Ping Pals (NDS) - Gamespot review

Wario64

works for Gamestop (lol)
3.3

http://www.gamespot.com/ds/strategy/pingpals/review.html

"In the end, it's impossible to rationalize Ping Pals' very existence to any satisfactory degree. Why make a game just like PictoChat when PictoChat already exists on the DS itself? After playing Ping Pals, you're unlikely to come up with any acceptable answers to this question, because none of the extra content it provides is worth paying for. Chalk this one up to poor decision making, lousy timing, or a combination of both. Just don't chalk this one up as a game you should play."

NDS BOMBA
 
duckroll said:
In a battle between Ping Pals and Armored Core: Formula Front...... who would win? :lol

I think clearly Armored Core would "win" the battle of which sucked least because there you at least get good visuals :P
 
Shit, who even rated it SUPERB or GOOD.

The people who voted are socially inept Nintendo dicksuckers who compulsively rate games they've never played in the off chance that somebody might see the score, somehow be convinced it's good enough to buy it due to some fake average User Score and then somehow help their company of the choice.
 
Stryder said:
I'm wondering what even made this app score over 3, it is just pictochat with avatars isn't it?

And, I believe "built in" support for games you could, technically, do by hand on Picto-Chat anyway. Lol.
 
Amir0x said:
The people who voted are socially inept Nintendo dicksuckers who compulsively rate games they've never played...

Speaking of socially inept dicksuckers who compulsively rate games they've never played, I've seen you talking a whole lot of trash about Ping Pals in several threads. Have you ever played it? Have you played a PSP yet? You sure seem to be judging those games (Lumines?) before playing them as well. In fact, I couldn't name a person on this forum who does so more frequently or blatantly than you have in recent weeks.
 
bobbyconover said:
Speaking of socially inept dicksuckers who compulsively rate games they've never played, I've seen you talking a whole lot of trash about Ping Pals in several threads. Have you ever played it? Have you played a PSP yet? You sure seem to be judging those games (Lumines?) before playing them as well. In fact, I couldn't name a person on this forum who does so more frequently or blatantly than you have in recent weeks.

Wayforward viral marketer! GET HIM
 
Ohhhh shit, I've been discovered. I'm outta here!

By the way, it took about 10 seconds for a well-known longtime member of the forum to read my post and send me the following messages in private:

"THANK YOU FOR REPLYING
BECAUSE I WAS JUST ABOUT TO
I want to fucking KILL THIS GUY"
 
It doesn't take a genius to see that Ping Pals was a terrible idea.

Yay, let's release a $30 "game" for new hardware that does effectively the same thing that that hardware's embedded (and free) chat software does.

$30 for "bratz" style avatars and bullshit "mini-games"? Please. It's not even worth 10 bucks, or the time spent in physically inserting the card into the system and booting it up. Blech.
 
I thought I remembered reading recently that when Ping Pals was concieved/being developed, they didn't know pictochat was going to be built in. That would make a lot of sense, really. Once they found out it was, they were already pretty far along so rather than ax the product they just shoved it out the door for $20. Makes sense.
 
Amir0x said:
I think clearly Armored Core would "win" the battle of which sucked least because there you at least get good visuals :P
I dunno, Ping Pals at least does what it says it does well. Mind you, what it does is completely fucking useless, but it still does it well.

It'd be like being a professional message boy. It'd be completely useless since we already have the technology to provide such services at a fraction of the cost, but at least you'd be good at it.
 
GDJustin said:
I thought I remembered reading recently that when Ping Pals was concieved/being developed, they didn't know pictochat was going to be built in. That would make a lot of sense, really. Once they found out it was, they were already pretty far along so rather than ax the product they just shoved it out the door for $20. Makes sense.

That's possible, but I also think that they wanted to capitalize on the DS launch fever. The DS software library is rather scant, so they probably figured that this was their best opportunity to sell the product, without having to do a major overhaul.

What the developers should have done is wait until some sort of DS Internet connectivity solution was announced, and then release Ping Pals as an "instant messenger" for it, with more mini-games as well. It's been known for several months that PictoChat was going to be included in the DS, and the developers should have adjusted accordingly. Then again, maybe they didn't care anymore and just wanted to milk it during the launch window, as I said above.
 
bobbyconover said:
Speaking of socially inept dicksuckers who compulsively rate games they've never played, I've seen you talking a whole lot of trash about Ping Pals in several threads. Have you ever played it? Have you played a PSP yet? You sure seem to be judging those games (Lumines?) before playing them as well. In fact, I couldn't name a person on this forum who does so more frequently or blatantly than you have in recent weeks.

I'm sorry, did you just try to defend those fuckers? That's what I thought. As they say on Saturday Night Live, "Simma Down Now." You're getting so defensive over those pitiful fanboys that I think you have a soft spot in your heart for them. Mind you, I don't care what side of the fence you are - things like this happen with Sony and Microsoft fanboys as well. But it's particularly disgusting when it's a game of such overwhelmingly poor quality that not even a mentally handicapped person on heroin who is blind and has no hands could give the game a good rating.

I didn't judge Lumines. At all. For all I know, it could suck dick. It's the only game I'm anticipating for PSP so it happens to be a game I want to hear good things about. I don't need to explain myself to you, but rest assured that if Lumines is garbage I will say so when I play it.

Ping Pals, however, I have had some experience with. It's not something I personally purchased (since I wouldn't pay for such drek even if it was, quite literally, the last game ever created) but my friend who works at a Game and Movie store did allow me some time with it. It's not something I could conceivably put time into to "beat" (as it doesn't have anything traditional like that, unless you want to get points to get more crappy stuff in the game), but if you've actually read my posts like you claim to you know then that I never form a final opinion about a game unless I've played it thoroughly.

In fact, I can't judge Armored Core: Formula Front because I have not played it. I have heard extremely bad things about it and it doesn't look good, but until I play it I can't judge it. Ping Pals, however, I have played. So before you go around passing faux finalities about people who clearly you know jack shit about, you should make it your business to actually know what the fuck you're talking about.

So, here's a recap. One, I have not judged Lumines. Two, I have played Ping Pals and I have judged it. Three, it doesn't matter what side of the fence you're on - that sort of compulsive rating is repulsive. And it's even worse when it's for drek like this. And finally, shut the fuck up unless you know what you're talking about.

Looks like we're all good then? Cool.
 
I'm not so sure that it's terrible as the fact that it really isn't...necessary. Honestly, they probably should've cancelled the second they learned that PictoChat would be included in the system and just salvage whatever work they had done for another game.
 
snapty00 said:
I'm not so sure that it's terrible as the fact that it really isn't...necessary. Honestly, they probably should've cancelled the second they learned that PictoChat would be included in the system and just salvage whatever work they had done for another game.

It's hardly even a game. It's just a chat program with some mini games that you can mostly reproduce with PictoChat anyway and it's even worse because it has really horrific artwork and garbage features.
 
duckroll said:
Yup, I'm sure that's the reason why we got stellar N64 titles like Superman 64! :D

Or, in the case of the rival camp, why we got games like Crow City of Angels and Fantastic Four!
 
Amir0x said:
Or, in the case of the rival camp, why we got games like Crow City of Angels and Fantastic Four!

Don't try too hard to pre-empt the nbots, it's useless, THEY WILL OVERRUN US! :lol
 
duckroll said:
Don't try too hard to pre-empt the nbots, it's useless, THEY WILL OVERRUN US! :lol

But I'm like some sort of crazy amalgam of nbot, sbot and mbot. My super alloy exterior makes me something like that insane walking soulful robot dude from Full Metal Alchemist.
 
snapty00 said:
I'm not so sure that it's terrible as the fact that it really isn't...necessary. Honestly, they probably should've cancelled the second they learned that PictoChat would be included in the system and just salvage whatever work they had done for another game.

Yeah, like fucking Shantae 2...how DID this "game" get picked up while S2 languishes in backburner hell?
 
Amir0x said:
But I'm like some sort of crazy amalgam of nbot, sbot and mbot. My super alloy exterior makes me something like that insane walking soulful robot dude from Full Metal Alchemist.

See you're lying right there! It's XBOT and we all know it! Your attempts to hide your true good nature have once again failed! :D
 
Amir0x said:
I'm sorry, did you just try to defend those fuckers? That's what I thought.

I am on neither side of any fence, and my intent is not to defend anything or anyone, least of all the so-called "fanboys." My intent is to expose you as someone who talks way, way too much and says way, way too little of interest or of note. 1200 posts in just over a month is unnecessary and absurd. Especially if you consider how many of those were unique or worthwhile in any way. Comparatively, guys like drohne and Lyte Edge, who post all the time, have around 1700 posts each in 6 months.

Ping Pals looks like a total pile of shit, but that's not the point. The point is that you're posting every 10 seconds in numerous threads just to say in various trying-to-be funny ways, i.e. "mentally handicapped person on heroin who is blind and has no hands," that Ping Pals sucks. Obviously it's the cool-to-hate game of the week, and everyone knows it looks like poo. But still, pulling the know-it-all funnyguy routine and constantly trying to point out how many kinds of dicks it sucks, when it's obvious that you have never actually played it, is just getting really irritating. Especially if you're going to start accusing other people of blindly supporting it, while totally ignoring the fact that you're blindly hating upon it. Both stances are equally moronic. And I don't buy your vague little story for a second - you had your 'friend' take out a copy of Ping Pals from the shrinkwrap just so you could try it? Better yet, two copies, so you two could try it together (which is the only way it could be fairly judged, I'd assume)? Right.

I didn't judge Lumines. At all. For all I know, it could suck dick.

You seemed to have your mind pretty well made-up a few days ago. From IRC channel #ga on 12/12/04 -- directed at me, no less:

[03:52] <Serico_Amir0x> Lumines is the best thing ever bobby
[03:52] <Serico_Amir0x> im telling you
[03:52] <Serico_Amir0x> i refuse to see otherwise

Anyway, I didn't intend to start some dumb war with you and I don't plan to speak of this again, nor am I going to call you a motherfucker, tell you to shut the fuck up, or slap some smug/blunt ending on this as if I'm simply right and that's-that. Just trust me when I say that you're becoming an extremely annoying presence, that you're coming on way too strong in too short a time, and that I'm not the only one who has noticed. The combative tone throughout your reply sure didn't help things, either. So take whatever you'd like from all that.
 
Gek54 said:
Doesnt Nintendo have to approve a game design before it even starts??

Uhh, NO. Nintendo, Sony, and MS all publish their own games. Revealing trade secrets wouldn't really be wise.
 
bobbyconover said:
I am on neither side of any fence, and my intent is not to defend anything or anyone, least of all the so-called "fanboys." My intent is to expose you as someone who talks way, way too much and says way, way too little of interest or of note. 1200 posts in just over a month is unnecessary and absurd. Especially if you consider how many of those were unique or worthwhile in any way. Comparatively, guys like drohne and Lyte Edge, who post all the time, have around 1700 posts each in 6 months.

I'm sorry, I didn't realize it was you who had to judge the content of my posts. I've got a total of 30 PMs in these "last few weeks" and many of those are from people complimenting my posting patterns. But thanks for playing! I post a lot, and almost everything I post is meant to provide personal insight into different situations. Whether or not you find my stuff interesting is irrelevant. And please with the "I am on neither side of the fence" bullshit. If you want to talk about trying too hard...

bobbyconnor said:
Ping Pals looks like a total pile of shit, but that's not the point. The point is that you're posting every 10 seconds in numerous threads just to say in various trying-to-be funny ways, i.e. "mentally handicapped person on heroin who is blind and has no hands," that Ping Pals sucks. Obviously it's the cool-to-hate game of the week, and everyone knows it looks like poo. But still, pulling the know-it-all funnyguy routine and constantly trying to point out how many kinds of dicks it sucks, when it's obvious that you have never actually played it, is just getting really irritating.

I'm sorry, you see... you expect me to take you seriously when you honestly think I have not played it. See, this isn't a matter of whether my posts are "interesting" or not - it's a matter of you not believing what I write. That's seriously not my problem. I only formulate final opinions on games I've played. I'm not even going to get into your "oh nos he's trying too hard to be funny" bit because that's the way I talk. I like the venom to spill over into my conversation as much as possible just to emphasize how much I hate any given thing. "Funny" is not something I am trying to be. That's Defensor's job with the whole IGN pic montage.

So we'll summarize this. You don't think I have played it and you don't like the way I point out it sucks. My response: Too bad, deal with it and I have played it.

bobbyconnor said:
Especially if you're going to start accusing other people of blindly supporting it, while totally ignoring the fact that you're blindly hating upon it. Both stances are equally moronic. And I don't buy your vague little story for a second - you had your 'friend' take out a copy of Ping Pals from the shrinkwrap just so you could try it? Better yet, two copies, so you two could try it together (which is the only way it could be fairly judged, I'd assume)? Right.

I'm sorry. My "hate" of them is motivated by one specific thing, which hardly makes me blind. These are people who sat down one day having barely even seen a few pics but realized it was coming on their system of choice and gave it a perfect score. This is, I'm sorry, reprehensible. There's no other way to put it. I don't care what system the game is for, this is something that deserves my hatred. And by the way, my "vague story" wasn't meant for you to buy. It was simply the truth, which requires no qualifiers. But no, he did not pull it out of the shrinkwrap so I could try it.

He, having a DS like I do, always puts aside a copy of the latest DS games for himself. I also played (and beat) Spider-Man DS this way, but for Ping Pals I was obviously much less enthused. On the only note you struck true in this statement is that I didn't play with him; I just used the functions I could use alone. I never claimed I played with him. You can play certain mini-games and stuff like that alone in order to gain points.

But anyway, like always, thanks for playing. It has got to feel good to be so consistently wrong.

bobbyconnor said:
You seemed to have your mind pretty well made-up a few days ago. From IRC channel #ga on 12/12/04 -- directed at me, no less:

[03:52] <Serico_Amir0x> Lumines is the best thing ever bobby
[03:52] <Serico_Amir0x> im telling you
[03:52] <Serico_Amir0x> i refuse to see otherwise

Way to pull it out of context. I remember that conversation decently, and I believe that was when you said "I don't get the appeal of Rez and I don't see what makes Lumines so special either." Something along those lines. All those lines which followed that you posted specifically were half-joking/half-sarcasm aimed at emphasizing my enthusiasm for this game. It is, as I said, the only game I'm anticipating for PSP. So I like to tell people why I feel it will be awesome. But, as you well know, I don't formulate final opinions unless I play (and most of the time beat) the game I've discussed.

bobbyconnor said:
Anyway, I didn't intend to start some dumb war with you and I don't plan to speak of this again, nor am I going to call you a motherfucker, tell you to shut the fuck up, or slap some smug/blunt ending on this as if I'm simply right and that's-that.

That, like, totally makes you mature. Oh, btw, I am right. And that is that.

bobbyconnor said:
Just trust me when I say that you're becoming an extremely annoying presence, that you're coming on way too strong in too short a time, and that I'm not the only one who has noticed. The combative tone throughout your reply sure didn't help things, either. So take whatever you'd like from all that.

Oh nos you're not the only one who has noticed!! I must make room for the phantom haters so that I may not offend their fragile minds. I will post as fast as I like, I will respond with statements that are as long and overblown as I like, and I will have whatever conversations I like

And, for reference, there's only one reason I have been combative during this thing. It's because you called my a liar. And that's when I get combative.
 
Top Bottom