBTQ/women have experienced for hundreds of years (really thousands) before the white middle class started hurting are made public, made clear, made important, and made right.
theBishop said:So, I definitely wouldn't say the demographics were anything close to the actual population of Philadelphia. It was disproportionately white for sure. But I didn't feel like a "sea of white" when I was in it. There was more diversity than I expected, but more work is needed.
Also, I think it's worth mentioning that white people have significant privilege here. Poor disenfranchised black citizens are risking a lot more coming out and possibly getting arrested than working-class whites. Hopefully, movements like these create some cover for all people to speak out with less fear of recrimination.
Stating facts is not trolling. At least they are honest about what this so-called movement is actually about now. Big labor.magicstop said:This, I hope. That Philly pic was very encouraging, but it was also a sea of white, and that's not good. However, there are POC/LGBTQ committees that are committed to insuring that POC/LGBTQ have a central position in this movement, and that the grievances that POC/LGBTQ/women have experienced for hundreds of years (really thousands) before the white middle class started hurting are made public, made clear, made important, and made right. If this movement fails to do that, it will have failed, period.
That being said, I'm hopeful. I'm working with the POC committee for my local Occupy movements, and it's a very positive force with some great ideas and people involved.
Also, if you haven't figured it out by now, remnant is trolling and there's no reason to respond to him. Just ignore him and move on. Seriously I am glad he posted that list of involved groups. I hadn't seen that even though it was on their site. Must be a newish addition. I will be updating the OP with that list shortly. Thanks remnant!
Perhaps that just don't care about the "movement."theBishop said:Also, I think it's worth mentioning that white people have significant privilege here. Poor disenfranchised black citizens are risking a lot more coming out and possibly getting arrested than working-class whites. Hopefully, movements like these create some cover for all people to speak out with less fear of recrimination.