• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Official Smashing Pumpkins thread

Thanks to Oreillo once again for helping me with the stream!

After a couple of listens, this is way better than Zeitgeist because there's nothing inherently horrible in the album (although I couldn't help but laugh at some verses like "I'm gonna love you 101 percent")... But I don't know, it lacks something and I can't put my finger on it.

I fucking love Quasar, but the rest of the album is way too mellow without ever really getting harder despite some cool solos. I actually like Oceania, but I guess I wanted more variety.

They're not awful songs like the first Teargarden ones, though, and I don't think Billy's voice is as bad as some of you guys are saying. I'll definitely buy the album next week, it will grow on me and I haven't bought a single album yet this year!

The saddest thing is one of my favourite sites' reviewer claimed that this album was the best thing Billy Corgan has ever done, including the albums with the original Smashing Pumpkins formation. I guess I can't trust his reviews again :lol He specially liked Oceania and I think he overhyped it for me, because I found it very dissapointing afterwards...
 
Starz is a cool song, wtf. It was even better live. I'd agree it suffered from bad production but it's still a good song.

There is not a single moment on Oceania as cool as, say, this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCVrE41Dik0&feature=player_detailpage#t=160s
Please ignore the fanmade video.

Or, this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61CXXBHrPE8&feature=player_detailpage#t=485s

Or, yes, despite the lame religious lyrics, even this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02p4KuuSvXY&feature=player_detailpage#t=98s

And I'm even gonna say this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ro8shNTlzTY&feature=player_detailpage#t=154s

Oceania doesn't have anything this good. Not even close.

Zeitgeist actually had some great songs, but they all fell victim to shitty production values for the most part.

And I'm really not defending the album as it's definitely among the worst, rather trying to demonstrate how far Billy has fallen since even then. Oceania is a huge turd. It was painful to sit through.

i like starz but again, the song is nearly completely ruined due to the "we are staaaaaaaaaahz". fucking baffling why he would put that shit in there. and i like all those zeitgeist songs too.

i think you are letting your hatred of byne cloud your judgement here. ocenia isn't great but there are some good tunes here. overall the albums are about the same in my opinion. zeitgeists best is better than oceanas best, but zeitgeists worst is also worse than oceanas worst
 
Heh, didn't realize there was a new Album coming out.

I'll Just toss this little bit of JC to lighten the room

My Itunes is screwed up, store isn't working. But I've listened to live tracks of what looks like the 1st 2 tracks (Quasar and Panopticon) and they sound decent. I'll listen to the rest of it, while wondering what JC is doing...

jimmy chamberlin is even more of a dumbfuck than billy because he listens to some fucking shaman guy. it's like religion infected the pumpkins and destroyed them

p.s. visit the NCAA online dynasty thread already if you're going to play this year!
 

rkn

Member
Youre out of your mind diablos. Oceania shits all over every single moment of zeitgeist...
Somewhat agree, while neither is anywhere near "best" Pumpkins, Zeitgeist just doesn't hold up for me.

I need to listen to Oceania, I haven't liked a Pumpkins album since Mellon Collie
You'll definitely hate it then.
 

jumper

Member
Youre out of your mind diablos. Oceania shits all over every single moment of zeitgeist...

Yeah. To each their own, but to call Oceania a huge turd is baffling to me.

There isn't a single bad track on Oceania. Not to say every track is the greatest, but to me I'd have a hard time singling out a filler or throwaway track.
 

Revolver

Member
After one listen it's better than I expected. I think the last half of the album is stronger than the first. It's starts off well enough with Quasar and Panopticon, then meanders for a bit until the title track.
 

Diablos

Member
At this point, I don't think I'll even bother listening to Oceana.
No, please do. If I can do it, you can do it. :D And I want to know what you think since you have probably seen SP more times than anyone else here.

Youre out of your mind diablos. Oceania shits all over every single moment of zeitgeist...
After the first track most of it is basically all watered down. The songs are so utterly generic that they are completely devoid of anything that makes Corgan such a good songwriter. It doesn't even sound like SP, and I'm not saying that from the standpoint of "it's not Siamese Dream" or even "it doesn't have Jimmy." It just sounds like bland uninspired shit.

Seriously, Violet Rays sounds like a fucking Avril Lavigne song. That's exactly what it reminded me of as soon as I heard it. Not even kidding. Production values could almost pass for one too at certain parts.

Yeah, Oceania is good. This coming from someone who gave up on them at Adore. I agree that Zeitgeist had some great moments, but it's definitely not as good as Oceania. Get some good pot and give it another go.
Smoking weed to Oceania would probably be like spending $600 dollars to sleep with a prostitute who has AIDS.

Adore is a fantastic album, and proof that Billy can do amazing things without Jimmy. Oceania is not an example of this however.

I fucking love Quasar, but the rest of the album is way too mellow without ever really getting harder despite some cool solos. I actually like Oceania, but I guess I wanted more variety.
Quasar is actually good, but that's it. The album completely goes to shit after that. It's really amazing how it just instantly falls apart. The guitar soloing at the end of Oceania is neat, but they actually do a fade out which just boggles my mind. Let me hear the whole thing, it would have made it another part of the album worth listening to. DERP.

I love mellow SP (a lot of their best material is mellow). It's not that it's too mellow, it's just boring and very generic sounding, especially in how the songs are structured.

