SolVanderlyn
Thanos acquires the fully powered Infinity Gauntlet in The Avengers: Infinity War, but loses when all the superheroes team up together to stop him.
Big Mom has something... her saliva is corrosive.
Now for Whitebeard. This might seem a counter to what I just said about pirates being considered "evil", but that's because his intentions are entirely based around creating and maintaining a "family".
A witch devil fruit wouldn't make sense. There would be some limits to a power like that.
As for the rest I think I said before that alignment was more about motivation than how they appear. Having someone just say things like "purple monkey trousers" and randomly cause chaos is generally seen as a very lazy sort of chaotic character. I think that all heroic sorts of characters can cause chaos when their goals conflict enough with the world even lawful good characters.
But a chaotic character is driven more by things like a belief that nobody or thing has any authority over them to guide their action. (Big check for Doffy, mark against for Blackbeard who knuckled under as a crew member for Whitebeard for a long time out of respect for his power.)
Blackbeard took a ridiculous amount of risks. He stayed in Whitebeard's crew with full intent to kill a crewmember. He actually did kill Thatch and fled. Then, he faked his way into the Warlords to get into Impel Down. Then he risked it all by arriving at Marineford and hoping the Marines wouldn't focus on him entirely (Akainu was too obsessed with killing Luffy).They also believe in taking big risks over taking actions that might seem safe but not as agreeable. (Big mark against for Blackbeard, he is called a coward who only moves when he has all pieces in place)
Chaotic characters aren't literally characters that cause chaos, though. Chaotic characters are those that have no regard for a system of laws to fulfill their goals, thus they are the polar opposite of lawful characters.
Blackbeard took a ridiculous amount of risks. He stayed in Whitebeard's crew with full intent to kill a crewmember. He actually did kill Thatch and fled. Then, he faked his way into the Warlords to get into Impel Down. Then he risked it all by arriving at Marineford and hoping the Marines wouldn't focus on him entirely (Akainu was too obsessed with killing Luffy)
Just because something is calculated, doesn't mean it has no risks. Either way, the point is that Blackbeard didn't give a shit about systems or laws, not when he was with Whitebeard or the Marines. He is Chaotic Evil because he:
1) Is evil.
2) Fulfills his intentions by lying and abusing systems of law to get what he wants with no regard for the repercussions (freeing Impel Down prisoners to the world, killing Thatch, causing the entire bloody war).
acid acid fruit, maybe?Big Mom has something... her saliva is corrosive.
Pretty sure this is backwards. Lawful characters are ones that believe in the law while anyone can use the law if they think they can use it to fulfil their goals. A neutral/chaotic character is one who uses the law when it's in their own interests.
A lawful character is one who is an agent of the law even if it is not in their interest and works against their goals. It's only really extremely lawful characters who have a really intense relationship with the law.
Blackbeard calculates the risks and doesn't take really big risks. His cockyness only lasts while he thinks that he has a large advantage in contrast to Doffy who was cocky to the end. He doesn't care about the system or any laws but only means that he isn't lawful.
Both Doffy and Blackbeard use the law and the warlord system for their advantage only but that's to be expected.
But here are two major character points that make the alignment make more sense to me.
Blackbeard was respectful to Whitebeard when he thought he was stronger but betrayed him when he thought he was weaker. Neutral Evil.
Doffy straight up killed his closest family members when they thought they threatened his status or freedom even though he gained nothing from it. Chaotic Evil.
This is exactly what I'm saying...Akainu believes in the law AND uses it. Doflamingo and Blackbeard are not lawful because they don't give a shit about laws, Doflamingo to a lesser extent.
It's pretty simple, Chaos is an absence of order, and Lawful is a reliance on order. Neutral is someone who uses both without a particular reliance on either (Doflamingo).
What? Are you saying characters like Blackbeard and Doflamingo are lawful because they are/were "agents" of the law?
Are the World Nobles Lawful too? Their actions would define their alignment.
Blackbeard took risks.
Just because something is calculated doesn't mean it isn't risky.
His whole fucking plan was risky. What if he never found the fruit? What if Ace killed him? What if Whitebeard never let him escape? What if Magellan killed him? What if Sengoku killed him? What about Akainu? Regardless, how is this relevant to Blackbeard's alignment?
