Akin's latest tweet:
I dunno, fundraising appeals don't jibe with dropping out.
His twitter intern doesnt know any more than we do I am sure.
Akin's latest tweet:
I dunno, fundraising appeals don't jibe with dropping out.
If McCaskill is any good at her job she'll bring this up constantly in the debates.Too bad the GOP and DEM conventions are soon. Akin can just ride out the storm until they hit, which will wash this story from the headlines and public consciousness.
He could always honestly apologize and point out that his understanding of these issues was based upon faulty ideas.
But that'll never happen.
and?
And she should constantly remind voters that Ryan sponsored the bill to redefine rapeIf McCaskill is any good at her job she'll bring this up constantly in the debates.
It's not like he reversed his position either.
That's it. I just thought it was amusing.
Btw, I love the fact that Akin's now defending himself by saying he used the wrong word, as if THAT was the main problem people had with it.
I hope Obama starts campaigning in Missouri if only for this.And she should constantly remind voters that Ryan sponsored the bill to redefine rape
Akin is on Hannity's show right now getting beat up. The fix is in
Akin is on Hannity's show right now getting beat up. The fix is in
I dunno, they might want him out, but I don't think he is smart enough to realize that.
Went on Hannity to play whiffle ball, prolly strike out anyway.
Akin is on Hannity's show right now getting beat up. The fix is in
Reference courtesy Roman Polanski via Whoopi Goldberg
Akin's latest tweet:
I dunno, fundraising appeals don't jibe with dropping out.
Ah. Scumbags, both.
Palin made a big show of asking for campaign donations right before she announced she wasn't running.
Hannity beating him up? I find that hard to believe.
Exactly, if he's still polling close to McCaskill it's not like Republicans are just going to ignore it. They need Missouri to win the Senate.GhaleonEB said:He knows this pressure will end tomorrow, and he'll have the GOP's full support rallying behind him for the rest of the race.
He knows this pressure will end tomorrow, and he'll have the GOP's full support rallying behind him for the rest of the race.
PPP out saying "Scott Brown leads in our new Massachusetts poll...first time since June 2011...that will be out tomorrow"
even i have to admit i find Scott more likeable than Warren, wonder if a few dem moderate voters feel the same
Ugh. Sounds like a bad polling day tomorrow.PPP out saying "Scott Brown leads in our new Massachusetts poll...first time since June 2011...that will be out tomorrow"
even i have to admit i find Scott more likeable than Warren, wonder if a few dem moderate voters feel the same
In all fairness, name one Massachusetts Democrat who would be beating Scott Brown at this point who isn't a Kennedy.The fact that Warren can't beat a republican in MA tells me she's not a good candidate. Too wonkish perhaps, and not in a personable way like Al Franken or even (yes) Paul Ryan.
In all fairness, name one Massachusetts Democrat who would be beating Scott Brown at this point who isn't a Kennedy.
He's snookered everyone into believing he's so gosh-darn moderate while voting for every right-wing piece of shit up for discussion, much like Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins.
BEN FUCKING AFFLECK. Dude should have ran.
PPP out saying "Scott Brown leads in our new Massachusetts poll...first time since June 2011...that will be out tomorrow"
even i have to admit i find Scott more likeable than Warren, wonder if a few dem moderate voters feel the same
Checked his wiki, doesn't sound like he's interested in public office.BEN FUCKING AFFLECK. Dude should have ran.
Checked his wiki, doesn't sound like he's interested in public office.
I think Warren will win it in a squeaker still.
What does PoliGAF think about this article? http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiswo...eral-motors-is-headed-for-bankruptcy-again/4/
The idea of GM going bankrupt again? What would the fallout be? Would it prove the bailout wasn't worth it? Would Mitt Romney flip flop on the issue again?
I think he makes a pretty unpersuasive argument.What does PoliGAF think about this article? http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiswo...eral-motors-is-headed-for-bankruptcy-again/4/
The idea of GM going bankrupt again? What would the fallout be? Would it prove the bailout wasn't worth it? Would Mitt Romney flip flop on the issue again?