They're not awful songs like the first Teargarden ones
Song for a Son, A Stitch in Time, The Fellowship, Spangled, and Cottonwood Symphony are better than Oceania except for Quasar (which is just as good in its own way I suppose)

The saddest thing is one of my favourite sites' reviewer claimed that this album was the best thing Billy Corgan has ever done, including the albums with the original Smashing Pumpkins formation. I guess I can't trust his reviews again :lol He specially liked Oceania and I think he overhyped it for me, because I found it very dissapointing afterwards...
Yeah, you'll have that. Good thing the validity of most music reviews these days are... yeah, nonexistent.

i like starz but again, the song is nearly completely ruined due to the "we are staaaaaaaaaahz". fucking baffling why he would put that shit in there. and i like all those zeitgeist songs too.
And Billy's super weird vocal delivery in Oceania is any better? I'm not trying to say Zeitgeist is a work of art, I am just saying it has some good songs despite bad production, and if nothing else, some really Pumpkins-esque moments that can keep you going.

i think you are letting your hatred of byne cloud your judgement here. ocenia isn't great but there are some good tunes here. overall the albums are about the same in my opinion. zeitgeists best is better than oceanas best, but zeitgeists worst is also worse than oceanas worst
I don't hate him, he didn't do anything to hurt me. He'd be great in a math rock band or some indie outfit. He's very robotic, ham-fisted and not meant for this kind of stuff. The way he's mixed on the album basically confirms this.

My judgement is not clouded -- in fact, the only track that makes me say "damn, I wish Jimmy was doing this song" is Quasar. That's it. He's severely missed there. The rest of the songs are so fucking bland that it doesn't matter if he's drumming or not. I guess I can take some weird comfort in that. But Bryne's drumming still sounds like shit, even in the most generic of cases. The whole album is shit, though, so whatever. :D

Heh, didn't realize there was a new Album coming out.

I'll Just toss this little bit of JC to lighten the room
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3jFkcAxSws
Billy is such a neanderthal for letting his ego get so big that he just couldn't stand to have a world-class drummer by his side. Idiot.

jimmy chamberlin is even more of a dumbfuck than billy because he listens to some fucking shaman guy. it's like religion infected the pumpkins and destroyed them

p.s. visit the NCAA online dynasty thread already if you're going to play this year!
Haha, shameless promotion of your threads :D
The shaman thing was short-lived, he's in Skysaw now. It was pretty weird though, I agree.

After one listen it's better than I expected. I think the last half of the album is stronger than the first. It's starts off well enough with Quasar and Panopticon, then meanders for a bit until the title track.
Quasar is good, Panopticon tries really hard to be a good song but falls flat on its face, and from there it just completely tanks.
 

Revolver

Member
Quasar is good, Panopticon tries really hard to be a good song but falls flat on its face, and from there it just completely tanks.

I agree with a lot of your points. I was shocked they did a fade out on Oceania, I wanted to hear the rest of the solo. Also some of the lyrics on the album are really bad. Especially on the Celestials. "I am special k"? "I'm gonna love you 101%"? WTF. I'd like to give it another listen, but right now it's not something I can see going back to over and over.
 

Diablos

Member
I agree with a lot of your points. I was shocked they did a fade out on Oceania, I wanted to hear the rest of the solo. Also some of the lyrics on the album are really bad. Especially on the Celestials. "I am special k"? "I'm gonna love you 101%"? WTF. I'd like to give it another listen, but right now it's not something I can see going back to over and over.
Whenever I hear Billy sing "I'll leave with anyone this night, I'll kiss anyone tonight" alongside the top 40 radio production values I instantly think of: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGR65RWwzg8&feature=player_detailpage#t=46s

Cut from the same cringe-worthy cloth. I swear. LOL

Corgan should just focus on reissues and do wrestling now. He seems to enjoy that. Nobody gives a shit about the new SP. He has said this album is "do or die" for his band, like Siamese Dream was I guess. Well, rest assured, Billy -- this is not going to sell millions of copies. Maybe he'll get a clue after dismal sales.
 
and billy said that music today isn't "dangerous" enough, then he comes up with these stupid fucking lyrics. how does any serious musician write those lyrics and then decide to put them in a song? makes me think if THAT is what he put in, what kind of awfulness was left on the cutting room floor?

a shame because billy still has the ability to create good music but when left to his own devices then he just can't create something that is good. this is why d'arcy was so valuable to the pumpkins: she wasn't afraid of him and wasn't afraid to tell him when the music was sucking balls.

i'm afraid matt bellamy of Muse is headed in the same direction as billy too :(
 

relaxor

what?
so the drumsticks in Oceania are some twiggy little branches huh? Billy's songwriting used to be so lean, stretched so tautly around the drum-skeleton. now they're a puddle.

I'll try to listen to this again, my first attempt didn't get too far...
 

Diablos

Member
and billy said that music today isn't "dangerous" enough, then he comes up with these stupid fucking lyrics. how does any serious musician write those lyrics and then decide to put them in a song? makes me think if THAT is what he put in, what kind of awfulness was left on the cutting room floor?
I don't know if he's stupid, in denial, or just trolling the fans left who still care about current material. Maybe it's a mix of all three. I don't know. It baffles me quite honestly. Is he that out of touch? Or is he just embarrassed to say he has kinda fallen on his face in the past 2-3 years?

