I'm not talking about bombing, nuking etc. the shit out of Syria until everyone is dead, but world leaders need to get their shit together and find a way to deal with this stuff.
That's a relief for the French and rest of world. The tension and fear would have been too much if they had even 1 on the lose
CNN was stocking fear of more.
Ugh, theater attackers blew themselves up as police approached according to various news feeds. Awful.
Do you really think we should try it the exact same way again? You do notice how much that went wrong?
If we start another all-out war in the middle east, we should at least have a better plan for how to deal with the situation afterwards. I have the impression that much of the problems in that region are due to the fact that the borders of the nations in that region do not align at all with the ethnic groups and identities that exist there.
So if we remove ISIS (and Assad, or whoever else we fancy conquering) from that map, it might be a good point in time to think about splitting up nations like Iraq and involving the ethnic groups there in deciding on new nations and borders.
If we start another all-out war in the middle east, we should at least have a better plan for how to deal with the situation afterwards. I have the impression that much of the problems in that region are due to the fact that the borders of the nations in that region do not align at all with the ethnic groups and identities that exist there.
So if we remove ISIS (and Assad, or whoever else we fancy conquering) from that map, it might be a good point in time to think about splitting up nations like Iraq and involving the ethnic groups there in deciding on new nations and borders.
The first thing that should have happened is redrawing the stupid fucking borders that britain made, lumping disparate groups of people who hate each other together into one 'country' (Iraq) was a bad idea.
That's stupid. It's not about borders, it's about governments. We removed governments, and terrorists took over. Don't remove the governments.
I really think they don't want to fuck with Putin.
If we start another all-out war in the middle east, we should at least have a better plan for how to deal with the situation afterwards. I have the impression that much of the problems in that region are due to the fact that the borders of the nations in that region do not align at all with the ethnic groups and identities that exist there.
So if we remove ISIS (and Assad, or whoever else we fancy conquering) from that map, it might be a good point in time to think about splitting up nations like Iraq and involving the ethnic groups there in deciding on new nations and borders.
Seems like really specious nonsense. No offense to you.
You can't really make sure somebody is dead until you verify it in person. And launching a special forces assault into an isolated estate with minimal defenses is a hell of a lot different than launching a special forces assault into the large, fortified heart of the enemy army.What does killing Baghdadi have to do with a ground invasion though? You say you want a ground invasion but if taking out the head is all it takes to bring down IS then what's all this about ground invasion?
It's not about borders, it's about governments. We removed governments, and terrorists took over. Don't remove the governments.
ISIS have claimed responsibility since her tweet
I get where you're coming from man that sounds like recipe for disaster.
I'm surprised there hasn't been a big attack against Russia yet.
I think it is honestly you who is naive. Ending ISIS will not end terrorism. But sure, bank on this short term reformation provided by jaded westerners.
Very naive. You really don't know what ISIL really is or what it is entirely consist of. You really think it is because its poor brown people and somehow making all those nations somehow prosperous is going fix much? I don't anyone know how many decades it will take for that to happen and how many people will be killed since we can't start a fight, but ISIL will. Only two of those countries have anything to do with ISIL . Iraq war were the remaining sunni terrorists groups joined up with ex-saddam officials, and with the civil war in Syria it was a natural focus point for jihadists all that became ISIL. Besides many foreigners ISIL aren't even poor and so the only point you was right about was ideology, and many joined them because of that and wasn't poor.
Anyway, the only way to hurt ISIL is through taking their territory and killing/capturing their leadership and destroy their infrastructure. If you really point those nations to all nice and rich then you have to defeat ISIL, because how else are you going to make all those nations(Iraq and Syria mostly) nice and cozy when they are there actively killing people? A war/battle/conflict has to be fought and no sugar coating and looking through western glasses is going to fix that.
