• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2013 |OT2| Worth 77% of OT1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Averon

Member
States like WI, OH, and IN, seems like places with state universities you'd love to go to, but immediately leave when you graduate. If you're a newly minted 20-something graduate of UW, what does the state have to keep you from jumping ship to Minneapolis or Chicago?
 

Gotchaye

Member
What about reverse term limits? Are there legal or practical (non-political) obstacles to basically extending whatever rules we have about conflicts of interest for politicians and people in really important appointed positions to cover their lives after leaving government? With a comfortable pension, of course, but with the aim of making sure nobody's going to work as a lobbyist or take a delayed bribe by going off to Goldman or similar.
 

Oblivion

Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
Ugh, I just watched a segment on Hannity where Michelle Malkin was "debating" James Carville, and she started lamenting about Chris Stevens like as if she was his goddamned wife/sister/mom/daughter/etc. Fucking right-wingers, I swear.

Also, she sounds very similar to porn actress, Stacie Starr.
 

RDreamer

Member
Wisconsin is a shit state. NOBODY likes it here. You know that Ohio meme ("Welcome to Ohio! Haha now you're stuck in Ohio!")? I'm amazed it hasn't caught on for this state. Its nothing but hilly open fields, dinky small outdated cities (e.g. Kenosha and Green Bay), and only one sizable city Milwaukee which is the definition of a Rustbelt. The ONLY decent thing about Wisconsin is Madison. Its a pretty nice city, but I really don't like the college because it reeks of "pro-white liberalism" or "hypocritical liberalism", whatever term you prefer...

Hey man I like my state :(

I feel like I'm getting more and more alone on that, and the stance is harder to keep as time goes on, though. I still think it's a beautiful state, and I like the sort of dinky small city feel rather than bustling metropolis. Milwaukee is pretty rustbelt and not the most beautiful city, but it feels like it has a lot of hidden gems and a pretty tight-knit, fun culture depending on where you are.

As much as Madison probably is a more white liberalism, I still really dig the culture over there and lover it every time I visit from Milwaukee. I wish most of the state was a little closer to that ideal.

The big thing that pisses me off about Wisconsin is mainly just the recent politics. People are too split and die-hard, and there are a lot of just nutso Republicans around now. It's like they came out of the woodwork and decided to scream at the top of their lungs every chance they get. It felt like before Walker yeah we had republicans, but they voted their mind and then kind of did their own thing and so yeah whatever we disagree but that's cool. Now it's just unbearable in places. That's pretty much the big thing I dislike about Wisconsin now. Everyone used to be pretty friendly to most everyone. Now it all feels so hostile.
 

Blatz

Member
I always wonder about this as well. My suspicion is that it's based more on the background changing than on people's views changing--what seemed liberal when you were young might shift to seem standard or even conservative when you get older. Imagine that you were a young supporter of women's suffrage in the World War I era. You probably lived to see the early days of feminism, and it probably shocked you and seemed like a nutty overturning of the social order. Things change, things move along without you.

I think part of it is as people get older and build a family they become more fiscally conservative. And that steers them more towards the GOP. But for me, it seems the GOP is just a crazy in their financial policies as they are in their social policies.
 

User 406

Banned
What about reverse term limits? Are there legal or practical (non-political) obstacles to basically extending whatever rules we have about conflicts of interest for politicians and people in really important appointed positions to cover their lives after leaving government? With a comfortable pension, of course, but with the aim of making sure nobody's going to work as a lobbyist or take a delayed bribe by going off to Goldman or similar.

I thought about this a long time back, and the basic problem with it is, as tiresome as the overuse of the phrase has gotten, is personal freedom. You'd essentially be barring people for life from a broad range of legitimate jobs simply because they chose to do a particular job in the past.

Then again, we do this sort of thing for convicted felons. And I don't think I am being entirely facetious with this particular comparison.

I think to pursue this idea in a way that would seem reasonable to most people you'd have to somehow tailor the forbidden jobs to the voting record of the politician in question, and considering the complexity of legislation and untangling the various interests involved, it would be an impossible task. Far "simpler" to outright ban all corporate lobbying and donations, and heavily regulate if not nationalize those sectors that politicians have tended to use their terms as internships for.


Hey GAF, I'm back.

Reading this thread while I've been banned it seems that I've confused people with my post history. I can clarify if someone wants to/is curious enough.

No one else has followed up on this, so I'll bite. What was all that stuff about asian immigrants superperforming and going from there into how all the other poor people need to bootstraps not mah hard earned money rawr? Looked a lot like a political conversion in progress, not that Poe's Law hasn't hoodwinked me many times before.
 
Greg Sargent's Morning Plum is a pretty nice round of today. It covers the NSA surveillance, what's threatening immigration reform at this point, and how the Senate race is shaping up in Massachusetts after the Markey-Gomez debate.