He did this kind of thing before. He released the "If All Goes Wrong" DVD's, which were superb, and talked very strongly about commercial bullshit and the state of things in the US while Gossamer played in the background (an awesome song). Then what does he do? Record a generic song for Hyundai for use during the Super Bowl, and license songs like Today for Visa commercials. What a fucking idiot.

His whole "I'll piss on Radiohead" statement was completely unnecessary too. The King of Limbs was a dud but even it is better than Oceania. :| Ugh

a shame because billy still has the ability to create good music but when left to his own devices then he just can't create something that is good. this is why d'arcy was so valuable to the pumpkins: she wasn't afraid of him and wasn't afraid to tell him when the music was sucking balls.

i'm afraid matt bellamy of Muse is headed in the same direction as billy too :(
No one can save him from his incompetence anymore.

Off topic, but Muse was never that great btw.
 

Kem0sabe

Member
Had the misfortune of seing them perform live this year at Rock in Rio Lisbon.

Fucking atrocious performance, dunno what i was expecting, it had been a very long time since i hear anything live by them, but by god man... Billy should have staid at home and lost a few pounds before going on stage.
 

Diablos

Member
It's because there's no Jimmy. BC/JC on stage is vital for the Pumpkins sound unless it's like Adore or something. I saw them in 2007 and it rocked. Billy talks about how he can't branch out with the core members of the band, and then he goes and makes the blandest SP album to date. He doesn't know what he's doing.

He is bulking up for his wrestling ambitions, if I recall.

New interview with Greg Kot of the Chicago Tribune:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/enter...e-0617-billy-corgan-20120615,0,5714132.column

Billy Corgan's mission statement for 'Oceania': Do or die
With his new band of young-gun Pumpkins, he talks about how he is making his best music since the '90s

Greg Kot
Music critic
10:59 a.m. CDT, June 15, 2012

Billy Corgan calls "Oceania," the Smashing Pumpkins' first studio album since 2007, "an anti-mid-life crisis album."

Whatever it's called, the new album due out Tuesday represents Corgan's best work since the '90s, when the Pumpkins were among the most successful bands of their time. The band broke up in 2000, and to hear Corgan tell it, he's spent most of the last decade figuring out how to create fresh music out from under the shadow of that legacy without fully letting go of it.

He says that after reuniting with original Pumpkins drummer Jimmy Chamberlin in 2005, he realized that he was holding on to an idea of the band caught between unrealistic expectations (repeating the success and sound of the Pumpkins 1993 breakthrough, "Siamese Dream") and his own nostalgia-loathing intentions.

Greg Kot

He's in the midst of writing what he describes as a "spiritual memoir," and it's causing him to "dredge up stuff from the past I wish I had forgotten. This album is basically my way of saying I don't want to carry this stuff anymore. I don't want to carry (original Pumpkins members Chamberlin, James Iha and D'Arcy Wretzky) forward anymore. It's done. I couldn't have made 'Oceania' if I didn't let go of that band."

Chamberlin and Corgan parted ways in 2009, soon after a tumultuous tour that found the singer verbally tussling with his audience. For a 20th anniversary Pumpkins tour, many fans were expecting a greatest-hits retrospective. Corgan instead presented a deep dive into his music, in which the beloved '90s singles were balanced by deep cuts and plenty of new tracks. The often-hostile reaction led him to "blow up the band" so that he could start fresh.

Corgan rebuilt the Pumpkins with young guns: guitarist Jeff Schroeder, bassist Nicole Fiorentino and drummer Mike Byrne. The imperative was not only to re-energize the audience, but "to reconnect with that part of me that made me want to make music in the first place." In an interview, he described the process:

Q: A few years ago, you said the album was dead, and you begin releasing your music song by song on-line. What changed your mind?

A: We did a radio tour, one of those b.s. things -- if you go play a radio station's party with seven other terrible bands, they'll play your record. We're playing and we're looking out at 18- and 20-year-olds and they don't care. What is this? How do you win this? You don't. We basically sat down and said, 'This is it. This is boring.' So what do we do to actually change this? Only thing that made sense was to make an album. Can you make an album that is so strong that it reignites the flame within you and the audience? Is that even culturally possible? We went to Sedona (a studio in Sedona, Ariz., with longtime producer and engineer Bjorn Thorsrud) for a while to work. It was small steps. I can write songs, I can always write songs. That's been part of the problem. Maybe I write too many songs and put them out loosey goosey. So let's get down to it and challenge ourselves. It takes so much psychic energy to do this. I did this album for a year, 12 hours a day. I understand how it gets tough for people when they reach a certain age and you just don't want to work that hard because it's easier not to. We could've made a lot of money playing the nostalgia shows. I cut that road off. It was do it this way or die.

Q: So you want to get the feeling of 1995 back, but you want it to do it with new music?

A: I want the new feeling. Picasso did some of his best work in his 90s. Neil Young is making some of his best music now. I don't want to be 25 again. There are people out there who are older who are cool. I want that. Music is your guide. At the heart of Jimmy Page is the 14-year-old playing skiffle and trying to figure out Scotty Moore licks in his bedroom. The year 1995 for me was miserable in some ways. I just dream of having a voice in the conversation. Not being written off by the bloggers as some grandpa who keeps showing up at the buffet table.

