One Piece Manga |OT| ZEHAHAHAHA! The Name of this Age is Blackbeard!

Status
Not open for further replies.
So I was reading up on momosuke and something occurred to me. The whole thing with Momosuke's underhanded sexual molestation of Nami and Robin via the childhood innocence facade. Are they aware?

Like, he's pretty blatant about it. Are they just made into idiots by maternal instinct, or are they playing along and just into the whole Shota con thing. Cuz I honestly don't know which interpretation is worse.
 
Veelk said:
So I was reading up on momosuke and something occurred to me. The whole thing with Momosuke's underhanded sexual molestation of Nami and Robin via the childhood innocence facade. Are they aware?

Like, he's pretty blatant about it. Are they just made into idiots by maternal instinct, or are they playing along and just into the whole Shota con thing. Cuz I honestly don't know which interpretation is worse.
Click to expand...
I think they're just completely ignorant about it as in a "how could a kid this young ever have these sort of intentions"
 
Russ T said:
Because you might think he doesn't deserve it, or any justification for him getting it would be weak and not good enough, given his character thus far? Dunno man.
Click to expand...
So...a joke character?

I'm repeating myself, but that's what I mean. I don't understand how you can look at Usopp, a character who's entire purpose is "turning lies into reality" and becoming a great warrior of the sea and think he isn't good enough for CH.

I mean, I understand that you might think he's a joke character and doesn't deserve it, but he isn't entirely.
 
I believe Usopp us supposed to be a lethal joke character that is meant to suck, but doesn't, and that's the joke.

Personally, I like it better when he's just an out and out character.
 
Veelk said:
So I was reading up on momosuke and something occurred to me. The whole thing with Momosuke's underhanded sexual molestation of Nami and Robin via the childhood innocence facade. Are they aware?

Like, he's pretty blatant about it. Are they just made into idiots by maternal instinct, or are they playing along and just into the whole Shota con thing. Cuz I honestly don't know which interpretation is worse.
Click to expand...

It's just a gag.

Sanji, Brook, and Kinemon are lustful characters and so the gag is that a little kid can be very forward physically while they can't.

It's like Nami hitting people like Luffy (rubber) and hurting them as a gag, it's just a gag and there's no real reason for it besides humor.
 
Cloud Strife said:
It's just a gag.

Sanji, Brook, and Kinemon are lustful characters and so the gag is that a little kid can be very forward physically while they can't.

It's like Nami hitting people like Luffy (rubber) and hurting them as a gag, it's just a gag and there's no real reason for it besides humor.
Click to expand...

It's amazing to me how people think that something being a joke divorces it from any sort of meaning. That it is a gag is not lost on me. It still informs us that Nami and Robin either become oblivious morons if their maternal instinct is triggered or they actively consent to being fondled by a child. Either way, the gag doesn't reflect well on them.

Edit: and for the record, it has nothing to do with finding the joke funny or not. A lot of people also assume that if you take something seriously, you must not be able to laugh at it. If you thought it was funny, that's great, but that doesn't divorce it from meaning either.
 
Faulty comparison again. Chopper is legitimately innocence (which he shouldn't be, since isn't he like 15? Puberty should be well underway. Maybe it's because he's a reindeer and is all about dem does) and uninterested in Nami and Robin as sexual beings. This kid is and he's pretty blatant about it.

Oh, and not to mention how it reflects on Sanji and Usopp for allowing their friends to continue getting molested in ignorance.
 
Cloud Strife said:
So...a joke character?
Click to expand...

No. Like a character who, givenw hat he's done, it wouldn't make sense for a thing to happen.

Like, how do you define "joke"? Is it "wouldn't make sense for a thing to happen"? because if so I guess I can see why you keep insisting whatever it is you're insisting.
 
Veelk said:
It's amazing to me how people think that something being a joke divorces it from any sort of meaning. That it is a gag is not lost on me. It still informs us that Nami and Robin either become oblivious morons if their maternal instinct is triggered or they actively consent to being fondled by a child. Either way, the gag doesn't reflect well on them.

Edit: and for the record, it has nothing to do with finding the joke funny or not. A lot of people also assume that if you take something seriously, you must not be able to laugh at it. If you thought it was funny, that's great, but that doesn't divorce it from meaning either.
Click to expand...
"Some people"? C'mon, dude.

Sometimes gags don't have real logical reasons for happening, which is why I compared it to Nami harming Luffy as a joke when by the series own standards it would be impossible. In this way you can see how women as intelligent as Nami or Robin can suddenly become oblivious for the sake of humor.

Whether you or I find it funny or not is irrelevent (I don't for the record). It's there because it's meant to be a nonsensical joke, not an actual thing that's meant to be taken seriously (maternal instinct?).

What I think you want to talk about it why it needs to be there in the first place which is different than why it's actually there.
 
Russ T said:
No. Like a character who, givenw hat he's done, it wouldn't make sense for a thing to happen.

Like, how do you define "joke"? Is it "wouldn't make sense for a thing to happen"? because if so I guess I can see why you keep insisting whatever it is you're insisting.
Click to expand...
All I'm saying is that Usopp isn't entirely a joke character like Buggy. His entire character development is turning him from a joke character to a strong warrior. Therefore, Usopp getting something like CH would make sense later on, and disagreeing that it isn't possible I can only imagine is because people think he isn't mean to be taken seriously.
 
Cloud Strife said:
"Some people"? C'mon, dude.

Sometimes gags don't have real logical reasons for happening, which is why I compared it to Nami harming Luffy as a joke when by the series own standards it would be impossible. In this way you can see how women as intelligent as Nami or Robin can suddenly become oblivious for the sake of humor.

Whether you or I find it funny or not is irrelevent (I don't for the record). It's there because it's meant to be a nonsensical joke, not an actual thing that's meant to be taken seriously (maternal instinct?).

What I think you want to talk about it why it needs to be there in the first place which is different than why it's actually there.
Click to expand...

Your kind of falling prey to exactly what I'm talking about. Whether it needs to be there is a discussion on the jokes necessity might be good to have, but that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the meaning the gag itself carries.

Yes, I know Oda probably meant to be "just a joke" and carry no further implications than that, but that's an age old excuse that has never flown. Authorial intentions only go so far. That's why aces tattoo had to be changed. Oda meant it to mean one thing, but it means another. That's why everyone cringes at Usopp's afro comment in Davy Beck. That's why you can no longer casually use 'gay' on gaf to negatively describe a thing, even if you do not have an intentionally homophobic bone in your body. There are plenty of jokes that don't fly in public, even when they are legitimately meant as just jokes, because they contain unpalatable meaning.

So I say again: being a joke (or otherwise merely intended as "just a joke" ) does not deprive it of meaning. The meaning of the momonosuke gag has some bad implications for pretty much everyone involved. As of now, I have issued no objections to it being included, I'm just calling for a discussion of its meaning.
 
Veelk said:
Your kind of falling prey to exactly what I'm talking about. Whether it needs to be there is a discussion on the jokes necessity might be good to have, but that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the meaning the gag itself carries.

Yes, I know Oda probably meant to be "just a joke" and carry no further implications than that, but that's an age old excuse that has never flown. Authorial intentions only go so far. That's why aces tattoo had to be changed. Oda meant it to mean one thing, but it means another. That's why everyone cringes at Usopp's afro comment in Davy Beck. That's why you can no longer casually use 'gay' on gaf to negatively describe a thing, even if you do not have an intentionally homophobic bone in your body. There are plenty of jokes that don't fly in public, even when they are legitimately meant as just jokes, because they contain unpalatable meaning.

So I say again: being a joke (or otherwise merely intended as "just a joke" ) does not deprive it of meaning. The meaning of the momonosuke gag has some bad implications for pretty much everyone involved. As of now, I have issued no objections to it being included, I'm just calling for a discussion of its meaning.
Click to expand...
Alright.
 
