• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Pillars of Eternity by Obsidian Entertainment (Kickstarter) [Up: Teaser]

J

jon bones

hot hot hanuman-on-man action
Vulcano's assistant said:
NeoGAF got one of the Inns, an artifact, and a NPC in the game by the way.
Click to expand...

you're blowing my mind, frank

tumblr_lhviv3NamC1qzfzefo1_1280.png
Click to expand...
 
L

Labadal

Member
I'm not a neogaf crewmember, but I'm also designing an NPC.

I still find it funny that I'll be contributing to the game, even if it only has a 0,001% effect on the final product.

If you guys are very interested in the game, Josh Sawyer posts many interesting things on the Obsidian forum. I don't agree with everything, but it does sometimes end up with some info not talked about anywhere else.
 
M

mclem

Member
Lancehead said:
Seems a bit redundant considering you'll be able to import (so I presume) portraits.
Click to expand...
Well, I assume the likeness would get an art style pass, so the Evilore would look good and appropriate. You don't get that with an imported image unless you're putting a lot of work in yourself.
 
V

Violet_0

Banned
I guess it's pretty cool to have your portrait in a critically acclaimed computer game, but I think I'd rather invest into a NPC character with a line of dialogue or two
 
I

injurai

Banned
Labadal said:
I'm not a neogaf crewmember, but I'm also designing an NPC.

I still find it funny that I'll be contributing to the game, even if it only has a 0,001% effect on the final product.

If you guys are very interested in the game, Josh Sawyer posts many interesting things on the Obsidian forum. I don't agree with everything, but it does sometimes end up with some info not talked about anywhere else.
Click to expand...

It's pretty awesome how the community is involved in this project. I don't think things have ever really been done to an extent like this. Hopefully it doesn't detract from their cohesive vision, but I'm really excited to see what all the fresh ideas bring to the world.

Dennis said:
This is more like it.

Now show me a pretty elf.
Click to expand...

They don't plan on including romances fyi...
 
M

Midou

Member
I was expecting them to reach this kind of level with the art, I am glad they did. Early stuff was meh, but we rarely see stuff that early, so I assumed it was very much a work in progress.
 
I

injurai

Banned
Midou said:
I was expecting them to reach this kind of level with the art, I am glad they did. Early stuff was meh, but we rarely see stuff that early, so I assumed it was very much a work in progress.
Click to expand...

Well the art said WIP and Don't Freak Out all over it... people still freaked...
 
M

Mister_Bubbles

Member
Labadal said:
If you guys are very interested in the game, Josh Sawyer posts many interesting things on the Obsidian forum. I don't agree with everything, but it does sometimes end up with some info not talked about anywhere else.
Click to expand...

Anything in particular that you think is interesting / worth mentioning?
 
L

Labadal

Member
Mister_Bubbles said:
Anything in particular that you think is interesting / worth mentioning?
Click to expand...

Examples of J.E Sawyer's anwsers to some questions.:

There will absolutely be circumstances where using a certain weapon, weapon type, spell, spell type against a specific enemy will be a tactically inferior choice, just as there is in A/D&D. The reason you have a party and the ability to switch weapons, spells, abilities, etc. is to allow you to adapt to the tactical requirements of different battles.

In 3E/3.5, if you have a character equipped with a mace and a character equipped with a longsword facing off against a zombie and a skeleton, insisting on attacking the skeleton with the longsword and the zombie with the mace will almost always be a bad tactic. Insisting on casting sleep against them is a bad tactic. If you cast Reflex-based AoE damage spells against rogues and monks, that's usually a bad tactic. Casting fireball at a red dragon is a bad tactic. If a tactic is never circumstantially bad, that's the death of tactical challenge. Why think of something else to do when the thing you've always done works just fine?

But just to make clear, in contrast to A/D&D, PE's weapon types will not be strategically inferior, i.e. bad even in the absence of context. There are a ton of weapons in every edition of A/D&D that are flat-out terrible on paper compared to other weapons. In 3E/3.5, it's usually Simple weapons, but there are plenty of Martial weapons that most people would never take. For example, why would I use a Heavy Mace when I could use a Morningstar? The latter weighs less, does the same damage, has the same crit range/multiplier, and two damage types (B/P vs. the Heavy Mace's B). Why would I use a Greatclub when I could use a Heavy Flail? The Heavy Flail weighs 2 lbs. more but has a higher crit range and has bonuses against disarming and when making trip attacks.

So if you want to make a dagger-wielding character, even a dagger-wielding fighter, that will absolutely be a viable choice in PE. If we do our jobs well, it should be roughly as viable -- and vulnerable to tactical challenges -- as a fighter who uses longswords or a pike. I wouldn't say that's usually the case in A/D&D. But there will be cases where Dagger Guy is going to run into problems against a particular enemy -- just as there will be for Longsword Guy and Pike Guy.
Click to expand...

We're not making a realistic simulation. "Is this realistic?" is a question I try to answer after I have answered, "Why would anyone want to use this?" If I haven't answered the latter question, the answer to the former is pretty irrelevant.

I've previously explained the basic mechanical distinction of low damage, high speed weapons vs. high damage, low speed weapons. Even if you're using a good damage type against the target's armor, you may still be operating at (significantly) suboptimal efficiency due to the difference between your weapons' damage and the target's DT. If the target has relatively high DT, using low damage, high speed weapons is inefficient. If the target has relatively low DT, using high damage, low speed weapons is inefficient.

Additionally, every base weapon type has an advantage that is not necessarily unique, but is not shared by most other weapons. The examples I have given previously are the pike's extended reach and the flail's ability to negate some of the defensive bonus of a shield.
Click to expand...

We don't really have the concept of "rounds" since we're working in real time, but certain weapons are inherently faster than others. Weapons like daggers, stilettos, rapiers, hatchets, clubs, and flails (think of these last two as being relatively small-- no caveman clubs or Witch-King flails) are "fast" one-handed weapons and attack more frequently than larger/heavier one-handed weapons like swords, maces, battle axes, war hammers, etc. Two-handed weapons are slower than their one-handed counterparts.

In terms of basic mechanics, the primary trade-off between fast weapons and slower weapons is between damage per hit and damage over time. If the target's DT is low, the low per-hit damage of a fast weapon is not particularly important because your attack rate racks up the damage quickly. If the target's DT is high, low per-hit damage is a bigger problem and the slower attacking weapons become much more efficient. But because DT is a value, not an absolute property associated with a type of armor, the applicability of weapons can shift as your character and his/her gear becomes more powerful. I.e., a DT that is problematic for Capt. Dagger at low level will mathematically become less relevant as your per-hit damage increases due to character/gear advancement.
Click to expand...
^This was all in the same topic from the #39 update.

I loved the weapon balancing of New Vegas. I love that there was actually reason to use Lucky over the Ranger Sequioa and that the best weapon was subjective, depending highly on your character's build. A character with high luck would find Lucky or That Gun amazing, whereas a character without high luck would consider them both bland, useless pistols for end-game. A character with high agility would enjoy using the Medicine Stick and it became his bread and butter, whereas a character with low agility or Trigger Discipline might find the gun fires too slow or reloads too slow to be worth using in combat. And again, a character with Fast Shot may use the AMR, but a character with Trigger might find it too slow to be useful, opting to use a Sniper Rifle variant instead. On the other hand, a Fast Shot user would be confined to an Assault Carbine or other highly-accurate SMG or shotgun whereas a Trigger Discipline user could enjoy anything from an Automatic Rifle to a 12.7mm SMG.


This, for me, gave New Vegas a lot of replay value. I replay it over and over and over trying to design characters around certain weapon concepts, figuring out what they can and can't do when put in the right hands. It was interesting to see which weapons could do what in the right situation, and this truly made two characters that both utilize guns manage to feel different from each other in playstyle.

Please, more of this. No "this Steel sword is 20% cooler than this iron sword" and gear that simply levels up with you with little to no variation at all. Give us variety, give us reason to experiment and give us reason to try and use different weapons as our main weapons, and have them perform differently in combat, of course.
Click to expand...
This is important to me and I will do my best to pursue it. To me, the realistic purpose/function of a weapon in the real world (assuming it exists) is the foundation for determining its place among peers, but realism should not dictate a weapon's overall value. I don't believe in designing "junk" weapons just for the sake of having them. I like the idea of having types of weapons with distinct strengths and weaknesses that the player can analyze for tactical application. If a player looks at a type of weapon and instantly realizes it will never have a place in his or her arsenal, I feel that's a failure on my part.

