Yeah I thought Spongebob Square pants getting an 8.9 was kinda weird toochespace said:no good can come of this.
LinesInTheSand said:and Halo 1 = most overrated game of 2001. Halo 2 will be the most overrated game of 2004. Comon man.
chespace said:no good can come of this.
unkasa said:I've yet to try Halo 2 out, but I have to concur with LineInTheSand. Halo is about as overrated as a game can be. With tediously conventional gameplay and interchangeable level design, I'm always puzzled by the love it receives. In recent memory, I haven't played a FPS as dry. With all of that said, however, I've read that Bungie rushed Halo, something they've sworn against doing this time around. I think Halo 2 will be what Halo failed at becoming.
Spike said:I was hoping that Kojima would've cut down on all the long-winded cutscenes and codec sequences, but looks as though I was wrong.
MarkMacD said:No, you were right. The game just has one in the beginning to give you all the necessary info to start playing, basically.
If they give it lower than they gave Halo (a 10) then they'd better prepare themselvesSpike said:XBN gave it a lower rating then?
GhaleonEB said:In case anyone missed it in the 19-page thread over at TeamXBox, Live co-op is in.
And so is the fuel rod gun.
CrimsonSkies said:Great score. Anyone who says Halo is overated when it's still selling 80K plus a month 3 years later is a moron.
GaimeGuy said:Just because a game sells doesn't mean it's as good as it's sales are.
Enter the Matrix, anyone?
op_ivy said:how is that confirmed?
fuel rod gun in single or multi? yes, there is a difference
chespace said:where is that thread where they confirm live co-op is in?
GhaleonEB said:Because the guy who has the mag said so....
He didn't specify. Though he did describe the new Blood Gulch Redux in some detail, and it rocks.
BRVolition said:The guy who has the magazine said the review didn't say anything about online co-op.
http://forum.teamxbox.com/showthread.php?p=4345447#post4345447
BRVolition said:The guy who has the magazine said the review didn't say anything about online co-op.
http://forum.teamxbox.com/showthread.php?p=4345447#post4345447
GhaleonEB said:Yup, you're right - my bad. Some other guy, who does't have have the mag said that. Sorry.
But this does raise some eyebrows (even if that's a MP shot):
GhaleonEB said:But this does raise some eyebrows (even if that's a MP shot):
GhaleonEB said:In case anyone missed it in the 19-page thread over at TeamXBox, Live co-op is in.
And so is the fuel rod gun.
How does its continued presence on sales charts testify to how good it is? I think the vast majority of Halo's fans are those new to the genre -- which, taken in that context, makes its popularity unsurprising. I don't mean to come off as an elitist, but, having played just about every FPS released, Halo ranks considerably low, imo. Again, I think Halo 2 will be what Halo vainly tried to be.
dark10x said:Nice assumption...but an incorrect one.
I too have played nearly every major and minor FPS released since Wolf 3D. However, I enjoyed Halo enough that it made my FPS top 5 list...
Halo falls directly below System Shock 2, Deus Ex, and Thief II while sitting right about Half-Life. Yes, I believe that Halo is just THAT good.
You don't? That's all well and good, but don't go making these crazy blanket statements that couldn't be further from the truth.
unkasa said:When did I say there aren't exceptions? Anyway, the comment was experientially derived. Meaning, when compared to other entries in the genre, my friends and I rank Halo low.
:lolIf it ranks low among FPS', then I'd say that you suck
Vagabond said:Halo was very well put together. It just felt 'complete' and well rounded.
If it ranks low among FPS', then I'd say that you suck. You should have said that 'It's only in the top 10 FPS' of all time' or something similar, because what you said is basically "This game sucks and is in the same lines as Deer Hunter as far as FPS' go."
Vagabond said:Halo was very well put together. It just felt 'complete' and well rounded.
If it ranks low among FPS', then I'd say that you suck. You should have said that 'It's only in the top 10 FPS' of all time' or something similar, because what you said is basically "This game sucks and is in the same lines as Deer Hunter as far as FPS' go."
unkasa said:I just found it very average. I don't think it sucked. After playing Call of Duty, it takes a lot for an FPS to impress me.
dark10x said:Ah, Scripts of Duty. I see...
So what other FPS games do you place at the top?
unkasa said:Copiously scripted or not, the game provided an amazing experience that dwarfs what I took from Halo. Other FPS games that I enjoyed immensely?
NOLF (Didn't enjoy its sequel at all.)
System Shock
Aliens Vs. Predator 1/2
Operation Flashpoint
Goldeneye
Those're a few
EDIT: Forgot to include the Killzone Demo. While flawed (hopefully, because it's a demo), the game strongly suggests CoD.
unkasa said:I just found it very average. I don't think it sucked. After playing Call of Duty, it takes a lot for an FPS to impress me.
unkasa said:EDIT: Forgot to include the Killzone Demo. While flawed (hopefully, because it's a demo), the game strongly suggests CoD.