Black Mamba
Member
If you are using the same arguments that you use here then I am not surprised. It'd be like trying to deflate a balloon by using a silly straw to shoot cotton balls at it.
If you are using the same arguments that you use here then I am not surprised. It'd be like trying to deflate a balloon by using a silly straw to shoot cotton balls at it.
gotta keep throwing that feces at that wall...
Laughing at Republicans is one of the things that I share with my Dad that we look forward to when we get the chance to spend time together. It's our fishing, or working on cars.
Yep, eventually something will stick, even if it's on yourself.
This...this might actually be big. This might actually blow up.
What makes you think that?
Sometimes the cost is worth it to keep the system honest. While I know in soundbites detailing anti-fraud and compliance efforts would leave people glazed over more than a discussion of foreign policy in the Korea's, it would give statistical proof to show the system is only helping those who need it as opposed to say the abuses in England's public assistance programs.
By all means study it. I look at it as a capital investment.
The cost analyses we have done and seen indicate its much more expensive to pursue fraud much beyond what is done now vs. what would be saved/recovered. For one the people who abuse benefits do so because they don't have anything or have little else. For another, Medicare fraud is mostly not done by individual recipients but corporations (hospitals, MCOs and so forth). Its an issue of diminishing returns and the costs become prohibitive and exhorbitant to prevent that last small sliver of fraud and abuse by individual recipients.
What makes you think that?
CHEEZMO;40779165 said:So you guys get pissed about this but Bachmann's not allowed to do it?
Ugh, libs.
CHEEZMO;40779165 said:So you guys get pissed about this but Bachmann's not allowed to do it?
Ugh, libs.
Hm. You'd expect the media to have thoroughly examined this by now.
The exaltation of the Clintons by Republicans is remarkable.Newt: Obama is the "Anti-Clinton"
Hey guys, you know who's the first great authority I think of related to the good things that came from Bill Clinton's presidency? Newt fucking Gingrich.
If you are using the same arguments that you use here then I am not surprised. It'd be like trying to deflate a balloon by using a silly straw to shoot cotton balls at it.
Because it can be spun in dramatic ways by the media, sadly enough. "Is Mitt Romney's success build on blood money?"
and pallin' around with terrorists.Because it can be spun in dramatic ways by the media, sadly enough. "Is Mitt Romney's success build on blood money?"
The exaltation of the Clintons by Republicans is remarkable.
This...this might actually be big. This might actually blow up.
Had to quote it.If you are using the same arguments that you use here then I am not surprised. It'd be like trying to deflate a balloon by using a silly straw to shoot cotton balls at it.
That's pretty bad.
What do you mean?
allowed to do what?
Blood libel!
Nobody's going to care about this.
But in the big picture, I don't believe that is true. Yes, in the short term they get a bigger tax cut. But in the long-term, the middle-class decays, no purchasing power = no growth, deficits grow, etc. In the long-term they can end up much worse off.
And if we end up with a very large under-class, there could eventually be a huge-whip-saw swing in politics for farther left politics. Those revolutions in the Arab Spring . . . they were not started because people got politically annoyed with their leaders . . . they started because people finally got too mad at rising prices, no jobs, and crony upper elite. If people are pushed to far, they hit a breaking point. I don't foresee such a revolution here because we already have a democratic system . . . but people may get squeezed too far. I think we are already somewhat seeing that right now except that it is causing the polarization. There are populist movements on both sides right now. But one side or the other may win the populist argument.
Just saw a tweet that made me laugh:
"IAmALibertarian because I have a terminally flawed understanding of economics, human behavior, and world history."
What if to appease the base after his campaign's Obamacare comments, Romney actually picks a Tea Party member like Paul Ryan.
My reaction:
What if to appease the base after his campaign's Obamacare comments, Romney actually picks a Tea Party member like Paul Ryan.
My reaction:
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/romney-announces-women-for-mitt-coalitionThe Romney campaign announced on Wednesday a Women for Mitt coalition, led by Ann Romney, to reach out to women voters. The announcement came just hours before President Obama is introduced by womens rights activist at a rally in Colorado.
Im proud to be heading up this effort to reach out to women voters, Ann Romney said in a press release. There is no doubt that women will play a critical role in determining the outcome of this election, and thats something Mitt understands well.
Since President Obama cant run on his record, hes resorted to scare tactics to distract and divide women namely, the so-called War on Women, which is a total myth, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers said. The women of America arent falling for it.
You missed one big one: interest.
People who think they are gaining equity by buying over renting often don't understand how amortization works.
Romney Announces Women For Mitt Coalition
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/romney-announces-women-for-mitt-coalition
Yeah he understands that very well lol.
When you have the Wall Street Journal and Redstate jumping you as a republican, you're in trouble. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Romney felt like he needed to "excite the base" and pick Ryan considering he's a wet blanket to most conservatives.
Haha.More like "Woman For Mitt."
I think this is one of Romney's problems. He is spending so much time trying to keep his own base that he doesn't at all reach out to independents or anyone else. He never got around to "shaking up the the etch-a-sketch" such that all he does is pander to the far-right. And that is not going to work. People don't want George Bush 2.
Romney Announces Women For Mitt Coalition
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/romney-announces-women-for-mitt-coalition
Yeah he understands that very well lol.
If they are not "falling for it" then why do the polls show otherwise and why are you desperately trying to create this 'Women for Mitt' group?Romney Announces Women For Mitt Coalition
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/romney-announces-women-for-mitt-coalition
Yeah he understands that very well lol.Since President Obama cant run on his record, hes resorted to scare tactics to distract and divide women namely, the so-called War on Women, which is a total myth, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers said. The women of America arent falling for it.
You guys are dumb if you think Ryan will actually get the VP nod. There is no way in hell someone so divisive will get the nomination. Before you say, "Palin LULZ" she wasn't divisive before she was picked, she was an unknown attractive female from Alaska. 99% of the country had never heard of her. Hal Mary, etc.
Paul Ryan is equal parts hated, feared, loathed, unknown, vilified, and whatever else nationwide. You don't pick that when you are looking for a VP, no matter how incompetent your campaign.
Zing!More like "Woman For Mitt."
You guys are dumb if you think Ryan will actually get the VP nod. There is no way in hell someone so divisive will get the nomination. Before you say, "Palin LULZ" she wasn't divisive before she was picked, she was an unknown attractive female from Alaska. 99% of the country had never heard of her. Hal Mary, etc.
Paul Ryan is equal parts hated, feared, loathed, unknown, vilified, and whatever else nationwide. You don't pick that when you are looking for a VP, no matter how incompetent your campaign.
You guys are dumb if you think Ryan will actually get the VP nod. There is no way in hell someone so divisive will get the nomination. Before you say, "Palin LULZ" she wasn't divisive before she was picked, she was an unknown attractive female from Alaska. 99% of the country had never heard of her. Hal Mary, etc.
Paul Ryan is equal parts hated, feared, loathed, unknown, vilified, and whatever else nationwide. You don't pick that when you are looking for a VP, no matter how incompetent your campaign.
Add Rush Limbaugh to the growing list of conservatives who are completely shocked by Team Romney’s latest move to defend itself by touting Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts health care law.
Limbaugh was literally left sputtering as he contemplated the Romney response.
Limbaugh’s criticism came just hours after political observers of all stripes were stopped dead in their tracks by Team Romney’s defense against a Democratic super PAC ad that all but accuses Romney of facilitating a woman’s death after Bain Capital shut down the steel mill her husband worked at, thereby denying the family of health insurance.
In two separate appearances on Fox News, Romney spokesperson Andrea Saul dismissed the ad and said that under Romney’s Massachusetts health care law — which Romney has repeatedly promised to strip away from the country as a whole if he’s elected president — the woman would still have insurance.
Conservatives went nuts, including Limbaugh.
“Andrea Saul’s appearance on Fox was a potential gold mine for Obama supporters,” he said. “They can say, ‘Romneycare was the basis for our health care.’”
I don’t know the people at the Romney campaign but I’m gonna tell you…your candidate is accused of killing a woman because … this isn’t about health insurance! They’re out there saying that your guy killed this woman! and your answer is well she’d of had health insurance if she lived in Massachusetts.
Here’s the full segment from Rush
Just saw a tweet that made me laugh:
"#IAmALibertarian because I have a terminally flawed understanding of economics, human behavior, and world history."
The 'Romneycare' thing is so bad, even Rush is getting in on the criticisms
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...itt-romney-on-health-care-defense.php?ref=fpa
Actually, a vice presidential bid, even if it fails, is a prominent launch pad for a presidential bid. It's not a guarantee, obviously. But if one has presidential aspirations, they shouldn't be averse to joining the ticket. And Republicans love losers. Truly.I'd love for him to pick Ryan just so that guy can see his future tank into oblivion when the ticket he is part of fails to win. Even as just a VP candidate in a presidential run no one likes a loser, its why no potential presidential candidates for 2016 want anything to do with Romney's VP choice.