I drew it in crayon this time
It was at Perkins.
Yup. That's our senator assisting with a kegstand at today's LSU tailgating festivities. That's gotta be worth a percentage or two, right?
I still say this. Not really because I don't believe in god (I'm not an atheist) but just because its more inclusive, it feels really sectarian to say the under god partLOL. Alright there buddy.
btw 1923 pledge of allegiance was the best:
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States and to the republic for which it stands; one Nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all."
PD are you gonna vote for Rick Snyder again?
Is it because he shitcanned Detroit or any other reason?No, I won't vote for Rick Snyder this year.
Uh-oh, Snyder's lost the coveted PD vote. Schauer's got this one.The Nerd is making it cool to be an accountant, how can I hate him
No, I won't vote for Rick Snyder this year.
Is there really nothing on GAF for the 310,00 (probably closer to 350,000 or higher) marching for climate progress in NYC.
Is there really nothing on GAF for the 310,00 (probably closer to 350,000 or higher) marching for climate progress in NYC.
I drew it in crayon this time
Immediately no. But it's about building a movement. I've had the chance to speak to mickibben when he came to my class. He's thinking longer term and see these as the marches on civil rights in the 50s.I hate to be cynical, but it'll change absolutely nothing.
Yup. That's our senator assisting with a kegstand at today's LSU tailgating festivities. That's gotta be worth a percentage or two, right?
Is there really nothing on GAF for the 310,00 (probably closer to 350,000 or higher) marching for climate progress in NYC.
They couldn't even get an extremely watered down cap and trade bill (Waxman-Markey) through the Democrat controlled Congress in 2009, and cap and trade was even in the GOP platform in 2008.
Nothing substantive will get done until we have like 2/3rds Dem majorities in both houses of Congress so we can ratify Kyoto and other climate change treaties.
Is there really nothing on GAF for the 310,00 (probably closer to 350,000 or higher) marching for climate progress in NYC.
Obama has done a lot with the EPAThey couldn't even get an extremely watered down cap and trade bill (Waxman-Markey) through the Democrat controlled Congress in 2009, and cap and trade was even in the GOP platform in 2008.
Nothing substantive will get done until we have like 2/3rds Dem majorities in both houses of Congress so we can ratify Kyoto and other climate change treaties.
They couldn't even get an extremely watered down cap and trade bill (Waxman-Markey) through the Democrat controlled Congress in 2009, and cap and trade was even in the GOP platform in 2008.
Nothing substantive will get done until we have like 2/3rds Dem majorities in both houses of Congress so we can ratify Kyoto and other climate change treaties.
John D. Rockefeller built a vast fortune on oil. Now his heirs are abandoning fossil fuels.
The family whose legendary wealth flowed from Standard Oil is planning to announce on Monday that its $860 million philanthropic organization, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, is joining the divestment movement that began a couple years ago on college campuses.
The announcement, timed to precede Tuesdays opening of the United Nations climate change summit meeting in New York City, is part of a broader and accelerating initiative.
In recent years, 180 institutions including philanthropies, religious organizations, pension funds and local governments as well as hundreds of wealthy individual investors have pledged to sell assets tied to fossil fuel companies from their portfolios and to invest in cleaner alternatives. In all, the groups have pledged to divest assets worth more than $50 billion from portfolios, and the individuals more than $1 billion, according to Arabella Advisors, a firm that consults with philanthropists and investors to use their resources to achieve social goals.
The people who are selling shares of energy stocks are well aware that their actions are unlikely to have an immediate impact on the companies, given their enormous market capitalizations and cash flow.
Even so, some say they are taking action to align their assets with their environmental principles. Others want to shame companies that they believe are recklessly contributing to a warming planet. Still others say that the fight to limit climate change will lead to new regulations and disruptive new technologies that will make these companies an increasingly risky investment.
Ultimately, the activist investors say, their actions, like those of the anti-apartheid divestment fights of the 1980s, could help spur international debate, while the shift of investment funds to energy alternatives could lead to solutions to the carbon puzzle.
Is it because he shitcanned Detroit or any other reason?
I was listening to NPR in the car a bit ago and they were talking about a flood of Syrian refugees into Turkey that were fleeing violence and it got me to thinking.
Whenever you hear of a mass of people moving across borders in say Africa or the middle East they are always called refugees. However, when various new sources and pundits and politicians in America talk about the flood of children from Central America coming across our borders to flee violence, they are called illegal immigrants. Very rarely does the news call them refugees.
I just think it's fascinating how just changing up a single word completely changes the context of the situation immediately when they are essentially the same thing.
Judge Jeanine Pirro called the Islamic extremist group ISIS Americas single biggest threat in her 200-year history" claiming that the threat was even bigger than those America faced during World War I, World War II, and September 11th. She predicted that ISIS will come to America, if not already on American soil.
Judge Jeanine: "Everything Ive been telling you for a month is accurate. You need to think September 11th, 2001. You need to remember what it felt like then. Dont sit there and think that government has you covered. Hell, the White House itself and its perimeter were penetrated twice in the last 24 hours."
"If our government were listening, our borders would be closed. If our government were listening, wed be bombing ISIS nonstop. And if they were listening, our president would be following the advice of the military experts united on the issue of boots on the ground. But instead, our president thinks he knows more than the military experts, a disagreement highlighted this week and virtually unseen in American history. And if our government were listening, we would never have gotten out of Iraq the way we did."
So who is gonna lead the fight against ISIS when our President is a known muslin?
They have a corporate structure!My Anaconda, Montana don't want none unless you're not a Muslim, hun.
So who is gonna lead the fight against ISIS when our President is a known muslin?
AND WATCH WHAT YOUR CHILDREN ARE READING ON THE INTERNET
One usual difference is that war refugees don't necessarily have the intent of relocating to the target country, only to temporarily escape the combat/danger. That is largely different from US example where the children are often coming here to relocate and join family who are already here, and there is little if any desire to return.
I would be interested in knowing what the receiving countries think of the war refugees though. Does Turkish press, as the receiving location, look at them as refugees or immigrants?
Brownback campaign in Kansas going all out on the attack that Paul Davis went to a strip club once in 1998 because Davis was representing the owner of the club in court.
Jesus fucking Christ Kansas.
Kansas Republicans desperation continuesBrownback campaign in Kansas going all out on the attack that Paul Davis went to a strip club once in 1998 because Davis was representing the owner of the club in court.
Jesus fucking Christ Kansas.
Does rest of the state feel the same way? I mean if he hadnt bailed on Detroit, he probably could coast his way to victory methinks.Mainly Detroit.
Although part of me feels like we'd be better off if he won, solely because Shauer literally won't accomplish anything as governor due to the extremist GOP congress. Everything will stagnate and he'll be hung out to dry in four years.
Brownback campaign in Kansas going all out on the attack that Paul Davis went to a strip club once in 1998 because Davis was representing the owner of the club in court.
Jesus fucking Christ Kansas.
The shit going down in Kansas is breathtaking to behold. A ruby red state like that, and Brownback has managed to turn 100 of his own Republican allies in the state legislature against him. How the hell do you fuck up like that?
Brownback campaign in Kansas going all out on the attack that Paul Davis went to a strip club once in 1998 because Davis was representing the owner of the club in court.
By actually doing what you campaigned on doing.
is there a place I can read up on all this?It really is stunning. Republicans have been adamant when it comes to supporting trickle-down economics at all costs. Even Republicans is less insane states like California or Massachusetts would sooner sacrifice their first born than raise taxes, and yet we have 100 fricken legislators in a state so conservative that even their local NAACP office has a confederate flag flying up front, have turned their backs on the teachings of the Lord Reagan.
It's arguably the most fascinating thing I've seen since I've been following politics.
PPP: Shaheen leading by 6 in New Hampshire
Republicans still trying to convince everyone (and themselves) that it's a tossup
And Michigan and Minnesota.So, like Pennsylvania every presidential election.