This also applies to weapon upgrades within "type". A longsword +2 is universally superior to a longsword +1. I think things get more interesting when an upgraded weapon is slightly inferior to its antecedent in one way. The more the player stops and makes a consideration of the pros and cons of using one weapon or another, the more he or she is problem solving and engaged in what's going on. If choices ever become no-brainers, they aren't really choices, and I think that can detract from the enjoyment of the game.
Click to expand...
^Here, he anwsers a forum member.

There's much more, but I'd have to search for specific things he's been talking about. If I see something that sounds interesting in the future, I'll post it here.
 
M

Mister_Bubbles

Member
Labadal said:
Examples of J.E Sawyer's anwsers to some questions.:

...

There's much more, but I'd have to search for specific things he's been talking about. If I see something that sounds interesting in the future, I'll post it here.
Click to expand...

Nice, those are indeed interesting reads - especially about his design approach to weapons. Thanks.
 
E

EndcatOmega

Unconfirmed Member
Not sure that's quite true about dnd 3.5 weapons- there's quite a few reasons to use a Greatclub- but that's just being pedantic. Good information, all told.
 
D

dude

dude
EndcatOmega said:
Not sure that's quite true about dnd 3.5 weapons- there's quite a few reasons to use a Greatclub- but that's just being pedantic. Good information, all told.
Click to expand...

Even if his specific example is wrong, D&D is full of useless weapons no one in their right mind would use (let alone specialize in) - And you can't know which ones until you're very familiar with the rules. I'm glad to know this is not the case in PE.
 
E

EndcatOmega

Unconfirmed Member
dude said:
Even if his specific example is wrong, D&D is full of useless weapons no one in their right mind would use (let alone specialize in) - And you can't know which ones until you're very familiar with the rules. I'm glad to know this is not the case in PE.
Click to expand...

Well, yeah, I'm just being a pedantic rpg nerd (though thanks to Clerics, even 'useless' weapons usually have their place)! Still, I do hope some weapons aren't only viable with certain classes- I wonder if unarmed Fighters will work?
 
L

LiK

Member
injurai said:
It means we know you're prepping for EviLore Travels: Project Eternity by adding your likeness. Don't disappoint, we expect let's plays and everything.
Click to expand...

gonna make a custom quest where EviLore must journey to GT Kingdom to meet Lord Pachter
 
K

Keasar

Member
LiK said:
gonna make a custom quest where EviLore must journey to GT Kingdom to meet Lord Pachter
Click to expand...

To stand in front a court of wizards due to allegations for leading a group of "smart peasant a**holes".

Which will be broadcasted through crystal balls.
 
X

xelios

Universal Access can be found under System Preferences
Lancehead said:
Seems a bit redundant considering you'll be able to import (so I presume) portraits.
Click to expand...

mclem said:
Well, I assume the likeness would get an art style pass, so the Evilore would look good ...
Click to expand...


LOL

I keep getting updates in my e-mail but I've been lazy about reading them; I guess I'm partly on blackout 'til it's upcoming, though I'm always up for seeing more art and environment shots. It's nice to know GAF will have a presence in the game with the tavern etc.
 
M

Mister_Bubbles

Member
Nice! And by the looks of it, that's even one of the less crazy variations.

Do want that Art Style document though; hopefully it won't be too long before we get a look at it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

You don't need to play Pillars of Eternity for Avowed story, Obsidian confirms
Game Dev
0
523
Draugoth replied
Enotria: The Last Song Indefinitely Delayed for Xbox Series Consoles
2 3 4
173
9K
Shubh_C63 replied
Obsidian Has a 3rd Unannounced Project in the Works
Rumor
1
370
Punished Miku replied
Bethesda Declined Obsidian's Proposals to Develop The Elder Scrolls Spin-Offs
News Game Dev 2
70
5K
Robb replied
BlazBlue Entropy Effect Sells 500,000 Units Worldwide; Producer Message Shared, Major Summer Update in the Works
Sales-Age
0
478
Thick Thighs Save Lives replied
Top Bottom