Well said. See ya later you useless fuck.I've been "serving" the great state of Montana in the U.S. Senate since 1978. You'll notice I put "serving" in quotes, because, let's face it, I suck. My wife has been pleading with me not to say this publicly, insisting that it's not true, that I'm a capable and dedicated public servant, blah, blah, blah. Bless her dear heart, but she's just being nice. Because, folks, I am telling you, I am hands-down the shittiest senator in the history of the Senate. The worst.
The other day, I was in my office, thumbing through some old pieces of legislation I'd either authored or co-sponsored. The whole time, I was thinking, "Christ, what a hack I am." Take my 1993 masterwork, S.915, the Semiconductor Investment Act. Section 2a of the bill states, "IN GENERAL–Section 168(e)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to three-year property) is amended by striking 'and' at the end of clause (i), by striking the period at the end of clause (ii), and by inserting at the end the following: '(iii) any semiconductor manufacturing equipment.'"
What the hell is that shit? As I recall, it had something to do with semiconductor manufacturing equipment. But you'd never know, what with the way I buried its meaning under a tidal wave of I-know-all-the-fancy-schmancy-bill-writing lingo. I was trying to look like Mr. Big Shot, but little did I know what a conceited ass I came off as. When the bill was pitched, Sen. Bob Packwood (R-OR) was nice enough to say some introductory words of support on the floor. But now I think he was just embarrassed for me and wanted to help a fellow senator save face, however little I deserved it. I forget what happened to that bill. Hopefully, it died without ever coming to a vote.
There's a huge stack of old bills in my office, each containing tons of that sort of hackwork. I'm tempted to burn down the entire Hart Office Building and cleanse the planet of every physical trace of my senatorial presence. But, no, that wouldn't do any good, because every facet, every aspect of my incredible suckiness is piledriven into the memories of those I so ineptly represent.
God. God. I am so, so, so sorry, folks.
There's something in the Constitution that lets the legislature challenge election results if they think something shady went down, and they could have basically overturned the election.What clause were the republicans thinking of to fuck elections with? I've gone over it(just now) to see anything they could is but I couldn't think of anythig
Romney is actually pretty funny, it's a shame he wasn't able to just be himself while campaigning.
This is true and very evident when you see them away from cameras. They're people first and foremost.Indeed. He had to pretend to be one person during the primaries, and another person during the general. And neither of those two was likely a complete and honest representation of himself.
The same appears to be true of most other US politicians.
Documentary looks interesting. That opening scene alone with the bubble just having burst seems very revealing.
How many skeletons are in Christie's closet? Will he still be the media's darling once everything comes out?
Caroline Krass, a top justice department lawyer, sparked the ire of several Senate intelligence committee members by claiming that crucial legal opinions about intelligence matters were beyond the scope of the committee.
Asked directly and repeatedly if the Senate panel was entitled to the memos, which several senators claimed were crucial for performing their oversight functions, Krass replied: "I do not think so, as a general matter."
The Senate intelligence committee, whose public hearings are increasingly rare, is usually a bastion of support for the CIA and its sister intelligence agencies. The exception is the committee's prolonged fight with the CIA over a 6,300-page report on the agency's torture of terrorism detainees in its custody since 9/11.
The committee has prepared its report for years; the former chairman, Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, said the classified version contains 50,000 footnotes. For a year, the panel has sought to release a public version that multiple members of the panel say documents both the brutality of CIA torture and what they have called "lies" told by the CIA to the oversight committees in Congress and the rest of the executive branch concerning its torture practices.
CIA director John Brennan, who was a senior CIA official during the years scrutinised by the committee, is resisting release of the report. The CIA has told reporters that the report contains numerous factual errors, which Senator Mark Udall, a Colorado Democrat on the panel, said on Tuesday was a "misleading" and self-serving description of differences of "interpretation" between the agency and the committee. "I'm more confident than ever in the factual accuracy" of the torture report, Udall said.
The Senate intelligence committee, whose public hearings are increasingly rare, is usually a bastion of support for the CIA and its sister intelligence agencies. The exception is the committee's prolonged fight with the CIA over a 6,300-page report on the agency's torture of terrorism detainees in its custody since 9/11.
He sounds like he's running for president, given his jabs at Hillary. Would be interesting, however I wonder if liberals can support someone with an A rating from the NRA.
The legislation would broaden the scope of the sanctions already imposed against Iran, expanding the restrictions on Iran's energy sector to include all aspects of its petroleum trade and putting in place measures targeting Iran's shipping and mining sectors. The bill allows Obama to waive the new sanctions during the current talks by certifying every 30 days that Iran is complying with the Geneva deal and negotiating in good faith on a final agreement, as well as meeting other conditions such as not sponsoring or carrying out acts of terrorism against U.S. targets.