Afghanistan succeeded in destroying al Qaeda there didn't it
Iraq war is the only one not justified. This one is
This is the bread in a bowl solution you have is who has invited all terrorists to join them in one location, we invade this one location and take care of majority of radicalists and its ideals
kinda surprised more people arent talking about this aspect of the whole thing
crazy they'd be able to pull something like this over security so soon after Hebdo. I remember Hollande instantly promising to go HAM on protetion of public places...
Afghanistan succeeded in destroying al Qaeda there didn't it
Iraq war is the only one not justified. This one is
This is the bread in a bowl solution you have is who has invited all terrorists to join them in one location, we invade this one location and take care of majority of radicalists and its ideals
Yeah, I don't want a new war. I just hope that if it comes to that our leaders will have a better plan of how to deal with the aftermath. Thinking that Iraq without Saddam would become a stable democracy was incredibly naive. Really no point in repeating every single mistake we already made.
The news is still fresh, Hollande is gonna get it in a few more days. The prospect of a Front National government is still improbable but looks less inconceivable by the day.
kinda surprised more people arent talking about this aspect of the whole thing
crazy they'd be able to pull something like this over security so soon after Hebdo. I remember Hollande instantly promising to go HAM on protection of public places...
You're just hung up on names which produce hollow victories. Yeah, we really destroyed Al Qaeda but they just changed names and the ones who remained joined ISIS or Al Nusra or the thousand other sects. It's just a way for politicians to score points, including Obama by saying such and such group is dead while another one springs up.
Bin Laden is dead but what changed? The threat is more real now than it was when he was alive. How many #2 members of groups being killed has been publicized?
The fight has to go on but your naive idea that there's any conclusion to this battle is laughable. The overarching jihadist ideology has not been eradicated at any point in the last 20 years and that's what you should be focusing on.
Lol who said anything about ending terrorism? Did I say anything about ending terrorism?
how the hell did it actually happen tho
kind of weaponry to kill that amount of people passing through security at a concert
I'm surprised there hasn't been a big attack against Russia yet.
how the hell did it actually happen tho
kind of weaponry to kill that amount of people passing through security at a concert
Everyone is cooking their own soup, so please tell me how that is helping the situation. It doesn't. They need to do this united and that's all I'm saying.Yeah, I'm sure it's that simple + that they haven't worked on it at all yet.
You're just hung up on names which produce hollow victories. Yeah, we really destroyed Al Qaeda but they just changed names and the ones who remained joined ISIS or Al Nusra or the thousand other sects. It's just a way for politicians to score points, including Obama by saying such and such group is dead while another one springs up.
Bin Laden is dead but what changed? The threat is more real now than it was when he was alive. How many #2 members of groups being killed has been publicized?
The fight has to go on but your naive idea that there's any conclusion to this battle is laughable. The overarching jihadist ideology has not been eradicated at any point in the last 20 years and that's what you should be focusing on.
Didn't they blow up that plane over the Sinai?I'm surprised there hasn't been a big attack against Russia yet.
If we start another all-out war in the middle east, we should at least have a better plan for how to deal with the situation afterwards. I have the impression that much of the problems in that region are due to the fact that the borders of the nations in that region do not align at all with the ethnic groups and identities that exist there.
So if we remove ISIS (and Assad, or whoever else we fancy conquering) from that map, it might be a good point in time to think about splitting up nations like Iraq and involving the ethnic groups there in deciding on new nations and borders.
how the hell did it actually happen tho
kind of weaponry to kill that amount of people passing through security at a concert
any reports on the state of eagles of death metal themselves?
where are they?
Isis holds territory and oil reserves that allows them to finance, train and organize terrorist attacks on European soil. It's about destructing capacities, not just chasing a name.
But in this case the name is also important, because it's the base of their whole ideology. And Islamic State without a State?
Isis holds territory and oil reserves that allows them to finance, train and organize terrorist attacks on European soil. It's about destructing capacities, not just chasing a name.
But in this case the name is also important, because it's the base of their whole ideology. And Islamic State without a State?