Jag
Member
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/25/w...onfronts-the-jihadist-danger-within.html?_r=0
This gives some more information. Molenbeek always been a problem zone for these kinds of things.
When Abdelhamid Abaaoud, the Belgian-born son of an immigrant shopkeeper from Morocco, went to Syria a year ago to wage jihad, nobody paid much attention.
Hopefully people will start paying more attention.
This incident has me attempting to re-consider this ISIS issue as a whole. Some have said it is the most dangerous warfare of our time... would you guys consider ISIS harder to defeat then, say, the Nazis or Japanese? Of course the aforementioned forces resulted in a full on war, but combating ISIS requires something different then simple explosions and overwhelming through numbers.
ISIS is based on an ideology. It's not a beachhead you can storm. The problem with fighting the ideology is it is based on things in Islamic culture that many people believe in, even though they are against violence. So yes, I think it is much harder than just beating a country into submission. Humans are pretty good at that.
An Arab GAFfer put it well earlier, if you try to speak out against the ideology, you risk being labeled a "kafir" an unbeliever.