No it's not it. i meant he had nothing on me to push with. the fact that i voted on style with my first post in the game means i can't be scum(or not a very good one at that).
I have nothing on you to push with?
Well let's see -
Day1:
*You "RNG" vote for Style in post 113.
*The nature of your vote for Style is called into question by Sorian in posts 117 and 121.
*Style defends your "RNG" vote in post 119.
*Sorian votes for you in post 140 and connects Style's defense to you as well.
*TheExodu5 even discusses Style as being one of his bigger concerns in post 253 (but scum would never call out scum).
*Style votes for you at post 157 then unvoted at post 391 because it was a "stupid vote" and he doesn't want to "pile on" despite you only being at three total votes, him being the second.
*Sorian even calls you out specifically as one potential scum player sitting amidst the natural votes for Style in post 402.
*TheExodu5 casts a vote for Style (again, no way scum goes after scum though) in post 527.
*Sorian point she out TheExodu5 using the term bus in post 544, this is the point where things take a turn for TheExodu5.
*TheExodu5 agrees you seem suspect (same he did to Style) but in the same post comes to your defense in posts 557. Calls Sorian's logic "puzzling".
*TheExodu5 walks back some on Style and also further defends you in post 597. Says Sorian is "grasping at straws". At this point he is likely scaling back his attack on teammates because he knows he fucked up and doesn't want to lead to you all getting lynched in a row.
*TheExodu5 doubles down on you and Style in post 648, defending you both again and attacking Sorian's claims.
*You stand by your Style vote in post 817 and seem content for the moment but that won't last will it?
*TheExodu5 makes his push and votes for exmachina in post 819. While doing so he goes to bat for you yet again saying he's "not feeling" your lynch.
*One post later in 820 you chirp out that you would also vote exmachina despite how content you seemed just moments before.
*Two more votes are cast on TheExodu5 prompting Vanguard to now switch off of his "hard push" for Style and vote exmachina to try and save now confirmed scum TheExodu5 in post 867. Exmachina is somehow his "only other read".
*Sorian points out that Vanguard, Style, and TheExodu5 appear to be connected in several posts like 615, 620. Then in post 915 he connects all three of you based on evidence I've included above.
*At day end all three of you are sitting on the exmachina votes, making up most of the push for him.
Day 2:
*Vanguard casts his vote for Style in post 1299. He is the sixth person on the vote. He does not give in-depth reasoning or follow this up at all before day end.
Day 3:
*I cast my vote for Vanguard today in post 1509. Point out you have not contributed at all and I already suspected you over the above reasons and have stated so several times.
*Vanguard finally makes his first posts of this day phase in posts 1542, 1544, 1546, 1551, 1553, and 1555 all to make the argument that he went hard after Style day one (via a supposed RNG vote), played a major hand in Style's lynch day 2 (via one post where he wasn't even in the first half of the votes), claim that scum would not paint a target on scum (as if a single RNG vote is much of a target), that scum would not hurt a fellow scum teammate (refuted by franconp from previous games and my own above examples from THIS game), and paint me as scum despite your own abandoned vote on Style in an attempt to tip the scales away from TheExodu5 by voting on exmachina.
Your argument is weak and the fact that you were completely quiet for the day until it was time to defend yourself then there was a flurry of activity is suspicious. The fact that your defense of yourself was weak and primarily you chose to instead attack me over my vote is even weaker.
I stand by my vote.