Maybe Sandusky was behind him, so when he turned around and saw what he was doing, he had to turn back around to pretend he didn't see it?So it would have been looking in the exact same direction?
Maybe Sandusky was behind him, so when he turned around and saw what he was doing, he had to turn back around to pretend he didn't see it?So it would have been looking in the exact same direction?
Statue is down for good. The library name is because of his large donationSo the Paterno name stays on the library and the statue goes into storage. Anyone else get the feeling the statue will be back eventually? At least it's gone for now.
Football program next please.
Statue is down for good. The library name is because of his large donation
Instead of taking down the statue they should've just turned it 360 degrees
What is the statute made of?
Lulz...Lies.
Well, I'd say that about raps this saga all up. Sandusky is in jail and the university has been thoroughly punished by having its metal man removed.
Mods, feel free to lock this thread. I think we're basically done here.
A statue nor the jailing a one man couldn't come close to righting this wrong. Nothing can.Well, I'd say that about raps this saga all up. Sandusky is in jail and the university has been thoroughly punished by having its metal man removed.
Mods, feel free to lock this thread. I think we're basically done here.
Why it wasn't an instant easy decision to take down a fucking statue of a guy who covered for a child molester for 14 years is disgusting
and why is th library still named after a child molester cover up?
are you kidding me? Death penalty to the football program for 5-10 years
Oh shit...Sarcasm, how does it work?
In other news:
NCAA source: "Unprecedented" penalties against Penn State
Uh oh!
i dont understand these defenders on espn
its like football is more important than human life for these people
Sarcasm, how does it work?
In other news:
NCAA source: "Unprecedented" penalties against Penn State
Uh oh!
What would be the purpose of punishing the current football program? We're the current players and coaches complicit?
What would be the purpose of punishing the current football program? We're the current players and coaches complicit?
This is such a cop out response, and clearly comes from someone unfamiliar with the NCAA. All the NCAA can do, when egregious violations are uncovered, is punish the program in its current state. Most of the time when these violations are discovered, the people responsible have already moved on to other jobs, or are fired ASAP by the University. Simply punishing the "people" responsible, does little to disgorge the institutional benefits that were received as a part of the illicit benefits or activity.There is no purpose, logically, when you pare it back. To me, it's purely to sate the thirst for revenge among many people, to get this issue out of the spotlight.
And then the media and the revenge-seekers will move on, (refusing to acknowledge that those complicit in the cover-up are long gone) leaving a fuckload of problems for Penn State in their wake. And in adidition to the victims of Fucking Sandusky and the Big 4UCKERS involved in th cover-up, a lot more innocent people will suffer greatly purely for having the "misfortune" of being attached to Penn State.
YES YES YES YES YES
My guess isn't the death penalty but a 5-year postseason ban and some other punishment affecting the program.
My guess is that the Big Ten also kicks them out.
Announcement is at 9 AM tomorrow morning. *Sets DVR*
I'm kind of shocked the NCAA is acting this quickly. I was not expecting them to do anything before the season started.
I'd say a bowl ban for 2012 is inevitable, but they're too close to actually cancel the season. 2013, however, will probably be bleak. Either the season gets cancelled or they'll get a massive scholarship reduction and bowl ban that will basically decimate their recruiting for the foreseeable future.
My guess isn't the death penalty but a 5-year postseason ban and some other punishment affecting the program.
The purpose, Roland, is to instill a precedent of punishment when a system is so institutionally fucked up that they can allow something like this to go on. It's to teach a lesson to those in the future who would allow something like this to continue in the name of a sport that doesn't matter at all in the end. They sold their souls for a football legend, and a punishment of this type is not 'revenge' - it's justice.
I think Penn State will receive a death penalty of three years. It will take Penn State a decade to recover or more.
This is such a cop out response, and clearly comes from someone unfamiliar with the NCAA. All the NCAA can do, when egregious violations are uncovered, is punish the program in its current state. Most of the time when these violations are discovered, the people responsible have already moved on to other jobs, or are fired ASAP by the University. Simply punishing the "people" responsible, does little to disgorge the institutional benefits that were received as a part of the illicit benefits or activity.
Had Penn State come forward in 1998 or even in 2001, then would the University and its football program been negatively affected? I think the reasonable answer to this question is "yes," or, to be more accurate, the people who decided to continue covering up Sandusky's crimes thought the answer was "yes." Therefore, the assumption is that covering up the crimes imparted some tangible benefit to PSU. Whether this came in the form of continued recruiting success or in maintaining a certain level of donor activity, the University and its football program benefited from covering up after Sandusky, and it is this benefit that must be disgorged and an example must be set so that other universities never, ever engage in similar behavior.
This is why the NCAA always punishes the program and the university, and not just the men or women involved in the violations. Look at USC and Reggie Bush. All the people and players involved: gone and still the NCAA punished USC. Look at OSU, Terrell Pryor, and tatgage: all the players and coaches involved are gone and still the NCAA punished OSU. Look at Alabama and Albert Means: coaches fired, boosters disassociated, player gone, and still the NCAA punished tUA.
The NCAA punishes programs to compensate for the benefit, whether real or perceived, that it received as a result of the violations, and to set examples for other universities who may think about committing the same violations. That's how the system works. Universities should consider how their towns, employees, vendors, etc. will suffer if they are caught committing violations, before they commit those violations.
What would be the purpose of punishing the current football program? We're the current players and coaches complicit?
And I get this argument, I totally do. I just disagree that this 'justice' hasn't already been delivered, in the form of a now crippling reputation, the rightful desecration of JoePa, worldwide media scrutiny, etc.
There's too many 'they''s in your post, and not enough explanation of who you're referring to.
You joking?
I expect a 6-7 year death penalty.
We've institutional corruption on a unique scale here, and an insular culture that even today doesn't seem to understand how bad what has been done by leaders and trustees was.
Unique breakdowns of this magnitude require a unique response in order to truly break the culture, that it may be built back up from the ground. A post-season ban doesn't do that, as Penn State has been fairly irrelevant in the post-season for a long, long time.
Death anywhere between 6 and 10 years has been well earned, in my opinion.
could be, but simply making their football program irrelevant by taking the scholarships away doesn't do though, IMO. they're already mostly irrelevant.
"They" as in the football institution at Penn State. THEY allowed this to go on, from the environment of worship that allowed them to overlook the clear sins of the program to the continued endless attempts to cover up or dismiss realistic claims of child abuse. It is only right that "they" get real punishment in order to send a message to other programs (and Penn State itself): football is not important. What matters is education, the health of your students, the safety of the environment they learn in. If you're sacrificing any of this in the name of football, you need to be punished.
And having a "bad reputation" does not do anything, trust me. I live in Pennsylvania, I cannot tell you how many people I encounter that think the Penn State football program is unnecessarily being blamed for Sandusky's crime and think the football program there is beyond reproach. No, what Penn State needs is a punishment that will cripple their football program for a number of years. Only then will the magnitude of these crimes be realized.
Why do people care so much about fucking college football. So much so that they would cover up the rape and torture of children and care about preserving the image of a coach who knew something about it and said nothing. IT'S JUST FOOTBALL AND A STATUE. I'm American and don't understand Americans, it's pathetic.
Sarcasm, how does it work?
Why do people care so much about fucking college football. So much so that they would cover up the rape and torture of children and care about preserving the image of a coach who knew something about it and said nothing. IT'S JUST FOOTBALL AND A STATUE. I'm American and don't understand Americans, it's pathetic.
And I get this argument, I totally do. I just disagree that this 'justice' hasn't already been delivered, in the form of a now crippling reputation, the rightful desecration of JoePa, worldwide media scrutiny, etc.
yeah a 6-7 year death penalty would destroy the Penn State football program - maybe for a generation or more. 2-3 is what I'd like to see.
Seriously? That's how it works in life. If I run a hospital and I hire someone who isn't licensed and a patient dies I'm not cleared of responsibility because I later fired the guy.
Every program would cheat if when you were caught all you had to do was fire the coach/AD and you could avoid penalty.
But this 'they' you speak of, those complicit in the cover-up, are gone. Are you saying the institution, as a body, were responsible for the cover-up? Because I believe those responsible were the 4 conspirators, and obviously Sandusky. They had all the power in the instituton, but now they are gone.
So when people say "THEY" should be punished, it doesn't wash with me. "THEY" are gone, the people now in charge have zero to do with what happened in regards to the cover-up.
A one- or two-year death penalty would basically destroy their program for a decade.
That would be sufficient for me.
The insular, football-crazed Penn State culture allowed this scandal to fester, so yes, the university and the community deserve punishment.
And I don't think anyone buys that only four people knew about Sandusky's proclivities. Apparently it was an open secret and somewhat of an inside joke among many Penn Staters.
That's approaching a dangerous slippery-slope. 'Insular, football crazed' culture isn't unique to Penn State.
football program>>>14 years of child molestation
gotcha