but Anne I like watching tanks melt when I discord them ;_;
Happens a lot. Not much you can do about your teammates unless you pick them. You can tell them to come to the objective but they still might not. At higher levels in competitive it's rarely a problem though. If your team does overextend you might have to be prepared to speed boost them back to the team.I just got the game last week and have played Lucio most of the time so I can get a hang of the game while trying to help out my team. But the most frustrating thing for me is trying to hang near the objective so to help heal teammates but they are no where near the damned objective. Like they are hiding worried about their k/d ratio instead of the objective.
Because I said a character isn't the best pick for all maps? I don't use reaper everywhere, and when I do it's solely because the zencio meta makes flankers who can back up ridiculously hard to finish off.
Back on topic though, Junkrat does a lot of AoE damage to tanks but it wont kill them that often as the game currently is with double supports. He might if the other team doesn't understand some stuff, but he's not as good of a choice as another high priority target DPS.
Switching characters if needed should be a "hey, we need an x, can anyone do that?" talk, not something people take direct offense by, since a lot of people would currently eat a loss if they know they were the best on their team rather than a win.
Plenty of interesting characters, and they choose the most boring one...
Looking to build a 65+ team on competitive for PC. Anybody interested? Looking for players with peak 65+
Who do you consider the best pick for all maps? I've played Junkrat on all maps and will do fine as long as I have a good coodinated team and I've done my fair share of taking down most of the enemy teams at times. I'm not even exaggerating. I've seen bad Junkrats play it too safe and they barely get any kills. It depends on how you play him just like with any other hero. It's not all set in stone.
Switching heroes is nothing new. Of course we will switch if there's a troublesome player on the other team that is domninating us. ex: I will switch to Winston for an annoying Genji or Soldier for Pharah. But if we're winning, there's no need to switch for the sake of switching.
Depends on the map, depends who you're playing with. Junkrat just isn't really that good compared to many other heroes- he gets too much aoe damage that does nothing while the majority of the dps characters you can take instead can really make work. You'd pretty much be better off with a McCree usually in his same role if no one is switching heroes for their mains, since he's more deadly and in similar positions, except he has tools to directly deal with flankers.
*Assuming everyone is competent
Now in reality you'll have a mccree anyways for the proper dps so he shouldn't be there so you can have a flanker or such, which is the choice between "do I want a junkrat or a <insert flanker>", in which case the flanker is much more efficient at killing high value targets.
I use reaper and Zarya on every map because im the best
you didn't answer my question for best pick. and no, McCree is not that great especially on consoles. he hardly dominates Comp matches I've played. killed him more than he killed me cuz i always know he will try to flank and most of my groups know when to hide when he does his Ult. but if you think Junkrat is weak then so be it. he's been working well for me.
Good.
I'd be interested and actually do play Zenyatta and Reinhardt (though mostly Lucio), but I'm not 65+.
Also what's your avatar from, can you PM me a full version pls.
Meet a better McCree
McCree isn't a sniper anymore, his flashbang is a tool to kill a flanker. If your McCree can't flash+fth hes awful, you need no aim.
And I didn't answer it because it's not relevant. There is no 'best pick' for all situations or this meta gets even more boring (minus zencio) and it's moreso that junkrat gets melted by flankers while having an additional flanker in his spot is better. Unless you're replacing a different slot with him, which is a fairly bad idea anyways.
He's 'useable' if the other team is bad, but it's definitely making your day way harder than it needs to be.
McCree is best general DPS pick on all the attack/defend maps. Best general DPS on KoTH is probably Tracer but you can argue Reaper.
And yeah this is probably the worst meta OW has ever had for pick variety.
McCree is best general DPS pick on all the attack/defend maps. Best general DPS on KoTH is probably Tracer but you can argue Reaper.
And yeah this is probably the worst meta OW has ever had for pick variety.
i edited my post., I met a Top 500 McCree and I still slaughtered him. he was lucky he had a good D.Va who carried their team.
and why do you keep mentioning metas. i'm mentioning my own experiences and I've dominated with Junkrat so I will keep playing Junkrat. Plus he's a fun hero.
I think mccree is now 100% anti flanker following his latest update not a flanker. The buffed fth speed and need to his range.you didn't answer my question for best pick. and no, McCree is not that great especially on consoles. he hardly dominates Comp matches I've played. killed him more than he killed me cuz i always know he will try to flank and most of my groups know when to hide when he does his Ult. even when we got MMed with Top 500 group, I was destroying their McCree with my Junkrat constantly. but if you think Junkrat is weak then so be it. he's been working well for me.
Zarya is legit amazing. I would say the best hero.
Yes. I want to argue reaper, but really, tracer is such a headache.
