So it looks like the LR is going to do way worse then I expected.Sub 140 seats would be really awful for the LR.
So it looks like the LR is going to do way worse then I expected.Sub 140 seats would be really awful for the LR.
I may have mixed things up a bit, nobody is saying that. You are saying the assembly is not legitimate. For me it is, since the voters chose who they wanted.What are you talking about ? (highlighted parts) Who said "I'm not represented " ?
This is where we disagree, people who didn't vote were conscious of their choice, they had the option of clearly stating "there is not a good choice to make" by voting blank.I really don't understand how you're adressing my initial poin : the lack of legitimacy of a National Assembly elected by less than 50% of the registered voters with a really bad electoral system for representativeness.
It was an exaggerated example to show my point, I didn't wanted to be realistic. So yeah, an example.
"If the participation was 90% with a suffrage exprimé of 20%"
It just isn't realistic given our current electoral system, bad example
And since people chose to not go vote, you can argue all you want about the legitimacy from a moral, philosophical or I don't know what point of view, it is representative."legitimacy is achieved from a legal point of view. "
Of course that wasn't the strickly legal one that I was talking about
I'm sorry but check the definition of moral : I am not saying this is bad not to vote, I'm not speaking of duty. I'm saying that your vision of an assembly that is not legitimate after 50% of people didn't go vote is wrong, because the voting system from a technical point of view evolves and allows you to vote for no one.And of course you're taking moral stances : your whole "if you're not voting blanc then you can't voice any concern" isn't "plain logic", it's an opinion. A very common one tbh, I've already discussed it on this thread with people that didn't understand that their point of view on abstention (civic duty, we don't care if you don't show up etc) is totally off-ground and therefore they don't understand the whole issue (as you clearly don't).
le Figaro said:Législatives : l'aile droite des Républicains en danger
Thierry Mariani, Jean-Frédéric Poisson et Jacques Myard
Des fondateurs de la Droite populaire en passant par le Parti chrétien-démocrate et Sens commun, les députés sortants ou les candidats de l'aile droite des Républicains sont en mauvaise posture. Les candidats modérés s'en sortent mieux.
Yep, they are saying the hard right ones are not doing well, the UDI and the moderates are standing out.My French is kind of rusty, but is Le Fígaro making a clear distinction between right wing politicians and centrists? That feels so refreshingly honest for a conservative paper coming from a country where the hard right tries to pass as centrist just to save face.
My French is kind of rusty, but is Le Fígaro making a clear distinction between right wing politicians and centrists? That feels so refreshingly honest for a conservative paper coming from a country where the hard right tries to pass as centrist just to save face.
I wish I could say the same, but I expect my proxy vote will not be handled in time (it also happened on first turn of the presidentials, I was able to vote myself on the two others)a voté
Sad for Bayrou that may have lost because of the very same argument...The French electoral system is so uniquely biased towards centrists because of the two round run-off system that I'm kind of surprised there hasn't been a major centrist insurgency in France before (I know Bayrou came close). Especially in two person run-offs, the rallying effect of the losing wing in any given constituency throwing their lot in with the centrist because at least he's not the other guy is powerful. Combine this with a Presidential mandate, PS in shambles, LR in search of an identity, and low voter turnout reducing the likelihood of three and four-person runoffs and you see a landslide like this.
Pretty fun to look back at some pundits who said that even if Macron won the Presidency, he would never win a majority.
BREAKING: French polling agencies project that President Macron's new centrist party takes large majority in parliament.
First projections are here:
Less seats for Macron than polls predicted, but still a very comfortable majority.
Socialists not imploding completely is good I guess.
8 Seats for the FN sucks. Was hoping for below 5.
Hahaha Philippot beaten.
Get shit on. Twat.
I'm not sure they'll have a reliable majority, though. Some part of the elected EM will probably voice their disagreements, especially if there's a margin...311 seats, they have the majority without Modem (577 seats total)
Le Pen doubling down on her usual bs talking points and crying a river about not having PR.
Well, I would love to see no FN in the Assembly, but I agree. There's a real issue there.Le Pen doubling down on her usual bs talking points and crying a river about not having PR.
Well, I would love to see no FN in the Assembly, but I agree. There's a real issue there.
I'm not insane enough to think that Mitterand had many reasons to change the rules (and Chirac as much to change them back), but I believe the rules introduced by Mitterand were better. Even if that meant a lot of FN people in Assembly.
Because, there's hypocrisy involved. Either they're not following the rules and they should be banned from elections, full stop. Or they're allowed to enter them, and people voting for them should at least see some presence in the Assembly.
The current system is awfully bad for getting people involved in the elections, and unsatisfying from a philosophical point of view.
I hope Bayrou will prevail on this, and Macron keep his promises on this point.
I'm super biased so I'm glad they are only getting 8 mps and I wish they had gotten even less but I think she's absolutely right about the lack of representation. There are millions of FN supporters who won't be represented. A party as big as the FN should have way more elected mps.
Well, I would love to see no FN in the Assembly, but I agree. There's a real issue there.
Can't see the PCF being in the same group as FI after what happened before that.
Well, I'm not that fond of the man, but I agree with a lot of his positions (including supporting Macron without having much respect for him), and I respect him for the choices he made sometimes, knowing it wouldn't be popular... I would be fine with him being the compass if someone like Borloo was at Matignon to handle the affairs.Except for Bayrou. Most useless politician in History. I wish Macron had gotten rid of him
Both borloo and Bayrou have a reputation for being personable but basically lazy slackers. At least for all his problems Macron has 'gnaque' so it's probably good that if someone got elected, it's him. I hope he gets rid of Bayrou asap. He doesn't need him.Well, I'm not that fond of the man, but I agree with a lot of his positions (including supporting Macron without having much respect for him), and I respect him for the choices he made sometimes, knowing it wouldn't be popular... I would be fine with him being the compass if someone like Borloo was at Matignon to handle the affairs.
I think you'll get your wish, in any case, I fully expect Macron to accept support when he need it and throw it away as soon as it's not welcome anymore.
I'm in slow internet right now so I can't check but I'm curious if
A) Villani (fields medalist and dandy) got elected
That's my circonscriptionI'm in slow internet right now so I can't check but I'm curious if
A) Villani (fields medalist and dandy) got elected
With 47.5% first turn and a 30% lead, I can't see him loosing, but I don't think results are available yet.I'm in slow internet right now so I can't check but I'm curious if
A) Villani (fields medalist and dandy) got elected
For Bayrou, no doubt, I'm not even sure it's just a reputation, but Borloo, I'm not convinced he even have this reputation, and should he have it, he sure doesn't deserve it. He's basically the opposite, a busy guy, hard at work, and also honest. How many people would have resigned their mandate because, due to health problem, they thought they couldn't invest themselves as much as they should in their work?Both borloo and Bayrou have a reputation for being personable but basically lazy slackers.
I've liked the guy for quite some time (before politics obviously) and he's always sounded sensible, so that makes me pretty happy.There is something a bit bonkers about him going to politics and he'll probably be a pretty bad MP - but I can't help but feel it's pretty cool
I'd say there's a LOT of things a bit bonkers about him in the past years, politics is just the last one, and one that was to be expected considering the recent years.There is something a bit bonkers about him going to politics and he'll probably be a pretty bad MP - but I can't help but feel it's pretty cool
Fair enough - I might have watched too much guignols at some point (stopped long time ago thankfully )With 47.5% first turn and a 30% lead, I can't see him loosing, but I don't think results are available yet.
For Bayrou, no doubt, I'm not even sure it's just a reputation, but Borloo, I'm not convinced he even have this reputation, and should he have it, he sure doesn't deserve it. He's basically the opposite, a busy guy, hard at work, and also honest. How many people would have resigned their mandate because, due to health problem, they thought they couldn't invest themselves as much as they should in their work?
Sure enough, they were harsh with him... ^_^Fair enough - I might have watched too much guignols at some point (stopped long time ago thankfully )
I'm in slow internet right now so I can't check but I'm curious if
A) Villani (fields medalist and dandy) got elected
B) how did minority candidates do (I know that LREM had a historic number of minority candidates but not sure how well they did)
There is something a bit bonkers about him going to politics and he'll probably be a pretty bad MP - but I can't help but feel it's pretty cool