Russ T said:
Is cool.

I feel bad for Buggy, though, and kind of wish he'd evolve past being a joke. D:
Click to expand...

!

He's the most powerful and feared Warlord of the Sea!

He's close, personal friends with Emperor Shanks!

He broke out of the most secure facility on the planet and into the second most secure facility in the same day!

He sailed under the most famous pirate of his era, Gol D. Roger!
 
Still waiting on the emotionally scarring flashback where Buggy and Shanks are real brothers and Buggy will awaken his DF when Shanks dies and become a Yonkou for real.

Believe.
 
Man God said:
!

He's the most powerful and feared Warlord of the Sea!

He's close, personal friends with Emperor Shanks!

He broke out of the most secure facility on the planet and into the second most secure facility in the same day!

He sailed under the most famous pirate of his era, Gol D. Roger!
Click to expand...

D:!
 
Veelk said:
Your kind of falling prey to exactly what I'm talking about. Whether it needs to be there is a discussion on the jokes necessity might be good to have, but that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the meaning the gag itself carries.

Yes, I know Oda probably meant to be "just a joke" and carry no further implications than that, but that's an age old excuse that has never flown. Authorial intentions only go so far. That's why aces tattoo had to be changed. Oda meant it to mean one thing, but it means another. That's why everyone cringes at Usopp's afro comment in Davy Beck. That's why you can no longer casually use 'gay' on gaf to negatively describe a thing, even if you do not have an intentionally homophobic bone in your body. There are plenty of jokes that don't fly in public, even when they are legitimately meant as just jokes, because they contain unpalatable meaning.

So I say again: being a joke (or otherwise merely intended as "just a joke" ) does not deprive it of meaning. The meaning of the momonosuke gag has some bad implications for pretty much everyone involved. As of now, I have issued no objections to it being included, I'm just calling for a discussion of its meaning.
Click to expand...
I have no comment on this topic. I just want to say that you are a very interesting person.
 
Tathanen said:
Random thought after reading some old volumes. Regarding how armament haki started being drawn black after the timeskip. Common interpretation is just that before the timeskip it was mysterious and secret kinda, but after it became a more normal thing, so Oda started drawing it so we'd know it was being used. But it's kinda inconsistent when you consider people like Vergo with his all-black mode being pretty distinctive. This visual isn't just for the reader.

What if the actual reason is that black armament haki is just unrefined. A sloppy technique of sorts, a representation of raw power and nothing more. But when you're a true master of it, it no longer shows? Who used it early on in non-black form? Reileigh for one, obviously a true master. Sentoumaru, the "most defensive man in the world." Surely Mihawk has used it. Garp, always hurting Luffy through his rubber. Men with this caliber of martial ability, I could believe they've "transcended" the black sheen.

This falls apart if there are some clear examples of characters that used non-black armament haki in the past who were decidedly scrubby, but I can't really think of any off the top of my head.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily. Boo used the invisible type of armament haki on Bobby Funk.

rsGs1Ov.png
Click to expand...

I still believe Hardening is an advanced form of armament haki that only those who can use haki can perceive.
It could be why you never see non-haki users commenting on the black metallic appearance of certain haki users.
 
I sincerely believe that armament Haki is in fact, invisible like the other forms. Only people trained in haki can see it. Oda just gave us the sight beyond sight with the timeskip.
 
Man God said:
I sincerely believe that armament Haki is in fact, invisible like the other forms. Only people trained in haki can see it. Oda just gave us the sight beyond sight with the timeskip.
Click to expand...

That used to be true when Rayleigh first used it, the blackening was added later, probably as a visual thing. There's no reason what you say can't be true though, dunno if anyone has ever given a recount of how it looks in the series. For Luffy at least it makes sense, it's like vulcanized rubber. For others not so much, it doesn't bother me a whole lot though.
 
