and this
smdh
Imagine if Noah needed the Koch Bros to build the arc.
Government official talking about Noah's ark and relating it to budgeting makes me want to punch myself in the face.
and this
smdh
Imagine if Noah needed the Koch Bros to build the arc.
Romney's wife went full retard yesterday. They are so out of touch it's amazing to me that her handlers actually let her talk. These were my favorite bullets:
* "We've given all you people need to know"
- re. finances.
* "Mitt and I struggled in college, Mitt had to sell stock."
* "Do you think he's the kind of person who tries to hide things?" - re. Mitt's indisputable hiding of things.
* "We give ten percent of our earnings to the (Mormon) Church every year." - I don't care about which church personally, I am just refering to the fact that right wing Fundies will think that.
* "Mitt never took a salary as Mass Governor" - he would actually have had to pay proper taxes on that, for once.
Eventually they will have to go Palin-quiet during the Campaign because everything out of their mouths sounds like Thurston Howll IIIrd from Gilligan's Island.
* "Mitt and I struggled in college, Mitt had to sell stock."
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., expressed worry this morning about broadcasting outlets that use taxpayer money to stay on the air.
But Rubio made his comments on NPR, a broadcasting outlet that uses taxpayer money to stay on the air.
"I do have concerns about spending money on public broadcasting," Rubio told Diane Rehm during an hourlong Q&A on NPR.
NPR has been a source of criticism from congressional Republicans who view it as a liberal refuge that espouses its views courtesy of public funding. Although only 2 percent of NPR's funding comes from government grants, the loss of federal funding would undermine the ability of NPR stations to pay for NPR programming, NPR says.
Rubio argued that private donations should support such an enterprise as NPR, and that plenty of outlets are available to house that ideology and format. He admitted, though, that he enjoys Rehm's show and that NPR's funding is low on the list of costs that should be cut.
A caller pointed out the irony of Rubio's position, saying, "He's spending an entire hour on the show today."
Rubio countered that a half-century ago, a station like NPR might have been necessary, but "today there is no shortage of options" for news and opinion.
"I have 300 stations on my satellite radio," Rubio boasted.
So Rehm asked him if he's contradicting himself by coming on her show if he doesn't believe her show should be funded by the public.
"Anytime we have an opportunity to go anywhere, we try to take that opportunity to communicate with people who are listening," Rubio said.
Aw... I was gonna pounce on the stock comment, but you erased it.
Romney's wife went full retard yesterday. They are so out of touch it's amazing to me that her handlers actually let her talk. These were my favorite bullets:
* "We've given all you people need to know" - re. finances.
* "Do you think he's the kind of person who tries to hide things?" - re. Mitt's indisputable hiding of things.
* "We give ten percent of our earnings to the (Mormon) Church every year." - I don't care about which church personally, I am just refering to the fact that right wing Fundies will think that.
* "Mitt never took a salary as Mass Governor" - he would actually have had to pay proper taxes on that, for once.
Eventually they will have to go Palin-quiet during the Campaign because everything out of their mouths sounds like Thurston Howll IIIrd from Gilligan's Island.
Reminds me of her classic from April.
* "Mitt and I struggled in college, Mitt had to sell stock."
I disagree that this is the kitchen sink and you should too. When we start seeing attacks on Romney's leadership at the Olympics, then you'll know we're in silly season.
Glenn Grothman is at it again. He's railing against the Madison council for imposing a rule that landlords have to hand out voter registration forms. He's saying it's compelling someone to vote, and he hopes some "freedom-loving" judges feel the same way as him.
Granted, this obviously isn't as bad as his statements about women's pay or his bill he put forward that said single parenthood was child abuse, but I really hope that idiot gets voted out soon.
Romney introduced as CEO of Bain Capital in 2001 http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/07/in-2001-still-ceo-of-bain.html
No one will be paying attention during the Olympics, hence the point about this being the Obama campaign's window.
There are no words...
Jobsless claims spike up
https://twitter.com/AP/status/225931953063477248
A healthy democracy is not harmed by requiring or enabling people to vote. Plenty of countries REQUIRE voters to vote, or attempt to. They are not communists nor fascists. Discouraging voter participation is treasonous.
The fact that Obama threw the kitchen sink at Romney and gained no ground should be troubling. Romney isn't spending money right now, as he waits to be nominated. This is basically the only time Obama's campaign will be outspending him, and it didn't work.
Obama's lead in NM shrunk this week as well
Right. People are beginning to focus on the campaign, but it's still July. An appreciable shift in the direction of the race was unlikely. Perhaps the Bain attacks will prove profitable in the future. I remain skeptical of their importance and think focusing on the ideological extremism of the Republican Party will prove more profitable. Nevertheless, this is at worst a distraction that does not harm Obama. It's clearly not the kitchen sink. Really, given the abundant evidence of the adroitness of the Obama Campaign, how does anyone expect them to shoot the moon in July?I disagree that this is the kitchen sink and you should too. When we start seeing attacks on Romney's leadership at the Olympics, then you'll know we're in silly season.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/07/karl-rove-super-pac-ed-rendell.php?ref=fpnewsfeedAmerican Crossroads, the super PAC founded in part by Karl Rove, has cast a prominent Democrat for a key role in its latest large-scale ad buy targeting President Obama in several swing states.
The super PAC is debuting a $9.3 million ad campaign calling out Obama with what the group calls very real third-party criticism of the presidents negative ads. Among the critics featured: Media fact-checkers who have made appearances in ads on both sides, and former DNC Chairman Ed Rendell, who called out the Obama campaign last week for suggesting Mitt Romney could have committed a felony if he provided misleading information to the SEC about his position at Bain Capital.
Glenn Grothman is at it again. He's railing against the Madison council for imposing a rule that landlords have to hand out voter registration forms. He's saying it's compelling someone to vote, and he hopes some "freedom-loving" judges feel the same way as him.
Granted, this obviously isn't as bad as his statements about women's pay or his bill he put forward that said single parenthood was child abuse, but I really hope that idiot gets voted out soon.
American Crossroads Casts Ed Rendell In Ad Criticizing Obama
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/07/karl-rove-super-pac-ed-rendell.php?ref=fpnewsfeed
Thanks Ed.
Any study on who really watches these ads? It's strange that "attack ads" are all the media rage while TV advertisement viewership is declining due to newer viewing methods. Are "attack ads" more effective with people who are less technologically savvy, like people who watch "regular" TV and listen to talk radio?
American Crossroads Casts Ed Rendell In Ad Criticizing Obama
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/07/karl-rove-super-pac-ed-rendell.php?ref=fpnewsfeed
Thanks Ed.
All are probably during Wheel of Fortune, Jeopardy, and evening talking head cable news shows.
This is terrible news, and I'm not even talking politics. We really need this thing to turn around.
Reminds me of her classic from April.
* "Mitt and I struggled in college, Mitt had to sell stock."
I'm always totally blown away by how the GOP has snookered old people who get Medicaid and all the other benefits that people do from the government into thinking that the government giving money to its citizens is bad.
Haven't the Dems snookered young people into transferring our wealth to all those assholes?
Right. People are beginning to focus on the campaign, but it's still July. An appreciable shift in the direction of the race was unlikely. Perhaps the Bain attacks will prove profitable in the future. I remain skeptical of their importance and think focusing on the ideological extremism of the Republican Party will prove more profitable. Nevertheless, this is at worst a distraction that does not harm Obama. It's clearly not the kitchen sink. Really, given the abundant evidence of the adroitness of the Obama Campaign, how does anyone expect them to shoot the moon in July?
I never thought that Obama'a "gaffe" was much of a mistake. It's just an awkwardly phrased statement that makes no sense out of its larger context.
Now compare that to "I like firing people". That sounds bad in any context. Then you find out that the guy actually did fire people, and got crazy rich from it.... It's just not a good look.
After listening to BO about someone helped -- teacher, mother, friends...... "it takes a village" --- who cares. Every human on earth had help learning to live but it had nothing to do with government or politicians. What is BO trying to say?
Hightways, modern bridges??? they were not needed until Ford made cars available at a price everyone could afford and dirt roads were a problem.
CHEEZMO;40040716 said:Kevitivity?
Eventually they will have to go Palin-quiet during the Campaign because everything out of their mouths sounds like Thurston Howll IIIrd from Gilligan's Island.
Reminds me of her classic from April.
* "Mitt and I struggled in college, Mitt had to sell stock."
That HAS to be out of context, unless Mitt was doing some trading with his own money before attending college.
Andrew Sabl quotes a 1994 interview with Ann Romney in the Boston Globe wherein she explains the material deprivation she and Mitt undertook in their student days, when both were so poor and jobless they had to support themselves by selling shares of stock that Mitt had been given by his dad:
"We were happy, studying hard. Neither one of us had a job, because Mitt had enough of an investment from stock that we could sell off a little at a time. The stock came from Mitts father. When he took over American Motors, the stock was worth nothing. But he invested Mitts birthday money year to yearit wasnt much, a few thousand, but he put it into American Motors because he believed in himself. Five years later, stock that had been $6 a share was $96 and Mitt cashed it so we could live and pay for education."
All this bickering about taxes or moral belief issues seem to pale in comparison when Syrian people have to worry about being killed by their government/rebels (not to mention there are plenty of other places like this as well)
Also China and Russia vetoed a UN security resolution (not exactly sure what that would have done anyway, but maybe open the door for assistance). That Assad guy is a pretty giant dick.
More here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/19/russia-china-syria_n_1686172.html
Sad. White people/first world problems I guess.
you should start a thread.
CHEEZMO™;40041154 said:
It just happened to be something my wife and I were discussing, but you're probably right. I'm a bit surprised there isn't one already.
The divide between Obama and Romneys oratory skill is mindblowing. Romney sounds like he has no conviction whatsoever. The debates are going to be fun!
Nope. That's what she said.