Didn't mean to imply otherwise.
Well in any case, that doesn't change my opinion on live action
That just looks really awkward
Didn't mean to imply otherwise.
Cowboy Bebop is an interesting anime that caters to the western audience and doesn't even follow a typical anime plot and just does random contained episodes similar to western cartoons up until the finale where there is a 2 or 3 parter for an ending.
is this the same kotaku guy that claimed cowboy bebop invented jazz?
Speaking of live action, Jellyfish Princess has a pretty great looking LA adaptation that's a nice in-between of j-drama and anime that'd be a nice compromise for non-fans of anime:
It's worth pointing out here that Cowboy Bebop was not created with an eye towards Western audiences (unlike, say, Space Dandy, where simultaneous international airings were a part of a business strategy from the beginning), it was just Shinichiro Watanabe and company making what they wanted to make. It was also massively popular and successful in Japan..
What the actual...
Kotaku, not even once.
Is there an equivalent to Feminist Frequency for anime? Seems like such a group would be useful to promote anime that deals with gender issues well and both help steer people in the direction of better anime and help steer the average show in a more palatable direction.
Didn't know this. The structure of the show still feels very western like what I'd watch of Batman TAS back in the day.
It's super popular in the west too, never even leaving the Adult Swim lineup of shows because it never really drops in viewership. Probably the easiest recommendation to make.
Ah yes, there's going to be such a good selection of gender equality-critiquing anime from a country that doesn't even rank in the top 100 for women's rights.
If otaku are outcasts, what are bronies?
I'm not even sure how you reached that conclusion, nevermind that adaptations don't always follow the rules established by the original work.
The show isn't too out there, that's ridiculous. Kill la Kill shit is every where anime.some things just work better animated than they do in live action. KLK is definitely one of those things. I get that the perversion is not for everyone..its not. But it is a major part of what the series is (for better or for worse) and the live action version would have to cut that and that would more than likely alienate the fanbase and to what purpose? The show's premise is still too out there for most people so that is another thing that would have to be edited. Then there is the action. This is the main thing that would not translate..that is the best aspect of animation because you can do whatever the hell you want. So that is a lot of things that would have to be changed for it to work. Then what is the point.
That is why people wouldn't want to see a live action version..it would be a bad adaptation.
I use Kill la Kill as an example. It's one of many shows that show these pervy scenes that people are OK with. You're simply ignoring the point of the question.Not sure why you're so fixated on Kill la Kill. As I said, I don't watch live action adaptions of any anime or manga, because I personally have no interest in it. If I want to watch something that's not animated, I watch American stuff like Fargo, Game of Thrones etc.
Coincidentally, much of Batman TAS was animated in Japan!
Watanabe and his team were certainly influenced by Western media when making Cowboy Bebop, which is a big reason why it found so much success over here, but that's different from making a conscious decision to appeal to Westerners. A lot of the best anime directors are people who are interested in a wide variety of film and television from outside their medium and incorporate those influences into their work, no matter who their works are aimed at.
These are just excuses from not wanting to honestly answer the question. The answer is both terrifying and sobering. No one is their right mind would watch a Kill la Kill live action just because of the ages involved.
It's not that anime is for pedos, but drawn people seem to get a pass for when lewd or pervy things happen.
They would use adults like they do now with shows that are live instead of anime.
There's really no level of pandering close to that of anime that a western live action show could get away with.The live action KLK argument kind of falls apart when you think about how often teenage characters are portrayed in a sexualized manner in live action, just played by adults so that makes it okay. The example of Transformers was used earlier in this thread as a case where it's apparently fine and it's been done in two of those movies. Yeah KLK is on another level from those but the supposition that underage actors would actually be used is a stretch that's makes the argument not even worth considering when the real issue of teenage characters being portrayed as objects of desire is hardly exclusive to anime and manga and focusing so hard on it frankly starts to come across as concern trolling in my view much of the time when the real issue is that people take offense to or are weirded out by sexualized content in a 2D medium in the first place, which is a lot harder to argue against.
I mean Teen Sex Comedy is a whole genre of American live action films for fuck's sake!
Coincidentally, much of Batman TAS was animated in Japan!
Watanabe and his team were certainly influenced by Western media when making Cowboy Bebop, which is a big reason why it found so much success over here, but that's different from making a conscious decision to appeal to Westerners. A lot of the best anime directors are people who are interested in a wide variety of film and television from outside their medium and incorporate those influences into their work, no matter who their works are aimed at.
