Yeah, something like that. You have as much authority as you can bring to the table.Yes, Luffy is that type of character, but the story isn't as pretentious about it. What makes it for me is, that he isn't angsty or annoying. He is a dummy who people follow not because he has any idea how the world works, but because of his positive spirit. While in Naruto people act like Naruto is a genius messiah. Plus, the One Piece main cast isn't getting thrown under the bus.
*sigh* Yeah, it definitely has that.
Honestly, I never felt they went with the Naruto is a messiah thing until way, way later in Shippuden. Before that, he was just a therapist whose appeals only really worked because the people he recruited were highly disturbed and depressed.
I don't find Luffy's approach better in terms of believably or failing that, simple character depth, but Oda is just a flat out better writer than Kishimoto was, and understands how to use foreshadowing, create anticipation, worldbuild, and maintain consistency. I give OP a lot of shit for a lot of stuff, but it's very well crafted in a lot of ways.
Because Oda decided to give the original 7 animal themes, but deviated from the theme as the series progressed.
Would you say that Sengoku having been an admiral in the past means that the Admirals don't have a "famous japanese actor" theme?
I never denied the theme, but it's a trivial gimmick of the characters to help unify things, not an in-story necessity or desire for the postion. No one in the story ever remarked "The WG decides who the Shichibukai candidates are based on their strength, reputation, and if they have an animal theme". I'm not asking why
Oda picked 7 places for Shichibukai, I'm asking why the
World Government did.