jamesinclair
Banned
Oh my god this new layout.
OBAAAAMAAAAAAA
OBAAAAMAAAAAAA
Heard the farm bill got defeated. What was it again?
holy fuck.How much further can it possibly drop?
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/congress-job-approval
Democrats are poised to make big House gains in 2014.
lol
If Republicans are only tied with seniors they're boned.
Ugh, I know. My eyes.Oh my god this new layout.
OBAAAAMAAAAAAA
Moderator? lol I thought they finally banned him. lolI wish Cyan wasn't a moderator. He doesn't post here as much anymore.
A melange of different policies ranging from conservation and commodity programs to nutrition and international trade. The primary hiccup is that the House bill reduced appropriations for SNAP by $20 billion. The reduction was too steep for most Democrats, yet too meager for many Republicans. So it failed miserably. Notably, the Senate passed a farm bill on June 10 by a 66-27 margin.Heard the farm bill got defeated. What was it again?
OMG. I can't even see to typerlydoms snod sojln eiazcf,Ugh, I know. My eyes.
THANKS OBAMA
Whatever national environment allows Democrats to win the House (with its supreme gerrymander) would probably be enough for them to hold onto the Senate.holy fuck.
it's about time i read some good news this week, sheeeeit
It would be both sad and hilarious if the House goes to the Dems but they simultaneously lose the Senate. My head would explode
Whatever national environment allows Democrats to win the House (with its supreme gerrymander) would probably be enough for them to hold onto the Senate.
That would be ridiculously ironic though
Don't know if i would die, but I might scream a little out of frustration.The irony would literally kill us dead. On the spot.
Dems take the House but lose the Senate.
Not even M. Night could come up with a plot twist that brilliant!
I'm working on it.Needs a few dozen more bans to qualify.
I'm working on it.
Grats to Ghal and Gotchaye. Definitely great to see more level headed, chill posters become mods; same applies to Mumei and Cyan.
What if it's 2012 and Romney wins the presidency, Democrats win the House and Republicans win the Senate?Dems take the House but lose the Senate.
Not even M. Night could come up with a plot twist that brilliant!
Hey, Ghaleon's a mod too! Congrats ese!
Good to see some more poligaffers being represented in the staff.
But they're all men! #WhereAreTheWomen
Don't worry, they've got binders full of us. Any day now!
Fixed so this post can make it out if the House alive.Ghaleon became a mod?
Snap!
Then again....I'm kind of surprised it hasn't happened before.
You think a drug dealer can get his sentence cut by almost half because he "agreed" that the government get his assets?
Nope.I've been following this thread for few weeks and I must say that your country's political system is thick as hell. I was just wondering about its accessiblity: does the majority of the american citizens understand how it really works?
I've been following this thread for few weeks and I must say that your country's political system is thick as hell. I was just wondering about its accessiblity: does the majority of the american citizens understand how it really works?
In a way I find that pretty interesting as a foreigner, in France we live it such a different way.
Too true, nicely put too.Sir, we have already established what kind of democracy we are, now we are simply negotiating the price.
As already said, it's really not that complicated, if you ask specific questions, I'm certain people will be more than happy to explain things.I've been following this thread for few weeks and I must say that your country's political system is thick as hell. I was just wondering about its accessiblity: does the majority of the american citizens understand how it really works?
In a way I find that pretty interesting as a foreigner, in France we live it such a different way.
True, but they'll be replaced by other, better complaints.Like, if people understood the power structure of the Presidency versus the Congress, 50% of complaints would disappear.
I heard from Timan that it's possible to add a feature that embeds tweets. I hope this gets added eventually.
#WhereAreTheWomen
You're welcome.
Did President Obama just step into political trouble on a new issue, or didn’t he?
Some critics say that remarks made by Mr. Obama on a visit to Northern Ireland this week amount to an assault on schools run by religious sects – including the Catholic schools that are prominent in the US as well as in Northern Ireland.
But, at a time when the president is under fire on multiple fronts, he also has defenders on this one – including some within the Roman Catholic Church.
Here’s what Obama said in remarks about building and maintaining peace across sectarian lines:
“There are still wounds [in Northern Ireland] that haven’t healed, and communities where tensions and mistrust hangs in the air.” A little later he added: “If towns remain divided – if Catholics have their schools and buildings, and Protestants have theirs – if we can’t see ourselves in one another, if fear or resentment are allowed to harden, that encourages division. It discourages cooperation.”
Since he uttered those words in Belfast on June 17, they’ve spawned resentment and opposition in some quarters – including among some US conservatives and Catholics.
“Catholic education is not the source of ‘division’ in Northern Ireland, nor are they a source of division anywhere in the world,” wrote Brian Burch, president of the group Catholic Vote. “Catholic schools educate children without regard for race, class, sex, origin, or even religious faith. The work of Catholic education is a response to the Gospel call to serve, not divide.”
The tiff over Obama’s words comes as the president has been struggling in public-opinion polls lately against a succession of problems, from controversies involving the Internal Revenue Service and citizen privacy to questions about his leadership on issues like health care reform and the conflict in Syria.
Mr. Burch has called on Catholics to sign a petition seeking an apology from Obama. The petition also refers to a “growing pattern of hostility on the part of this administration toward Catholics,” mentioning as examples aspects of the president’s health care reform law and a Justice Department argument to the Supreme Court against a religious exemption to employment discrimination laws.
But Bill Donahue, president of the Catholic League, has a different take on Obama’s remarks. He says critics have taken the words wildly out of context – if they’ve paid attention to the words at all.
“There are plenty of reasons to be critical of President Obama’s policies as they relate to the Catholic Church, and I have not been shy in stating them. But the reaction on the part of conservatives, many of whom are Catholic, over his speech in Ireland, is simply insane,” Mr. Donahue said in a Friday blog post.
“Obama was not condemning Catholic schools – he was condemning segregation,” Donahue wrote. “He was calling attention to the fact that where social divisions exist, the prospects for social harmony are dimmed. How can anyone reasonable disagree with this observation?”
It was pretty clear* he was talking about social segregation and not just about schools.
Oh, by the by. I was planning on purchasing a buttload of books from Amazon or Barnes, was wondering if y'all had any suggestions?
Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict.Oh, by the by. I was planning on purchasing a buttload of books from Amazon or Barnes, was wondering if y'all had any suggestions?
Fixed so this post can make it out if the House alive.
Context: Northern Ireland.
I mean, really. Have we really reached the point where Obama can say something incredibly obvious about N Ireland--golly, there's a divide between Catholics and Protestants? in Ireland? no fucking way--and somehow engender mass freakouts among conservatives? Really?
Well hold onto your butts, because in 2014 Gomez will be back with a vengeance:
You see, losing is actually winning!
Massachusetts Senate races will continue to be fool's gold for Republicans, much like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Minnesota at the presidential level.They just don't get it...Markey's "record" to shoot at? Mass. voters will almost certainly agree with everything he votes for in the senate!
Also since when is a campaign rally featuring the president a sign of desperation? It's a special election, the only possible way for Markey to lose is if dems don't realize an election is happening or if they stay home. Getting them fired up is a good idea, and what better way to do it than bring in the big guns.
If Gomez loses the right's spin will be that Gomez could have won if the GOP big money donors rallied to him. And articles like this ensure republicans continue to attempt to replicate Scott Brown. That's fine with me: let them waste their money. It seems like there are far better states out there to run these republican "outsiders" than Mass.
(I think Gomez could make it to congress one day given his life story, but not the senate. But clearly he needs some seasoning.)
Well, there goes embedding tweets.
Obama's going to make a major speech on climate change on Tuesday. Also, Anthony Weiner is making the mayor race about single-payer.
I have a question regarding the whole NSA story. Am I correct in assuming that all of the information the government is collecting is already being held by private companies (Google, Verizon, etc.)?
I mean, I remember reading a story a few years ago about how Google had detailed records of everybody's search history. The way I understand the story, the NSA simply receives the data these companies are holding and compiles it into a central database. So, if that is correct, I'd like to see someone who's upset over the NSA's actions explain why it's ok for private companies to have access to all of this information, and why it becomes not ok when the government gets it.
I'm not necessarily ok with the NSA spying programs, I'm not sure where I fall yet. I feel like there's been a lot of confusing hyperbole and half-truths floating around the media with this story and I'm not quite sure how I feel about it because I'm not sure I have a full grasp of what's going on.
Shit, he's got my vote. We all know it's the best solution, it's about time someone actually came out and said it. I hope that even if he loses, whoever beats him picks this up and runs with it.
If we can get single-payer in NYC...
It'd be a hell of a thing. I can guarantee now that he's said it that the insurance companies will start pouring all sorts of money into the race.