In accordance with goals laid out frequently by hard-liners in Congress and the influential lobbying group the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the bill sets tough conditions for a final deal, should one be reached with Iranian negotiators. Among those conditions is a provision that only allows Obama to waive new sanctions, even after a final deal has been struck, if that deal bars Iran from enriching any new uranium whatsoever. The bill states Obama may not waive sanctions unless the United States and its allies "reached a final and verifiable agreement or arrangement with Iran that will ... dismantle Iran's illicit nuclear infrastructure, including enrichment and reprocessing capabilities and facilities." (Congress could also block Obama's waivers by passing a "joint resolution of disapproval" against a final deal.)
The most eye-opening part of the bill is a non-binding provision that states that if Israel takes "military action in legitimate self-defense against Iran's nuclear weapons program," Congress should move to "authorize the use of military force, diplomatic, military, and economic support to the Government of Israel." That language, calling for congressional authorization of American military force, is even stronger than that introduced in February by another Iran hawk, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). With the support of AIPAC, the Graham resolution, a non-binding bill, was subsequently softened and passed by the Senate in April.
Critics of imposing new sanctions fear that the bill will violate either the spirit or the letter of the Joint Plan of Action signed in Geneva. The interim deal allows some flexibility, mandating that "the U.S. administration, acting consistent with the respective roles of the President and the Congress, will refrain from imposing new nuclear-related sanctions." Administration officials have mounted a so-far successful effort to stall new sanctions in the Senate. (The House overwhelmingly passed new sanctions in the summer.) Previous rumors of a bill in the Senate were said to contain a six-month delay that would prevent the legislation from taking effect while talks continued, but this iteration of the legislation doesn't contain that kind of fail-safe. Asked this month by Time what would happen if a bill, even with a delay, passed Congress, Iran's Foreign Minister Javad Zarif said, "The entire deal is dead."
On Saturday, Kingston came out against free lunches, saying that children should have to pay at least a nominal amount or do some work like sweeping cafeteria floors.
"But one of the things Ive talked to the secretary of agriculture about: Why dont you have the kids pay a dime, pay a nickel to instill in them that there is, in fact, no such thing as a free lunch? Or maybe sweep the floor of the cafeteria -- and yes, I understand that that would be an administrative problem, and I understand that it would probably lose you money. But think what we would gain as a society in getting people -- getting the myth out of their head that there is such a thing as a free lunch," he said.
Michelle Nunn is going to have the easiest campaign ever. No matter which GOPer wins the nomination she can just copy Claire McCaskill or Joe Donnelly's playbooks.Even better news. Seems Rep. Jack Kingston solved the problem of child hunger:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/...hould-work-if-they-want-to-eat-school-lunches
Seems he's been reading Newt's presidential biography.
Top Senate Democrats Break with White House and Circulate New Iran Sanctions Bill (Ali Gharib, FP)
"And a happy new year... some other year. Let's fight Iran in 2014."
Even better news. Seems Rep. Jack Kingston solved the problem of child hunger:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/...hould-work-if-they-want-to-eat-school-lunches
Seems he's been reading Newt's presidential biography.
Even better news. Seems Rep. Jack Kingston solved the problem of child hunger:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/...hould-work-if-they-want-to-eat-school-lunches
Seems he's been reading Newt's presidential biography.
I don't know. Policy gets fucking loopy when you extract it from the Book of Revelation.What the fuck is wrong with them, this doesn't serve America's strategic interests, it only serves Israel's hard right extremist's interests. Any deal is going to require that Iran be allowed to enrich uranium to low levels for use in civil nuclear reactors. I can't see how anyone could claim that a country doesn't have the sovereignty for at least that.
What the fuck is wrong with them, this doesn't serve America's strategic interests, it only serves Israel's hard right extremist's interests. Any deal is going to require that Iran be allowed to enrich uranium to low levels for use in civil nuclear reactors. I can't see how anyone could claim that a country doesn't have the sovereignty for at least that.
He sounds like he's running for president, given his jabs at Hillary. Would be interesting, however I wonder if liberals can support someone with an A rating from the NRA.
It's so obvious he did this due to taking a beating over his recent "we can fix Obamacare comments," which got him crucified on the right. What a pathetic party.
I recall a similar proposal a long time ago.
Howard Dean had an A rating from the NRA.
The guy who's losing in all (but one) of those matchups is Tom Corbett. 36-48 vs. Jack Wagner
37-45 vs. Allyson Schwartz (June: 35-45)
37-44 vs. Katie McGinty
37-44 vs. Tom Wolf (March: 39-39)
39-42 vs. Rob McCord (June: 35-43)
39-41 vs. Ed Pawlowski (March: 38-44)
42-37 vs. John Hanger (March: 42-41)
Vermont is a weird place.
So congress finally decide to do something, and it's this crap, ugh.Top Senate Democrats Break with White House and Circulate New Iran Sanctions Bill (Ali Gharib, FP)
"And a happy new year... some other year. Let's fight Iran in 2014."
Top Senate Democrats Break with White House and Circulate New Iran Sanctions Bill (Ali Gharib, FP)
"And a happy new year... some other year. Let's fight Iran in 2014."
lol, Hillary should be so scurred! IN COMES THE BAUCUSHe sounds like he's running for president, given his jabs at Hillary. Would be interesting, however I wonder if liberals can support someone with an A rating from the NRA.
Say hello to the most powerful lobby in Washington. It's not Big Pharma, Big Oil or the defense contractors. It's AIPAC.
I hope Obama stands his ground and vetoes the deal.
But will it have 67 votes in the senate? That seems possible, but I hope to god not.
Fifty percent of Americans say Bush is more responsible for the countrys current economic problems than President Obama, the Post-ABC poll shows. Just 38 percent hold Obama more responsible. Seven percent assign equal blame.
You know what this thread really needs? A year end wrap up award ceremony, like the gaming side does.
Who's with me?
Shittiest Congress of the Year: The 113th
Worst President of the Year: Obama
Fattest Governor of the Year: Chris Christie
Best Ted Cruz of the Year: Louie Gohmert
Baddest News of the Year: Kay Hagan
Traitor of the Year: (Tie) Edward Snowden & The Pope
News Story of the Year: Benghazi
Worst Country of the Year: The United States of the America
Best Country of the Year: 'MURICA!
Shittiest Congress of the Year: The 113th
Worst President of the Year: Obama
Fattest Governor of the Year: Chris Christie
Best Ted Cruz of the Year: Louie Gohmert
Baddest News of the Year: Kay Hagan
Traitor of the Year: (Tie) Edward Snowden & The Pope
News Story of the Year: Benghazi
Worst Country of the Year: The United States of the America
Best Country of the Year: 'MURICA!
I just woke up, read this post in the dark with one hand covering my one eye and am laughing like a crazy man. Thanks.
If you only have one eye and you're covering it how are you able to read it?
You have two eyes?!Using my other eye.
You have two eyes?!
You have two eyes?!
CA: 15,000 sign-ups daily
NY: 4,500 daily
CT: 1,400 daily
KY: 3,000 daily
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...eraging-15000-obamacare-enrollments-each-day/
Ugh at this duck dynasty stuff. Being reminded how many bigots I know.
As for the perverted GLAAD spokesperson, what Phil Robertson says is what true Christians believe because it's what God and Jesus say about homosexuality - it's sin and unnatural (Romans 1:26-27), it's an abomination to God (Leviticus 18:22), and homosexual sodomites and lesbians will not inherit the kingdom of heaven (1 Corinthians 6:9-10). This sodomite spokesperson is either completely deceived or he's never read the bible because he's wrong about everything he said! It will be interesting to see how A&E are going to handle this and if they're so PC they're going to cave to the sodomites and lesbians perverts. I hope they don't, but won't be surprised if they do. I love the Robertson families' show because they're not afraid to speak the truth of God's Word. If A&E dumps them, I'm dumping A&E.
The irony here is delicious.The GLAAD spokesman had better check what true Christianity means and not cherry pick Biblical verses either. God's pretty clear on it. Phil is doing them a favor by warning them--ignoring their behavior and pretending it's ok is exactly what the enemy wants.
If only GLAAD understood how much we do not care what they think. Ever. their hate filled screeching is designed to stop any discussion.
GLAAD is the problem, not the solution. A frog has better conversation and intellectual reasoning than a Christianophobic/reasonophobic hate mopngering lying homosexual member of GLAAD.
Ugh at this duck dynasty stuff. Being reminded how many bigots I know.
How many skeletons are in Christie's closet? Will he still be the media's darling once everything comes out?
They mentioned some ugly shit he may have been involved with alongside his brother, during his AG days. And I honestly believe republicans are digging for the dirt as hard as democrats are. He's probably fucked. Not that he'd win the GOP nomination if he was clean of course.Probably a poop load. Somewhere mentioned in Game Change 2.0, the Romney guys were vetting Christie for vice president and were pretty worried about some of his past issues. Also, Romney thought he was too fat.
Possibly, it's not clear from those quotes (I haven't read the article yet). If they're just talking about retention by communications companies, that's a little less problematic, but still something new for the US. Many European countries mandate that communications data be retained by providers for so many years, but that doesn't exist here (yet). However, those quotes suggest something even more than that to me.
They mentioned some ugly shit he may have been involved with alongside his brother, during his AG days. And I honestly believe republicans are digging for the dirt as hard as democrats are. He's probably fucked. Not that he'd win the GOP nomination if he was clean of course.
You know what this thread really needs? A year end wrap up award ceremony, like the gaming side does.
Who's with me?
Shittiest Congress of the Year: The 113th
Worst President of the Year: Obama
Fattest Governor of the Year: Chris Christie
Best Ted Cruz of the Year: Louie Gohmert
Baddest News of the Year: Kay Hagan
Traitor of the Year: (Tie) Edward Snowden & The Pope
News Story of the Year: Benghazi
Worst Country of the Year: The United States of the America
Best Country of the Year: 'MURICA!
At that pace, those four states alone sign up over 160k people in one week.