In all fairness, name one Massachusetts Democrat who would be beating Scott Brown at this point who isn't a Kennedy.
He's snookered everyone into believing he's so gosh-darn moderate while voting for every right-wing piece of shit up for discussion, much like Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins.
I feel like Im almost a New Hampshire resident, noted Romney, who owns a vacation home here on Lake Winnipesaukee. He quipped, It would save me some tax dollars.
Oh Mittens.
Seriously, who is prepping him!?!?!?
What does PoliGAF think about this article? http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiswo...eral-motors-is-headed-for-bankruptcy-again/4/
The idea of GM going bankrupt again? What would the fallout be? Would it prove the bailout wasn't worth it? Would Mitt Romney flip flop on the issue again?
http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/01/july-2012-not-enough-time-edition/Autoblog said:Ever hear the expression that there aren't enough hours in the day? For General Motors and Ford, there weren't enough days in July. These two domestics sold fewer vehicles last month than the year before, but they also had two fewer days to work with, July having only 24 selling days to work with this year versus last year's 26. So you may hear some news reports decrying these two automakers for slipping sales, but in actuality, the average number of vehicles that each sold per day in July increased, and that's what really counts.
http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/20/feds-expect-greater-loss-on-auto-bailoutAutoblog said:The saga of the U.S. Treasury's involvement with General Motors has become the theater of call and response: the call is Treasury announcing how much it stands to lose on its bailout of GM, the response is a turgid chorus of "Government Motors!" and "They should have died!" peppered with a few defenders trying to make themselves heard. Well, here we go again, since the latest Treasury report filed states that it stands to lose $25.1 billion on the 500 million shares of GM stock it still owns.
There are two qualifiers with this, the first being that the estimate is low; it was made when GM's stock price was $22.20, but at the close of trading on of August 17 the stock price was $22.01. The second and much more important qualifier is that Treasury only loses $26 billion, give or take, if it actually sells the stock. Treasury's report to Congress on the state of its investment doesn't mean a sale is imminent, it's just an update. The only thing we've heard about the date of a sale is that Treasury has no immediate plans on such, preferring to wait until the market catches up to the progress it feels GM has made.
At one time the government expected to lose $44 billion on the auto bailout. Even if it takes a $26 billion bath on GM and adds the $1.3 billion loss on Chrysler, that's still a 33-percent improvement on what could have been. And that's called "looking at the bright side."
Chicken Little's Second GM Bankruptcy: The Gold Medal For Silly Op-Ed PiecesForbes contributor Louis Woodhill must deserve some sort of special recognition for his thinly-argued op-ed contribution forecasting an early second demise of GM.
Are you fucking kidding?! They're just gonna cover the conventions and call it quits until the debates right? Lazy fuckers.This always happens, and this is always said, but its a damn shame TDS is on a break this week.
Remember when the Tea party was supposedly about the deficit and being fiscally responsible?
And now it turns out it is about Christian-right nuts and people that will bloat the deficit with massive tax cuts for the rich. Basically, the Tea Party was just the GOP base.
Remember when the Tea party was supposedly about the deficit and being fiscally responsible?
And now it turns out it is about Christian-right nuts and people that will bloat the deficit with massive tax cuts for the rich. Basically, the Tea Party was just the GOP base.
I am still writing my open letter for sanity that I will post up around the country.
Remember when the Tea party was supposedly about the deficit and being fiscally responsible?
And now it turns out it is about Christian-right nuts and people that will bloat the deficit with massive tax cuts for the rich. Basically, the Tea Party was just the GOP base.
Remember when the Tea party was supposedly about the deficit and being fiscally responsible?
And now it turns out it is about Christian-right nuts and people that will bloat the deficit with massive tax cuts for the rich. Basically, the Tea Party was just the GOP base.