There's really no level of pandering close to that of anime that a western live action show could get away with.
Although if next week on Arrow, the camera could stop and focus on the sun setting behind the shape of Thea's labia (beneath panties of course) as she does a slow motion handstand kick, I would tune in.
Probably why I've been enjoying a lot Masaaki Yuasa's works. He has a lot of influences from Tex Avery, Ladislas Starevich, Wallace and Gromit, Fantastic Planet and so on, and it shows in a lot of his works. He was even a guest animator for the episode Food Chain in Adventure Time.
And? That's not what I asked. The fact you go to "they would use adults" is answer enough, it seems.
There is such a huge range of characters sizes that we wouldn't even be watching the same show.
To me being nude is not the same as being sexualized. There is so much worse that is mainstream.
How would you feel if the characters are played by adults but are still labeled as 17 year olds in the movie? That's what a lot of teen comedy's do and it's apparently okay.And? That's not what I asked. The fact you go to "they would use adults" is answer enough, it seems.
How would you feel if the characters are played by adults but are still labeled as 17 year olds in the movie? That's what a lot of teen comedy's do and it's apparently okay.
You're really trying hard not to say yes or no. I said if it had the budget to make it live action scene for scene, would you watch it? There's a lot of deflection to this question with "it's not anime so no!", "it would be changed". If it was a frame by frame adaption of the anime with a big enough budget to make it identical, would you watch it?
I'm OK with that. Those teen comedies aren't being as detailed. There is a difference between alluding to teenagers having sex and having a sexy body to "let's depict her vagina so clearly when she transforms."
It's funny that you keep bringing up genitals while those are the one thing anime isn't even allowed to show.I'm OK with that. Those teen comedies aren't being as detailed. There is a difference between alluding to teenagers having sex and having a sexy body to "let's depict her vagina so clearly when she transforms."
Would it really be any more tasteful if the character was a couple years older?
It's funny that you keep bringing up genitals while those are the one thing anime isn't even allowed to show.
No, but it would be more understandable if it was a 20-year-old because you can write it off as some guy's jerk off material. The younger the are the weirder the territory.
You can still do that with Kill la Kill. Imaishi, the director, (who I strongly dislike, by the way) is a pretty perverted guy and includes a lot of crass sexual humor in all his works. He made a show called Panty and Stocking with Garterbelt, after all.
You'll still have to explain to me how Shannon Elizabeth, playing a highschool aged girl, masturbating topless in American Pie is less explicit than kill la kill.It's not showing it 100% clearly but when they do the close up of the behind shots you understand what they're going for. Compare it to a Miyazaki film where if there's underwear involved it's really benign and not super detailed.
You're missing the point entirely. At a point you have to think, "why am I watching a 17-year-old girl transform where she's wearing this super revealing outfit... wait did it just zoom in on her vagina being pulled by her outfit?" You can consider that spank bank material but then people might just raise questions. I use Kill la Kill as a reference because it's on the edge of 17 and 18, but there's much more anime out there that use younger students. Erina Nakiri is 16 in Shokegi no Shoma. I just don't get how people can be comfortable watching certain scenes like that and think, "that's a good show to recommend to people" when, if it was live action, you would probably stay away from a show where the 16-year-old character is there for your sex enjoyment instead of being an actual character.
You'll still have to explain to me how Shannon Elizabeth, playing a highschool aged girl, masturbating topless in American Pie is less explicit than kill la kill.
And? I still find wrong doing in that as well. Compared to anime like Kill la Kill Transformers is super, super tame.A lot of people turned out to see Transformers and didn't even think of that.
Oh, yeah, I was actually thinking about that one earlier, too.
You'll still have to explain to me how Shannon Elizabeth, playing a highschool aged girl, masturbating topless in American Pie is less explicit than kill la kill.
You're really trying hard not to say yes or no. I said if it had the budget to make it live action scene for scene, would you watch it? There's a lot of deflection to this question with "it's not anime so no!", "it would be changed". If it was a frame by frame adaption of the anime with a big enough budget to make it identical, would you watch it?
And? I still find wrong doing in that as well. Compared to anime like Kill la Kill Transformers is super, super tame.