Q: How'd you rediscover that feeling?

A: I've found peacefulness in myself where I found I didn't have to be more than or less than. Be yourself moment to moment. Go left, right, and in between. You like keyboards, guitars, loud stuff, quiet stuff. Just go with it. Stop overthinking it. It's very similar to the way I worked in the '90s.

Q: So you're saying you lost that in the last decade? Why?

A: I got away from that to teach myself a few things. I'm a bit weird. I'm the guy who would be bored with two on two basketball, so I'd play against four guys to make it interesting. I've done a lot of that in (2005 solo album) "The Future Embrace," (2003 band project ) Zwan – working within concepts of limitation. Can I box my way out of this corner? I think this is the first time I've made a record where I didn't box myself in. If it sounds like Frank Zappa one minute and Vangelis the next, OK.

Q: How were your earlier records boxed in? Whatever people say about them, the Pumpkins were definitely their own thing through much of the '90s.

A: I said this to the current band the other day. The "Siamese Dream" band didn't exist. I created that band and then we learned how to be that band after the record. I expressed to (producer Butch Vig) an idealized vision. A beautiful, silver version of the Smashing Pumpkins that did not exist. It was a movie. The videos, the success enhanced and filled in the gaps. (The 1995 album "Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness") is a much more accurate portrayal, it's the band as we really were --- mean, dark. (The 1991 album "gish") is me trying to be somebody, "Siamese Dream" is me trying to create something, "Mellon Collie" is the band unvarnished. "Siamese Dream" was me working within my own and Butch's straitjacket. (Nirvana's Kurt Cobain) went through it, with the idealized version of Nirvana on "Nevermind" and the unvarnished version on "In Utero" with (Steve) Albini. Finally you reach a point where it's over, the game doesn't work, Smashing Pumpkins is dead. I couldn't just flip the switch and be great. So is there nothing in this for me? You walk away or try to make it for you. The difference for me is that at 45 I feel I have to deliver or you don't get another chance. Our axiom for "Oceania" was you have one chance. Don't expect anyone to listen seven times. They'll listen one time if you're lucky.

Q: When things are working, great artists say they reflect their audience. Do you feel you're still in touch with your audience?

A: I feel I'm reflecting the part of the audience we don't hear from. There are a lot of people out there who love music but don't have a place in music culture as it exists. I meet these people all the time. Soccer mom, 34, has good taste in music. They are your average rock fan who isn't part of the Pitchfork culture. They don't follow the train. They're the difference between 40,000 sales and 400,000. We've disenfranchised that part of the culture by playing to the (snobby, snarky) crowd. The Internet has swelled that (expletive) crowd. The crowd that trashes what you do instantly and writes you off. It's like the '90s indie-rock crowd all over again: Don't look this way, don't dress this way, don't play long guitar solos, whatever. But there are people out there in their teens who found Led Zeppelin and Pink Floyd, they don't care that those bands don't exist anymore. They exist in their computer. They're finding this other value system that isn't contemporary. It's a wider scope. The unspoken audience, the stragglers, and this new audience who isn't snarky or cares much about modern record business, that's our audience.

Q: You spent a lot of time in the last decade working to get a band up to speed. But people feel it's you who call all the shots. How much a part of this album is the band?

A: The album tells the best version of the story. People have a general misunderstanding of what I do, like I'm standing in the back directing things. The behind the scenes pace of the way we work is different. It's hard to translate. But they're playing on the album. This is not one of those things where in 10 years I'm going to say I actually played all the instruments (laughs).

Q: What's the main difference between this album and (2007 Pumpkins comeback album) "Zeitgeist"?

A: "Zeitgeist," in retrospect, is the death album -- the last album of the Smashing Pumpkins era. It just took seven years to come out. I went in with a very naive idea. Everyone wants me to make "Siamese Dream" again, which equated in my mind to a bunch of loud guitars, with that as a transition into a new era. It was like "Indiana Jones" Part 3. You play to an expectation. The smart move when we got back together would've been to do a greatest hits album, a greatest hits money tour, then do a new album. I didn't do that -- much to the consternation of Jimmy (Chamberlin) and my management, because I left millions of dollars on the table. But my plan didn't work either. When I made "Siamese Dream," I was taking LSD, crashing on people's couches, broken-hearted over a girl who later became my wife. You can't be that again. It's disrespectful to your own past to think you can relive your own past. I kept saying to Jimmy, where is the psychedelia? Because I always felt that was the heart of our sound. So I got rid of things, until it became this very primal music, one angry guitar and one angry drummer. I tried to build on that. But my relationship with Jimmy was broken. I didn't want to admit it. He would've been happy to keep it going and I had the blinders on and was marching forward. I just stepped in the wrong mudhole. But I learned some things. I came across an apathetic audience, and it ignited something in me. It brought back that old "(expletive) you."

Q: Things got hostile during that 2008 tour. You were pretty abusive toward the audience, and some people still haven't forgotten that or forgiven you. It reminded me of some weird, uncomfortable Andy Kaufman skit.

