WhiteRabbitEXE
Member
Fuck guys... I haven't been this depressed about something being over since Lost 6 years ago.
Fuck guys... I haven't been this depressed about something being over since Lost 6 years ago.
People claimed the show jumped the shark when Carter was killed, and when Samaritan was introduced. IIRC, people preferred if they had stayed with the procedural elements instead of evolving into large mythology. Which is insanely mind-boggling.
My problem with Samaritin is that it was too OP compared to the Machine that Finch never wanted to "release" from it chains. It was a really painfull arc, people were dying because of Finch ethic and Samaritin having unlimited power and ressources.
So I'm part of people who prefered POI before Samaritin but I still watched because I like the show.
Yeah I felt in S4 they dumbed down the capabilities of the two machines. There were a number of instances where Samaritan didn't catch something that The Machine in the past seasons would've quickly picked up on.The problem I had with Samaritan was that it never actually felt as smart as the machine and how they continued pushing it.
It never topped the machine seeing Finch by his reflection on the cake dish over someone's shoulder through a webcam to me.
Samaritan was better in the background as an ongoing plot,
Elias, Root, Control & Hersh, HR, Vigilance, Kara and Mark Snow heck even MI6 guy I found far more interesting.
My problem with Samaritin is that it was too OP compared to the Machine that Finch never wanted to "release" from it chains. It was a really painfull arc, people were dying because of Finch ethic and Samaritin having unlimited power and ressources.
So I'm part of people who prefered POI before Samaritin but I still watched because I like the show.
Yeah I felt in S4 they dumbed down the capabilities of the two machines. There were a number of instances where Samaritan didn't catch something that The Machine in the past seasons would've quickly picked up on.
in the end, was it the Machine that downloaded back into the subway? or a new AI based on the Machine and Samaritan, but obviously it had the voice of Root
It was the Machine's copy. Samaritan is 100% gone.
Damn our Lord Savior JC sacrificing himself again to save us all, I'm sad man,this show was great, brought my family together, I watched every episode with my father and brother.
This and Fringe were the sleeper hits of the last ten years for sure.
You know, I'd be interested to hear what it actually means to 'kill' Samaritan. It'd be pretty plausible that it isn't as easy as it is to kill a human.
To kill an ASI physically would be to destroy it's drivers, processors, etc. However, to do this to a wired up ASI, you'd basically have to destory all the computer equipment it inhabits, something not possible.
Alternatively, you delete it's existence as a sentient file. But it's actually really difficult to delete things on a computer. Something can almost always be recovered, right?
The machine didn't physically destroy anything of Samaritan, so what did it actually do to cease the existence of Samaritan? While Samaritan as we know him is definitively gone, it seems like there would be remains of his existence that would definitely affect how the machine programs.
I wish I knew more about coding to understand how an ASI would work.
You know, I'd be interested to hear what it actually means to 'kill' Samaritan. It'd be pretty plausible that it isn't as easy as it is to kill a human.
To kill an ASI physically would be to destroy it's drivers, processors, etc. However, to do this to a wired up ASI, you'd basically have to destory all the computer equipment it inhabits, something not possible.
Alternatively, you delete it's existence as a sentient file. But it's actually really difficult to delete things on a computer. Something can almost always be recovered, right?
The machine didn't physically destroy anything of Samaritan, so what did it actually do to cease the existence of Samaritan? While Samaritan as we know him is definitively gone, it seems like there would be remains of his existence that would definitely affect how the machine programs.
I wish I knew more about coding to understand how an ASI would work.
P.S. As an extreme aside, 'Zero Day' is interesting because of how stealthy its implausibilities are. The Memories that the machine has manually reentered are all base64 strings. The biggest problem with this is that just one wrong character renders the entire thing useless. So in order for the machine to make any use of that data, it either needs to correctly predict and account for every human fuck-up--a near impossibility--or have multiple mills process the same data and try to gain a consensus from the multiple versions. Either way, I imagine that whatever state it is recovering is always incomplete and garbled. Also, unlikely that this state can all be put in over the course of a single day unless it has mills all over the world.
Honestly, i think the best episode is S01E07 - Witness.
That's when you get that shit has just got real.
Not that the finales (God Mode > If-Then-Else > Return 0 > Firewall > Deus Ex Machina) don't have their punch, but the Elias presentation was too good.
I feel S3\4 are a bit too doom&gloom. You can only be an underdog at one step from total annihilation for so long.
Also as a coder, the eye rolling at anything involving hacking, "nuclear option virus" and samaritan in general was... uhm...
Not really, no.
Double parity bit should get it done properly. Although, it probably would've made sense to compress and decompress to words - errors are far less likely when you can perform a dictionary check.
Thinking of it, not sure why it couldn't have offloaded the data it wanted to keep to some other data storage, and just have hired employees upload it back after the midnight wipe.
The "typing it back in" was really more for dramatic effect. To pass Ernest Thornhill off as a person in the episode for longer.
The point is not whether or not the errors can be detected, they obviously can. The problem is that unless the string is re-entered, that data is pretty much lost. To ensure QA, the machine would have to be pretty involved in the process to make sure that bad strings were re-entered correctly via some sort of feedback.
It is the last point that is important here. That entire operation was much too makeshift to have established the sort of back and forth required to ensure that the data was always good.
And yes, using actual words would have been much more conducive to manual re-entry, but I am assuming that it would have been a bridge too far.
Parity bits allow for data recovery. They're not MD5 checksums - implementing them for large amounts of data is pretty hard (and memory consuming, +12.5% for 1 error / word tolerance, +25% for 2) but to lose data past double bit parity is pretty unlikely.
For "Why don't you just use external HDDs, dummy" - Finch likely hardcoded that limitation in. The point was that it was a workaround on Finch's laws, contrary to the spirit but not the letter.
Not really, no.
Double parity bit should get it done properly. Although, it probably would've made sense to compress and decompress to words - errors are far less likely when you can perform a dictionary check.
In a scenario where all the the data is properly purged(and aggressively zeroed) from all disks, memory and backups, all the machine has are the base64 strings that it needs to decode before it can use the resultant data. Ex:
Given this string: "This is the machines memory."
Base64 encode: "VGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgbWFjaGluZXMncyBtZW1vcnku"
Now a few minor mistakes: "VHhpXyBpcyB0aGVgBWFjagluZXMncBtZW1vCnku"
Your new (incomplete) decoded string: "Txi_ is the`acj nes'p[[K"
This is assuming that the machine at this point has no reference at all and is simple able to decode the data and tests its veracity. It has little recourse when it comes to fixing the bad data unless the situation is as I outline in the original post.
Any competent super intelligent AI is going to be able to estimate the error rate of people reading and typing its memories in, and then select a level of error correction that can detect and repair any corruptions introduced with an acceptable probability of unrecoverable corruption.
IGN's top 10 episodes of Person of Interest (with 1 Honorable Mention)
HM - Witness - Season 1
10- RAM - Season 3
9 - Firewall - Season 1
8 - Relevance - Season 2
7 - The Crossing - Season 3
6 - The Day the World Went Away - Season 5
5 - Deus Ex Machina - Season 3
4 - 6741 - Season 5
3 - The Devil's Share - Season 3
2 - Return 0 - Season 5
1 - If-Then-Else - Season 4
My Thoughts:
Not sure if I'd have 6741 on my list. I still have serious problems over real life simulation/VR working on anyone strapped to a table and not walking. Shoot was fine, but it started to become the main storyline of a show about ASI's. I also feel that keeping Shaw alive after If-Then-Else damages it enough to drop it a spot or 2. It was a perfect ending scene, but nullified by offscreen events. Always thought that If-Then-Else was going to be John's death, but changed by Sarah's departure, going by how little storyline they gave John afterwards.
But as is, Return 0 has yet to cause me not to tear up on multiple scenes. It's the music, the end, and it's the little things.
I think I'd rank my 10 like this:
1. Return 0 - Season 5
2. The Devil's Share - Season 3
3. If-Then-Else - Season 4
4. God Mode - Season 2
5. Deus Ex Machina - Season 3
6. Dead Reckoning - Season 2
7. Terra Incognita - Season 4
8. Zero Day - Season 2
9. Firewall - Season 1
10. Death Benefit - Season 3
HM's: Proteus - S2, Foe - S1, Mission Creep - S1, RAM - S3, / - S3, YHWH - S4, 90% of the rest of the show S1-5
List could change and move every day, except for probably the top 3.
The Day the World Went Away was on of the best things ever on television. Ever.
Dany, does the IGN list skip episodes? If it does I suggest not doing that. The small moments are what makes this show amazing and you may miss those.
Dany, does the IGN list skip episodes? If it does I suggest not doing that. The small moments are what makes this show amazing and you may miss those.
I will once I can get my hands on the S4 blu-ray. It'll actually only be released in Finland today, it seems. Can't afford it right away but I'll get it as soon as I can.Carter's death is felt even through S4. Keep watching!
Should have shot him in the knees