It being visible only to haki users is probably the most plausible theory I heard on the change, but it doesn't make gel with the manga's third person omniscient narration.
 
Just something I've noticed. He appeared after Ace and Blackbeard's fight, after the Straw Hats were separated, after Marineford.
I think there was some narration at the end of Skypiea and Thriller Bark. I'm not too sure.
 
I still hope to see more reactions from around the world (Strawhats hometown, Alabasta, Dragon etc) to the news of what happened at Dressrosa.
 
Imperial Bishop said:
Just something I've noticed. He appeared after Ace and Blackbeard's fight, after the Straw Hats were separated, after Marineford.
I think there was some narration at the end of Skypiea and Thriller Bark. I'm not too sure.
Click to expand...

Oh, I see, you meant the narration boxes. That wasn't what I was talking about, or rather that's only a small piece of it.

I mean the narration, how the story is told. From what I can tell, when characters have flashbacks, we're seeing what literally happens, not a characters memories that would naturally be colored and morphed by time and experienced, or even their present, which would have the perspective skewed according to a character's bias'. We see perspectives of past characters of the flashbacks that the character that is supposedly remembering them couldn't possibly be aware of. And when the narration boxes come up, they usually are just reporting facts with neutrality. "This is character X, bounty Y, on Z island" or "Whitebeard took 64 stab wounds, 134 gunshots..." and so on. Chopper's entire flashback takes place in the split second of Luffy punching out a guy, literally faster than thought of that detail can be recollected, implying time is literally put on pause, rather than the character recollecting the event as a natural part of the story.

So what I'm saying is that the narration of OP isn't taking place behind any particular character and seems to be giving us the literal truth of what happens. The "Haki can only be seen by those who know Haki" theory would only make perfect sense if we were seeing the story of OP from Luffy's perspective, or even a limited third person perspective. Something that is meant to influence the truth of what we are seeing. But if it's a omniscient third person narration, which, as the name suggest, then the narration would be fully aware of Haki from chapter 1 and have no real mechanism to hide it, since as the name implies, it's already aware of it, even if none of the characters are.
 
You can still have an omniscient point of view into the world yet choose to disguise something until it becomes plot relevant.

If I'm honest with myself I'd actually prefer if Haki was still invisible, I don't really like how it looks most of the time.
 
Man God said:
You can still have an omniscient point of view into the world yet choose to disguise something until it becomes plot relevant.

If I'm honest with myself I'd actually prefer if Haki was still invisible, I don't really like how it looks most of the time.
Click to expand...

An omniscient narration doesn't disguise things. At best, it rearranges them for the highest possible drama, which this one occasionally does (for example, it concealed the goal the Luffy-Law alliance made by deciding to go after Kaido until after the arc and is in general particular about where it reveals the flashbacks) but it doesn't just outright lie to you, which this would be. That would make it an unreliable narrator, and unreliable narrators by nature have an agenda. That's just not how OP's narrator seems to work by and large, or else this would be the sole, and somewhat jarring instance of it. If it's objective were to build highest mystery, it'd be much more in it's style to have the black haki appear, with none of the characters commenting on it, making the reader the only one who notices it, until it's explained.

Edit: reviewing the definitions, I miswrote. I meant objective narrator, not omniscient. Though the objective narrator is usually omniscient (and I think OP's is), an omniscient narrator can be a little subjective (in terms of offering judgement and such on characters, and though they pretty by and large don't decieve the reader, they're atleast capable of being unreliable). But what I meant is that OP's narrator is an objective third person, so same difference, I just said omniscient where I really meant objective. .
 
Man God said:
!

He's the most powerful and feared Warlord of the Sea!

He's close, personal friends with Emperor Shanks!

He broke out of the most secure facility on the planet and into the second most secure facility in the same day!

He sailed under the most famous pirate of his era, Gol D. Roger!
Click to expand...

