CNN's reporting Wisconsin as a toss-up based on a poll that has Obama up 49%-45%. Uh?
CNN's reporting Wisconsin as a toss-up based on a poll that has Obama up 49%-45%. Uh?
CNN's reporting Wisconsin as a toss-up based on a poll that has Obama up 49%-45%. Uh?
... the fuck? This analysis is hilariously wacky.
They ask King what happens if Romney gets Wisconsin. King says if Wisconsin turns red, then so does Ohio... for some reason. Then he might get Florida, and then oh look he's only 7 votes away!
CNN's reporting Wisconsin as a toss-up based on a poll that has Obama up 49%-45%. Uh?
Must be within the margin of error.
New CNN/ORC Int'l poll in WI: Obama/Biden 49, Romney/Ryan 45.
I still wouldn't really call it a toss up. Lean Obama maybe. Toss up? Not yet.
I think they should if only to help Baldwin's numbers out.Black Republican said:if u ever see the obama campaign stumping in WI you know they're being chicken littles
She lives in Florida, doesn't she?
I think so. Not sure.
So "bringing her to Florida to use as a prop" was some preeeeetty dishonest phrasing there.
Sorry. "Bringing her to a rally to use as a prop."
If the McCain team had more than what has already been released they would be out by now.
No they wouldn't.
If anyone has anything real on Romney's tax history they'll wait until October, probably mid-October, to drop that bomb.
Right now it would just be part of the election narrative and basically close the door for an Obama win. What journalist or political pundit wants that?
Instead whoever has them can sit on them until mid-October while the whole 24 hour news industry makes bank, then drop the bomb in October when the race can still be falsely reported as semi-close.
Instantly the person who has them becomes the man/woman who decided an election. They'd go on any talk show they want, get offered book deals immediately, and likely wind up with their own show on one of the news networks.
The smart career play for anyone sitting on that bombshell is to slow play their hand until it has maximum impact.
I laughed hard at this. Well put.
"People as old as mom here are not affected."
Young person: "What about me?"
"ROFL"
that would be some nas ether ish right thereNo they wouldn't.
If anyone has anything real on Romney's tax history they'll wait until October, probably mid-October, to drop that bomb.
Right now it would just be part of the election narrative and basically close the door for an Obama win. What journalist or political pundit wants that?
Instead whoever has them can sit on them until mid-October while the whole 24 hour news industry makes bank, then drop the bomb in October when the race can still be falsely reported as semi-close.
Instantly the person who has them becomes the man/woman who decided an election. They'd go on any talk show they want, get offered book deals immediately, and likely wind up with their own show on one of the news networks.
The smart career play for anyone sitting on that bombshell is to slow play their hand until it has maximum impact.
The Aaron Sorkin adaptation will be amazing.I wish I lived in a Hollywood movie.
No they wouldn't.
If anyone has anything real on Romney's tax history they'll wait until October, probably mid-October, to drop that bomb.
Right now it would just be part of the election narrative and basically close the door for an Obama win. What journalist or political pundit wants that?
Instead whoever has them can sit on them until mid-October while the whole 24 hour news industry makes bank, then drop the bomb in October when the race can still be falsely reported as semi-close.
Instantly the person who has them becomes the man/woman who decided an election. They'd go on any talk show they want, get offered book deals immediately, and likely wind up with their own show on one of the news networks.
The smart career play for anyone sitting on that bombshell is to slow play their hand until it has maximum impact.
No they wouldn't.
If anyone has anything real on Romney's tax history they'll wait until October, probably mid-October, to drop that bomb.
Right now it would just be part of the election narrative and basically close the door for an Obama win. What journalist or political pundit wants that?
Instead whoever has them can sit on them until mid-October while the whole 24 hour news industry makes bank, then drop the bomb in October when the race can still be falsely reported as semi-close.
Instantly the person who has them becomes the man/woman who decided an election. They'd go on any talk show they want, get offered book deals immediately, and likely wind up with their own show on one of the news networks.
The smart career play for anyone sitting on that bombshell is to slow play their hand until it has maximum impact.
No they wouldn't.
If anyone has anything real on Romney's tax history they'll wait until October, probably mid-October, to drop that bomb.
Right now it would just be part of the election narrative and basically close the door for an Obama win. What journalist or political pundit wants that?
