Young, stupid, and brainwashed. He believed in what he was fighting for, he didn't know any better, he thought the road he chose was right because his elders (in a position of trust) told him to.
Everything is relative, and so were his actions.
Yes, he is responsible for sending thousands to meet their maker, but what is an appropriate punishment for this man?
He's already dead, and probably dead inside. He probably had no life either, living in fear, not being able to relax, thinking when 'they' will come for him.
Put yourself in his shoes, he probably cries every night knowing what he did. He is human, not a machine. He may have regrets, he does have emotions.
Reducing him to evil will do you no good, he has sinned, but he is still HUMAN.
And what do humans do? They err.
Your 'fucking' reductionism is futile, he becomes his actions, and you demonstrate a lack of empathy. And so do all the other blind justiciers out there. The judicial system does not accommodate each case by its own, and if it did, it wouldn't be equitable for all, and that is why it fails. Something can be done, outside of the broken 'system'.
Justice is blind.
He essentially got away with it. He's 97 and he'll likely be dead soon anyway. Putting the guy on trial or killing him won't change the fact that he played a part in genocide and essentially got away with it.
Snip
Godmann you went there.Young, stupid, and brainwashed. He believed in what he was fighting for, he didn't know any better, he thought the road he chose was right because his elders (in a position of trust) told him to.
Everything is relative, and so were his actions.
Yes, he is responsible for sending thousands to meet their maker, but what is an appropriate punishment for this man?
He's already dead, and probably dead inside. He probably had no life either, living in fear, not being able to relax, thinking when 'they' will come for him.
Put yourself in his shoes, he probably cries every night knowing what he did. He is human, not a machine. He may have regrets, he does have emotions.
Reducing him to evil will do you no good, he has sinned, but he is still HUMAN.
And what do humans do? They err.
Your 'fucking' reductionism is futile, he becomes his actions, and you demonstrate a lack of empathy. And so do all the other blind justiciers out there. The judicial system does not accommodate each case by its own, and if it did, it wouldn't be equitable for all, and that is why it fails. Something can be done, outside of the broken 'system'.
Justice is blind.
Young, stupid, and brainwashed. He believed in what he was fighting for, he didn't know any better, he thought the road he chose was right because his elders (in a position of trust) told him to.
Everything is relative, and so were his actions.
Yes, he is responsible for sending thousands to meet their maker, but what is an appropriate punishment for this man?
He's already dead, and probably dead inside. He probably had no life either, living in fear, not being able to relax, thinking when 'they' will come for him.
Put yourself in his shoes, he probably cries every night knowing what he did. He is human, not a machine. He may have regrets, he does have emotions.
Reducing him to evil will do you no good, he has sinned, but he is still HUMAN.
And what do humans do? They err.
Your 'fucking' reductionism is futile, he becomes his actions, and you demonstrate a lack of empathy. And so do all the other blind justiciers out there. The judicial system does not accommodate each case by its own, and if it did, it wouldn't be equitable for all, and that is why it fails. Something can be done, outside of the broken 'system'.
Justice is blind.
Wikipedia said:Alois Brunner (born 8 April 1912) was an Austrian Nazi war criminal. Brunner was Adolf Eichmann's assistant, and Eichmann referred to Brunner as his "best man." As commander of the Drancy internment camp outside Paris from June 1943 to August 1944, Brunner is held responsible for sending some 140,000 European Jews to the gas chambers. Nearly 24,000 of them were deported from the Drancy camp. He was condemned to death in absentia in France in 1954 for crimes against humanity. In 1961 and in 1980, Brunner lost an eye and the fingers of his left hand, respectively, as a result of letter bombs sent to him by Mossad.
In 2003, The Guardian described him as "the world's highest-ranking Nazi fugitive believed still alive." Brunner was last reported to be living in Syria, whose government rebuffed international efforts to locate or apprehend him.
...
In his 1980s interview by the German magazine Bunte, Brunner declared that his sole regret was not having murdered more Jews. In a 1987 telephone interview to the Chicago Sun Times, he stated: "The Jews deserved to die. They were garbage, I have no regrets. If I had the chance I would do it again..."
What's wrong with Hungary?
Yeah, I think most of us are familiar with the Milgram experiment. If anything, Milgram just makes it more important to punish those who are "just following orders."
Amazing that they still found another.
Nothing is as mindblowing as when Mossad tracked down, kidnapped and extradited Eichmann out of Argentina. What's even more mind blowing is that if they had done it two weeks earlier they would have gotten Mengele as well.
Well, if they want to devote time to this, I guess so. He will probably die before they can do anything though.
Not what I meant, but okay.
Your heartfelt words have moved me, but I'm not the one who needs to hear them. Please make haste to share your eloquent insight with the surviving relatives of Herr Csizsik-Csatary's youthful indiscretions. I believe that you alone can give them closure.Young, stupid, and brainwashed. He believed in what he was fighting for, he didn't know any better, he thought the road he chose was right because his elders (in a position of trust) told him to.
Everything is relative, and so were his actions.
Yes, he is responsible for sending thousands to meet their maker, but what is an appropriate punishment for this man?
He's already dead, and probably dead inside. He probably had no life either, living in fear, not being able to relax, thinking when 'they' will come for him.
Put yourself in his shoes, he probably cries every night knowing what he did. He is human, not a machine. He may have regrets, he does have emotions.
Reducing him to evil will do you no good, he has sinned, but he is still HUMAN.
And what do humans do? They err.
Your 'fucking' reductionism is futile, he becomes his actions, and you demonstrate a lack of empathy. And so do all the other blind justiciers out there. The judicial system does not accommodate each case by its own, and if it did, it wouldn't be equitable for all, and that is why it fails. Something can be done, outside of the broken 'system'.
Justice is blind.
Young, stupid, and brainwashed.
What sickening intolerance. Only an unfeeling brute would refuse to accept that humans are diverse, and for some humans the highest expression of their humanity is whipping and condemning to death other humans that are Jewish.That point could be made about a young man who only experienced a nazi controlled school system, was a member of the Hitler youth and was drafted into the war at a very young age.
Like the protagonists in "The Bridge": http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052654/
But that fucker here was born in Hungary and already 29 years old in 1944. And don't tell me someone ordered him to wear a whip on his belt to beat the shit out of jewish prisoners!
That being said, I don't like the thought of sending a 97 year old man whose crimes date back almost 70 years to jail. But I'm somewhat pleased that this asshole now knows what kind of legacy he will leave behind. Put him on trial and let the world know what a monster he was. Even if he'll never serve prison time due to his age and health, it's better than nothing.
If only we had a defence force for people who cant read topics.I guess it isn't that surprising that along with all the defence forces gaf has we also have a genocide defence force. :/
Rest assured: it does. He's at the end of life, they're not going to lock away his corpse. Even if they do, that indignity would be met with indifference.Being responsible for the deaths of innocent people is something that doesn't go away with time.
So how many therapy sessions did you have with him so far? I mean, you pretty much know what's going on in that guys brain.Young, stupid, and brainwashed. He believed in what he was fighting for, he didn't know any better, he thought the road he chose was right because his elders (in a position of trust) told him to.
Everything is relative, and so were his actions.
Yes, he is responsible for sending thousands to meet their maker, but what is an appropriate punishment for this man?
He's already dead, and probably dead inside. He probably had no life either, living in fear, not being able to relax, thinking when 'they' will come for him.
Put yourself in his shoes, he probably cries every night knowing what he did. He is human, not a machine. He may have regrets, he does have emotions.
Reducing him to evil will do you no good, he has sinned, but he is still HUMAN.
And what do humans do? They err.