Blackbeard doesn't care about Whitebeard or his crew. Respectful? When? He used them, even at the very end when Whitebeard has his throat he says "Wait! Aren't I your son! Don't kill me!" like the lying scumbag he is. No regard for order=Chaotic.
Doflamingo is neutral. He is like Blackbeard in that he straight up destroys things, and basically says fuck it when things aren't going his way, but you can't deny that he ran a very tight ship. The entire damn arc is about exposing his very secretive society in Dressrossa and his black market. If Doflamingo was Chaotic, why rule a kingdom? Why maintain any order at all? Just because he can kill without benefit does not make him Chaotic, you can't ignore the very manipulative side of him too.Remember, Chaos isn't just straight up murdering people and causing mayhem,
I said this as well yes. Evil is murdering people and creating mayhem in general we both seem to agree on this I think unless I am missing something. Maybe you would like to talk about this some more in much greater detail if I am mistaken on what you are thinking so I can correct you possibly
Chaos is an absence of order.
Not really but I comment on this else where.
In regards to the definition of a Chaotic character
A chaotic character would be a character who's character is disorganised maybe you mean something else I don't really get what you are saying here.
, they don't follow orders or maintain any.
Why wouldn't chaotic characters maintain orders or follow them if it suited them? If you gave yourself an order that made sense for you why wouldn't you maintain it or follow it? I don't really understand this.
Anything beyond this is probably just our subjective opinions, so I guess we can just agree to disagree?
Sure, whatevs.
A sh*t ton of One Piece cosplayers at Anime Expo.
https://twitter.com/SteveYurko/status/617456015735304193
Chaos isn't an absence of order. Actually without any order a chaotic character would just be some sort of slapping purple nuns with wet fish look at me my ennui is on fire.
What chaotic characters should be more about is a lack of restraint when it comes to respecting what other people represent.
Blackbeard is Chaotic because he doesn't respect what other people represent (your words). He doesn't respect Whitebeard, he uses him for his power, but that doesn't mean he respects him in the way I see it. And like I said, this doesn't matter, because his actions still constitute him betraying Whitebeard anyway. Coupled with him using the Marines, this makes him Chaotic.Blackbeard is not chaotic because he respects the players too much. He recruits people with big reputations. He works for Whitebeard and says the he respected him because he was strong. Where as Doffy recruits crazy kids who come to him strapped with explosives or anyone who reminds him of himself.
At this point I don't feel that we know enough about the characters of the world nobles or know enough about what they know to make a judgement. But since they are not presented as typical "hero" or "antagonist" characters I feel that it doesn't matter to much either way. This alignment system isn't really some in depth psychological system more a sort of rough shorthand that acts a guide of how to play a character. A guide that can often be ignored as well. I think that it is important to remember that and not make the mistake of taking things too seriously.
But how does this risk argument factor into Blackbeard being Chaotic or Neutral? That was my main issue. Whether Blackbeard takes risks or not, he still did what he did. He still abused Whitebeard's crew and the Marines to get what he wanted.What is a risk or not in the One Piece world is open to interpretation as it follows dramatic rules rather than being underpinned by real world statistical data. The way it is presented dramatically is that Blackbeard does not really appear to be at risk when he acts.
Well we know from his actions what his personality is. What we don't know is how he got that personality in the first place.What this tells us about his personality and how it's relevant is up for us to think about I guess.
Well lying itself is not chaotic. The reason why you lie tells you if you are chaotic. Whitebeard was lying to save his own skin or buy time which is totally not lawful or chaotic. Lying to antagonise someone for his own vanity would be chaotic for sure but he didn't do that. He also made clear that he used to respect Whitebeard because he was strong but now he was "past it" so didn't respect him. Totally not lawful or chaotic. If he said he never respected Whitebeard and only joined up with him because it was the only way to stay relatively free that would be chaotic.
