ferrarimanf355 said:
The neocon organizations will be shaking their head at this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15613198/
"Neocons" are socially liberal or moderate, extremely hawkish (especially with regards to islamic extremism), and fiscally conservative. At least in theory. However:
- They sold out on #1 for the support of the "values voters"
- They ****ed up all of the actions they took because of #2
- They sold out on #3 to support the war and for bribes; the latter primarily for the unswerving support of the corrupt and morally/philosophically/intellectually bankrupt House of Representatives, but also to weaken any sort of Senate resistance.
Neocons were and are far (
far) from the scariest interest group in the GOP to liberal goals and ideals. The evangelical bloc, the southern racist bloc, and the midwestern/western paleoconservatives are all scarier and more dangerous. However, the ascent of the neocons was predicated on the support of these other, worse interest groups (see: John Ashcroft, far from a "neocon"). What's worse, once they ascended into power, they made utter hash of their one big idea (in Afghanistan/Iraq/Iran/North Korea, and the list goes on and on).
I have to admit, I'm ideologically not worlds apart from the neocons. But I was never willing to accept the alliances they made, and I've been horrified and ashamed by the utter incompetence they've shown at every level.