ErasureAcer said:
has anyone ever been exit polled? I've voted at college in past years and now have voted here at my home and well...I've never even seen an exit poller. Kinda makes me wonder how accurate it is if they are only polling certain precints.
Well, they try to pick a set of precincts that has made for an accurate sample in the past, so they probably don't switch things up much unless some polling goes horribly wrong.
olimario said:
I don't want 4 years of Kerry
Me neither. But I want 4 years of Bush even less.
FnordChan said:
I hate to break it to you, but Nintendo is going to go third party and start making games for the Kerry Administration. Sorry.
I was thinking the other day... Nintendo going third party wouldn't be a bad thing if I chose to interpret that as them fielding candidates for office.
Nash said:
If Kerry wins, Bush has a few weeks in the Whitehouse before he hands over the presidency doesn't he?
Until late January.
Drudge said:
But early 2000 exit polls showed Gore +3 in Florida
Of course, some might say that wouldn't be inaccurate except for ballot snafus.
Azwethinkweiz said:
God I wish I lived in North Carolina and not South Carolina. At least I'd feel like I was making a difference. Oh well, at least I voted for the abolishment of mini bottles in South Carolina.
Thank you, The Daily Show, for making it so I understand what he's talking about here. So informative.
xsarien said:
You should be happy that the only cord coming out of it was for electricity, God knows the shit that could be pulled if they were networked.
Yeah, I've heard they aren't exactly a bank vault when available from the outside world.
CrimsonSkies said:
Ohio and Florida will go Bush if the sample % was as skewed to women as I read elsewhere.
Don't forget the early voting, either.
Duck of Death said:
Speaking of CNN, I just turned them on and Wolf Blitzer was just demonstrating their ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS monitor setup. So many screens of election. . .
It is a funny thing. I was thinking maybe it would work better in high definition, so you could actually check out the things in the distance.
Ignatz Mouse said:
One thing I hope for-- a landslide, or at least a clear margin. The last 3 presidentail elections were all close enough for people to grouse FOR AGES abotu mandate. It'd be nice to see a president who actually has one.
I don't think 1992 or 1996 were all that close. But a significant third party vote-getter did mean the share by the eventual winner would be less. Still, Clinton got nearly 50% in 1996.