Facts only - gotta love Buggy.

Cant wait to see him post time skip...i love this dude. During the War when he tought for a couple moments that he could take on WB...man i lost my shit and had to laugh out loud. Oda managed his arc perfect so far.

Hail Buggy-Sama !!
 
LonelyGreyWolf said:
He does not have conqueror's haki.

Simple as that.
Click to expand...

Zoro has a different but somewhat similar ability in his killing intent, something he shares with Mihawk. You don't have to read any subtext regarding conqueror's haki into it - it's an ability that nobody seems to have given any attention to, so I thought I'd point it out.
 
I do think there's a possibility that another strawhat will get conquers haki, if only for the fact that luffy already perfected for the start of the new world, when it seems like such a late-game powerup. I can definitely see another strawhat unlocking it near the end of the series.

Zoro would be a shoe-in, based on the fact that rayleigh has it, but he honestly doesn't need it, it wouldn't feel like that much of an acomplishment.

But ussop. I can definitely see ussop getting it. He would benefit greatly from it, he has trouble with close quaters combat, being a sniper and all, so conquers would fit him perfectly.
Plus even though he's a coward, he's got a lot of willpower.



Veelk said:
So I was reading up on momosuke and something occurred to me. The whole thing with Momosuke's underhanded sexual molestation of Nami and Robin via the childhood innocence facade. Are they aware?

Like, he's pretty blatant about it. Are they just made into idiots by maternal instinct, or are they playing along and just into the whole Shota con thing. Cuz I honestly don't know which interpretation is worse.
Click to expand...

I think you're seriously overthinking it.
These are fictional anime characters drawn at the author's whim. he wants to show comedic effect by getting sanji and brook jealous. They are simply being blinded by the presumed innocence. It's greatly exaggerated as everything in manga. It doesn't really have anything to do with maternal instincts or anything.

Comedic effect and fanservice tend to explain a lot.
Why is it that majority of important female characters are slender and have gigantic tits? Is it some meta narrative that only beautiful women are successful? No. It's just fanservice.
 
Foolworm said:
Zoro has a different but somewhat similar ability in his killing intent, something he shares with Mihawk. You don't have to read any subtext regarding conqueror's haki into it - it's an ability that nobody seems to have given any attention to, so I thought I'd point it out.
Click to expand...

That's because it has nothing to do with this. It's not haki, it's overwhelming power and use of fear and superiority. Monet did not get defeated like a person effected by conqueror's haki would be.
 
Imperial Bishop said:
Not necessarily. Boo used the invisible type of armament haki on Bobby Funk.



I still believe Hardening is an advanced form of armament haki that only those who can use haki can perceive.
It could be why you never see non-haki users commenting on the black metallic appearance of certain haki users.
Click to expand...

nope..Zephir was called "black arm zephir" for obvious reasons..so everyone was able to see his hardening
 
LonelyGreyWolf said:
Yeah, Luffy, Zoro and Sanji have observation haki. They all used it on Fishman Island :)
Click to expand...

I can't tell Mihawk's innate abilities from haki. His intimidate ability seems to stand in for conquerer, his hawkseye ability for observation and his feats of swordsmanship for armament. It makes him unique and a better character for it.

Since haki was explained, people have been explaining away all sorts of abilities as haki based, which is a bit sad. I'd like to see a bit more of Rokushiki or Okama Kenpo.
 
LonelyGreyWolf said:
That's because it has nothing to do with this. It's not haki, it's overwhelming power and use of fear and superiority. Monet did not get defeated like a person effected by conqueror's haki would be.
Click to expand...

See I'm not entirely sure. Zoro's comment on Fishman Island about needing a new captain if Luffy couldn't pull of CoC the way he did make me think twice. With Monet, she was intimidated into oblivion, I think that was an application of CoC within an actual fight. We won't know for sure for a while yet but with the way Oda likes to drop hints and such I feel like this is the case.

