How dare some people in this thread wish for there to be more sweet games for us to enjoy on our PS4s?
Where are the people advocating for LESS games?
How dare some people in this thread wish for there to be more sweet games for us to enjoy on our PS4s?
What?At least we don't have someone in here comparing Sony to nazi Germany, like in the May PS+ thread.
PS3 has shipped 90 millions at this point in time.Is that already like 1/3 of where the PS3 is now?
How dare some people in this thread wish for there to be more sweet games for us to enjoy on our PS4s?
From this thread I learn that my PS4 literally has no game and games I've been playing are all created with my imagination.
Is that already like 1/3 of where the PS3 is now?
Yep. Sony selling Morpheus is going to slow down the adoption of VR.Cool for Sony, but I'm not happy with it. These consoles are kinda outdated technology wise and if the keep one selling a lot this will slow down overall progress especially with emerging technologies like VR.
Where are the people advocating for LESS games?
If you look at the posts that people are jumping on, they're generally not saying the same thing as what you are.Maybe not, but if I were to express my disappointment that there aren't as many sweet games to play on my PS4 as I would like, I'd probably get labelled as a troll.
It's fair, but keep in mind Sony's current library dwarfs their first 2 year releases overall compared to PS3. They have more games than the competition, they have more exclusives than the competition and have the game of the generation that's an exclusive that just came out in March. I'd say they're doing pretty well and feeling pretty good about everything at the moment.How dare some people in this thread wish for there to be more sweet games for us to enjoy on our PS4s?
Link? This sounds like an amazing disaster.xxracerxx said:At least we don't have someone in here comparing Sony to nazi Germany, like in the May PS+ thread.
Nice numbers. More Bloodbornes and less Order 1886's please!
So has the Wii U even broken 10 million yet?
At least we don't have someone in here comparing Sony to nazi Germany, like in the May PS+ thread.
Maybe not, but if I were to express my disappointment that there aren't as many sweet games to play on my PS4 as I would like, I'd probably get labelled as a troll.
At least we don't have someone in here comparing Sony to nazi Germany, like in the May PS+ thread.
How dare some people in this thread wish for there to be more sweet games for us to enjoy on our PS4s?
At least we don't have someone in here comparing Sony to nazi Germany, like in the May PS+ thread.
anyway, maybe its possible to hit 25 million till e3?
Personally I want a remaster of Bloodborne. It's been almost 2 months after all.I want more games.
Kick & Fennick HD remaster for example would be pretty sweet.
Outdated? I wouldn't say so. But if you want top line hardware there is only the option to play on PC.Cool for Sony, but I'm not happy with it. These consoles are kinda outdated technology wise and if the keep one selling a lot this will slow down overall progress especially with emerging technologies like VR.
How dare some people in this thread wish for there to be more sweet games for us to enjoy on our PS4s?
Yep. Sony selling Morpheus is going to slow down the adoption of VR.
Sophisticated enough? You really need to learn to pull your head out of your own ass every now and then.Sony selling Morpheus being only compatible to a console which isn't able to fully show VR potential will not help VR. In fact, there is a risk that it'll sway the other way and will be seen as a "gimmick" since the experience isn't sophisticated enough. Anyway, these consoles have very weak CPUs which you do not want to see in 2017 and onwards I guess...
Exclusives matter, just not always in NPD chart topping ways. Hell I bought a 360 to play Viva Pinata, a Wii U to play Toad's Treasure Tracker, and XB1 to play Sunset Overdrive and a PS4 to play Octodad. None of those games were chart topping hits, but each sold at least one system.
Yeah, I think the long tail of support of the PS3 also had some effect on the adoption of the PS4.
It signaled the market that if you buy a PlayStation you get support until the new one comes out and sometimes even longer than that.
Yeah. I'm just saying you can have any feeling on the lack of exclusives that an one has an interest in or the overall market and how it doesn't gel with what one personally likes.
The problem just arises if the personal opinion on what should matter is not supported by the statistics in the very thread you post it in.
That's why I only see the two options there if you believe the PS4 is shit in that department. It's either it doesn't matter, or they are not shit but amazing. ;-)
Sony selling Morpheus being only compatible to a console which isn't able to fully show VR potential will not help VR. In fact, there is a risk that it'll sway the other way and will be seen as a "gimmick" since the experience isn't sophisticated enough. Anyway, these consoles have very weak CPUs which you do not want to see in 2017 and onwards I guess...
I talked about all 3 consoles, not just the Wii U. How is it stupid when it is one of the three consoles that are out at this point in time? This is what I mean when facts don't matter to you when you put your head in the sand and ramble nonsense instead.Everything sells. Anything is a potential system seller. To what degree is the difference that each title carries with it. And what the hell are you talking about with "facts don't matter to you"? I didn't say anything false. You're the one using one of the worst selling consoles in history as an example of the selling-prowess of exclusives. That's fucking stupid.
What?
Link? This sounds like an amazing disaster.
the fuck?
okay, I need to see this. Link?.
It's fair, but keep in mind Sony's current library dwarfs their first 2 year releases overall. They have more games than the competition, they have more exclusives than the competition and have the game of the generation that's an exclusive that just came out in March. I'd say they're doing pretty well and feeling pretty good about everything at the moment.
I do hope we get one more surprise game for Q4 2015 from Sony though. Even though we will be getting R&C and hopefully Persona 5. Get Rime to release this year and Bend's game (new IP please) and I am more than happy.
Sony selling Morpheus being only compatible to a console which isn't able to fully show VR potential will not help VR. In fact, there is a risk that it'll sway the other way and will be seen as a "gimmick" since the experience isn't sophisticated enough. Anyway, these consoles have very weak CPUs which you do not want to see in 2017 and onwards I guess...
For what it's worth the poster was making a joke. As he has done many many times before in various threads and was quoted endlessly "for the mega lulz."I'm just linking to the post instead of quoting it, because it's really off topic for this thread. Thread was locked because of that post.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=162104647&postcount=701
PS2 didn't have a mostly world wide simultaneous launch, like the PS4 did.I can kind of see PS1 and PS3 but I can't really understand how it's beating PS2. It must be the size of the industry now or something.
Why do these threads devolve so quickly? The "no games" stuff really needs to stop.
I talked about all 3 consoles, not just the Wii U. How is it stupid when it is one of the three consoles that are out at this point in time? This is what I mean when facts don't matter to you when you put your head in the sand and ramble nonsense instead.
For what it's worth the poster was making a joke. As he has done many many times before in various threads and was quoted endlessly "for the mega lulz."
The console is still a joke when it comes to the game library. Two years in.
The way things are going can't see this success lasting long... The ball is in Sony's hands now.
I hope you learned a lesson from this thread. You can't mess with the PS4 army like that.
I'm just linking to the post instead of quoting it, because it's really off topic for this thread. Thread was locked because of that post.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=162104647&postcount=701
For what it's worth the poster was making a joke. As he has done many many times before in various threads and was quoted endlessly "for the mega lulz."
lolI hope you learned a lesson from this thread. You can't mess with the PS4 army like that.
PS3 has shipped 90 millions at this point in time.
More like 1/4.
I hope you learned a lesson from this thread. You can't mess with the PS4 army like that.
I'm just linking to the post instead of quoting it, because it's really off topic for this thread. Thread was locked because of that post.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=162104647&postcount=701
For what it's worth the poster was making a joke. As he has done many many times before in various threads and was quoted endlessly "for the mega lulz."
PS2 didn't have a mostly world wide simultaneous launch, like the PS4 did.
I know the poster, but jokes have a limit too.
How is a terrible example when it's one of the three consoles out right now? Why don't you say it's a terrible example because it doesn't fit my narrative, and I like putting my head in the sand instead when that happens.Yes, facts matter to me. And I haven't discredited any. The Wii U exists, but it's a terrible example to use to portray the significance of exclusives. If I am not mistaken you were exaggerating the importance of exclusives, which today means very little when talking about hardware sales when you see how popular other multi platform franchises are. I can imagine that GTA V alone pushed more consoles than a majority of exclusives. And so many consoles are paired with multi platform titles in bundles.
What the fuck are you talking about? It had them when it released and almost all of them bombed. Had they sold well, they would have kept making them. They didn't, they sold horribly. The idea that a console with slightly better specs of PS3/360 would sell more instead of Nintendo's first party IPs is one of the worst comments I've read here in some time.And once again, I will reinforce that your use of the Wii U as a platform sustained by exclusives is poor. Simply existing does not mean it's successful. It's had over two years and mostly exclusives to rely on to sell as poorly as it has. Of course we won't know how much more or less multi platform titles would have affected it, since it hasn't happened nor will it most likely happen, so I will just say that for a console primarily focused on exclusives, its systems do not sell well as a result of them.
The console is still a joke when it comes to the game library. Two years in.
The way things are going can't see this success lasting long... The ball is in Sony's hands now.