A: It's (pro) wrestling (laughs). I'm in character. Even Jimmy Chamberlin believed it. All he saw was money going down the drain. I'm a weirdo like Wayne (Coyne) from the Flaming Lips. He'll be the guy in the bubble floating above the audience and I'll be the guy in the black dress on stage. There's a saying in wrestling where you start to live your gimmick. On the road, I'm in character, at home I'm with my cats playing Xbox. Is it smart? No. Is it compelling? At times. But I needed to do it.

Q: It was your way of blowing it up?

A: It's an unconscious expression. I still remember standing on that stage in Chicago (in 2008). The band and the audience are getting more uncomfortable, and there's little Billy in the center with his microphone. I want to be in the moment. If that had been a super warm crowd I wouldn't have reacted like that. The show we did at the Riviera last year, that was one of the warmest crowds I've ever played for in 25 years. It's irksome for me as an artist for my life to be reduced to a song, or a moment, a performance. That's not me. I've left a lot of money on the table by being a weirdo, but I'm still here.

Q: There's inherent tension between the guy who's weird, the outsider willing to alienate your audience, and the one who also wants to be part of the conversation, at the center of the culture. How do you resolve that?

A: I wanted to be from the normal "Leave it to Beaver" family and wasn't. I was being singled out about my birth mark, I was too tall, too weird. From the start I was on the outside. Maybe everyone goes through it. But I turned it into a narrative that is in my DNA. All the local bands were talking (expletive) about us when we started to get big. We were very isolated. We go to New York for the first time in 1990, it's Sonic Youth land. Again we don't fit. We go in with an adaptable sense of if we don't belong, we're going to storm your stage. You really want to be accepted, but you do this pose to get through.

Q: So how do you measure this album, whether it's successful or not? Through sales, or something else?

A: "Oceania" I think is going to turn the corner, and we're going to be positive for a while. I have to fight the temptation to blow it up. Maybe it's self-destructive. But if reaction so far can be a gauge, we've done something good. Hard core hater fans are liking it. People default to what they know when you don't give them something powerful. But if you give them something powerful, they all crawl back. We're all going through this collective identity crisis. We're online forming new personalities. The systems of things we used to count on, are breaking down, and it's a free for all. Success is how do we survive that. Success isn't record sales, it's street cachet. The temperature of the Pumpkins right now is pretty good. Six months ago, not so good. Two years ago, it was down the tubes. With this group we've rebuilt the credibility with the fan base. People were hearing the songs on YouTube a year ago, and I would get messages from fans, "Don't (mess) it up, Billy." They liked the songs and were worried I was going to mess up a good thing.

Q: You've decided to release the album through a major label, EMI, even though you've long said the traditional record-industry model is broken and beyond repair. What happened?

A: I still think that. But I thought naively that by becoming an entrepreneur and putting out my own music, that my fans would rally and help me market it. They didn't. I got, "This is the worst, retire," from some blogger. As a music fan of artists with a certain longevity like Tom Waits, Van Morrison, Neil Young, I want to hear all of it. The good, the not so good, everything. They've earned it. But that's not the way our country works. We're the absolute worst at appreciating that sort of thing.

Q: So social media is not the democracy we thought it was?

A: It's just allowed the most narcissistic among us to amass more power. But a lot of people in my generation are avoiding it. It's just not interesting. Chat boards chase away people who want to be positive, and they get shot down, so they retreat from it.

Q: So at what point did "Oceania" take shape as an album? Was there a turning point song or moment?

A: I'm in Sedona, the band is taking a break (in February 2011). I'm there by myself working with Bjorn. There is a message from the ex-wife of (former Electric Prunes bassist and recent Corgan collaborator) Mark Tulin. She's crying, he's dead of a heart attack, just 62 years old. I'd seen him two days before. His death hit me hard. It made me think, "What am I doing?" There were 400 people at his funeral. It was a joyous, joke-filled dinner, because that was his spirit. I went back to Sedona and went through all our music. We'd done 30 demos. I heard his bass parts and would cry. The band was in limbo. And it hit me, "If I'm gonna do this, I'm gonna do it right." Stop (messing) around. You're 44 at the time, get off your pity party. You know how to make records, stop being a baby, just do it. It was like, I had a sense of purpose. I went into my old mode. I was ruthless in the '90s. I did whatever I had to do to get the band where it needed to be. There was one destination. It had to be big. And when I got there I realized it wasn't so great. The band went boom. I didn't have any more bullets in the round. I didn't want to have to justify anything. I had to let go of the band, the legacy, a new chapter. Better suit up. I got very sober, serious, very deliberate. I'm much kinder than I used to be, but I'm still ruthless. … For a while there, I didn't want to be at the center of every decision when I was making records. But the best music I ever made I was at the center of every decision. I don't make any apologies about that anymore. I don't want to be in a windowless room poring over musical details. But that's the lesson I learned. I wasn't going to fail because I didn't go for it. (Chicago Cubs slugger) Dave Kingman was my idol as a kid. He was a .220 hitter. He struck out a lot. But when he hit the ball, it went way over the fence and through the window across the street.

greg@gregkot.com
Yeah. Completely out of touch. Part of me just wants to pick apart his statements and point out how full of crap he is. Read the whole thing, you'll see.

