GoldenEye 007
Member
Hate to say it but the country should have been taken over and never have been given back.
9/11 happened when I was in 8th grade and I remember asking my history teacher about the possibility of the US staying in Iraq and making it a territory or state after the war. Of course as an 8th grader I had little understanding of things, but I'm reminded of that.
But thinking more, that might have to be a possible solution. Obviously not a state or territory but a full-blown and continued occupation after any conflict/war with a gradual establishment of a non-lesser of two evils government, restrictions, build basic infrastructure and education systems, etc., over a long period of time. Essentially like a Japan model. And yeah that war would include going into soverign nations that might not outright support organizations like ISIS, but either will not or cannot do anything to stop/control ISIS.
Can't pull a Iraq, do a half-committed (and unjustified) war, then a half-committed "rebuilding" and expect more shit to not hit the fan. But I understand - short of larger attacks, there will be little support for such a sustained large military presence.
I don't know. That probably won't work either as this is a different type of enemy, but I'm at a loss of how to effectively address this. Rebuilding is probably the best bet, but I fear near total war is needed first before that can realistically happen. I'm not sure targeted assassinations are the answer.