bean breath said:
You're missing the point. The match is to see who get's the win, Rock or Cena.
In all honesty, they're probably going to lose as a build up to Wrestlemania. That's why Cena's dominating them now so he's more than well protected when he loses at Survivor Series. Couple that with Miz/Truth's win not being clean and Cena's doubly protected, just to be sure.
I know you're not defending this booking--you're just stating the obvious--but what the fuck is the point of "protecting" Cena in the ridiculously overpowered state he is currently in? Wouldn't having him actually
lose cleanly once in a while actually
help his underdog schtick and get people to care about his matches more? This is doing the exact opposite; it's making the heels the underdogs in essentially every match he's in, which seems
insanely counter-intuitive.
Vince should be protecting wrestlers that he is trying to establish as a main-event-level talent, not ones that are already astronomically over. Del Rio is a
perfect example of this. He shouldn't be losing clean to every face on the roster. I'm not saying he has to make all of the faces tap, but at least let us think it's
possible. As-is, no one thinks Del Rio would beat Cena one-on-one. Same goes for Miz, R-Truth, Barret, Rhodes, Ziggler, Swagger etc.. None of these guys, despite all of them getting/having gotten big pushes, seem like any real threat to the likes of Cena/Orton/Punk (it sucks to have to put Punk here, but it's true :S).
The only heel in recent memory to beat a face clean is Mark Henry, and
holy shit, it worked! People care about Mark Henry! Now "marks" will perceive most of the roster as underdogs against Henry, and whoever on Smackdown finally beats him--assuming it's not fucking Orton--will get a
huge amount of respect and will essentially be insta-pushed. Henry won't lose any credibility either, assuming that he's not booked like garbage after losing the title. We'll just have two more legit main eventers, instead of an overabundance of former champion mid-card jobbers.
For the record, I'm aware that most of this is common sense and that I'm preaching to the choir. But you just gotta sometimes, y'know?
Also, I really shouldn't have posted such a long rant at the
very tail end of this thread. Don't be surprised/offended if I copy this into the November thread. I really want to foster some actual discussion about this topic, re: what is the purpose of "protecting" someone, and how talent should be established properly vs. how it's currently being done.