Gomez done fucked up in the last half hour of the debate.
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
Greg Sargent's Morning Plum is a pretty nice round of today. It covers the NSA surveillance, what's threatening immigration reform at this point, and how the Senate race is shaping up in Massachusetts after the Markey-Gomez debate.

Gomez done fucked up in the last half hour of the debate.
Gomez opposes an assault weapon ban in a state that has one. He opposes Obama-care in a state that created the template for it.
Lawl.
 

thcsquad

Member
States like WI, OH, and IN, seems like places with state universities you'd love to go to, but immediately leave when you graduate. If you're a newly minted 20-something graduate of UW, what does the state have to keep you from jumping ship to Minneapolis or Chicago?

New Glarus beer. Not available outside Wisconsin. That's about it.

We Chicagoans had to drive up to the border to buy cases of it.
 

zargle

Member
States like WI, OH, and IN, seems like places with state universities you'd love to go to, but immediately leave when you graduate. If you're a newly minted 20-something graduate of UW, what does the state have to keep you from jumping ship to Minneapolis or Chicago?

As someone who grew up in IN and lives in OH, I can say that the big cities in OH are pretty good, or at least Columbus and Cincinnati since God hates Cleveland, but if you are in IN get out of there as fast as you can.
 

NewLib

Banned
As someone who grew up in IN and lives in OH, I can say that the big cities in OH are pretty good, or at least Columbus and Cincinnati since God hates Cleveland, but if you are in IN get out of there as fast as you can.

Indianapolis is not great, but it's a much better place to reside than Cincinnati. Can't speak to Columbus
 

LosDaddie

Banned
Interesting, and certainly matches my experience. I was a young conservative (moderate, but I still wince at some of my beliefs) and lived in a bastion of Reaganism. And on FB, those friends who haven't gone all Christ-y are all much more liberal now.

I used to believe the "Young Liberal to Old Conservative" stereotype when I was younger, but now I just think it's lie conservatives use to bash liberals with, ie "Well of course you're a liberal....you're still young/in college and don't have a real job yet / or you haven't started a family yet".

Personally, I don't know many people who've changed parties over the course of their lives. But I don't usually discuss politics with friends, either.


Why is the GOP wasting their time on these faux scandals? It is not like Obama can do much anyway.

You already answered your own question:

There is really no point in talking about politics for the next 3 years is there? Nothing of substance is going to pass through that House. And they'll hold it in 2014 for another 2 years of obstructionism.

Our government is static. Nothing is going to change for years.

That's some good politicking there.
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
I used to believe the "Young Liberal to Old Conservative" stereotype when I was younger, but now I just think it's lie conservatives use to bash liberals with, ie "Well of course you're a liberal....you're still young/in college and don't have a real job yet / or you haven't started a family yet".
It's similar to the "if you're young and not liberal then you don't have a heart, but if you're old and not conservative then you don't have a brain" backpat.
 

Zona

Member
symbolic racism

someone on the board plugged this book and its amazing for really deconstructing racism today in america. I think it was the mod who always is in the race and gender threads. Don't recall the name.

Racism without Racists, the book will make you uncomfortable

I'm quite late with this but I also recommend White Supremacy and Racism in the Post-Civil Rights Era by the same author. I read it last year and found it gave a great overview of the topic.
 
You already answered your own question:


That's some good politicking there.

I don't think it is good politicking though. Obama is relatively popular and calling him a Kenyan Muslim that sent brave Americans to their death in Benghazi is not helping them, it is backfiring. Yes, their base loves it but they are losing the middle. Congress is always hated but they are ESPECIALLY hated now.
 

RDreamer

Member
As someone who grew up in IN and lives in OH, I can say that the big cities in OH are pretty good, or at least Columbus and Cincinnati since God hates Cleveland, but if you are in IN get out of there as fast as you can.

Seriously IN sucks. My wife and best friend are from there, and I hate going through that stupid state to get anywhere. It's just fucking awful from head to toe. Boring nasty and ugly. And fuck Fort Wayne with a metal spoon.
 

zargle

Member
Indianapolis is not great, but it's a much better place to reside than Cincinnati. Can't speak to Columbus

I'll disagree, but I dont spend much time in Indy save for Gencon, so I dunno.

Seriously IN sucks. My wife and best friend are from there, and I hate going through that stupid state to get anywhere. It's just fucking awful from head to toe. Boring nasty and ugly. And fuck Fort Wayne with a metal spoon.

Hey now, that's my hometown you're talking about.




I hate it so much. God it's so awful.
 
Seriously IN sucks. My wife and best friend are from there, and I hate going through that stupid state to get anywhere. It's just fucking awful from head to toe. Boring nasty and ugly. And fuck Fort Wayne with a metal spoon.