As I touched said above, it's really amazing that he says all of the original band members held him back and then he goes off and does his worst album to date. LOL. Greg Kot is awesome, but he's clearly jumping on an uncrowded bandwagon when he says Oceania is his best work since the 90's.
 
billy is so full of shit. he always blames the fans for his failures. i also find it hilarious that it was JIMMY who was concerned about the money. he has no credibility with the fans. any good will the pumpkins had after coming back was eliminated once he pulled his typical antics.

everytime i read a recent billy corgan interview it just pisses me off
 

Diablos

Member
billy is so full of shit. he always blames the fans for his failures. i also find it hilarious that it was JIMMY who was concerned about the money. he has no credibility with the fans. any good will the pumpkins had after coming back was eliminated once he pulled his typical antics.

everytime i read a recent billy corgan interview it just pisses me off
Yeah. He's such a terrible liar. Why does he even do this? It's not helping him.

-He calls Zeitgeist the last album of the "Smashing Pumpkins era" but still calls his band Smashing Pumpkins? Okayyy....

-This is the first time he made a record and didn't box himself in? Maybe so, but it just goes to show you how his talent has waned over the past several years. But really, I don't believe that statement. Even in Zwan he wrote a lot of amazing songs that sadly did not make the album. He's not giving himself enough credit. It's intentional, too. He's trying to make fans think he was this artist partially stripped of his creative focus even though he was basically at the helm of every decision in SP and Zwan. Nobody is going to buy that, Billy.

-The band didn't exist until Mellon Collie? Yes it did. Gish and SD were more idealistic in terms of what he wanted the band to be, yes, but during the SD tour the band learned how to fit into that sound and it was quite a feat for Corgan and his bandmates. So he really should not be critical of that era, rather damn proud of it. They had a unique chemistry. And from MCIS to Machina, the band was awesome on tour as well. Even the Zeitgeist tour was good.

-I find it hard to believe Jimmy Chamberlin was just chasing dollar signs, and that Corgan would have been wanting to do a greatest hits album and tour. HE'S FULL OF SHIT. He had meltdowns on stage whining about fans who wanted to hear nothing but the hits and their favorite album and whatnot. He's such a terrible liar.

-THEN he goes on to say his whole thing on stage yelling at fans was a joke and that even the band believed it at the time? WTF? No, that was genuine. He was angry. He must be really embarrassed, but you can't troll your way out of your bad behavior. :)

(I guess it should not surprise me that Billy is an Xbot.)

Here we have this guy running around intentionally discrediting what made his band so great, in hopes of establishing a new connection with fans to make himself viable again. He's an idiot. I NEVER thought he would take it this far. He's completely tarnishing his legacy for absolutely nothing. He will never be commercially viable again. It's really sad what he has become.

I can't recall how many times Billy was anti-greatest hits tour/album around the Zeitgeist "era". And they already did a greatest hits in 2001, so I don't know what else he would have been able to release since it had like 40 tracks almost, across 2 discs.
 
Yeah. He's such a terrible liar. Why does he even do this? It's not helping him.

-He calls Zeitgeist the last album of the "Smashing Pumpkins era" but still calls his band Smashing Pumpkins? Okayyy....

-This is the first time he made a record and didn't box himself in? Maybe so, but it just goes to show you how his talent has waned over the past several years. But really, I don't believe that statement. Even in Zwan he wrote a lot of amazing songs that sadly did not make the album. He's not giving himself enough credit.

-The band didn't exist until Mellon Collie? Yes it did. Gish and SD were more idealistic in terms of what he wanted the band to be, yes, but during the SD tour the band learned how to fit into that sound and it was quite a feat for Corgan and his bandmates. So he really should not be critical of that era, rather damn proud of it. They had a unique chemistry. And from MCIS to Machina, the band was awesome on tour as well. Even the Zeitgeist tour was good.

-I find it hard to believe Jimmy Chamberlin was just chasing dollar signs, and that Corgan would have been wanting to do a greatest hits album and tour. HE'S FULL OF SHIT. He had meltdowns on stage whining about fans who wanted to hear nothing but the hits and their favorite album and whatnot. He's such a terrible liar.

THEN he goes on to say his whole thing on stage yelling at fans was a joke and that even the band believed it at the time? WTF? No, that was genuine. He was angry.

I guess it should not surprise me that Billy is an Xbot.

Here we have this guy running around intentionally discrediting what made his band so great, in hopes of establishing a new connection with fans to make himself viable again. He's an idiot. I NEVER thought he would take it this far. He's completely tarnishing his legacy for absolutely nothing.

I can't recall how many times Billy was anti-greatest hits tour/album around the Zeitgeist "era". And they already did a greatest hits in 2001, so I don't know what else he would have been able to release since it had like 40 tracks almost, across 2 discs.

classic billy. "wait... you guys thought.... you thought i was serious!? lol oh u guyz!!!" it makes it really hard to support his music after i read his interviews. i know it shouldn't make a difference because douchebags can make good music but it does make a difference to me
 

Diablos

Member
classic billy. "wait... you guys thought.... you thought i was serious!? lol oh u guyz!!!" it makes it really hard to support his music after i read his interviews. i know it shouldn't make a difference because douchebags can make good music but it does make a difference to me
Classic Billy on steroids. It's getting worse. He's beyond the "douchebags make good music" phase. He's in full on trolling his fanbase mode while making 90% shitty music. He is completely pissing on what made him such a great musician in such a phenomenal band, in hopes of it resonating with enough people who would give a shit (but that's not happening). It's a huge gamble, and a stupid one at that.

