Who?
In hindsight Gaddafi and Hussein kept control with far less bloodshed....
Who?
See, that's the problem. That's why this is happening.
You arent implying it you are just outright staing it go on keep blaming the victim.
The Belgian government said a while ago that the police/anti terror forces etc... stop many possible attacks before they take place, but that it's just a matter of one organized attack slipping through the cracks before a disaster happens. This is the same in France, Germany, UK, etc..
You really do not have to be very smart to understand the risks and direct link to the refugee situation in Europe. If anyone flat out denies that, then keep living in your fantasy world of a tolerant multicultural society with bunnies, unicorns and welfare for all.
Many muslim terrorists arrived as refugees in Europe and were able to go into stealth mode calmly waiting to execute a planned attack.
We shouldn't forget who is responsible for the radicalization of the islamic world. It's a boomerang guys.
We shouldn't forget who is responsible for the radicalization of the islamic world. It's a boomerang guys.
Don't know if I'm allowed to post this, people running from the bataclan, shocking, be careful:
http://www.rtl.be/info/monde/france...ang-partout-des-cadavres-partout--770593.aspx
Absolutely horrible.
I need a safe place.
We shouldn't forget who is responsible for the radicalization of the islamic world. It's a boomerang guys.
We shouldn't forget who is responsible for the radicalization of the islamic world. It's a boomerang guys.
One of the most harrowing videos I've seen. Horrible.Heartbreaking, left me speechless.
Holy fuck man..Don't know if I'm allowed to post this, people running from the bataclan, shocking, be careful:
http://www.rtl.be/info/monde/france...ang-partout-des-cadavres-partout--770593.aspx
Absolutely horrible.
I mean, I mentioned that question in my post? It's right there. I was asking for other solutions.
As for the total war thing. I'm somber in saying that. It's not something I'm celebrating. I'm acknowledging that especially because ISIS is not a sovereign nation with defined borders, it will require an extensive sweep and action in sovereign nations that are either incapable or unwilling to address ISIS and other similar organizations within their borders.
It would cost an immeasurable amount of lives. It would be ugly. It would be time-consuming. It would require unprecedented support. It would turn out to be WW3. It would then require an unprecedented level of occupation, rebuilding, government establishment, investment, and expense until these areas can reasonably resist extremist movements.
Now like I've said a million times now that nobody is reading, I also acknowledge that the political will for this does not exist (unless attacks like this continue). So yes, how else to address this? Doing nothing and just "living with the reality" isn't an option and I think we all know that.
^ terrorist organizations are bred from western involvement. Not excusing their actions at ALL. But people who are suggesting to bomb and be rid of the Middle East don't see that it is the cause of their motivation for these tragedies.
Nobody's blaming the victims. Calm down.
We shouldn't forget who is responsible for the radicalization of the islamic world. It's a boomerang guys.
We shouldn't forget who is responsible for the radicalization of the islamic world. It's a boomerang guys.
Jesus christ... The horror that took place there.Don't know if I'm allowed to post this, people running from the bataclan, shocking, be careful:
http://www.rtl.be/info/monde/france...ang-partout-des-cadavres-partout--770593.aspx
Absolutely horrible.
I guess I just want to know what our options actually are. If you're talking gruesome reality, then upping security and living with the reality of occasional terror attacks is an option.
Turning Syria and Iraq into perpetual police state of the west might be another option, but I'm not sure if that will help if all it does is continue to give people reasons to hate the west.
If you think that terror perpetrated and supported by people who shout "allahu akbar" while they are massacring people, who willingly blow themselves up because they "love death more than [we] love life", and who associate with the "Islamic State", which regularly publishes theological justifications for its actions, are not warranted to be labeled "Islamic", then you have been blinded by a miscalibrated identity politics. It should go without saying that this does not mean that all Muslims are islamists or jihadists, but apparently it's not obvious to you.
What Islamic texts have you read so far?
In hindsight Gaddafi and Hussein kept control with far less bloodshed....