This meta has no pick variety. Even with McCree being worse, hes still the optimal choice for maiming flankers like no tomorrow just by hitting his CD. That's 3 slots filled, then you have your tank/2 tanks based on your other two choices.
It just doesn't leave much room for many other characters unless you're innovating. And sure, if you want to innovate with Mei or Junkrat, go for it, but if the pros aren't doing it every map, your strategy is probably not going to work better than them to win a 6v6 with a team kill.
You met a bad McCree then. There are some good ones.
And I mention the meta because in the 70s you meet some full teams who actually play the meta and will run you into the ground for running a defense hero on most maps.
Also Anne I'm pretty sure plays both PS4 and PC, so...
Nah, I just play PC. I have friends that are 75~ on PS4 so I go hang with them and talk about the game with them.
The major thing about playing off meta on console is that console has a lower skill ceiling and is less competitive in general. Just meansaying you can get away with more off meta than normal on PC.
lol well what level are you? Ill give you a try and see if we have any synergy together
And it is Sabrewulf from Killer Instinct
New pic from the upcoming animated short.
Nah, I just play PC. I have friends that are 75~ on PS4 so I go hang with them and talk about the game with them.
The major thing about playing off meta on console is that console has a lower skill ceiling and is less competitive in general. Just meansaying you can get away with more off meta than normal on PC.
sorry, but everything you said hasn't happened to me in my experience in Comp so if i do happen to play against another top 500 McCree who's good and can dominate our team, I'll let you know.
I don't know what to do against a good Zarya.
How much better do they need to make Ana to make her relevant?
Why the hell would you choose Torb on KotH
Junkrat's riptire seems useless on PC, it gets destroyed almost every time.
Depends on the map, depends who you're playing with. Junkrat just isn't really that good compared to many other heroes- he gets too much aoe damage that does nothing while the majority of the dps characters you can take instead can really make work. You'd pretty much be better off with a McCree usually in his same role if no one is switching heroes for their mains, since he's more deadly and in similar positions, except he has tools to directly deal with flankers.
*Assuming everyone is competent.
Looking to build a 65+ team on competitive for PC. Anybody interested? Looking for players with peak 65+
As of two days ago I was level 67 and climbing at a pretty steady rate. Then I had some bad luck monday.....losing 12 games in a row. It didnt matter how good I played, things just always ended badly. Games with 4 golds, bad coinflips, team mates leaving even when we were dominating, etc. And apparently when you go on a losing streak it starts to rank you down an entire level per loss, which is kind of bs, but that is a different story.
Anyways, I think I have had enough of trying to solo it. I want to start building a well rounded team that can communicate and pick heros that are needed rather than being selfish.
My two mains are D.VA and Reaper. I have been working with Ana recently as well with some success, but still could improve on her.
Would love to get a good Rein and Zenyatta on my team. Anyways, if anybody is interested in building a team with me that would be awesome.
aww, thought you did. And yes, you can get away with some weird stuff on console that a smart team of 6can just run you through for.which rarely happens
Well you also just hit 65, it's...very different than top 500. Like an ocean apart in how people play. A counterargument to why Junkrat is a very bad pick on most maps isn't really "I haven't met a good McCree" since the role McCree fills nowadays is very easy. Junkrat should be taking a flankers spot, and in most cases, it just simply isn't worth it.
As Anne said, you can get away with a lot more on console, but a team that knows what it's doing will be able to autopilot a win.
PC meta=console meta minus snipers, just less people follow it because they're less competitive. It doesn't mean they still can't get punished for it.
How can you have too much AOE? lol.
In an ideal situation, Junkrat is softening folks up while the others are are picking them off. If he's getting too many kills himself, that itself is an anomaly. He should be dealing the most damage for sure but not most kills.
I do feel like Defense heroes are pretty misunderstood currently. Most don't capitalize on their strengths on an individual and a team level which is a real shame.
I know Bastion works, but he's a bit hard to work against her when there's a Genji on your ass and a Junkrat spamming shit at you lol.-stand far enough away where leazer beam wont hit you
-shoot her a couple of times to bait out the bubble
-wait for the bubble to end
-shoot her and kill her
Bastion is super good against Zarya surprisingly.
I know Bastion works, but he's a bit hard to work against her when there's a Genji on your ass and a Junkrat spamming shit at you lol.
I mean there's nothing wrong with playing off meta if you don't intend to climb to the top and you have fun on a character. You should probably know the game well enough at some point to know there's almost always a better choice than Junk rat, but until you hit a point that you can't win or aren't having fun with him you can keep playing him.
In LoL I'm actually pretty trash so I just play off meta champs I have fun on if they can work in the comp. It's nbd. If I did wanna climb though I'd have to learn some meta picks but that's not my jam.
I know I talk about meta a lot, but just because you know metake doesn't mean you have to always play it. I run Mei picks sometimes cause I like Mei and im confident I can make it work on some maps, but I know there's a less risky pick.
FYI, i'm 66 now and i've played with plenty of players in 70's on most of my games. we're constantly get matched up with high 60's to low 70's including top 500 players.
How can you have too much AOE? lol.
In an ideal situation, Junkrat is softening folks up while the others are are picking them off. If he's getting too many kills himself, that itself is an anomaly. He should be dealing the most damage for sure but not most kills.
I do feel like Defense heroes are pretty misunderstood currently. Most don't capitalize on their strengths on an individual and a team level which is a real shame.
I mean there's nothing wrong with playing off meta if you don't intend to climb to the top and you have fun on a character. You should probably know the game well enough at some point to know there's almost always a better choice than Junk rat, but until you hit a point that you can't win or aren't having fun with him you can keep playing him.
In LoL I'm actually pretty trash so I just play off meta champs I have fun on if they can work in the comp. It's nbd. If I did wanna climb though I'd have to learn some meta picks but that's not my jam.
I know I talk about meta a lot, but just because you know metake doesn't mean you have to always play it. I run Mei picks sometimes cause I like Mei and im confident I can make it work on some maps, but I know there's a less risky pick.
Why the hell would you choose Torb on KotH
I just don't enjoy meta talk when it's framed in the "This is the right way to do it" rather than the "This is the most popular and followed upon." It makes the discussion feel suffocating especially when this game has a lot of moving parts that change how things should be approached at any given time.
I just don't enjoy meta talk when it's framed in the "This is the right way to do it" rather than the "This is the most popular and followed upon." It makes the discussion feel suffocating especially when this game has a lot of moving parts that change how things should be approached at any given time.
I see what you mean. Think their jumps are for different purposes. Lucio climbs and jumps walls to escape or evade while junkrat uses his jumps to shoot down (I assume as I don't play him) and his mine to escape.
think this depends on the role and how much you play your main in comparison to your secondaries. DPS would require the most time investments as they are hardest and most important. I've got about 10+ hours in most DPS but don't feel comfortable with them for comp. Similar hours on Zen but feel can do well with him as I'm used to support as I have almost 90 hours on Lucio so I know when and who to heal, positioning and can see what's happening easier than a DPS can.
Think I read somewhere genji does everything tracer can but better. Better mobility, can escape easier and better ult. Tracer seems to work for me though I guess. Probably cos she targets healers so know what they would do I guess.
The issue is junkrat becomes junk damage in the 70s in most situation, since ultfeeding tanks can be better spent on an alt hero.
This is exactly how I feel every time I come in here and people tell me I'm playing it wrong even tho I've been doing well. Whatever, I think I'm done with this meta talk. If I reach 70's before deadline, I will let you know if you meta guys were right or not. Comparing us to pros is not how I want to think of this game.
Eh, you do remember the last meta report from Captain Planet, right? Junkrat jumped up right underneath D.Va and Tracer in the last tournament and occupies the same tier as Roadhog. Captain Planet's analysis was "Finally, Junkrat gained significant ground this week – escaping the F Tier as pros realized they still needed a consistent, AOE damage-dealing replacement from the liability that Pharah has become."
I've linked this before and I don't think anyone paid it any attention but Junkrat is most certainly not useless and most certainly still has a role, even in the new meta. It's telling when the Pros break a hero out to change the meta and I believe Junk is still effective at killing Lucio and Zen from a distance and over obstacles and can make life difficult for Genji and Tracer.
I just don't enjoy meta talk when it's framed in the "This is the right way to do it" rather than the "This is the most popular and followed upon." It makes the discussion feel suffocating especially when this game has a lot of moving parts that change how things should be approached at any given time.
It won't really prove that much though. Many teams could probably run Mei on every map, they're just making it a harder win, it's not impossible.
My rank is 215 I think. In competitive highest was 68 (like 1% off 69) but right now it's 67.Responding to the bolded. WOW! What Rank are you? I have 42 hours total play time with a little over a 1/4th of them on Lucio. I am small potatoes.
I always get confused when people say defense heroes are weak when junkrat behind reins shield is a solid alternative to pharah in terms of aoe damage and he can out put solid damage to take out enemy reins shield or just spamming grenades on payloads to get enemies off.
He might be overshadowed by pharah but he is no slouch. Defense heroes are weak yes but not junkrat.
Junkrat is the exception to this rule, though. The others are situational, and if given the choice, I would rather help my team with a Support or Tank Hero, as at least I can feel like I'm contributing to the cause.