I don't think I've ever seen someone with so much talent and such a broad focus throw it all away because of their insecurities. Seriously. This is like the death throes of someone who is plagued by incompetence and being unable to make good decisions.

I think the only valid thing he said in the entire interview was that the lack of being young and taking drugs prevented him from being more psychedelic on the Zeitgeist album.

Billy had everything. And when the band became less commercially viable after MCIS, he still wrote incredible songs for a loyal fanbase for over about fifteen years. Fifteen years. He never got properly recognized for it, really. Because when you think about that, plus the first three distinct eras of the band (Gish/SD/MCIS), it's truly amazing and something that no one else will ever be able to replicate. For about 25 years he defied the notion that a commercially successful artist would get stale and be unable to write amazing songs. Instead it was a huge body of work that from beginning to end stood up to mediocrity. But now he is basically discrediting all of that (and, btw, becoming quite mediocre) for reasons that are selfish and make absolutely no sense in the real world.

Honestly, he's so insecure that he's almost becoming what people who hated him made him out to be, and dressing it up with a lot of pretentious, non-sensible banter. It's really strange. I kind of feel bad for him at this point. He's an old, weird, out of touch, tinfoil-hat wearing, God-fearing loon. I really hope he comes to his senses and just walks away from this.
 

MadOdorMachine

No additional functions
I'm listening to this for the first time right now. From a production and performance level, it's leagues better than Zeitgeist. I'm not sure the songs are better written, but they sound better. It's a shame Billy didn't take more time to make Zeitgeist a better album because it really could have been up there with Mellon Collie if the vocals and production levels were better imo. Anyway, so far Oceania's definitely not old Pumpkins which Zeitgeist did a good job at achieving but it's a new direction which is good. I'm not hearing any complex time changes or face melting guitar solos, but it has a mellow happy vibe about it that reminds me of the early days.
 

MadOdorMachine

No additional functions
I don't hear anything that reminds me of the "old days", and that was the point even, according to Corgan.

The vibe is mainly what I was talking about. The attempt at something new which is what they were constantly doing back in the 90's. After Adore, everything they did started sounding the same. It was the same style. This is at least something different. I'm over half way thru it right now, and it's definitely mellowed out like the second disc of MC. It's simple songs like Thirty Three.
 

genjiZERO

Member
I'm not sure why he's hating on Radiohead and Jonny Greenwood now. Radiohead doesn't really start beef with anyone as far as I can tell (except Miley Cyrus and Kanye West, but honestly, that seems like less of Radiohead being dicks and more because they didn't want to get involved in celebrity nonsense and MC and KW had hissy fits). Also, he's dead wrong about Jonny. Jonny is a simply amazing guitarist and composer. He's not the "best ever", but no one claims that and he clearly is one of the most talented musicians in the mainstream today. He's also more talented Billy Corgan.
 

MadOdorMachine

No additional functions
So far I like the second song - Panopticon - the best. Unfortunately, I have to agree that nothing really stands out as a single or hit song which Zeitgiest had plenty of. I'll have to give it another listen, but everything felt like it should have been filler songs an album to transition between the hits. The good thing is that they sound like good filler songs, there's just nothing that really stood out to me as a hit.
 

dark_chris

Member
I went to the concert two days ago when they came to chicago. It was actually pretty awesome and played their old hits as well.
 

Diablos

Member
So far I like the second song - Panopticon - the best. Unfortunately, I have to agree that nothing really stands out as a single or hit song which Zeitgiest had plenty of. I'll have to give it another listen, but everything felt like it should have been filler songs an album to transition between the hits. The good thing is that they sound like good filler songs, there's just nothing that really stood out to me as a hit.
Hahaha. Told youuu.

There's nothing as good as Thirty-Three on this record. Simplistic songs can either be good or bad. Thirty-Three was arranged beautifully and has truly wonderful lyrics.

That Billy Corgan is long gone.
 

ATF487

Member
So far I like the second song - Panopticon - the best. Unfortunately, I have to agree that nothing really stands out as a single or hit song which Zeitgiest had plenty of. I'll have to give it another listen, but everything felt like it should have been filler songs an album to transition between the hits. The good thing is that they sound like good filler songs, there's just nothing that really stood out to me as a hit.

This makes me sad. The Pumpkins always had good singles but there's so much more to music than that.

Interested to see the comments here, I know Billy has been insane for years but I thought Oceania was better than it had any right to be, after Shitegeist and the Teargarden "songs." I've only given it one listen with the iTunes stream though.

SP will always be like Weezer, for me. Their best material is way behind them but it was so important to me that I have infinite goodwill, even if they jumped the shark years ago.
 

Yager

Banned
I listened to it a couple of times and all I can say is that I like it. Sounds better than Zeitgeist, has some really good songs, but I agree with most of you in the fact that some sound 'flat' and 'generic'. Anyway, I wasn't expecting another Mellon Collie or Adore, in fact, I was expecting something awful, but it's OK.
 

Oreoleo

Member
There aren't enough standout tracks to justify the record length, that's about the worst criticism I can leverage against Oceania. If it were left to me I'd probably cut 3 or 4 tracks, and they wouldn't even be bad songs.
 

Ixion

Member
Am I the only one here who thinks Zeitgeist is a good album? I never really understood why it's so criticized. I guess because it isn't varied enough?

