Well, I do understand that if you don't find a person even remotely sexy/attractive it is quite hard or even impossible to base a relationship on to that. I don't say that looks are everything, but they do play a part.
Also like I have mentioned previously, people define "curvy" totally different. Some people actually see themselves only as "curvy" if they have way bigger friends for example and on the other hand a person with exactly the same type of body would say she is nearly morbidly obese. I am starting to think that on dating sites, it is very reasonable to depand full body shots, even if even those can lie quite much. It is totally possible to take a decent or even a nice photo from a bigger person and just play with lights and angle. Hahha, damn, online dating sounds like gambling were you never know will you win or even if you would, what will you actually get.
Ooh, the legendary look scale. I haven't actually never got my hands on it and can't really say I would be sufficient of rating people with it to be honest. Five to six would be still considered quite normal and not a sexy beast if I am correct...
Do you lads and lassies generally use that scale so should I actually get to know it a bit better? I can't say I would be that enthusiastic about it, since I find it a bit unreliable. I don't know have people been using the same scale, but I think I have been personally ranked anything in between 2 to 8 which makes me doubt it a bit since that is a huge variety. People might just define it a bit different ways I assume.
Even if I don't really get the scale I have noticed that people tend to naturally hunt partners from the same attractiveness level that they are themselves or if possible a bit above that. It is also possible to cheat your level a bit with flattering clothing, nice hair style and right attitude. Keep that in mind.
Oh and I am happy to help or share the little knowledge or experiment I have. At least, like you said, it is from a bit different point of view. And congratulations for the number by the way! Hopefully it will work out great.
Honestly, the looks scale is kind of a male created thing. I don't really believe in using numerical values to judge a woman's looks so I use words. And I don't believe that a perfect "10" exists. If a chick is decently attractive (6-7), then I'll message them. At one point I went out with a girl on a one time date to a night club was ok looking (5-6); not attractive, not good looking but somewhere in the middle. I had fun, but I realized she used me to go out since I paid for her cab.
Since pictures are deliberately chosen, it is very much hit or miss at the face to face meetings. But I do agree that through the magic of Photoshop which I use to crop images so that the frame looks tighter and for color adjustments, clothes and hair style, people look different in that moment only; who's to say if they still have that same haircut as in the main picture?
As for the woman who's number I got over the weekend. I responded to her text around 3:40AM ( or 15:40 in Europe), woke up the next day, got nothing. Texted her later on in the night, nothing again. The ball's in her court now, but I'm not holding my breath that she's going to reply so I'll remain a bit cynical. I'll give it a couple of days before I decide to delete her number and the thread of texts.
Honestly, I'm not a fan of mirror shots at all and absolutely avoid taking them at all costs since everyone and their mother is into taking those types of pictures in this day and age. I think if you're gonna take pictures of yourself and you don't have someone to do take some shots for you, you should do so with a camera that has a self-timer.
So I think the mirror shot isn't doing you any favors. It would also help if you have a bigger variety of shots. I'm not a fan of wearing beanies or hats of any kind myself, but it would help if you put up a picture where you're not wearing a beanie because it almost seems like you're hiding your hair for whatever reason may be.
I know you mentioned that grammar isn't important and that you typed it from your phone, but given that you go to college, you should demonstrate how educated you are by fixing up all the grammatical errors in your profile, punctuation, and using proper capitalization e.g. ou is capitalized. The fact that you misspelled Asian when you have the correct spelling in your info box is embarrassing. I'm super anal about grammatical errors so I don't mean to sound like a jerk, but this is all common sense.
I don't get too annoyed by it since I run into women's profiles where they claim that grammar is important, but ironically enough I easily spot a few grammatical errors so at least you're not one of those people.
As a whole your profile is ok but there's nothing that really stands out to me that would give me a reason to send you a message; it sounds pretty average and kind of boring. I gave you a 5 star rating.
I changed my profile picture again since I just took a haircut this weekend, changed a few things in my profile, and reduced the amount of pictures I reduced it to 4 as opposed to five. I'll probably keep it at 4 pictures from here on out with the 4th picture being a bonus picture.
Here's my profile again.