I argued Sanji and Zoro had Haki during Fishman island. Oda had given us plenty of hints but some people wouldn't have it until Luffy outright said it on Punk Hazard.

Sanji is the parallel to Zoro and always will be. Luffy's right hand and his left hand. Even their designs compliment each other, you've got a right eye'd demon and a left eye'd devil. Both will have CoC by the series end I am absolutely certain. Them and Usopp.
 
Zoro's comment is more like "if he couldn't do at least that after two years spent training, he doesn't deserve to be captain."

I don't think it's an admittance that Zoro has conqueror's haki, he was there when Luffy used it to knock out Duval's bull and probably later learned that it was conqueror's haki sometime in the 2 years after.
 
RomanceDawn said:
See I'm not entirely sure. Zoro's comment on Fishman Island about needing a new captain if Luffy couldn't pull of CoC the way he did make me think twice. With Monet, she was intimidated into oblivion, I think that was an application of CoC within an actual fight. We won't know for sure for a while yet but with the way Oda likes to drop hints and such I feel like this is the case.

I argued Sanji and Zoro had Haki during Fishman island. Oda had given us plenty of hints but some people wouldn't have it until Luffy outright said it on Punk Hazard.

Sanji is the parallel to Zoro and always will be. Luffy's right hand and his left hand. Even their designs compliment each other, you've got a right eye'd demon and a left eye'd devil. Both will have CoC by the series end I am absolutely certain. Them and Usopp.
Click to expand...

I disagree entirely.

And regarding your second paragraph, like I mentioned above, Zoro and Sanji used haki on Fishman Island so there's nothing to argue about there, really.
 
Guys...whats with Conqueror's Haki obsession the last pages ? The other Strawhats wont get it and Oda didnt drop any kind of hints why we should expect this. Talk about diminishing returns...this Haki is supposed the special and very rare and some of you act as if the others getting it was a given. Its not like the other Strawhats need it ot have issues taking out Fodder.

We know a handful of people who have...this isnt your standard powerup.
 
I'm just saying Oda had given us clear hints about Zoro and Sanji's haki without actually saying it until Punk Hazard. I was pointing out those hints long before it was confirmed and I think Zoro's CoC hints were the examples I gave above. We'll just have to wait and see.

At CW, we already know through Chinjao that there are plenty of people in the One Piece world with CoC. I don't really care either way who does or does not get it, I just feel like Oda has been setting it up for other Straw Hats for years now.
 
The ONLY other strawhat I feel has a chance to get conqueror's haki is Zoro, and only because of the Rayleigh parallel.
 
RomanceDawn said:
I'm just saying Oda had given us clear hints about Zoro and Sanji's haki without actually saying it until Punk Hazard. I was pointing out those hints long before it was confirmed and I think Zoro's CoC hints were the examples I gave above. We'll just have to wait and see.
Click to expand...

Well, I also pointed out those "hints" long before it was "confirmed" (although it clearly was), and I say Zoro didn't use conqueror's haki, so that gives me as much credibility as anyone. Like you said though, we'll just have to wait and see, but I'm 100% confident that Zoro didn't use conqueror's haki during Punk Hazard, and up until this point I'm 100% confident he has never used it.

While I don't think he'll ever get it, this is where we enter areas of speculation. I can totally see why people think Zoro will get it one day and it's impossible to say at this point, whether he'll get it, but I personally don't think so. Wouldn't make sense. We'll see though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Sports betting |OT|
7
11K
Hideous Snake replied
ItalianGAF |OT| - Italia
3
1K
Azzurri replied
Food |OT| GAFeteria
2
77
18K
SLoWMoTIoN replied
One Piece Manga |OT3| Anything You Can Gum I Can Gum Better
289 290 291 292 293
15K
1M
Aeon712 replied
COMICS!!! |OT| January 2017 This is the Dawning of the Age of Apocalypse
115 116 117 118 119
6K
273K
BenjaminBirdie replied
Top Bottom