• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

"OCCUPY WALL STREET"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dude Abides said:
Where are the fortified positions Manos was warning us about?
NYPD did it's job and prevented them access to Wall Street.

That said, I wasn't expecting the people showing up to be this useless and ineffectual...and hilarious! So I was overcautious, I gave these people way too much credit.


El Sloth said:
Someone should let all those anti-capitalism dudes know that they should probably stop buying those Guy Fawkes masks. Because, uh, yeah.
LOL. That's hillarious.

Remember when I said that other picture was last...I lied.

Ron Paul Anon Sign From Earlier
2mK73.jpg
 
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:
NYPD did it's job and prevented them access to Wall Street.

That said, I wasn't expecting the people showing up to be this useless and ineffectual...and hilarious! So I was overcautious, I gave these people way too much credit.

And you're trying way too hard.
 
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:
NYPD did it's job and prevented them access to Wall Street.

That said, I wasn't expecting the people showing up to be this useless and ineffectual...and hilarious! So I was overcautious, I gave these people way too much credit.

You promised a modern Bastille day, and all we got was a standard patchouli-soaked festival of nothing. I'm holding you responsible for my lack of entertainment.
 
Dude Abides said:
You promised a modern Bastille day, and all we got was a standard patchouli-soaked festival of nothing. I'm holding you responsible for my lack of entertainment.

This seems to be the most fitting punishment for Manos for his conduct in this thread.
 
I love how confused the right-wingers are getting.

Everyone's there for different reasons, there is no defined message, they are all different; welcome to the modern age, we all have different problems/grievances but we can, and are allowed to, gather together as one and protest.
 
Dude Abides said:
You promised a modern Bastille day, and all we got was a standard patchouli-soaked festival of nothing. I'm holding you responsible for my lack of entertainment.

I apologize fully and completely for my failure to deliver a modern day Bastille.

Will Talking Coin giving an interview to a Russia Today Newscaster help?
fxq4Q.jpg
 
travisbickle said:
I love how confused the right-wingers are getting.

Everyone's there for different reasons, there is no defined message, they are all different; welcome to the modern age, we all have different problems/grievances but we can, and are allowed to, gather together as one and protest.
Isn't the defining message "stop fucking us over, wall street"?

Seems like a bunch of jumbled political talking points but that does seem to be the main theme.

Edit: Lol @ coin I like how its like some weird convention complete with weird cosplay
 
Bloodbeard said:
I have the weirdest boner right now. I think it's because I don't get the NO reference?
You're not alone (well in not getting the reference). I just don't even get what she could mean (unless something happened in NO recently) other than she is from NO and doesn't want Wall Street hoarding coke from her?
 
I've got a friend who has organized a bunch of protests in the past, and he told me that you could pretty much know this one was going to fail ahead of time because Anonymous was involved (and they're not really capable of doing productive things if said things involve leaving their computers). He pretty much called everything we've seen in this thread; total compliance (no chaining themselves to buildings or being confrontational whatsoever), no organization or unified message discipline at all, and a huge overemphasis on terrible costumes. Anonymous members don't understand why dressing up as Darth Vader and hanging a sign around your neck that says WALL STREET converts pretty much zero people to your side *and* makes the other people at the protest look more ridiculous simply for being on the same side as you.
 
What's your problem Manos:

The act of protesting?

The diversity within this protest?

The reason (or lack of) for this protest?


I don't understand? You seem to be posting pictures of people from different age groups? people from different ethnic, educational and political backgrounds? people using different methods to convey their message?

Your posts are confusing and do not have a clear, defined message? All I can conclude is that you dislike the very definition of a protest? Are you some kind of commie bastard!!
 
travisbickle said:
What's your problem Manos:

The act of protesting?

The diversity within this protest?

The reason (or lack of) for this protest?


I don't understand? You seem to be posting pictures of people from different age groups? people from different ethnic, educational and political backgrounds? people using different methods to convey their message?

Your posts are confusing and do not have a clear, defined message? All I can conclude is that you dislike the very definition of a protest? Are you some kind of commie bastard!!
He hates America and loves the status quo.
 
badcrumble said:
I've got a friend who has organized a bunch of protests in the past, and he told me that you could pretty much know this one was going to fail ahead of time because Anonymous was involved (and they're not really capable of doing productive things if said things involve leaving their computers). He pretty much called everything we've seen in this thread; total compliance (no chaining themselves to buildings or being confrontational whatsoever), no organization or unified message discipline at all, and a huge overemphasis on terrible costumes. Anonymous members don't understand why dressing up as Darth Vader and hanging a sign around your neck that says WALL STREET converts pretty much zero people to your side *and* makes the other people at the protest look more ridiculous simply for being on the same side as you.
If he had the chance or interest, how would your friend have gone about organizing things? Other than the stuff already mentioned in your post.
 