I don't mean literally following orders and maintaining them. I mean it systematically. Blackbeard obviously followed the rules in WB's crew and when he was with the Marines. But the difference is that he doesn't care about those rules nor does he use them preferably over disorderly conduct.Why wouldn't chaotic characters maintain orders or follow them if it suited them? If you gave yourself an order that made sense for you why wouldn't you maintain it or follow it? I don't really understand this.
I think I addressed what I've been trying to say, I admit it's all really confusing and I'm not the best at being clear.
This is why you should never bring up the D&D alignment system for things like this unless it's just meant as a gag. It's imperfect at best.
Oda spills some shit sometimes. Not gonna lie.
But the joke was someone asking "Why do the women have large breasts" and he replies "I draw the dreams of young boys"
It's not my type of humour but I don't see it as sexist either.
D&D alignments don't work very well with most major One Piece characters. It's short-sighted to try and fit in someone like Luffy, Doffy or Blackbeard because they can tip-toe between neutral and chaotic depending on the situation.
It appears that this only appears to "beautiful women" in OP ... it's either that type, or "unique" women (many times a little bit ugly, too)...Oda said that drawing women was the hardest thing for him to draw (and the second most time-consuming, mostly because of their hair and the techniques used). Maybe he just find it hard to come up with female body types.
While we've had the sexism debate countless times, I think at this point it's more of an art question: Why do all of the women look the same? There's like, one body type and two faces. You can either be Nami or Robin, basically. You can draw "boy's dreams" and have all the women be incredibly sexy, but they should at least look kind of different.
I think you have been perfectly clear and just want to say that i agree with you
While we've had the sexism debate countless times, I think at this point it's more of an art question: Why do all of the women look the same? There's like, one body type and two faces. You can either be Nami or Robin, basically. You can draw "boy's dreams" and have all the women be incredibly sexy, but they should at least look kind of different.
I dont know. The jokes themselves arent really offensive or harmful but they clearly come from a sexist world of view when you look at the women representation of OP and comments like that SBS about a "Man's Romance" or whatever it was. But i agree generally, not my type of humour either.
It's not like most manga artists don't draw their characters based on a general deign template.
Most artists find it easier to fall back on a handful of body type designs for the majority of their characters. This is very common in comics and animation.
Yes, but what is annoying is that at the beggining the template was not bad and the women design were not ridiculous and the Nami face was not so widespread since there were fewer characters. Oda's art has improved tremendously in several ways since then but i wish he hadnt changed the way he designed women to the disappointing template he apparently uses now.
But this is really my biggest pet pieve with OP. And really just because it could be so much better and more varied. Oda has shown he can do it but he just doesnt want to?
Posts like this piss me off tbh - dude dedicates his whole life to the Manga sacrificing sleep, his wife and kids...if he feels more comfortable and satisfied using with the basic design he has, thats his right and recreation. No matter what he decides on or uses you cant satisfy everybody... the OP Lore and characters created are already nuts at this point and he has to keep the story going, i dont think he wants to use the 3-4 hours of sleep he gets on reinventing how he designs women.
The basic design and physical appearance strong normal sized dudes is the same as well - Ace, Sabo, Law, Luffy etc.
"The better designed females aren't doing enough!"Even if he would fix the female character designs, people would moan about something else
"The better designed females aren't doing enough!"
I don't know, but I really don't know what exactly happens now.Hype for this week's chapter rising. Think we'll see Kaido?
Even if he would fix the female character designs, people would moan about something else
Definitely some world reactions.I don't know, but I really don't know what exactly happens now.
Definitely some world reactions.
When all is said and done I think Luffy and Law will head out with Sabo and the revolutionary ship. Doubt they will stick around long with the whole world now aware of what they have done.
I think it's still a little early for Jinbei to return but I'm happy to be wrong.Nah, I think Jinbei is going to show up and they'll go chasing after the Sunny. The timing of the ending of his cover story arc and the ending of the Dressrosa arc is just too perfect. It'd allow Oda to reunite the entire crew at once instead of having two reunions.
rereading the end of punk hazard up to the current chapter
in chapter 692, pg 11, is that possibly Rob Lucci in the bottom middle panel?
Looks like he might have joined a pirate crew
Well, that could be Toei fucking up, but it certainly does not look like LucciThe portrait is clearer in the anime, for what that's worth.