IN is strange mix. It has a large rust-belt (OH, Ill, MI) flair, it has some Southern (KY & WV) flair, and wee bit of liberal Mid-West (MN & MI) flair. It ends up being a hybrid southernish-Mid-west rust belt state.
 
Saxby Chambliss said the same thing. They've been grabbing these phone records for seven years.

Without prejudice to the issue, I mean, what did people think the NSA was doing all the time? There's a reason they're the least talked about agency! They spend all their time spying on Americans.

Seriously, what did people think was going on at the monstrous data centers they're building all across the country? Another LHC experiment or something?
 
House intel chief says domestic terror attack was thwarted through the data collection: https://twitter.com/ap_ken_thomas/status/342689024667947009

so they'll scare us into giving up rights.

there's no other way they could have stopped it? they needed to EVERY record kept?

Seriously, what did people think was going on at the monstrous data centers they're building all across the country? Another LHC experiment or something?

I have no problem with them collecting data that has a purpose. This dragnet collection of every phone record is absurd though.
 

gcubed

Member
so they'll scare us into giving up rights.

there's no other way they could have stopped it? they needed to EVERY record kept?



I have no problem with them collecting data that has a purpose. This dragnet collection of every phone record is absurd though.

data always has a purpose. The purpose just may not be known yet
 
Nobody's scaring anyone, dude. They just said what they got from the data.
Yes they are. The implication is that this is a policy that "saves lives", there is no other way they can get the data and opposing the collection means terrorist attacks are going to happen.
 
"We've been doing this for seven years" doesn't strike me as a good excuse for blatant civil liberty abuses. I figured Obama would continue some of Bush's security measures, but I would have never guessed he'd be significantly worse on civil liberties than Bush.
 
Yes they are. The implication is that this is a policy that "saves lives", there is no other way they can get the data and opposing the collection means terrorist attacks are going to happen.

No they're not. It's one report out of the House intel chief, who said what they were able to do with the data. Nobody is hitting home the point that it has "saved lives."

Calm down.
 

gcubed

Member
"We've been doing this for seven years" doesn't strike me as a good excuse for blatant civil liberty abuses. I figured Obama would continue some of Bush's security measures, but I would have never guessed he'd be significantly worse on civil liberties than Bush.

by default, this can't be worse, this is just "as bad as".

Overall though, yes, worse. While i don't support torture, its still a little down the scale from killing Americans without a trial
 
I want to be extremely upset at the NSA...but honestly, law or no law, court order or no court order, I'd feel they'd be doing it anyhow.

:/

Feels bad man.
 

Jackson50

Member
I posted a study a few days ago on this topic. It's frightening to witness the utter disregard for the public good simply to undermine President Obama's signature policy. The Republicans who reject the Medicaid expansion are guilty of unconscionable sins. Their cretinous obstinacy is not only fiscal stupidity, it denies millions of Americans access to healthcare; they will pay more to cover fewer people. They are willfully sabotaging the public good for politics.
Wisconsin is a shit state. NOBODY likes it here. You know that Ohio meme ("Welcome to Ohio! Haha now you're stuck in Ohio!")? I'm amazed it hasn't caught on for this state. Its nothing but hilly open fields, dinky small outdated cities (e.g. Kenosha and Green Bay), and only one sizable city Milwaukee which is the definition of a Rustbelt. The ONLY decent thing about Wisconsin is Madison. Its a pretty nice city, but I really don't like the college because it reeks of "pro-white liberalism" or "hypocritical liberalism", whatever term you prefer...
I was skeptical until I discovered that drinking fountains are called 'bubblers' in Wisconsin.
lets-ignore-the-east-coastwest-coast-split-and-notice-that-wisconsin-and-rhode-island-call-a-water-fountain-a-bubbler.jpg
 

Oblivion

Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
Moar goodies from that Republican autopsy thing:

• "everyone in America should have access to health coverage"
• "reducing big government" does not make sense as a policy goal
• there is a worthwhile difference between "fixing" and "reducing" the national debt
• gays should be allowed to get married
• "we are spending way too much time out there fighting other countries' wars"
• "taxes should go up on the wealthy" (Not kidding: 54% of the young Republicans surveyed agreed with this sentiment. Obviously, "takers")

Let us emphasize: these are things that a majority of younger REPUBLICANS believe are GOOD things.
 

GaimeGuy

Volunteer Deputy Campaign Director, Obama for America '16
Maybe, just maybe, there's some hope for the GOP in the future.

So many of people who identify as republicans say sound things, yet they elect the most unreasonable, far right candidates.


Show you're reasonable people by electing reasonable candidates. Until then, your "reasonable" policy stances are bullshit, since the people you're electing don't hold those views.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom