On the contrary, some of the most enthusiastic comments about image quality (which, to be clear, means the overall result of resolution, rendering quality, OLED screens, HDR, lens type and lens setting) came right from die-hard high-end pc VR guys, who regularly play with the most high-end headsets (Varjo included), armed with 4090. And still they where hugely impressed. Obviously it's not all due to the headset, but also because PSVR2 is bringing again high-end VR titles. whereas on PC VR almost all the titles came out in the last years have been standalone-level games.
But several of those analyzed each aspect of the image, comparing it to the other headsets. Saying that ps5 is "too weak" to run those games, when it's on par or better in the final result compared to most of the high end headsets with beefy GPUs, sounds quite retarded. Sounds more like fake report or general ignorance of the average aspect of high end PC VR image quality.