Hari Seldon said:You generalized it about an entire campus with:
That's not my quote. LOL.
Hari Seldon said:You generalized it about an entire campus with:
Hari Seldon said:You generalized it about an entire campus with:
Hari Seldon said:You generalized it about an entire campus with:
Hari Seldon said:That is not how psychology works when backed into a corner.
CrankyJay said:That's not my quote. LOL.
You still sound like an idiot. You can keep grabbing snippets of an overall point and try and make it work.Fenderputty said:Says the man who posted this.
Hari Seldon said:Fuck then why did you respond to me responding to that? lol
Damn is it EVER a Penn Staters' fault with you!?!Hari Seldon said:Fuck then why did you respond to me responding to that? lol
Pristine_Condition said:Who is backed into a corner?
Who backed them into that corner?
Aren't the people in that corner actually there because they themselves ran there, so they could all gather together in their own little insular group, so they could escape the real world, -- the world telling them the truth -- that their heroes are cowards who allowed a child rapist to live among them, to have an office on campus, and ultimately, to rape more children again and again and again through their own inaction?
So if they are in a corner, then yes, they are cowards. Cowards who are afraid to face the truth.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:You still sound like an idiot. You can keep grabbing snippets of an overall point and try and make it work.
His actions come across more as premeditated than anything else. Those aren't the actions of a coward, they are the actions of a morally sick person.
I dunno. I think you're reaching but we will see.Sanjuro Tsubaki said:You still sound like an idiot. You can keep grabbing snippets of an overall point and try and make it work.
His actions come across more as premeditated than anything else. Those aren't the actions of a coward, they are the actions of a morally sick person.
I'm saying those things because you are desperately trying pin the tail on an argument point with me, but not bringing anything to the table. I've already stated I don't feel sorry for McQueary and you keep trying to assume I do.Fenderputty said:Your overall point was again? I'm an idiot and a fool and need help. Cause it sounded a lot to me like you've been almost feeling sorry for McQueary and all the horrible things he had to go through seeing.
I'm not even bringing up the flight angle. McQueary worked alongside Paterno and Sandusky for a decade after seeing a ten year old boy get anally raped. Put the pieces together.C Jones said:I dunno. I think you're reaching but we will see.
Again flight is not uncommon in this scenario. Plus he went to the most powerful person on campus.
beast786 said:This is exactly what I am afraid off. Sandusky was above the law. And McQueary and everyone knew that. And were probably knew that reporting to COPS would mean nothing.
Again , not making excuse for McQueary. But he could be scared of his life.
I didn't say having that opinion was wrong. I'm just explaining why there is more to his situation than a person who didn't go to the police. Problem with this thread is it is filled with people still trying to make argumental points. I try and give more information to one...I then have someone else trying to tell me about poor JoePa or white knighting McQueary.wonderkins said:eznark is on fire. Love it.
And it's not for lack of understanding of an argument, it's because some of us reject the argument out of hand.
McQueary's culpable of being a cowardly fuckdick. No mitigating factor changes that.
C Jones said:I think he was speaking for himself too. When people crap on the entire uni I would think it drives him nuts.
Hari Seldon said:So not knowing the socially correct way to deal with your emotions is somehow being a coward? Imo it is called being a 20 year old.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:I didn't say having that opinion was wrong. I'm just explaining why there is more to his situation than a person who didn't go to the police. Problem with this thread is it is filled with people still trying to make argumental points. I try and give more information to one...I then have someone else trying to tell me about poor JoePa or white knighting McQueary.
...I've already posted a bunch of it. I didn't call you an idiot either. I'm not aware if you read the jury report or anything as many of the people in here have not.eznark said:So give this additional information that us ignorant idiots aren't privy to. So far you've said you know more than me. Maybe, probably? I don't know. Let's hear it.
Sysgen said:There is a district attorney missing and declared dead with his harddrive recovered from the bottom of a river so you may be right and still who knows how deep this thing goes.
No, I get that. And you're a good person.Sanjuro Tsubaki said:I didn't say having that opinion was wrong. I'm just explaining why there is more to his situation than a person who didn't go to the police. Problem with this thread is it is filled with people still trying to make argumental points. I try and give more information to one...I then have someone else trying to tell me about poor JoePa or white knighting McQueary.
I misunderstood your argument, I think. And I think we all did.Sanjuro Tsubaki said:I'm saying those things because you are desperately trying pin the tail on an argument point with me, but not bringing anything to the table. I've already stated I don't feel sorry for McQueary and you keep trying to assume I do.
I'm not even bringing up the flight angle. McQueary worked alongside Paterno and Sandusky for a decade after seeing a ten year old boy get anally raped. Put the pieces together.
Slayven said:WHy the fuck are people rioting?
eznark said:You know he was 28, right?
Hari Seldon said:Apparently you don't red gud either since I was obviously referring to the rioters.
Pristine_Condition said:Every single one of the people responsible for the fact that people are crapping on Penn State are people from Penn State: The accused rapist, the accused perjurers, the Head Football Coach that lives in a bubble, the willfully-ignorant fanbase and student body that refuses to accept the disgusting reality of the actions and inactions of those people, the stupid student and fanboy "media" trying to make this a media conspiracy or some bullshit, and the rioters -- Again, ALL THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE EMBARRASSING PENN STATE ARE ALL FROM PENN STATE.
He should be mad at them, yet he's actually defending some of them, and instead blaming some murky bugaboo outside influence, be it the media or the public at large, or whatever.
That's craziness.
College fans scare me, and half the time the crazies fans never went to the school.Zzoram said:Because they like football and therefore support the coach, despite the coach being a piece of shit and doing nothing to stop his assistant from raping children on campus repeatedly.
I have no problem people believing he was a coward. I simply don't buy it. After reading the report, hearing the variation of statements since, and looking at his involvement with the program from that date...it just doesn't all add up properly.C Jones said:I misunderstood your argument, I think. And I think we all did.
Eznark and some others I believe are saying he's a coward for running away from the shower incident. But you seem to be talking about his actions as a whole from 2002 on (as far as why he didn't talk to police). We are talking about two different things.
eznark said:Damn it! And I don't even have the "I went to Penn St. so it can't be my fault" argument. Sigh.
Pristine_Condition said:LOL
Yes, I'm sure outside pressures are causing all these people from Penn State to act absolutely crazy.
...
Perhaps a hat of some type would stop this offending outside influence from causing "the psychological response" you speak of.
Perhaps a hat lined with aluminum foil or something...
Now let me ask you to be clear: you also think him running out of the locker rooms that night was premeditated? That's the area Im a little confused at when it comes to your thoughts on him. I know you think his actions after are.Sanjuro Tsubaki said:I have no problem people believing he was a coward. I simply don't buy it. After reading the report, hearing the variation of statements since, and looking at his involvement with the program from that date...it just doesn't all add up properly.
He knows exactly who Sandusky is and what he means to the program. He might have not had his full plan thought out, but he knew who he was running out on and why he was.C Jones said:Now let me ask you to be clear: you also think him running out of the locker rooms that night was premeditated? That's the area Im a little confused at when it comes to your thoughts on him. I know you think his actions after are.
Gotcha. That is definitely believable. My version varies but only slightly. It's basically semantics though.Sanjuro Tsubaki said:He knows exactly who Sandusky is and what he means to the program. He might have not had his full plan thought out, but he knew who he was running out on and why he was.
Say it was the janitor from Victim 8. He would have called the cops or possibly stepped in.
I'm not even aware of your points though. I was speaking primarily to eznark. While doing that getting trolled by another poster. All I read was the flight risk posting which I seriously doubt ever crossed his mind.C Jones said:Gotcha. That is definitely believable. My version varies but only slightly. It's basically semantics though.
You can call it many things. I used the term "morally sick" to describe McQueary. The fact is you can use that term to describe practically every person involved to this point.DBebm5 said:I think a healthy society has to define what McQ did a cowardly act. That doesn't mean that he wasn't also brainwashed within a larger environment, but turning your back on a child being brutalized like that is cowardly, period.
To synthesize the two points being made: a massive conspiracy of silence like what seems to exist at Penn State requires a lot of cowardice to function properly, in fact.
It occurs to me a culture of worship exists at Penn State based on the levels of inaction in the administration and the students reaction.DBebm5 said:I think a healthy society has to define what McQ did a cowardly act. That doesn't mean that he wasn't also brainwashed within a larger environment, but turning your back on a child being brutalized like that is cowardly, period.
To synthesize the two points being made: a massive conspiracy of silence like what seems to exist at Penn State requires a lot of cowardice to function properly, in fact.
marathonfool said:What are the Penn State students protesting exactly? The firing and media coverage? Seems like they are doing more harm to the university than the firing itself.
Well I meant flight as in "panic" as in flight or fight. I think the mix of what he saw and who he saw made him flip out and bounce and not contact police.Sanjuro Tsubaki said:I'm not even aware of your points though. I was speaking primarily to eznark. While doing that getting trolled by another poster. All I read was the flight risk posting which I seriously doubt ever crossed his mind.
You can call it many things. I used the term "morally sick" to describe McQueary. The fact is you can use that term to describe practically every person involved to this point.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:You can call it many things. I used the term "morally sick" to describe McQueary. The fact is you can use that term to describe practically every person involved to this point.
We don't know. I read over that chapter several times trying to piece it together.DBebm5 said:100% agreed.
A non-semantics topic, for those who have ready the GJ report: what's the significance of the section after (I believe) the janitor catches him, where Sandusky prowls the parking lot a couple of times? Was he looking for witnesses? There aren't supposed to be any irrelevant details in such reports, but the importance of that info escaped me.
That seems to indicate one of a few things...outlawedprod said:"During our own investigation, years later, the mother told us that she had been specifically instructed by state police not to speak with reporters. No charges were filed against Sandusky in 1998. With the mother cowed into silence, the incident remained buried."
Hari Seldon said:The only people I'm defending are the rioters. They have justifiable reasons for being mad at the university. Not because the university fired JoePa, but because it seems everyone at the top of the university was a bunch of scumbags. But whatever, they are at least mad at the right people, if not for the right reasons.
Hari Seldon said:JoePa I'm willing to wait for more evidence...
Hari Seldon said:...because he is the least guilty out of everyone involved.
I assumed he was looking to see if there would be any police activity or other faculty gathering around the scene due to the incident being reported.DBebm5 said:100% agreed.
A non-semantics topic, for those who have read the GJ report: what's the significance of the section after (I believe) the janitor catches him, where Sandusky prowls the parking lot a couple of times? Was he looking for witnesses? There aren't supposed to be any irrelevant details in such reports, but the importance of that info escaped me.