Wtf dude? If I could decide, I would banish all religions.
Faith
Banned
(Today, 10:05 AM)
Wow,I guess he really did it
Wtf dude? If I could decide, I would banish all religions.
Who is behind ISIS exactly? ISIS did almost no damage to Bashar in comparison to what it did to the rebels. ISIS interfered in Iraq after the huge protest in the Sunni part and then shut down the protesters and turned it from a protest against injustice into a war against ISIS. ISIS had many suicidal attacks against SA right after SA launched their campaign in Yemen to take out Alhothi who is Iran's ally. ISIS attacked France and Turkey who are also one of the strongest countries that stood against Bashar. However, ISIS never attacked Iran and only had one attack in Hezb Allah territory. Idk if this was just a mere coincidence but unless it a coincidence then ISIS looks like nothing but a group controlled by the intelligence of other countries to serve their purposes in the region.
Despite ISIS and every terrorist organization clearly saying that they are doing this for religion, in the name of religion, I find it hilarious that people still claim that it has 'nothing to do with religion'. 'Oh its just political', 'these are just mentally disturbed people with nothing to do with Islam'. Somehow I should take your word over the word of those who are doing it? They are clearly shouting from the rooftops that it's about religion, that they are inspired by religious ideology, they are trying to follow the ideology to the fullest, and here are people claiming 'oh they are not true Muslims, it has nothing to do with religion'. Give us a break, man! If we can't even accept it for what it is, forget about defeating it. they know it, that the rest of the world has already lost the battle cause they can't even come to call the enemy for what it is, let alone fight it.
Tell me, if indeed ISIS is just a 'mentally disturbed non-stable individuals' and what not, how come they are only Muslims? where are the 'disturbed' youths from Christians or Hindus?
You are not getting to what I am saying. If ISIL is there in Iraq then how are you going to make the country more safer? You really going to think those people care about your western values ? No they don't. They want an state. It is naive to assume they want to listen to anything by anyone besides themselves and they are actively killing people and taking territory to control the country, it would be stupid not to kill them and regain control of the country and make the country safer, (it's called war you have to do that there is no way around it, especially with these guys) because how else are you going to when they are out to kill people and want to, and take over Iraq, Syria, and then other nations?
No stop putting words in my mouth. I clearly said not the matter of want to or not westerners are already there including the US,Britain, and the French . I was also saying you would have to militarily confront them I didn't say a damn thing about me wanting to. If you don't want them there then people have to get their governments out.
Really, when in the hell did I say all of them are educated? Why do you keep doing it is getting really stupid. I said the foreigners in Iraq/Syria are that way; they clearly don't care about western values because they went to join ISIL. It has been documented that western civilians went there.
I said it won't get terrorism and talking about terrorism in general. I was clearly talking about Iraq and Syria and since this killings have to do with ISIS I am referring Iraq and Syria as they are mainly there with the main force.
Do I need to ? No, but I did because I think it is.
Ok, you aren't playing attention I said nothing about Islam fundamentalism to him that comment about that was to you not to him. Maybe you are equalizing Islam fundamentalism, I'm not doing that when I am talking ISIS I'm talking about them nothing else.
Typical, you keep avoiding my point. Yeah, you got the answers to eliminate ISIS, but do you got a way to eliminate the deaths of innocents in the western world? If not, fuck off?
I don't represent the western world, and I'm sure you don't represent Islam. But if the argument you're presenting is that the west needs to eliminate ISIS to keep their homes safe, than again, sincerely, fuck off.
Islam is a religion of more than a billion people. Democracies self regulate, but the religion of peace doesn't? You present so many strawmen regarding who are 'true' ISIS members but fail to realize that ISIS members have a unifying belief in the elimination of apostates(which we all are); but you continue to present non-nonsensical explanations for their existence with things like some of them "are rich", "are well educated", "have different motivations", and then end your argument by saying the only solution to this is by violently murdering them. Really? Then, you have the audacity to go ahead and call people naive. Present some empirical data, if you're going to make broad statements of a particular fundamentalist group fitting a mold you've created. The burden of proof is yours. You don't fucking know the half of it.
Again, you call someone naive for suggesting the answer is not violence, and then contend that the violent removal of extremists is the answer. Brilliant. Yep, you got the answers and fuck me for suggesting otherwise!
It is rich how you barely grasp the English language and still accuse me of not paying attention. It seems like you know how to solve ISIS problem yet no one else does! Honestly, you should reread all your shitty posts before your next attempt at a reply, for coherence's sake. But I don't have faith in your comprehension so for that, I must say bye.
ex-Saddam officials, sunni terrorists, and many people from the world. There's no conspiracy and ISIL is only really concentrated in Iraq and Syria.
