• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Playstation Portal reviews

midnightAI

Member
The LCD screen is the biggest negative about this device for me. It’s just not good enough in this day and age.
Even if every other outlet except for PC Mag says its great, with some saying its the best LCD on any handheld they have used?

I get it, OLED is better (for the most part, OLED still has its issues, especially cheap ones), but its also more costly. (dont be surprised if a Pro version of this comes out in the next 12 months with OLED and some other features)
 

ArtHands

Thinks buying more servers can fix a bad patch
Why are people hung up on a remote play device only being able to do PS5 remote play. It does exactly what it's designed to do so of course you need a PS5. What a dumb 'review'.

(And this is the first one to say it has a mediocre screen all others said it's an excellent screen, is it as good as OLED? Maybe not but it's by no means bad or mediocre)

Edit: oooh, actually, this is by PC Mag, I think they owned Smartphone & Pocket PC Magazine back in the day. In 2007 we won the best mobile Shoot Em Up category for that years awards. I take back the 'dumb review' comment (not really)

People's standard and expectation for things evolve and change over time. Just because Sony said it can only do PS5 remote play doesn't make anything better.
 

ArtHands

Thinks buying more servers can fix a bad patch

Engadget review



Polygon review



Inverse review



Digital trend review
 
Last edited:

midnightAI

Member

Engadget review



Polygon review



Inverse review



Digital trend review
I see a pattern in your posts, keep on warring son
 

ArtHands

Thinks buying more servers can fix a bad patch
Its a Remote Play device, what people expect is irrelevant, its for, you know, Playing.... Remotely (which it does very well, better than anything else out there for PS5 Remote Play)

if you don’t want it to be more useful, then ok i guess.
 

midnightAI

Member
if you don’t want it to be more useful, then ok i guess.
Good, glad we are in agreement that a PS5 Remote Play device can play the PS5 Remotely, well done

(why on earth anyone expects it to do more when we have known this for months is beyond me)

I think techradar sums it up best:

Buy it if...​

You need a convenient way to play your PS5 game library
Knocking all other Remote Play options out of the park, if you’re looking for an extra way to play your PS5 then the Portal’s performance and functionality offer the best way to do just that.

You want an ergonomic handheld gaming device
By virtue of being based on the DualSense, the PlayStation Portal is one of the most ergonomic and accessible handheld gaming consoles you can get right now.

Don't buy it if...​

You're looking for a cloud streaming or native handheld
The Portal is not for cloud streaming or playing games natively; it is only for mirroring and streaming your PS5.
 
Last edited:

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member

PC Mag review:
2.5 / 5 Fair
So it does exactly what Sony said it would do (and seems to do it fairly well) and is only $200 but getting bashed by several reviewers because it can't do more?

Frustrated Headache GIF by Kelly Clarkson
 

NeoIkaruGAF

Gold Member
Can anyone tell me what 10 - 15 year old kid (who owned a PS5) wouldn't want one?
It’s pretty clear from other posts itt that if you have kids around, they own and use every TV in your house at the same time to watch Spongebob and the adult in the house can only play on a Portal while Spongebob is airing.
So what kid would want a Portal if they can have the TV anytime? It’s a dad’s product.
 

DrFigs

Member
So some of the reviews are saying as a con that it is expensive. like endgadget. They mention that you can get a backbone for 100 dollars and use your phone as a screen. But doesn't that go to show how inexpensive the product is? if the next best alternative is 100 dollars cheaper but doesn't come with a screen?
 
Last edited:
It’s pretty clear from other posts itt that if you have kids around, they own and use every TV in your house at the same time to watch Spongebob and the adult in the house can only play on a Portal while Spongebob is airing.
So what kid would want a Portal if they can have the TV anytime? It’s a dad’s product.

My kid is 1 years old currently but they can fucking dream on. The OLED is daddies and they can fuck off.

I hate handhold gaming but to me this product is so very underwhelming. If this was a third party device doing the exact same thing. NOBODY would be talking about it.
 
Last edited:

ArtHands

Thinks buying more servers can fix a bad patch
Tomsguide



wccftech



BGR



Pushsquare

 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
For most games you probably won't even notice, twitch shooters are probably not ideal though. I haven't really heard many reviewers complain about it so I don't think it's a big deal. Probably down to the individual though and what type of games they are playing. But if you are a COD player for example you'd probably play on the big screen anyway as a small screen wouldn't be ideal for competitive play anyway. (Doesn't affect me personally as I don't tend to like those types of games anyway but for those that are it's probably a valid concern)
It is still very disappointing from a device that is tied to the PS5 and we should demand more.
 

Sleepwalker

Member
Got charged, guess I'll see for myself and return if its not up to par.

Remote play is kinda hit and miss around my house and I have a 3gbps fiber connection lol.
 

ChoosableOne

ChoosableAll
I watched gameplay videos of Spider-Man 2. Beyond the latency issues(which is not that bad for single player games), the graphics didn't look great, and the performance seemed quite low. Considering that the quality is expected to drop further away from the router, it appears that they have produced a device worse than I expected. The fact that it can't stream videos and PS cloud games is a significant drawback too. If the price were between 100-150 dollars, it could have been a good alternative to dualsense+dobe stand(which is heavier but costs 60 dolars in total).
 

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
Probably the router is the culprit, I'll see how this thing does before I go out investing more $
Yeah if the remote play is spotty around your house its the router since remote play is relying 100% on your own wifi

A free way to try to boost your own wifi is change channels in your router and not let it auto select or download a free wifi analyzer tool and get away from channels being used by your neighbors
 

Sleepwalker

Member
Yeah if the remote play is spotty around your house its the router since remote play is relying 100% on your own wifi

A free way to try to boost your own wifi is change channels in your router and not let it auto select or download a free wifi analyzer tool and get away from channels being used by your neighbors

To be fair I only tried it on the steam deck a couple times and the wifi on that thing is not great, I was hoping the Portal was Wifi 6 compatible but alas.
 

midnightAI

Member
It is still very disappointing from a device that is tied to the PS5 and we should demand more.
Demand? why? It's very purpose is to be a remote play device, nothing more, nothing less.

I think you want something that this is not, and thats fine, don't buy it, hassle them to make a proper handheld then complain that resources are taken away from first party PS5 development to make handheld games, do what you like, but this device just isnt for you so why complain about it?
 
Last edited:

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
Ooof, that's harsh, isn't sending something like that via snail mail unusual? (for insurance reasons etc)

It's canada post expedited (via the mail system, still has insurrance) vs courier next day. I guess I should just be happy it wasn't regular ground, that's like 10 business days.
Weird though since like thr last 10 packages have been courier for the "free shipping".
Must be due to which warehouse it ships out of.
 

midnightAI

Member
It's canada post expedited (via the mail system, still has insurrance) vs courier next day. I guess I should just be happy it wasn't regular ground, that's like 10 business days.
Weird though since like thr last 10 packages have been courier for the "free shipping".
Must be due to which warehouse it ships out of.
Well in that case Friday isnt too bad, better than waiting over a week
 

midnightAI

Member
Having standards? Expecting corps not to phone it in?
So you'd complain if your hammer doesnt saw wood? that's not phoning it in, that's doing exactly what its supposed to do, sometimes its better to focus on a single thing and do it to the best of your ability than do lots of things and do none exceptionally well.

(and as you can see from everywhere going out of stock, you might not want it but seems plenty of others do)
 

Certinty

Member
£200 with an OLED screen, bluetooth and better battery life and I would have taken the risk.

But given the way it is, I can’t see any reason to choose this over remote play on the Deck given the limitations and price.
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
Yea, but most wifi's have a pop-up screen that requires a browser to authenticate... pretty much every hotel wifi and airport wifi... the Portal does not have a browser
yea, exactly. i wonder if Sony is going to put a browser in. Probably not, because of security fears. Again, what a stupid system.
 

FrankWza

Member
Yea, but most wifi's have a pop-up screen that requires a browser to authenticate... pretty much every hotel wifi and airport wifi... the Portal does not have a browser
Yeah I don't use public wifi but I could see this being an issue for those that don't have cell plans that allow hotspot and are fast enough. Hopefully they patch in a solution. Isn't it possible to tether to your phone when it's connected to wifi? That would be a simple workaround
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom