The_Reckoning
Member
arrest any cop who has a part in this for child porn. Wtf
I'm surprised they haven't charged the girl with the same offense.
If it's for producing child porn then the girl should be charged too, shouldn't she?
Either way, it's ridiculous.
Wait what? Isn't this ,err..., consensual? I'm so confused right now.
So like, if they inject him, are they going to restrain him so that he can't cover it up and take pictures?
So they'd be making underage non-consensual bondage porn so that they can arrest him for having taken a picture of his own dingdong?
Wait wait wait
So a 15 year old girl sends pictures of herself to a 17 year old boy who sends a video of himself. The mother finds this out and calls the police? And that's the case?
What. The. Fuck?
Why is the boy persecuted for the video in the first place?
prosecutors want to take a photo of his erect penis, possibly forcing the teen to become erect by taking him to a hospital and giving him an injection
This is...erm...what?
Too far society, too far.
Also, apparently by today's standards, I broke the law ALOT as a teenager.
They are both juvenile. Kids will be kids, throw the case out and sign them up for a class about the troubles of sexting. Ridiculous how far this case has progressed.
If I were the boy's parent I would press charged against the girl. Because that would be the only way to get back at the girl's mother for ruining a life for no good reason.
If I were the boy's parent I would press charged against the girl. Because that would be the only way to get back at the girl's mother for ruining a life for no good reason.
+1.This is so fucking stupid.
You would want to ruin the life of your son's girlfriend who has done no wrong because her parent is an asshat?
Tortuous sexual assault of a minor with intent to produce child pornography. Life in prison please.This is a very clear case of following the letter of the law, and ignoring the spirit.
Actually, I don't even think they are following the letter of the law here - because what the fuck. If this person is a child, and thus taking pictures of him constitutes child porn, what the fuck does forcing a child against his will to be put into a medically induced state of arousal, and then photographed constitute?
Manassas is in Virginia, by the way. In case you haven't heard of it.
This is a very clear case of following the letter of the law, and ignoring the spirit.
Actually, I don't even think they are following the letter of the law here - because what the fuck. If this person is a child, and thus taking pictures of him constitutes child porn, what the fuck does forcing a child against his will to be put into a medically induced state of arousal, and then photographed constitute?
So like, if they inject him, are they going to restrain him so that he can't cover it up and take pictures?
So they'd be making underage non-consensual bondage porn so that they can arrest him for having taken a picture of his own dingdong?
Because he was producing child pornography!1!!!!11!
Doesn't matter. The 17-year-old is being charged for creating child pornography, ie by photographing his own penis. The girl only matters in so far as her mother filed the complaint. Taking a picture of your own body as a teenager is a serious crime which will put you on the sex offender registry for life.
.
So instead of focusing on actual pedophiles/predators and their networks, these people want to penalize some random teen by giving him an erection against his own will and take pictures of it?
That's it, i'm done. You've officially jumped the shark, America.
So instead of focusing on actual pedophiles/predators and their networks, these people want to penalize some random teen by giving him an erection against his own will and take pictures of it?
Foster asked how that would be accomplished and was told that we just take him down to the hospital, give him a shot and then take the pictures that we need.