There are 1.6 BILLION Muslims. If this was as systemic and incompatible as you say the world would be fucked right now. It would be World War on a completely new level. Attacks would be daily, constant and never ending. You wouldn't have Muslims fleeing war torn areas thinking the West will give them hope for a better life.If you still can't see that this shit is systemic and that the religion or rather the liturgy encourages such barbarism, then you will never understand.
Truth of the matter is that this will keep happening because islam is fundamentally incompatible with modern western civilizaion based largely on Protestant culture. Those planned attacks see their genesis in mosques are in conversations after the afternoon prayers, amongst young people who share the same ethnicity and beliefs. This is further aided and abetted by clerics who say nothing, by family and friends who hear whispers but stay quiet, by facilitators who allow them to train and equip them whom they reach by contacting other friends who know them.
It's there for all to see. But herein lies the internal struggle, that of the modern renaissance man, unable to reconcile himself with the idea that some people, with different norms and values do not operate based on the same principles that they grew up with. Those same people who find in fundamental islam, which is basically the essence of the whole religion, a justification to unleash their sadistic fantasies. It's a very powerful motivator. I personally don't believe in the holy aspect of it. I think it's just some sort of rationalization which helps to intellectualize crude power relationships.
The type of modern, harmless religion that some practice and parrot out as being the true message sadly has no impact on this, because to fundamentalists, it serves no purpose and they don't think it's legitimate. The religion has never known true reform on a universal scale which is a huge problem.
Here's what's gonna happen tomorrow, after this senseless act. A bunch of community leaders are gonna come out to say that the French people will show solidarity and condemn those acts, there will be some sort of powerful mass gathering to show that they are not afraid and they will show up on tv and in the media to offer their condolences. Shit won't fly this time. Why? Because young people , children, men and women with no agenda died tonight. Innocents basically, in what is essentially the cultural capital of the world. They were slaughtered after a hard week's work, when they were the most vulnerable. It was an indiscriminate massacre with no purpose but to spread hate.
Those explanation about what leads to radicalization won't matter because nothing can allow this. No poverty, no hardship. You simply cannot condone this. It's been a trope, a platitude for far too long to explain delinquency in the 'quartiers'. Something changed today. It will never be the same again. It is a tragedy.
I'm not talking about the small youth who went to there because these are clearly brainwashed. I'm talking about the people who run this operation and whether they have some sort of alliance with Iran. you might be right and that this just me looking into nothing here bit I just find it really suspicious that ISIS action in the region were concentrated in the area where Iran was going to lost their influence and that almost all ISIS actions served Iran in the area.
This is the beginning of another huge war though. And a ton of people innocent or not are going to die in it.
Can someone educate me on why it's sometimes ISIS and sometimes ISIL?
I agree, but often people blame western intervention and completely ignore the history of the region : as if the poeple living there don't have their own stuff going on that is radicalising them.
It's about politics, but looking to the west to explain while ignoring what is going on in the middle east and other places... doesn't work out well.
lmao, YOU DON'T ANALYZE WHAT'S HAPPENING
Can someone educate me on why it's sometimes ISIS and sometimes ISIL?
I'm not talking about the small youth who went to there because these are clearly brainwashed. I'm talking about the people who run this operation and whether they have some sort of alliance with Iran. you might be right and that this just me looking into nothing here bit I just find it really suspicious that ISIS action in the region were concentrated in the area where Iran was going to lost their influence and that almost all ISIS actions served Iran in the area.
There are 1.6 BILLION Muslims. If this was as systemic and incompatible as you say the world would be fucked right now. It would be World War on a completely new level. Attacks would be daily, constant and never ending. You wouldn't have Muslims fleeing war torn areas thinking the West will give them hope for a better life.
10,000 compared to 1.6 billion. And those 10,000 are concentrated to a narrow sect of the religion. Again, lets not overstate things here. The islamic religion has its problems. Some inherent and a lot circumstantial. But the VAST majority of Muslims are living peaceful, normal lives and do not support terror or radicalism.These attacks ARE happening on a daily basis, just not always in the cities of the Western world. You realize that over 10.000 terrorist attacks are committed every year? It's mostly Muslim perpetrators, but also Muslim victims. It is a war of ideas, not only between Muslims, but also with non-Muslims.
Well I'm not a military advisor. I said as much. Ultimately this is the off-topic section of a video game forum so nothing I say matters in the real world. Not sure why you're seeming so upset as realistically both of our "solutions" are untenable and unrealistic in the present climate and has no bearing on anything.All the stuff you criticize me for are just as true for you. Your "solution" is just as likely to fail as it is to succeed but it'll take decades and cost trillions in meantime. You're whole shtick seems to be revolving around proposing an idea you willfully admit is never going to happen, but because it sounds so amazing in your hypothetical visions, no one can criticize it until they propose an equally unrealistic plan.
I'm done wasting my time and energy. I wish you good luck.
Sölf;185436083 said:I went to bed 7 hours ago, anywhere where I can catch up?
10,000 compared to 1.6 billion. Again, lets not overstate things here. The islamic religion has its problems. Some inherent and a lot circumstantial. But the VAST majority of Muslims are living peaceful, normal lives and do not support terror or radicalism.
I'm not sure how grabbing territory from the Shiite government of Baghdad is working for Iran. Considering that government is in close relations with Iran.
Yes, because there's nothing Islamic terrorists care more about than the humans treatment of the refugees they sent running...
worth posting.
(I live near Paris and had to make sure everyone i know was safe btw)
As I said there was a huge protest of Sunni people in Al anbar against the discrimination against them in Iraq and guess how it was shut down. Also ISIS attacked helped Iran to build a new militia Alhadhs Alshabi with global support which is build on Iraqi budget and is derived from Shia ideology. They did some horrifying acts in the Sunni territories where they where stationed. Again I might be reading too much into this but the investigations showed that Almalki the previous president had a lot of responsibility in ISIS control now.
But the VAST majority of Muslims are living peaceful, normal lives and do not support terror or radicalism.
Can someone educate me on why it's sometimes ISIS and sometimes ISIL?
worth posting.
(I live near Paris and had to make sure everyone i know was safe btw)
I went to bed just after they stormed the theatre
I know a lot died, but did they manage to get many out?
So you are trading one mono-causal explanation for the next.
Currently we know to little to pinpoint the exact causal relation to this event, but radical Muslim theologists definitely are aligned to it.
10,000 compared to 1.6 billion. Again, lets not overstate things here. The islamic religion has its problems. Some inherent and a lot circumstantial. But the VAST majority of Muslims are living peaceful, normal lives and do not support terror or radicalism.
Yes, because there's nothing Islamic terrorists care more about than the humans treatment of the refugees they sent running...
"We'll bomb your home, rape your family. But rest assured, if Europe doesn't take you in and treat you well, we'll fuck them up too!"
Would 2% of all Muslims waging voilent jihad be a problem ? That's still leaves the VAST majority of Muslims out of it. It also means an army of 32 million, vastly outnumbering all other armies combined.
Yeah, it should be apparent to everyone that there's various causes making these kinds of nightmares happen. Radical religious rhetoric contributes. Poverty contributes. Poor education contributes. Genetics and upbringing contributes. Even Western interventions in the Middle East contributes. Instead of fighting over which pet explanation we think is most contributory everyone should just agree that there's many reasons why this shit happens.
So how do we work toward a solution, to prevent tragedies like this in the future? Closing borders and bombing people doesn't seem to work so well. It's just my opinion, but I think we need to step up our social/cultural engineering efforts. In school we test kids on their knowledge, which is fine, but I think we should really test character too. Is this student quick to violence? Put them through an anger management class. Does this one have crippling anxiety? Put them through confidence training. Exams could (for example) have a student faced with someone insulting their deeply held beliefs and if they respond violently they fail and have to resit, but if they debate sensibly, agree to disagree, or resolve the conflict in some other tolerant way then they pass.
Immigration reform could also involve having people go through such tests. If I wanted to become a US citizen today I would need to pass a civics exam first. But I could know everything about US law/government/culture and still be a murderous psychopath. An empathy/character test would filter out the crazies much more effectively than a knowledge-oriented exam.
Anyway, sorry you have to deal with this shit, France.
10,000 compared to 1.6 billion. And those 10,000 are concentrated to a narrow sect of the religion. Again, lets not overstate things here. The islamic religion has its problems. Some inherent and a lot circumstantial. But the VAST majority of Muslims are living peaceful, normal lives and do not support terror or radicalism.
This has to be among the stupidest things I've read all day.
Terrorists angry that people fleeing from their terrorism are not treated well enough? Wat?
I never said that all Muslims were involved, but you stated that attacks did not happen daily, but they do. However, the fact that Muslims are targeting each other way more than western civilians, seems to strongly suggest that these problems that are not exclusive to western intervention, as some claim it to be in this thread.
Looks like CNN finally updated their number of dead to 128 from 153. God, they really do suck.
I never said that all Muslims were involved, but you stated that attacks did not happen daily, but they do. However, the fact that Muslims are targeting each other way more than western civilians, seems to strongly suggest that these problems that are not exclusive to western intervention, as some claim it to be in this thread.