Not defending American Pie but I understand what they're going for: male fantasy at a young age. Sure, it came off as misogynistic and dumb, but for a movie where 4 dudes want to lose their virginity before prom it makes sense and the women are their conquests but their hearts get captured instead. It's less explicit because Kill la Kill adds in explicit scenes for no reason. At least American Pie has a reason why there's topless chicks in each movie.
And? I still find wrong doing in that as well. Compared to anime like Kill la Kill Transformers is super, super tame.
Not defending American Pie but I understand what they're going for: male fantasy at a young age. Sure, it came off as misogynistic and dumb, but for a movie where 4 dudes want to lose their virginity before prom it makes sense where the women are their conquests but their hearts get captured instead. It's less explicit because Kill la Kill adds in explicit scenes for no reason. At least American Pie has a reason why there's topless chicks in each movie. What's the reason why for (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jR5HqMMLDo) (NSFW) flapping boobies, close up us ass, and vagina?
Both are serving the same point, male titillation.Not defending American Pie but I understand what they're going for: male fantasy at a young age. Sure, it came off as misogynistic and dumb, but for a movie where 4 dudes want to lose their virginity before prom it makes sense where the women are their conquests but their hearts get captured instead. It's less explicit because Kill la Kill adds in explicit scenes for no reason. At least American Pie has a reason why there's topless chicks in each movie. What's the reason why for (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jR5HqMMLDo) (NSFW) flapping boobies, close up us ass, and vagina?
I'm not excusing it, I'm saying this isn't a reason that anime fans should exclusively feel shame. This kind of presentation is a problem across media at large and your attempts to paint it as Japanese animation's unique problem are growing increasingly more tortured and desperate.
If they got Shannon Elizabeth to do it yes. Would still be tamer than her masterbation scene.
Both are serving the same point, male titillation.
If you grab up the narrative from American Pie as valid excuse you can do the same with Kill la kill and say that those suits only work that way because life fibers blablabla...
None of that makes the scene itself less or more explicit.
You're missing the point entirely. At a point you have to think, "why am I watching a 17-year-old girl transform where she's wearing this super revealing outfit... wait did it just zoom in on her vagina being pulled by her outfit?" You can consider that spank bank material but then that might just raise questions. I use Kill la Kill as a reference because it's on the edge of 17 and 18, but there's much more anime out there that use younger students (I say students because a lot of these anime want to reference just how young they are). Erina Nakiri is 16 in Shokegi no Shoma. I just don't get how people can be comfortable watching certain scenes with her and think, "that's a good show to recommend to people" when, if it was live action, you would probably stay away from a show where the 16-year-old character is there for your sex enjoyment instead of being an actual character. Compared to Shameless Season 1 with Karen you can understand what they were going for.
I didn't watch Kill la Kill (past a Japanese stream of the first episode) because I hate Imaishi's style and try to avoid all his works. I'm just trying to explain the reason why it has sexual content and the context behind it.
Also, while I'm not fond of everything in the Soma series, Erina is an actual character.
It's the money.
Most geek culture is owned and run by Western megacorps, while anime IPs are held by Japanese companies that don't always see eye-to-eye with Western licensees. The rise of huge geek culture events as all-media gatherings has coincided with geek culture starting to make tons of money for the big media conglomerates, and with Western-made games themselves becoming extremely successful on a worldwide scale. Anime is not effectively monetized in the US. If you have control and ownership over something you're selling, you're going to put it front and center ahead of somebody else's property.
Sorry but that's just silly pedantry. You think anyone who sees those two scenes side by side will go "oh that cartoon is much more explicit"How does life fibers lead to close up of Ryuko's body every transformation? Is her vagina the source of her power? I am legit confused. Isn't it blood being fed to Senketsu? Serving the same point is correct but they are there for different reasons. American Pie is just more valid than random upskirt shots.
Yeah, media does make women sexy. What other medium does this to this extent and to young girls so commonly?
Sorry but that's just silly pedantry. You think anyone who sees those two scenes side by side will go "oh that cartoon is much more explicit"
Can you list 20 where young teenagers are sexy and are flaunted so obviously? I can do that with anime. Heck, one of the "better" anime of last year was No Game, No Life and the female protagonist... WOW (not in a good way).Comic books, though they've gotten better about it in recent years. Recent development.
Films and TV do it more often than you probably even think about, it's just not as visually arresting because of the restrictions of the medium.