As for Oceania, I pretty much agree with the general consensus. The middle is a little too tame and boring for me, but the rest is good. Overall, very solid.
 

Dead

well not really...yet
reviews are starting to pile up

4 stars from All Music

3.5/4 by Greg Kot ("Corgan's best output since the 90s")

BBC - Positive (no score)

4/4 from Chicago Sun Times

NME 6/10

4/5 Sputnik Music

Positive from Streogum

Popmatters take 1 - 7/10

Popmatters take 2, 4/10

So far the reviews seem to fall in the very favorable range, with a few mixed to negative ones in the mix. There are a lot more out there but im not gonna post every single newspaper review (only Chi-town ones) and online site there is lol
 

Mohonky

Member
Am I the only one here who thinks Zeitgeist is a good album?

I liked it. I've liked all their albums though.

Though to me, Smashing Pumpkins aren't really Smashing Pumpkins anymore, not with out D'Arcy, Iha and Jimmy.

I get the impression Billy just wants to keep living out what he had with the Smashing Pumpkins from their glory days in the early 90's and he has a hard time letting it go while the others around him have moved on.

It's a pity, I wish Smashing Pumpkins were still Smashing Pumpkins with the original band together, but that's not to say I haven't enjoyed the last few albums.
 
Am I the only one here who thinks Zeitgeist is a good album?

Definitely not, but it burns out fast after United States for me. I think I agree with Billy on that being the end of the Smashing Pumpkins era that we once knew, I mean it was him and Jimmy most of the time anyway.

Oceania haunts me, songs like Pinwheels and Oceania are in my head constantly these recent days. The album definitely moved up a notch with time.

Diablos, friend...why so angry, man? I miss the optimistic SP fan but it seemed like you had your mind made up before you gave the new record a listen and tried to justify your feelings afterwards. I'm not hating, just miss the happy SP guy who started this thread! ;) To each their own of course.

And finally, good to see people are still taking interviews with Billy out of context, saw one that said hes now blasting itunes and Facebook from the same antiquiet interview where he apparently attacked Radiohead. Reading comprehension fail everywhere.
 

Dead

well not really...yet
After several listens, and a full CD listen, I can definitely say I love the album. It just trounces everything Corgan has paraded around as the smashing pumpkins since the reformation and is overall the best collection of material since the Zwan days, which held some pretty amazing jewels (most of which was never officially released).

The vocal mix is a huge improvement, as are his vocals in general, and musically Its overall pretty fantastic. It really feels like a continuation of the Machina days, having gone through a side trip through Zwan and then taking an extended stay in Prog nation. As an avid HATER of all that SP post 07 has been, Im really really happy with this album
 

Dead

well not really...yet
Yeah, as an album its better than both the solo album and Mary Star of the Sea (though Im fond of it, the production and mix on it are problematic) I think.
 
btw the album is $5 for digital download on amazon. i bought it there so i'll be able to dig into it a bit more. i listened to the stream on itunes but it was kind of hard to follow as it didn't tell what songs were playing, just one long stream
 

Gouty

Bloodborne is shit
Zeitgeist > Oceania

Zeitgeist wasn't great but at least a handful of the songs had shape and drive.
 

Reese-015

Member
I'm very surprised that people are digging Oceania. But I was also very surprised that people were hating Zeitgeist.

Zeitgeist was pretty damn cool.

Oceania is utter fucking crap. It literally sounds like Billy Corgan is trying to troll me. I do not understand how this shit happened. It is absolutely beyond me. It doesn't even sound like Corgan on auto-pilot (which is often pretty good). It sounds like a lobotomized Corgan doing generic rock songs with no identity whatsoever and absolutely nothing interesting going on in terms of production either.

I'm 101% (lol) with Diablos on this one.

I'm gonna listen to Oceania again soon just to be sure because I'm so much in disbelief. It took me 4 listens to get through the whole thing, I just couldn't keep listening to it. And this is coming from someone who actually liked all of Billy Corgan's work thus far. Srsly. Wtf.
 

Macam

Banned
For what it's worth, I think some people are being a little overly harsh. Yes, BC is tremendously flawed, scarred by tremendous success and insecurities that makes him somewhat erratic and seemingly bipolar. The man hangs out with cats and Xbox for god's sake.

You have to let go of the fact that he's going to become this cohesive, purely musical driven entity focused on successfully recreating some sort of definitive legacy in the history of rock n' roll. He's not…and never will be. For all intents and purposes, Siamese Dream is dead. MCIS is dead. Fire up the ol' records, b-sides, bootlegs, and remasters, and enjoy them for what they were.

The initial fire of success has burned out; he's pretty set for life. I think more than anything, at this point, he just wants some modicum of that old success and respect from the corridors of musical power as it were, without really admitting as much. In a way, I think he sorts of wants to be the modern day equivalent of Jack White; having a free hand to jump around musically with a loyal and popular following, while earning the respect of music critics. Of course, I don't think Jack White mouths off quite as much, but then again, I don't really follow Jack White's off-stage musings much either.

I do like Oceania, but it's a slow burn for me. I think Zeitgeist is a stronger, more accessible album, and Oceania feels like a muted counterpart to it in some ways. I'm enjoying it for what it is, but I think anyone touting this as some sort of comeback is deluding themselves.
 
Top Bottom