speculawyer
Member
Can we send Lindsey Graham to go fight in Iraq?
Only if we also make John McCain fly the plane.
Ouch, that was a low blow!
Can we send Lindsey Graham to go fight in Iraq?
And it Begins . .
http://news.yahoo.com/republicans-blast-obama-over-failed-iraq-policy-164846361.html
But here is the amazing part . . . I start reading the comments and the people seem to agree that we should not waste our blood & money there.
I'm at a loss for words....
Yahoo comments actually being sane?
O_O
What world have I woken up into?
Buffet Rule was used to balance the bill. Otherwise we'd blow a hole in our budget.Is he wrong? The bill includes the Buffet Rule, which we all know republicans will never support under any circumstances. If Warren, Reid, etc were actually interested in passing the legislation they would have at least tried to find a bipartisan way to pay for it. I'm not saying that would have worked, I'm just saying the way this was handled was pure politics for the midterms.
Every since major websites started implementing an upvote/downvote system in their comments, the cesspit comments from websites like yahoo, youtube have gone away. But you will see something really insane out of the blue upvoted to hell. Usually it's race related or has something to do with xenophobia.
No Majora's Mask remake, thanks Obama
And it Begins . .
http://news.yahoo.com/republicans-blast-obama-over-failed-iraq-policy-164846361.html
But here is the amazing part . . . I start reading the comments and the people seem to agree that we should not waste our blood & money there.
Raúl Labrador is supposedly mulling a runSo with Sessions dropping out, I guess absolutely everyone has stepped out of Kevin McCarthy's way for Cantor's party leadership spot, so basically nothing interesting is going to change there. 8 days on very little notice just isn't enough time to make a case for anyone but the guy that's traditionally the next in line.
Wide open battle for the soon to open whip position though, with a lot more time to make a campaign, and I wouldn't be surprised if the tea party gets thrown a bone there. It would basically give the tea party house members a designated leader, which might keep things more under control, or make the revolution that much easier depending how much of a true believer the tea party whip ends up being.
I would say this whole thing also has put the establishment in a weaker position for a January fight for leadership which the tea party will actually be prepared for.
I'm extremely interested in how this all turns out. Outside of a government default, there's nothing they can really do to hurt the country much more than they already have, so I do find myself hoping that the republicans go crazy as possible to really make this whole era pass by as quick as possible.
Yep, first thing that came to mind. Down, but not out as the media/bloggersphere has been trumpeting over the past several months. This is a bit of a double-edged sword; good in that it shows the most extremist voices of the GOP front and center, which turns off a lot of voters and can help Democrats big time... bad because it gives the Tea Party an even bigger ego and allows them one step closer to just completely overthrowing GOP leadership in the House -- if not that, then at least having them by the balls more than they ever did before. Boehner's future is questionable to me right now. Privately, I think he, Kevin McCarthy, McMorris Rodgers et al. are scared shitless... and they should be. Ultimately every non-crazy American should at least be a little concerned. Imagine if we had a Speaker/leadership more in the vein of Ted Cruz during the shutdown last year? The establishment was bad enough... the economy was on the brink of crashing and that was with semi-rational people at the helm. I can't imagine the altenrative... well, I can, but I don't want to right now. :\So it looks like the news of Tea Party's death was rather premature.
Meh, it is the ultimate wet dream: the GOP will finally implode. It never happens, though. The GOP settles their scores in private and try as hard as they can to stick to the 'program', however devoid of, well, anything it may be, like good soldiers. It is part of their M.O. This certainly makes it seem like more of a possibility... but now that Cantor is stepping down in just a little over a month, I just don't see it happening. The sparks within and outside of leadership are probably flying at this very moment, but by the time late July comes around they'll all find a place to land as usual... which brings me to my next point:"@costareports: I'm on phone now w/ Peter King of NY, who says he wonders if the party is crumbling on the whole"
Our country is the only thing that is fucked like Amir0x said. The GOP will settle their scores internally and reunite in their dysfunctional weird unity in their neverending conquest to dig their knife deeper into the heart of any policy that Obama champions or even remotely supports. They are playing a really long game that started before he was even sworn in. Most of the GOP overall is perverse and downright terrifying. They're about as radical as you can get in Congress without being violent.Tea party revolt, Republican party literally coming apart at the seams. What Republican is going to dare speak up for immigration reform if they can get flanked on the even FURTHER RIGHT than Cantor?
This is insanity. America is so fucked
Hold it right there, pal. We're like two years out from really getting into the Presidential election. That is an eternity in US politics. Between how Obama will handle the next two years, what the GOP will do (or won't do), what happens globally, how the economy continues to improve, stay flat or fall, etc. etc. etc... there are too many variables. The Democratic brand, whether you think the blame falls on Obama or not, isn't quite where it needs to be at the moment. And that's all the GOP needs for an edge right now, and for them, that's enough to build on something that can spill over into 2016 and really pay off for them if they get their way.Cantor being pushed out is hilarious, but it's also setting up the GOP's shellacking in 2016 I've been predicting for years here.
This is what the beginning of the end looks like. It's coming.
Boehner on why Cantor lost:
America, where whipping out your dick is more offensive than thumbing your nose at the parents of children lost to senseless gun violence. People who are counting on their elected representatives to finally reign in this country's obsession with firearms and doing fuck all for the mentally ill.I miss this guy
Raúl Labrador is supposedly mulling a run
I just had a meltdown.That won't be true with Paul Broun holding the gavel.
I don't think anyone expected Boehner to still be Speaker next term.
Sorry about Brietbart link, only result on first page of Google that explains it well enough and is a "name" site.The first bill Schweizer says Boehner used the tollbooth tactic on was the Wireless Tax Fairness Act of 2011. The bill, which received broad congressional and public support, placed a five year freeze on state and local governments’ ability to slap taxes on cellphone users. Big phone companies like AT&T and Verizon strongly supported the bill. The Wireless Tax Fairness Act of 2011 (H.R. 1002) was introduced in March 2011 and easily passed the House Judiciary Committee in July.
Instead of promptly scheduling a vote, however, Schweizer says Boehner sat on the popular bill: “Everyone expected Boehner, given his general aversion to raising taxes, to support the bill and hold a vote. But as the months went by and mid-October arrived, it was unclear whether the vote would ever come.”
Boehner finally set a vote for November 1, 2011. “The day before the vote, Boehner’s campaign collected the toll: thirty-three checks from wireless industry executives, totaling almost $40,000,” writes Schweizer. The bill passed easily on a voice vote.
Two more bills Schweizer says Boehner employed the tollbooth strategy on were the Access to Capital for Job Creators Act (H.R. 2940) and the Small Company Capital Formation Act (H.R. 1070). The bills were designed to help small businesses get easier access to capital by easing stock offering regulations. Brokers and venture capital and investment firms all supported the proposed law.
Once again, says Schweizer, Boehner collected a tollbooth fee hours before bringing the bills to the floor for a vote on November 2 and 3.
“The Speaker of the House took in $91,000 in the forty-eight hours of October 30 and 31 from investment banks and private equity firms, two days before the vote,” writes Schweizer in Extortion. “During the same time period, he took in $46,500 from self-described ‘investors’ and another $32,450 from bank holding companies. With the tolls paid, the votes took place on the full House floor. Both passed easily.”
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/washingtons-open-secret-profitable-pacs/
After weeks of trying to get an interview with Congresswoman Napolitano, we finally cornered her outside a meeting of the Hispanic Caucus. She told us that as a woman and a minority, banks wouldn't lend her money, so she had to she withdraw $150,000 from an investment account to lend it to her campaign.
Steve Kroft: You loaned money to your campaign and then charged the campaign 18 percent interest?
Grace Napolitano: That is correct.
Grace Napolitano: To be able to do a lot of the things I had to do were not feasible unless I did what I had to do. And so at that point, that's what was recommended, and that's what I went with.
Steve Kroft: I don't think there's anything wrong with loaning your campaign money. But then collecting 18 percent interest from your campaign seems a little too much.
Grace Napolitano: Would you go out and get a loan and not get charged interest?
Steve Kroft: It's still 18 percent and $228,000 in interest.
Grace Napolitano: You like to favor 18 percent.
Steve Kroft: I do like to favor. I mean, that's what the Mafia gets.
Grace Napolitano: It isn't like I've really profited. I still live in the same house. I drive a small car. I am not a billionaire, or a millionaire, for that matter.
Steve Kroft: Did your campaign contributors know that you were paying back a loan, charging the campaign committee 18 percent?
Grace Napolitano: Well, you don't go out and publicize that, but they know that I had a campaign debt.
I actually agree with Angry Fork in a way there (although my political philosophy matches his to a tee but I'm far more reasonable and less dogmatic about it no offence to AF) but bringing up a quote by Bertrand Russell "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.” I feel in some ways that the left in general is reflective of that, as they just don't seem to be passionate enough about pushing their ideas compared to the right, there's too much uncertainty and theorising tied to their politics, especially from the centre-left which makes up the majority of left-wing politics, and it doesn't lead to any form of action on a grassroot's level to actually try and influence things or put pressure on the government , which is a shame because the right pretty much have the monopoly of power due to the nature of the system.. I mean as a recently committed political activist who does a lot of activist stuff in my country (Australia) due to my free time I'm constantly impressed by the level of passion from all the socialists, anarchists, more radical democrats, environmentalists I've met in my activism who put in a lot of hard work into building up campaigns, going to rallies, hosting public forums to spread their ideas, perform interventions into unions, use social media in creative ways, organising with their political groups etc and yet most of the centre-left eg liberals and social democrats I know here just complain on facebook and theorise about the problem instead of taking any real political action, which I feel is a damn shame because the big problem with the far-left is it's far too easy for it to fall into sectarianism and having a more moderate voice in a sense to prevent them from going too far with their dogma would be beneficial, that and it seems to be a lost cause to unite all the left-wing ideologies.. despite the fact they all want the same thing just disagree about the means.You want a Fox News of the left.
SEN. JOHN McCAIN (R-AZ): Well, the fact is that the president is now deciding saying that there's no option. I'm sure you saw the reports where two Iranian Quds Force, their elite battalions, have moved into Iraq. This has turned into one of the most serious threats to American security in recent history. There is now the Syria/Iraq area, the largest area ever of radical islamist extremism. They are moving back and forth between Syria and Iraq. Our failure to help the resistance in Iraq, our failure to give these people the help they needed when we could have gotten rid of Bashir Assad, those chickens are coming home to roost as well. So what does it mean to the American people? It means that we are now facing an existential threat to the security of the United States of America.
###
McCAIN: I think you are confused because you didnt know what happened with the surge where we basically had the country pacified. We had a stable government in Baghdad, and we had the conflict basically for all intents and purposes won. We still got troops in Bosnia, a residual force would have stabilized the country. Most military experts will tell you that. So Im sorry about your confusion, but the facts on the ground were that al Qaeda had been defeated almost completely and with the residual American force and at that time, a strong Iraq. Now, [Iraqi PM Nouri] al-Maliki is very weak. Maliki got worse after we left. And again, I knew this was going to happen, because we didnt leave that force behind. And so Im sorry about your confusion, but anybody who was there will tell you we had the conflict won.
Obama should ask Reid to bring to vote a bill authorizing US troops to go to War in Iraq.
Since Republicans want to do it so much.
Patriot War Hero Pilot Johm McCain schools the slow kids on MSDNC:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kRZmCZy7yo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W5ndaevRuo
yea...nothing he said is true. The surge was doomed to fail unless we kept boots on the ground as a police force which was never going to happen. Revisionist history at best is what John McCain aspires to.
Bammy about to make statement on Iraq.
You want him to resign afterwards? because that's how presidents resign in america.you've gotta be quite a pos to blame the implosion of Iraq on Obama. Their army was "trained" for what, a fucking decade? Republicans are literally demanding Obama answer the parents of fallen US soldiers, and why the "gains" they sacrificed their lives for were lost.
If Obama had any balls he'd straight up say "those sacrifices should never have been made in a war that should have have been waged, and those who authorized it should be ashamed of themselves."
I just had a meltdown.
That better not happen. That guy is a fucking nutcase.
I don't think anyone expected Boehner to still be Speaker next term.
Scott Brown is a joke and I don't know why anyone here (*coughPDcough*) took him seriouslyScott Browns New Hampshire Senate campaign sent a news release Wednesday questioning why Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) wasnt appearing with President Obama while he was in town.
But Obama was in Worcester, Mass., about 50 miles from the New Hampshire border. The president will then be raising money in Boston for Senate Democrats.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/wp/2014/06/11/which-town-is-browns-town/
Scott Brown is a joke and I don't know why anyone here (*coughPDcough*) took him seriously
It seems he's picked up the drama queen skills from his pal Lindsay.Patriot War Hero Pilot Johm McCain schools the slow kids on MSDNC:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kRZmCZy7yo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W5ndaevRuo
SEN. JOHN McCAIN (R-AZ): Well, the fact is that the president is now deciding saying that there's no option. I'm sure you saw the reports where two Iranian Quds Force, their elite battalions, have moved into Iraq. This has turned into one of the most serious threats to American security in recent history. There is now the Syria/Iraq area, the largest area ever of radical islamist extremism. They are moving back and forth between Syria and Iraq. Our failure to help the resistance in Iraq, our failure to give these people the help they needed when we could have gotten rid of Bashir Assad, those chickens are coming home to roost as well. So what does it mean to the American people? It means that we are now facing an existential threat to the security of the United States of America.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/wp/2014/06/11/which-town-is-browns-town/
Scott Brown is a joke and I don't know why anyone here (*coughPDcough*) took him seriously
Bububu Reagan of the 21st century...
If we make all of the people good, markets will be good. If markets are bad, which they are, that means people are bad, which they are. Want good markets? Change the people.
This dude just really wants us all to go to church, and that appears to be his economic policy conclusion.
This seems risky.Obama should ask Reid to bring to vote a bill authorizing US troops to go to War in Iraq.
From the jenius who clobbered Cantor:
Translation:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/06/13/1306706/-The-economic-theology-that-beat-Cantor
Wow. GOP managed to replace that asshole Cantor with someone who seems to be even more of an asshole.
weird...he looks like a cross between Mitt Romney & Stephen Colbert...with some James Woods thrown in for good measure.
weird...he looks like a cross between Mitt Romney & Stephen Colbert...with some James Woods thrown in for good measure.
I can't un-see James woods now.
weird...he looks like a cross between Mitt Romney & Stephen Colbert...with some James Woods thrown in for good measure.