ISIS wants Rome next.
Why Rome of all places?
The home of Catholicism?
ISIS wants Rome next.
Why Rome of all places?
you gonna 360 no scope four suicide bombers, John Halo? ridiculous comments.
This keeps getting repeated here. Source?ISIS wants Rome next.
Why Rome of all places?
Logical and tactical actions against IS did almost nothing in the past 2 years.
And your solution is to make the Western world police states. Not solving the root cause and make the victims pay. Sounds lovely.
Are you serious? There's heroes all the time. I wouldn't be surprised if we hear of heroic actions coming out of this event. You don't have to be an action star to actually do something.
ISIS wants Rome next.
Why Rome of all places?
The Prophetic narration that foretells the Dabiq battle refers to the enemy as Rome. Who “Rome” is, now that the pope has no army, remains a matter of debate. But Cerantonio makes a case that Rome meant the Eastern Roman empire, which had its capital in what is now Istanbul. We should think of Rome as the Republic of Turkey—the same republic that ended the last self-identified caliphate, 90 years ago. Other Islamic State sources suggest that Rome might mean any infidel army, and the Americans will do nicely.
"KILL 'EM!" and then hope for the best is also a terrible plan. A ground operation would further destabilize the Middle East and further stole the anti-Western sentiments that exist there.
I don't have a solution. Doing the same thing we've been doing since the 90s is not smart. It's stupid, expensive, and will ultimately prove fruitless. But if a stupid war without an endgame fuels your rage, go for it!
Given that snide quip about multicultural societies, I imagine he'd favour the homogeneous variety.
They're running from both.Yet they're running from ISIS, not Assad.
Right. Except music venues are private establishments, and can rightfully ban weapons as they see fit.I'd take my chances versus being able to do NOTHING. You may be fine with being completely helpless. Others are not.
what the hell am I asking for?
you're taking this to some weird extreme level where all im saying that upping security in a concert venue after a tragedy just happened to avoid another one and after your president promised it sounds like what should happen
who is talking about the future and businesses and shit? im not talking of this as a solution opposed to others dude. You're putting my argument as if I was saying this is the one thing to be done to avoid this happening. of course you gotta draw the line at some point, but you also gotta start, at all.
im saying it's shitty and surprising there wasnt more security there <- so just read this one sentence I guess
The Belgian government said a while ago that the police/anti terror forces etc... stop many possible attacks before they take place, but that it's just a matter of one organized attack slipping through the cracks before a disaster happens. This is the same in France, Germany, UK, etc..
You really do not have to be very smart to understand the risks and direct link to the refugee situation in Europe. If anyone flat out denies that, then keep living in your fantasy world of a tolerant multicultural society with bunnies, unicorns and welfare for all.
Many muslim terrorists arrived as refugees in Europe and were able to go into stealth mode calmly waiting to execute a planned attack.
How much more though? What form would it take?
However, when shootings happen in the USA, anti-gun people jump at the opportunity in less than a minute and "everyone" seems ok with it?
"Westerners" don't have the stomach to take care of ISIS. It's not like a traditional, enemy state. How do you combat an ideology?
edit
Is someone seriously suggesting that audience members at a concert should be armed??? Good lord.. I can't even fucking imagine..
I would never leave my house.
There is at least an endgame: destroying ISIS capacity of financing, training and organizing terrorist attacks like this one. It's not my rage, it's rather my fear. The fear that they are capable of striking in any European capital at some point in time.
Okay I'm out, this thread is become a "refugees are terrorists" and "if everyone had guns this wouldn't have happened" bullshit of personal opinions and no supporting sources
think about what this thread is about before you post people, good lord
They're running from both.
It's Assholes vs Assholes vs Assholes in Syria, and the general population are suffering from it.
Yes, Syrians are fleeing from Assad, despite fucking ISIS vying for power in Syria? And you expect people to treat the poll with an ounce of credibility? The most brutal Salafist jihadi groups vying for power that will make daily life and conditions for women much more constricted and worse off than Assad.
If ISIS went after the pope so many countries would be falling over themselves to just blow up Syria.I admit to complete ignorance on the topic, but I do wonder if the choice of Paris and Rome would have something to do with the fact that both cities share the same landmass with the countries that ISIS operates out of.
