What, jealous that Boston has won championships in all four of the major sports within the past decade, while NY hasn't?weekend_warrior said:
Pretty much. I don't know too many people who were bothered by this.A Black Falcon said:What, jealous that Boston has won championships in all four of the major sports within the past decade, while NY hasn't?
Man it sucks for the Yankees that Granderson will never be as good as Ellsbury.jman2050 said:Man it sucks for the Red Sox that they wasted Ellsbury's unlikely career year.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:Man it sucks for the Yankees that Granderson will never be as good as Ellsbury.
But he really isn't.jman2050 said:But he's better than Ellsbury right now.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:But he really isn't.
You keep lying to yourself then. At least I'm honest.jman2050 said:You keep telling yourself that.
Windu said:Ellsbury is having a better offensive year than granderson (barely) and Ellsbury is generally considered the better defensive player. So yeah, Ellsbury > Granderson
last time i checked, Granderson or Ellsbury wasn't an entire team. So i don't know what the hell that is all about.weekend_warrior said:If the Sox make the playoffs- ellsbury
If the Sox miss the playoffs- Granderson
If hell freezes over- Bautista
If the voter had brains- Verlander
Oh, you brought MVP talk into the comparison. Cute.weekend_warrior said:If the Sox make the playoffs- ellsbury
If the Sox miss the playoffs- Granderson
If hell freezes over- Bautista
If the voters had brains- Verlander
Windu said:who the fuck told lowe to throw it to third? that was dumb
The Sox don't have to make the playoffs for Ellsbury to be MVP. It might help him if they do (thanks to his heroics), but it's not necessary.weekend_warrior said:If the Sox make the playoffs- ellsbury
If the Sox miss the playoffs- Granderson
If hell freezes over- Bautista
If the voters had brains- Verlander
I have no idea if he's on steroids or not, I wouldn't guess it just because he's good this year, but hah, as if every team doesn't have multiple players drugging? Of course they all do.eznark said:Juiceberry's 3 home run season next year is going to be hilarious.
A Black Falcon said:The Sox don't have to make the playoffs for Ellsbury to be MVP. It might help him if they do (thanks to his heroics), but it's not necessary.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:Oh, you brought MVP talk into the comparison. Cute.
Stop spewing this liberal PC bullshit, for fucksake.weekend_warrior said:Just my opinion but I don't think a player should get MVP if their team doesn't make the playoffs, unless they have an overwhelming better season then anyone else, which Ellsbury definitely hasn't done.
Enron said:Derek Lowe is a piece of shit. Drown him in the Chattahoochee.
so lets use that logic. So you would say Francisco Cervelli is more valuable than Jose Bautista because he is on a playoff team? because that is essentially what you are saying.weekend_warrior said:Just my opinion but I don't think a player should get MVP if their team doesn't make the playoffs, unless they have an overwhelming better season then anyone else, which Ellsbury definitely hasn't done.
This is why you are simply some lifelong Laker basketball fan. Glad to know you don't even watch the fucking sport.weekend_warrior said:This has been the first year Ellsbury has been even remotely productive.
Windu said:so lets use that logic. So you would say Francisco Cervelli is more valuable than Jose Bautista because he is on a playoff team? That is essentially what you are saying.
throw fredi in there tooEnron said:Derek Lowe is a piece of shit. Drown him in the Chattahoochee.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:Stop spewing this liberal PC bullshit, for fucksake.
yeah i blocked that out. So sorry. Anyway, i have never understood the logic of only picking people on playoff teams. It says Most Valuable. So in my mind that means if its the best player because if you put him on any team, he would be a upgrade and be more valuable than anyone else.darkside31337 said:Wow really?
I think you missed the part where he said overwhelming better season.
I agree that if the Red Sox choke Ellsbury really shouldn't win the award. It's kind of embarrassing.
Sanjuro - I'm not with you on Elsbury or your Boston love, but spectacular job with that jab!Sanjuro Tsubaki said:Stop spewing this liberal PC bullshit, for fucksake.
darkside31337 said:I agree that if the Red Sox choke Ellsbury really shouldn't win the award. It's kind of embarrassing.
Windu said:yeah i blocked that out. So sorry. Anyway, i have never understood the logic of only picking people on playoff teams. It says Most Valuable. So in my mind that means if its the best player because if you put him on any team, he would be a upgrade and be more valuable than anyone else.
Windu said:so lets use that logic. So you would say Francisco Cervelli is more valuable than Jose Bautista because he is on a playoff team? because that is essentially what you are saying.
Just my opinion but I don't think a player should get MVP if their team doesn't make the playoffs, unless they have an overwhelming better season then anyone else, which Ellsbury definitely hasn't done.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:This is why you are simply some lifelong Laker basketball fan. Glad to know you don't even watch the fucking sport.
well i don't give a shit about narrative, the award is for the best player not who the fuck has the best story. That shit goes to stuff like comeback player or whatever. And yes, right now i would pick Bautista.darkside31337 said:I agree with this. But Ellsbury's MVPness is based on the narrative that he's saved the Red Sox season which would be the truth if they get in. If they don't get in then what exactly has he saved?
Either way Bautista should win the award.
darkside31337 said:I agree with this. But Ellsbury's MVPness is based on the narrative that he's saved the Red Sox season which would be the truth if they get in. If they don't get in then what exactly has he saved?
Either way Bautista should win the award.
eznark said:...............