Instead whoever has them can sit on them until mid-October while the whole 24 hour news industry makes bank, then drop the bomb in October when the race can still be falsely reported as semi-close.
Instantly the person who has them becomes the man/woman who decided an election. They'd go on any talk show they want, get offered book deals immediately, and likely wind up with their own show on one of the news networks.
The smart career play for anyone sitting on that bombshell is to slow play their hand until it has maximum impact.
Obama knows what it is, though I wonder how/if he could somehow get it to "leak" without the fallout coming back towards him?
Are they still on that $700 billion talking point?
yeesh.
Is there a particular reason why presidential candidates are not required to release tax returns?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/...urgh-Stealers-The-Voter-ID-Paul-Ryan-StrategyAnd everyone in the Beltway is asking the same question - WHY? Why is a candidate for national election working so hard to anger moderates and swing voters? Why is he appealing to fans of Ayn Rand instead of grandma's on Social Security? Why is he working so hard to widen his party's gender gap? Surely, they say, this is a losing strategy - by trying to appeal to the fringe of his party, he's handing Obama the election, right? RIGHT???
Under ordinary circumstance, that would be "right," but this year that's not the case. If you look at these actions as a part of a concerted strategy it all makes sense. Basically, the strategy is the mother of all "Hail Mary Passes" - but it very well could work. It goes like this: do everything you can to fire up your base while at the same time, by hook or by crook, suppress the other guy's base. Then you only have to rely on a squeaker win in a couple of counties in a couple of states to shift the whole nation your way. It allows you to target resources very narrowly, and for election officials in control of only a couple of pivotal precincts to have tremendous power in our admittedly very partisan, very divided country.
Man, the advertisements on CNN are like 60% anti-Obama. I've had it on in the background today and I don't think I saw a single pro-Obama one at all.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/...urgh-Stealers-The-Voter-ID-Paul-Ryan-Strategy
Obligatory lol Daily Kos, I'm no conspiracy believer etc...but the more I look at this election, the more this seems like the case. Florida, PA, and Ohio all have vote suppression issues. If you shit can enough votes in Philly, you can swing a close election.
Brian Williams was on The Daily Show last night talking about how their political team eschews talk of swing states and says it will *all* come down to just 12 counties.http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/...urgh-Stealers-The-Voter-ID-Paul-Ryan-Strategy
Obligatory lol Daily Kos, I'm no conspiracy believer etc...but the more I look at this election, the more this seems like the case. Florida, PA, and Ohio all have vote suppression issues. If you shit can enough votes in Philly, you can swing a close election.
This voter suppression thing.. is it really going to be a problem in November?http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/...urgh-Stealers-The-Voter-ID-Paul-Ryan-Strategy
Obligatory lol Daily Kos, I'm no conspiracy believer etc...but the more I look at this election, the more this seems like the case. Florida, PA, and Ohio all have vote suppression issues. If you shit can enough votes in Philly, you can swing a close election.
This voter suppression thing.. is it really going to be a problem in November?
It could be but Obama has the advantage in enough states right now that just flipping Ohio or something might not be enough to win the election for the GOP.This voter suppression thing.. is it really going to be a problem in November?
It could be but Obama has the advantage in enough states right now that just flipping Ohio or something might not be enough to win the election for the GOP.
But of course, the race could get closer.
Could Republicans really steal all 3 though? Ehhh.It's not just Ohio though. Add Florida and PA to that. I know PA isn't a swing state, but if enough votes are withheld who knows what happens. Regardless of how old people view Ryan, whoever wins the state will likely do so with a bare majority; again, more than enough to be impacted by Scott's voter purge.
Is RNC really doing a fauxbama debate with Donald Trump?
Fucking really?
They need to pick up Thad McCotter's political sitcom pitch.Can someone put CNN out of it's misery? I'm sorry but it has to be done.
Needs a few more "You didn't build that!"s, but yeah, my money's on this ;PProbably be more like this:
Faux Obama - -"Hope, change, yes we can" speech-
Trump - ::rolls out to enormous applause::
"You're fired. The American people said that you're fired!"
- garbage country music begins to play-
but my baby soledad will have no job :-(Can someone put CNN out of it's misery? I'm sorry but it has to be done.