i know some people take issue with some of your posts in this thread, and get irritated, which I don't generally find to be the case for myself, as I think you raise a lot of interesting questions and the like, but this really got to me.
It doesn't make me mad, it just makes me sad ;-;
Well, I'll clarify my position a bit.
The issue I take with Luffy is that he is essentially uninvolved in the world changing events he participates in. His motivation for every single arc is fundamentally the same. "My name is
Indigo Montoya Monkey D. Luffy. You
killed my father messed with my friends. Prepare
to die get beat up." At any given modern arc, there is more going on than he realizes or cares about because if he happens to take a liking to the people there, he will fight to defend them. And it so happens that all he needs to do to solve everyone's problems is punch out the leader guy. For example, it's not like he is aware of the horrible shit that Doflamingo did to Law, and I'm pretty sure Rebecca didn't tell him of her family's history. So who was Doflamingo to Luffy? Just some jackass that kept causing a ruckus. So every villain of every arc comes across the same from his perspective. They all have varying personalities and backstories and such, but Luffy doesn't know or care about any of that, they are just people who his friends don't like for reasons he doesn't pay attention to. It makes his fights highly uninvolved and detached.
This moral is mostly taken from Shanks, who in the first chapter outlined his philosophy clearly: "I don't care what you do to me, but anyone who messes with my friends gets fucked, even if they're hte ones in the wrong." Every villain we had so far was unique to one another, but they were such a overtly evil that people uniformally loved what Luffy did, from Morgan to Doflamingo. For example, Doflamingo did a lot of horrible shit, but under his rule, Dressrosa prospered enormously. I questioned highly how the city can possibly come back from the kind of destruction that they were faced. Well, I apparently got the answer in the last Dressrosa chapter: easily. Apparently, they were in the happy process of rebuilding, and going out of their way to make statues even though they apparently had houses to build. The city was almost destroyed, and it's no big deal. The money that Doflamingo provided is gone, and it's no big deal.
So I hope you understand how in any given arc, what Luffy is doing is the least interesting thing going on, partly because it's predictable, partly because I find it inauthentic. In a real life scenerio, there would be a faction of Dressrosa citizens that hate the strawhats because their lives were fantastic before they arrived. I don't mean to say that they are selfish or evil, but it's a human reaction that people won't be happy that their lives got turned over like this, with extreme hardships placed upon them overnight. It'd be more believable that the money that Doflamingo brought in would be sorely needed to help with reparations and bringing livelihood up.
This unanimous love of Luffy is extremely grating then. Even if Dressrosa's citizens are happy that they are free from Doflamingo's rule, Luffy just introduced a whole new set of arduous problems, or by all rights should have, which would have left the Dressrosa citizens feeling atleast conflicted. Like, yeah, my precious owner was a maniac that placed us under a spell, but it was still a comfortable spell where I was happy (Essentially, the matrix problem). But, no, this happens every arc, Luffy punches out the big bad, and everybody loves it, everyone's problems are solved, yay....and as a result, Luffy's beliefs are never meaningfully challenged. For example, I would find it a very interesting situation if Luffy happened to meet one of the villains the first time before he met the innocent victims he's dicking over. Luffy's code only applies to friends, so what if the victims, in pure defense, are changing the tide against the villain, and the villain needs Luffy's help. Well, by how Luffy operates, the villain is his friend, so that would obligate him to help him crush the victims instead. But I doubt we're ever going to get that situation. Alternatively, Luffy would be so much more interesting to me if he actually considered the various dynamics of the world going on around him. He's after pure freedom, as he's said multiple times, but he's never abused his freedom, not out of some moral code, but just because he hasn't been inclined to do so. Take Bart, however, who has been relentlessly cruel to others, cutting out someone's tongue for a remark against Luffy. He's essentially following the same code of ethos that Luffy is, but he also enjoys causing people pain as long as they're not friends of his. Luffy doesn't know about this, Bart's just his fanboy. But what if he did? What would happen if Luffy looks at the generation for who he is an example and sees all the pain he has wrought by inspiring his principles in others?
I feel like Gon from Hunter X Hunter is what I would like Luffy to be. He's a bright eyed, generally nice kid, who only really gets mad if you mess with his friends. But whereas that series doesn't shy away from how alien and disturbing this can make him if placed in the right situation, Luffy is just this concept romanticized and kept away from more realistic (and, imo, interesting) consequences of having such an overly simplistic, extremist personality of "hurt friends, will fight". It will never have him befriend a monster wherein his moral code then obligates him to participate in atrocities, his actions will never come to a head where he has to regret the pain he has unintentionally caused others (I don't consider Impel Down to be an example because we have yet to see anything the inmates he let out did), because if they did, Luffy's character would break in one of two ways. He would either have to abandon his current lifestyle of 'living without regrets' and finally develop away from what we know him as now. Or else he can stay the same, indifferent of the pain he has wrought because he wants ultimate freedom to do the fuck he wants, then he becomes become, atleast a little, a monster himself.
So, TLDR, I view Luffy as too highly romanticized to see as an actual character that's interesting. He is a functional Deus Ex Machina that we are following throughout the world. A savior that just happens to show up to beat the evil bad guy for no real reason other than that he's just looking out for his friends, who are obviously all decent people themselves. This is also why I enjoyed the Enies Lobby arc, since that's the one time that Luffy's management of his friends (regarding Usopp) is put under question and pressure. I wish more of that happened. As it is, any emotional investment people get from any arc is from pasts that Luffy never sees, from people Luffy only barely talks to, and then saves because he can. So when I say that I consider Luffy to be at his most interesting when he is on unsteady ground with himself, I'm telling the truth. But I also hate that he's not anywhere near that 99% of the time, so in effect I highly dislike him.
Edit: If anyone is preparing to have another megadebate about this, just know that I'm not interested in this one. I just wanted to clarify my take on Luffy for Pegosaurus. Unlike most things I bring up, I feel that this delves more into subjective opinion than any objective fact might be gleamed from it through debate. Luffy bugged me for a long, long time and I couldn't put my finger on why until about a year ago, where I discovered the real problem was that I just didn't believe in him as a character. No amount of evidence anyone here can provide is really going to change that. If there is anything you wish me to clarify, I'd be down with that, but I'm not looking for a fight on this one.