Your 'fucking' reductionism is futile, he becomes his actions, and you demonstrate a lack of empathy. And so do all the other blind justiciers out there. The judicial system does not accommodate each case by its own, and if it did, it wouldn't be equitable for all, and that is why it fails. Something can be done, outside of the broken 'system'.
Justice is blind.
Rest assured: it does. He's at the end of life, they're not going to lock away his corpse. Even if they do, that indignity would be met with indifference.
He killed thousands of people. That's the point.
Let him live out the rest of his life in peace when he was directly responsible for the deaths of thousands of people? Fuck no. He doesn't deserve to leave this world on his own terms after taking that right away from all of those people.
Is it wrong that I think of the end of The Departed?I have to agree. Let him die knowing he didn't get away with it.
Oh yay, we're in the news again.
Why is it that in every single GAF thread I've ever read that involves discussion of the Holocaust, Hitler, WWII, etc, there are people who feel the need to defend the Nazis?
There's a difference between understanding evil and sympathizing with/justifying it. I see the latter far too often in threads like these, but thankfully, just from a vocal minority.
Young, stupid, and brainwashed. He believed in what he was fighting for, he didn't know any better, he thought the road he chose was right because his elders (in a position of trust) told him to.
Everything is relative, and so were his actions.
Yes, he is responsible for sending thousands to meet their maker, but what is an appropriate punishment for this man?
He's already dead, and probably dead inside. He probably had no life either, living in fear, not being able to relax, thinking when 'they' will come for him.
Put yourself in his shoes, he probably cries every night knowing what he did. He is human, not a machine. He may have regrets, he does have emotions.
Reducing him to evil will do you no good, he has sinned, but he is still HUMAN.
And what do humans do? They err.
Your 'fucking' reductionism is futile, he becomes his actions, and you demonstrate a lack of empathy. And so do all the other blind justiciers out there. The judicial system does not accommodate each case by its own, and if it did, it wouldn't be equitable for all, and that is why it fails. Something can be done, outside of the broken 'system'.
Justice is blind.
So it'll be forgiven in a couple months. How comforting.Nope. Murdering thousands of people is something that can NEVER be forgiven as long as he lives.
I really like all the 'throw him in prison' comments.
Innocent until proven guilty???
Take him to Israel, and let him see how much he failed. I doubt he could cope with that.
Young, stupid, and brainwashed. He believed in what he was fighting for, he didn't know any better, he thought the road he chose was right because his elders (in a position of trust) told him to.
Everything is relative, and so were his actions.
Yes, he is responsible for sending thousands to meet their maker, but what is an appropriate punishment for this man?
He's already dead, and probably dead inside. He probably had no life either, living in fear, not being able to relax, thinking when 'they' will come for him.
Put yourself in his shoes, he probably cries every night knowing what he did. He is human, not a machine. He may have regrets, he does have emotions.
Reducing him to evil will do you no good, he has sinned, but he is still HUMAN.
And what do humans do? They err.
Your 'fucking' reductionism is futile, he becomes his actions, and you demonstrate a lack of empathy. And so do all the other blind justiciers out there. The judicial system does not accommodate each case by its own, and if it did, it wouldn't be equitable for all, and that is why it fails. Something can be done, outside of the broken 'system'.
Justice is blind.
"In his statement of defense, Csizsik-Csatary admitted to some involvement in the ghettoization of Jews, to handing over at least two Jews to the Germans and to attending the last mass deportation of Jews out of Kassa (Hungary),"
Umm I'm pretty sure that defense has never worked. It kind of got tried in this Germany city once and it didn't work out well.Handing them over to superiors, i.e., following orders is a war crime? Seriously, not every Nazi is a war criminal,
Making him dig a hole in the ground and shooting it is fine with me.there's absolutely no point in sending a 97-year old man to jail.
Well, the Nuremberg Trials were a judicial abomination, there isn't much credibility to it.Umm I'm pretty sure that defense has never worked. It kind of got tried in this Germany city once and it didn't work out well.
Making him dig a hole in the ground and shooting it is fine with me.