Could it be an accessibility thing? Aside from border crossings, these must be the easiest major western cities to smuggle stuff into (weapons/personnel, etc). No rail/ship/air travel required. Again, uninformed speculation on my part, but something that struck me.
I admit to complete ignorance on the topic, but I do wonder if the choice of Paris and Rome would have something to do with the fact that both cities share the same landmass with the countries that ISIS operates out of.
Could it be an accessibility thing? Aside from border crossings, these must be the easiest major western cities to smuggle stuff into (weapons/personnel, etc). No rail/ship/air travel required. Again, uninformed speculation on my part, but something that struck me.
Sooo, like the rest of the EU? London/Stockholm is basically "the same landmass" as well despite tunnels and bridges.
https://twitter.com/afp/status/665370470796128256AFP: #BREAKING Eight militants killed in Paris attacks: investigation source
I don't want to fuck up this thread any more than the gun debate but i remembered some coincidences from that creepy video that went around the other month:
Redlipsliketenth=kill the president: french president was at the game?
2015 there will be three: Friday the 13th. Three in 2015, yesterday being the last.
"Strike an arrow through the heart of the eagle": eagles of death metal
Probably just coincidence.
Do you even know what it you takes to create a stable regime ?
Stable regime or not, getting rid of them in the vacuum or not you are going have to military confront them. Also, getting rid of ISIL will get rid of the current ISIL simply as that .
I said it is naive because making those countries safe and wealthier isn't going to fix anything because many people that are in ISIL are western educated people and/or lived in places like that.
Again, I only talking about ISIL and you keep bring up BS that wasn't making any sense in the context to what I was talking about.
Islamic fundamentalism is part of ISIL, but Boka Harem, AQ, and ISIL are entirely different beasts with entirely different strengths, purposes, details etc. Getting rid of ISIL will not end terrorism, no shit, getting rid of them stops more breeding grounds and makes those countries much more safer and again I wasn't even talking about terrorism in general just ISIL.
Most likely it was just an ARG.What was that from?
Who's claiming responsibility?
Shit is really going to hit the fan now.
re-education.
The process needed to reduce the terrorist threat around the world is extremely expensive. Even more so than a full blown war. This is why nothing will be done to solve the root issue.
As for ISIS, attacking paris, even if they had failed to kill as many as they did, was a sure way to help their cause. What they need right/want is more extremists joining their cause. By attacking paris they are sure to create an anti-syrian/muslim/etc sentiment across europe and that will in turn create more radicalisation and extremism.
ISIS has been very effective and that is scary.
You could add the top 6 deadliest U.S. shootings going as far back as 1966, and it would still be a mass shooting short of what just happened in France after a few hours.That's because gun violence is epidemic in the US and very rare in France. Not to mention this is an act of terrorism, not your average shooting anyway, and your whole posited scenario about John McClane wannabes in the theater somehow making a difference because of their concealed carry is total bullshit.
There's nothing hypocritical about it, you're just off on another planet.
Not the place for gun control arguments.
It's a scientific survey among 900 refugees who fled from Syria to Germany, 70% of them because of Assad. It's not the be-all-end-all of surveys, certainly, but it directly contradicts your claim they're fleeing ISIS, not Assad.
Care to share a survey that supports your claim?
Most likely it was just an ARG.
https://www.reddit.com/r/creepy/comments/3ongx1/this_creepy_puzzle_arrived_in_our_mail/
Given that snide quip about multicultural societies, I imagine he'd favour the homogeneous variety.
I dont know. Is that what you wanna hear? no one here knows shit
all im saying that if 3 cops were there rather than apparently 0, maybe 1 live could have been saved? who the hell knows, but that's already worth it. a terrorist attack over a place with virtually no security is an understandable thing now?
how do we even know if this venue wasnt chosen precisely cause the security is shit?
I can fantasize a 'could have' scenario to this side just as much as you can the other. we're going in circles.
this is what this is:
- oh there were 0 cops there? shit, should have been more security
- more security??? BUT AT WHICH POINT DOES IT STOP?
Whoa. I'm just saying all dominant sides in Syria are shit.Some of those assholes gained power via Western interventions and abrupt toppling of dictators. What now? All of Iran and Syria soon will chant USA=Satan. Do they chant that because they're just born evil?
With Syrian government stopping ISIS - crisis in Syria will go down. The people of Syria will trade political activism in return for normal schools and offices vs an ISIS/Nusra/Saudi controlled regime taking over.