I was one that defended Felix with his last fight with WSJ. It was reporting on the things he said and did but I really like his content. He did a fucking dumb thing.
I can't wait for the hbomberguy video on this
Some gaming youtubers went from internet celebrity to, like, celebrity celebrity. This increased their fanbase to the point where people start to criticize them more and they're under a bigger microscope.
So, for example, they say nigger during a video. They get criticized for it. Well, they think, black people say that all the time! Clearly I don't need to apologize for it, it's a double standard! So they don't apologize and people keep bringing it up. They, for every good reason, get called racist by some. Then other people will have the youtuber's back; actually, man, you're right, it is a double-standard, those people who are criticizing you are overreactive fucks! By the way, have you heard of this guy Milo? You'd like his shit.
Soon, they start only listening to the people that support them, and those people are alt-right loons who believe you should be able to do anything and say anything as long as it's not about them. If you're a big youtuber who got thrust into the limelight without the time to acclimate to criticism, this way of thinking is really appealing. It feeds into the idea that everything is everyone else's fault and people only hate you because of your success.
This can also just exasperate poisonous thoughts they already had before this. It is unlikely someone became a white supremacist just because people criticized them for saying nigger, but they didn't feel safe being vocal about it until the Criticism Loop gave them the perceived support they needed to come out.
In summary, you're right. Every single one of them probably did not start with these beliefs, but some did. They all end up in the same place, though, because they can't handle a reality where something they did was absolutely wrong.
If anything, I would think that people on this board, and even the "SJW" types would fight to retake the word and own it the way it should be.
I'm proud to be a gamer. Gaming was mostly attacked from the right concerning violence, etc. then came the gamer gate era. Then it just became a war of toxicity, demonization, and far left-far-right shit flinging while everybody in the middle just wanted to play games.
All that seemed to cool down at least until Vidcon when big wigs of both sides had it out and caused more controversy.
It's just weird. In a world where progressives get pissed for being mislabeled, and or called the wrong label even inadvertently, its strange people wouldn't want to defend a good label that is being a gamer.
LMAO- nice attempt at discourse there. I don't even watch the guy. Screw me for trying to be objective, right?FTFY
P.S. Don't try to "both sides" this discussion with your JAQ'ing off posts and actually read what people are posting.
No. Don't loop me in with either camp, and don't try and shame me for looking at either side for objectivity. I don't even go in Anita or GG threads because there isn't a lick of welcome dissent in those threads with lout getting dogpiled at the least. I think both sides are terrible IMO. Hell, even when one from either side dares to try and find a middle ground or try and have meaningful discussion, they are attacked, tarred and feathered. Example: Boogie at Vidcon, Liana K, or Laci Green, DARED to try and do something that was against the narrative, even if reasonable or factual. I think a couple on the skeptic side tried this and the rest just disowned and attacked. Nobody wants reason or movement towards resolution on either side. It's all terrible.I imagine their priorities concern things that would actually have a tangible effect on the industry, like promoting inclusion or combating harassment.
You pulled the both sides argument on GamerGate, a movement that was made to push women out of the industry, twice in one paragraph. That's a problem.
Lots of GamerGate supporters like TotalBiscuit liked to say "We're real gamers who just want to play games," just like you are. I'm not saying you're one of them, but you're not going to be able to do anything to retake the label when you're using their rhetoric. Also, one of the other stereotypes people have of self-styled gamers is that they lack concern (at best) for literally anything else. You're contributing to that negative (though comparatively tame) connotation people have with the word by seemingly being more focused with "just playing games" and being called a gamer, so, again, you're not doing a whole lot to indicate why the word gamer would be better off being reclaimed by people like you when it's still in your possession (at least partially).
What exactly are you referring to here? Is it gender identity? Because if it is, and you're pulling the old "Nerds are just like *actual marginalized group here*" shtick, you're once again demonstrating that the word gamer still belongs to you, even if it's not for the reasons you want.
He did a fucking dumb thing. But I'm not sure it was intended as anti-Semitic.
I still don't understand what was the missing context in the WSJ thing. They even included a clip in the video where Pewdiepie says he's not an actual anti-semite and didn't think the guys would hold up the sign and even apologizes.LMAO- nice attempt at discourse there. I don't even watch the guy. Screw me for trying to be objective, right?
I watched the videos in full context, unlike the the WSJ hit piece.
As far as the proof discussion, it's a long thread and I asked for a couple links. With the time it took you to take shots at me, you could have helped me out.
See, now this I mostly agree with. It was definitely insensitive. But again- stupid. I think it cheapens the actual fight against real anti-semites to loop him in with that.Here's your problem. PewDiePie's start of darkness wasn't that he secretly had a shrine to Hitler in his basement. It wasn't that he passed by the synagogue and his soul was brimming with violent intentions.
The issue was that PewDiePie, largely due to being a rich white man, has developed so little sympathy for his fellow human being that he still thinks as a grown adult that "death to jews" is a funny joke. It doesn't occur to him that a group whose global population were cut in half by people spouting that same thing would not find that funny. Maybe a culture who has been oppressed for two thousand years would not find that funny.
PewDiePie does not have to have "anti-Semitic" intent to be an anti-Semite, he could just be an unsympathetic dickwad who has no problem kicking around people who are unlike him as he goes about his day. And he probably is and unsympathetic dickward. This is the aspect that makes explicit racists into attractive friends; they're the ones who will pat you on your back and say it's their fault they were offended, rich white man. That is the aspect that his explicit racist friends will latch on to and strengthen when they want to build PewDiePie into a supporter.
What makes it even worse in my eyes is that PewDiePie's lack of sympathy for others previously became a problem with his rape jokes. And he fixed it. He admitted he was wrong and he decided to change. It seemed like he had the chance to realize his lack of sympathy and change for the better. There are other YouTubers who have; look at early Something Awful Let's Plays and they also make a ton of similar jokes, which they no longer do.
But, for some reason, Jews are harder for him to sympathize with for PewDiePie. Suddenly he's going to strike that line in the sand and say, no, I'm not going to develop sympathy for Jews. In fact, I'm going to regress and become more aggressive and hostile to others instead. Maybe he had less sympathy for them to start off with, or maybe him having much more money than he did back then has made it that much harder for him to self-reflect and grow in a positive direction.
The apology was like 10% of the video, rest was complaining about WSJ yes. That's not a good apology to start pointing fingers and saying it wasn't my own fault afterall!See, now this I mostly agree with. It was definitely insensitive. But again- stupid. I think it cheapens the actual fight against real anti-semites to loop him in with that.
And didn't he apologize in his follow up vid, for being offensive while simultaneously attacking WSJ for he hit job? It's been a whil, I might have to go rewatch.
See, now this I mostly agree with. It was definitely insensitive. But again- stupid. I think it cheapens the actual fight against real anti-semites to loop him in with that.
And didn't he apologize in his follow up vid, for being offensive while simultaneously attacking WSJ for he hit job? It's been a whil, I might have to go rewatch.
The video they made was just a string of clips not noting he Content of the actual video and the context within.I still don't understand what was the missing context in the WSJ thing. They even included a clip in the video where Pewdiepie says he's not an actual anti-semite and didn't think the guys would hold up the sign and even apologizes.
They were simply reporting on the stuff he has produced. No twisting of truth or leaving out important details.
The apology was like 10% of the video, rest was complaining about WSJ yes. That's not a good apology to start pointing fingers and saying it wasn't my own fault afterall!
I guess saying "I apologize" is not enough. And yes. It was clearly a hit piece centered to destroy his character, while lying by omission.1. He is a real anti-Semite. Casual anti-Semitism is still anti-Semitism.
2. An apology is not an apology when it ends with "but it's the media's fault, fuck the media." The guy is still not taking responsibility for his action, he's saying whatever empty statements he thinks he needs to to get the pressure off of him.
Screw me for trying to be objective, right?
I watched the videos in full context, unlike the the WSJ hit piece.
No. Don't loop me in with either camp, and don't try and shame me for looking at either side for objectivity. I don't even go in Anita or GG threads because there isn't a lick of welcome dissent in those threads with lout getting dogpiled at the least. I think both sides are terrible IMO.
And again, I'm not here defending PDP on this one, again because I'm not educated on the matter good enough.
No. Don't loop me in with either camp, and don't try and shame me for looking at either side for objectivity.
I don't even go in Anita or GG threads because there isn't a lick of welcome dissent in those threads with lout getting dogpiled at the least. I think both sides are terrible IMO. Hell, even when one from either side dares to try and find a middle ground or try and have meaningful discussion, they are attacked, tarred and feathered. Example: Boogie at Vidcon, Liana K, or Laci Green, DARED to try and do something that was against the narrative, even if reasonable or factual. I think a couple on the skeptic side tried this and the rest just disowned and attacked. Nobody wants reason or movement towards resolution on either side. It's all terrible.
It's not even enough that folks like Bill Maher apologized multiple times for their mistake. There has to be blood. Careers lost. Livelihoods destroyed.
I guess saying "I apologize" is not enough.
The video they made was just a string of clips not noting he Content of the actual video and the context within.
Aside from watching H3H3's take on it, I went back and watched the videos in question. Many of them were parodys.
What'' also funny is, GAF LOVED H3H3 until Ethan dared to defend Felix. There's even an H3 OT basically.
I guess I just align with "Speech should be free, but the consequences earned." And all that happened as intended. PDP took a risk, he lost shows and partnerships. Consequences. But that's never enough here, even for people who make mistakes. It's not even enough that folks like Bill Maher apologized multiple times for their mistake. There has to be blood. Careers lost. Livelihoods destroyed.
And yet again- attacks, and not one person has offered to say "here's why I believe there's a pay-gap, oh, and here's a source." That's all I'm looking for. Not everyone blindly support something while being shamed for not supporting by default. Should there be a pay gap? Hell no. Even with my employer, every one entering the positions listed are eligible for the same base pay, and then everything else is performance incentive and merit increase based on annual performance and behavior.Using phrases like "hit piece" doesn't make a very compelling case that you're an objective observer.
Ah, OK, so you are a "both-sider." Saves us a lot of time beating around the bush.
If only I had a dollar for every time an "uneducated, objective" person came into one of these threads with strong, bullshit opinions on the subject...
I'm a gamer, movie-er, TV show-er, worker, sleeper, drinker, breather, fucker, masturbator and dang proud of it!I AM A GAMER! I IDENTIFY WITH MASS MARKET CONSUMER PRODUCTS!
I was one that defended Felix with his last fight with WSJ. It was all out of context BS that everyone just picked and raged over. He did a fucking dumb thing. But I'm not sure it was intended as anti-Semitic. That said, I don't have anything to say here because I don't know much about he wage gap argument. I hear both sides making solid arguments (at least for the American wage gap). I know a lot of fuss is being made in Hollywood about equal pay. But isn't that a bit different?
So If anybody has links and proof, etc, I'd love to see it. I genuinely don't know much about it.
Ask how much the industry is making profit wise. That's a positive right? Otherwise, but the left and the right have just shat all over it over the last 30 years
People who don't like labels, is best I can tell. I'm proud to be a gamer. Gaming was mostly attacked from the right concerning violence, etc. then came the gamer gate era. Then it just became a war of toxicity, demonization, and far left-far-right shit flinging while everybody in the middle just wanted to play games.
All that seemed to cool down at least until Vidcon when big wigs of both sides had it out and caused more controversy.
This video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFY7mGkmFxo What important context should be added here? It does show the Pewdiepie's side too, that it's just entertainment. And yes saying I apologize isn't enough when it's clearly not sincere because he goes on a long rant that he was just made to look bad while not actually doing anything worth criticizing. If he truly thinks he fucked up and went too far, why isn't he fully owning up to it but blaming media?The video they made was just a string of clips not noting he Content of the actual video and the context within.
Aside from watching H3H3's take on it, I went back and watched the videos in question. Many of them were parodys.
I guess saying "I apologize" is not enough. And yes. It was clearly a hit piece centered to destroy his character, while lying by omission.
I guess saying "I apologize" is not enough.
No. Don't loop me in with either camp, and don't try and shame me for looking at either side for objectivity.
PewDiePie continues to be a true titan of human thought & wisdom.
I guess saying "I apologize" is not enough.
those posters are not racist but they sure are funny.
Maybe if there was actual hate or something on them i would even consideer them racist or anything similar.
Stereotypes will always exist, making fun of them and i mean all of them not just some of them makes them less impactfull when used in ill intended ways.
Is just like how curse words get their power from being prohibited and lose the impact when used constantly.
those posters are not racist but they sure are funny.
Maybe if there was actual hate or something on them i would even consideer them racist or anything similar.
Stereotypes will always exist, making fun of them and i mean all of them not just some of them makes them less impactfull when used in ill intended ways.
Is just like how curse words get their power from being prohibited and lose the impact when used constantly.
All the stereotype jokes my high school friends told me sure weakened their power. Now I don't take them seriously when they text me about feminist rallies so that I can mock all the stupid sluts like they love to. Or when they point out how all the things they say about brown people are true, except about me because I'm different.
You are mixing things here, is not the same making a joke about how stupid is a stereotype than making fun of a stereotype.
Is not the same saying "fuck you" than replacing every other word with fuck when speaking.
You are deluding yourself if you claim to be objective.LMAO- nice attempt at discourse there. I don't even watch the guy. Screw me for trying to be objective, right?
That's bullshit. Plenty of people offered legitimate criticism/disagreement of Anita's videos or opinions and weren't shat upon whatsoever. It's only when it's disingenuous bullshit that the dogpiles start.No. Don't loop me in with either camp, and don't try and shame me for looking at either side for objectivity. I don't even go in Anita or GG threads because there isn't a lick of welcome dissent in those threads with lout getting dogpiled at the least.
...OhI think both sides are terrible IMO.
Hell, even when one from either side dares to try and find a middle ground or try and have meaningful discussion, they are attacked, tarred and feathered. Example: Boogie at Vidcon, Liana K, or Laci Green, DARED to try and do something that was against the narrative, even if reasonable or factual. I think a couple on the skeptic side tried this and the rest just disowned and attacked. Nobody wants reason or movement towards resolution on either side. It's all terrible.
And yet funnily enough you seem more than happy to write long diatribes about how "both sides are terrible" and "dissent is quashed". Huh. It's almost as if you didn't have a shred of good faith in any of your posts. :OAnd again, I'm not here defending PDP on this one, again because I'm not educated on the matter good enough.
Where explicitly is it pointing out that the stereotype is stupid? Highlight the exact point.
The joke is that it says "don't be racist", and then defines not being racist with a bunch of racial stereotypes. There's no enlightened message here.
Yes, excuse us for thinking that people who continually pull shit like this should not have a platform reaching and influencing millions. PewDiePie is infecting millions of kids with his bullshit, so yes, until he stops this shit, it is not enough.I guess I just align with "Speech should be free, but the consequences earned." And all that happened as intended. PDP took a risk, he lost shows and partnerships. Consequences. But that's never enough here, even for people who make mistakes. It's not even enough that folks like Bill Maher apologized multiple times for their mistake. There has to be blood. Careers lost. Livelihoods destroyed.
Yes, "I apologize" is not enough when you close it off with a rant about how you really are the victim and pull this:I guess saying "I apologize" is not enough. And yes. It was clearly a hit piece centered to destroy his character, while lying by omission.
"Don't be racist like mario" then describes how mario is the ultimate racist stereotype, the joke is in that the statement is wrong not that it is right.
Laci Green has become a TERF. No one should really be defending her.
This would imply that she has the capability to be radical about anything other than easy money. More of a TEMF.Laci Green has become a TERF. No one should really be defending her.
It doesn't "describe how mario is the ultimate racist stereotype", it just lists stereotypes that came to the minds of whoever made the poster. Mario is an Italian. He likes pasta, he's portly, and he works at a blue collar job (which we never really see him do). That's the part of Mario that's a stereotype.
He doesn't "look like a Mexican". He doesn't "jump like a black man". He doesn't "grab coins like a Jew". That's all on the people making the poster. Mario is Italian, not some racist Frankenstein.
It's much like how PewDiePie's jokes don't say anything about anyone else than PewDiePie and how he thinks.
What is "he talks like a black man" supposed to mean in that PewDiePie picture?it is abviously exagerating the character, finding racist traits in anything posible about the character, the joke works because of this, add more text to it and it becomes even better as long as is something that it is there. Te more racist traits you add , the wronger the statement is.
It reminds me in how a "how to basic" video works.
What is "he talks like a black man" supposed to mean in that PewDiePie picture?