God people dangling from the windows, people dragging victims leaving blood traces.. Its surreal.Don't know if I'm allowed to post this, people running from the bataclan, shocking, be careful:
http://www.rtl.be/info/monde/france...ang-partout-des-cadavres-partout--770593.aspx
Absolutely horrible.
Me asking for alternatives is the antithesis to "stubbornly defending everything I say and not opening my mind." It conveys that I acknowledged once again that I understand the political will for what I say doesn't exist at this time and therefore what would be a different solution? You've just have failed to state any sort of potential solution other than apparently just leave things alone and I guess hope it all works out?Do me a favor right now and it's real simple. Explain to me what military action would have stopped the Boston bombers from doing what they did.
You also said you're not an expert so maybe you should stop stubbornly defending every single thing you say as gospel and open your mind to what people are trying to explain to you.
Don't we all. I was fucking scared last night. Don't get me wrong...
How do we fight brainwashed people that want to die?
In hindsight Gaddafi and Hussein kept control with far less bloodshed....
There is almost no chance there were refugees involved with this so what are you talking about?
We shouldn't forget who is responsible for the radicalization of the islamic world. It's a boomerang guys.
^ terrorist organizations are bred from western involvement. Not excusing their actions at ALL. But people who are suggesting to bomb and be rid of the Middle East don't see that it is the cause of their motivation for these tragedies.
I wouldn't say that the world has changed, so much as that we are fighting in different kinds of countries. A war between the US and China, for instance, would probably be much more traditional(ignoring the nukes).People need to get these WW2 fantasies out their minds. That time is long gone and the world that existed then could not be any different from the one we live in now. Vietnam was the beginning of this new reality, then Soviet Afghan War and now the War on Terror. The days where it was all real simple and people signed unconditional surrenders on board a battleship while posing for photos don't exist anymore. No matter how much you want them to.
The sooner you stop living in the past, the sooner you can actually confront the issues.
Wahabism is not a result of western intervention.
Nonsense. You're misinformed.
Oh they will. Right winged political parties will have a ball with this. And aggressive dumbasses will cause some trouble here and there, possibly and probably hurting innocent people having nothing to do with this all.Don't be so obtuse. It is quite possible that people meaning to causes terror would use the refugee situation to move around easier and to their advantage.
Don't know if I'm allowed to post this, people running from the bataclan, shocking, be careful:
http://www.rtl.be/info/monde/france...ang-partout-des-cadavres-partout--770593.aspx
Absolutely horrible.
Me asking for alternatives is the antithesis to "stubbornly defending everything I say and not opening my mind." It conveys that I acknowledged once again that I understand the political will for what I say doesn't exist at this time and therefore what would be a different solution? You've just have failed to state any sort of potential solution other than apparently just leave things alone and I guess hope it all works out?
And the military action is meant to systematically take out infrastructure and overall will - again coupled with competent long-term support, infrastructure, education, etc. after the fact to establish non-shit governments that can locally defend against extremists. Not laving a vacuum like Iraq and to a lesser extent Afghanistan. The idea being that due to that strengthened infrastructure, increased resources and education, there is less demand for extremest actions like the Boston bomber or attacks like Paris today, 9/11, etc.
Anyone who wants to blame western culture for this is absolutely fucked. Radical Islam sympathizers.
Jesus christ... The horror that took place there.
For what? Religion is one of those things that needs to go way down the list of priorities in this world. We need to believe in humanity. We are on a real planet with real people and we CAN live together without fucking fairytales.
I'm not. I've lived in the Middle East temporarily and heard crap of justifying killing Americans and Europeans because of what they've done to Iraq and Afganistan.
There is almost no chance there were refugees involved with this so what are you talking about?
Anyone who wants to blame western culture for this is absolutely fucked. Radical Islam sympathizers.
Yeah, radical Muslim theologists.
That is a hand waving argument to justify their intentions to themselves.I'm not. I've lived in the Middle East temporarily and heard crap of justifying killing Americans and Europeans because of what they've done to Iraq and Afganistan.
When it comes to religious fundamentalism, it really doesn't take two to tango.
People will always find reasons to do this bullshit with or without religion: power, envy, "revenge"... Religion is an excuse, not the cause.