El Sloth said:
If he had the chance or interest, how would your friend have gone about organizing things? Other than the stuff already mentioned in your post.
Haven't asked, but my guess is: more stuff like actually blocking people from getting into the trading floor, *actually* impeding business in any sense, not getting up and moving wherever the cops tell you to move, et cetera. Also, message discipline and no stupid costumes.

You know, the actual risky kind of civil disobedience that requires you to get arrested, but makes the point that impeding the interests of the powerful is all it takes to get you arrested. The kind of civil disobedience that actually puts you at risk, and thus that the 'nonviolent' privileged middle class white people who showed up for this event are afraid of.
 
America showing the world how not to protest.

Also, pissing all over Arab spring by referencing it as an inspiration.

Well played, guys.
 
The police state didn't even let the protest happen legitimately since they can't even be on Wall Street, so whatever. I do hope what's there increases in size at least, though.
 
captmcblack said:
The police state didn't even let the protest happen legitimately since they can't even be on Wall Street, so whatever. I do hope what's there increases in size at least, though.

Of course; they know that the American public is too apathetic to put anything together and actually change things for the better. The scum on Wall Street heard about this and had a good laugh at their exclusive country club this weekend.
 
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:
Oh I found a couple of flickr accounts, so I have a feeling the hits are just going to keep on coming.


He means you are crying, tearing up.

It's probably because of the stick up your arse, that's gonna sting.
 
Why did the cops not let them onto Wall Street? Don't all the traders access the NYSE via the side door, since the actual front of the building has a gate around it? If its just a tourist plaza anyways, who cares if they want to congregate there?
 
lawblob said:
Why did the cops not let them onto Wall Street? Don't all the traders access the NYSE via the side door, since the actual front of the building has a gate around it? If its just a tourist plaza anyways, who cares if they want to congregate there?

I recall hearing that it was something to do with foot and car traffic in the area. They also didn't bother trying to get a permit too.
 
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:
I recall hearing that it was something to do with foot and car traffic in the area. They also didn't bother trying to get a permit too.

You need a permit to protest ? What happened to the right to assembly ?
 
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:
I recall hearing that it was something to do with foot and car traffic in the area. They also didn't bother trying to get a permit too.

Lol. I love it. Go to the trouble of creating pamphlets, don't bother getting a permit.


confused said:
You need a permit to protest ? What happened to the right to assembly ?

In NYC, at least, certain types of protests require permits, and in some cases, bonds. AFAIK, its a fairly straightforward process to obtain a permit.
 
lawblob said:
Lol. I love it. Go to the trouble of creating pamphlets, don't bother getting a permit.




In NYC, at least, certain types of protests require permits, and in some cases, bonds. AFAIK, its a fairly straightforward process to obtain a permit.


What's a bond ? What is it for ?
 
confused said:
What's a bond ? What is it for ?

If you want to have a protest in a public park, for example, and expect a lot of people to be there, you have to pay for a bond that is basically an insurance policy in case the protestors cause damage to the area they are protesting.

In 2004 there was supposed to be a huge protest in Central Park to protest the Republican convention, but nobody was willing to cough up the bond money, so the cops wouldn't let them have their protest in Central Park, IIRC.


confused said:
If no damage is done, is the money returned ?

Yes
 
lawblob said:
If you want to have a protest in a public park, for example, and expect a lot of people to be there, you have to pay for a bond that is basically an insurance policy in case the protestors cause damage to the area they are protesting.

If no damage is done, is the money returned ?
 
Walked up Wall Street today from the East River to the Church, and not a single protester was in sight. I did notice a lonely protest sign laying on the cobblestones behind gates. The actual street was blocked, so pedestrians could only walk on the sidewalks. So if the goal of this thing was to make a single street in NYC more difficult to traverse for middle and lower class workers striving to get to their low-paying jobs on time, then congrats. It totally worked!
 
lawblob said:
Lol. I love it. Go to the trouble of creating pamphlets, don't bother getting a permit.

Yep, someone either fucked up big time or is just an idiot. I'm open to either theory at the moment.


confused said:
If no damage is done, is the money returned ?
Yes.

AVclub said:
Walked up Wall Street today from the East River to the Church, and not a single protester was in sight. I did notice a lonely protest sign laying on the cobblestones behind gates. The actual street was blocked, so pedestrians could only walk on the sidewalks. So if the goal of this thing was to make a single street in NYC more difficult to traverse for middle and lower class workers striving to get to their low-paying jobs on time, then congrats. It totally worked!

Hey, shut the fuck up, they're doing this to for you man!
 
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:
Yep, someone either fucked up big time or is just an idiot. I'm open to either theory at the moment.



Yes.



Hey, shut the fuck up, they're doing this to for you man!

At least that's fair. I can understand a city wanting some financial insurance in case shit hits the fan.

I'm going to go with option B : Idiot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom