I don't think they're noting the same results. The stats
Whataburger posted are for lethal dog bites and your link is more for general dog bites:
I understand that its different sources I'm just saying you can make stats look good for anyone.
I
Also, I always heard labradors actually bit the most. Guess not.
Thats what I thought too. Mostly because lab mixes I think are the most populous breed.
I
You actually got a source on this? Every source I've seen says they were bred for blood sports and there's a massive difference between hunting and a blood sport.
I was specifically talking about a single breed bred in China for use as police dogs. It was bred to be trained to do anything including attack so I guess I was a little hyperbolic but still. I'd imagine like German Shepards they can be taught to attack and kill on command.
Historically there are plenty of dogs that were bred for brutal activity much like the Pitbull. I think part of the problem here is recently they are selectively bred for dog fighting. That is skewing the perception. Its also a bit selective in the history of the dog. It has changed throughout the generations. Its sad and fine that people don't like them. But I just can't support calling for their ban and thus killing of the animals. The USA has a huge problem with pets in general and treating them like objects.
If it is history that is calling for breed ban why don't other breed bans that have even more intimidating characteristics. Any of these dogs could easily kill or mame a person. Lets face it humans are weak bitches compared to most wild life. When you have a dog or decent sized cat they probably wouldn't hesitate to attack if they didn't have some sort of food and affection relationship with their human.
How about a dog known as the "bodyguard" which also shares an ancestor with "pitbulls"
"The Cane Corso is a descendant of the old Roman
molosser.
[1]. Its name derives from
cane da corso, an old term for those
catch dogs used in rural activities for cattle and swine, as distinct from
cane da camera which indicates the catch dog kept as a bodyguard. In the recent past, its distribution was limited to some regions of Southern Italy, especially in
Basilicata,
Campania, and
Apulia.
[4]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cane_Corso
or the actual dog specifically bred to hunt big game just like the original pit bulls and came from a "fighting dog"
"The Dogo Argentino because of its purpose, is very stubborn and pain tolerant. This combined with the breed's natural intelligence and domineering tendencies mean that this dog is not suitable for inactive or inexperienced homes, and is ideal for a working home, or at a minimum a very active home. The breed needs an experienced owner and firm leadership, and is not ideal as a pet or service dog role, though it has been successful in the latter."
I also think its a misnomer to call all these dogs "pit bulls". all the while calling for a ban on a breed. When in fact this isn't "one breed". There are at least three AKC breeds that fall in the more umbrella term. So putting them all together and saying "that breed has problems" is pretty unfair.
"Currently, there are a number of breeds that are recognized by different associations which fall under the term "pit bull". The Federation Cynologique Internationale currently only recognizes three breeds: the Bull Terrier, the Miniature Bull Terrier, and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier.
[20] The Canadian Kennel Club also recognizes these breeds, as well as the American Staffordshire Terrier.
[21] The American Kennel Club recognizes the American Staffordshire Terrier, the Staffordshire Bull Terrier, the Miniature Bull Terrier, and the Bull Terrier as breeds also.
[22]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_bull
Also it seems a lot of bullshit of what pit bulls were bred for happened long before the modern version of the dog. And a lot is speculation as to where the line started.
http://www.pitbull411.com/history.html[/quote][/QUOTE]