Snowman Prophet of Doom
Member
I think the thing with Trump and bankruptcy is that he comes from a world where risk is an inherent feature of everything you do, so he doesn't really "get" how several major bankruptcies look from the other side.
That thing with Megyn Kelly is so goofy to me. Is he just afraid of women or what
How am I supposed to fit all that in two predicates? :U
Plus...
Jeb meets with Right to Rise head Mike Murphy
That thing with Megyn Kelly is so goofy to me. Is he just afraid of women or what
I remember it differently. She got wrecked and immediately fell into obscurity.If the way he handled Fiorina is anything to go by he's not great at debating women, no.
I remember it differently. She got wrecked and immediately fell into obscurity.
She rose leading into the debate, then plummeted immediately after.Lol what? She rose a lot after that debate while Trump fell. She fell back to nowhere after people researched her and found her a liar and terrible businesswoman.
I remember it differently. She got wrecked and immediately fell into obscurity.
Regardless of what strategy he works up, he has already made the bed he's going to sleep in. All the incendiary talk during the primary is going to bite him in the ass so hard.I'd also like to note that I'm not Diablosing about Trump. Barring some unpredictable happening, I don't see a probable path to him doing any better than terrible in a general election. My point was just that I think he knows his weaknesses in comparison to Hillary and that his strategy to overcome them will be better than we think.
She rose leading into the debate, then plummeted immediately after.
Fiorina only got a debate bump from the first undercard debate where the media shoved her down our throats.As I remember it she actually got a polling bounce from her debate performance in September where she was incredibly prominent and vocal against Trump, but then people looked at her record.
Then like Carson got swallowed up in the later parts of the year following Paris and San Bernadino.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com...lected=Carson,Cruz,Fiorina,Kasich,Rubio,TrumpNot remotely the case.
Fiorina only got a debate bump from the first undercard debate where the media shoved her down our throats.
Not remotely the case.
Fiorina fell back into obscurity because she was 1) a pretty crap candidate for the GOP this cycle since she's only not in The Establishment™ because she failed to win her Senate race, 2) a pretty crappy candidate just in general as a failed businessperson, and 3) she didn't do anything at all to capitalise on her brief time in the spotlight and modicum of momentum.
But I think only her and Carson have managed to do anything to Trump throughout the primary. And Megyn Kelly.
She got onto the main stage by engaging Trump publicly.
The survey, conducted in the three days after 23 million people tuned in to Wednesday night's GOP debate on CNN, shows that Trump is still the party's front-runner with 24% support. That, though, is an 8 percentage point decrease from earlier in the month when a similar poll had him at 32%.
Fiorina ranks second with 15% support -- up from 3% in early September. She's just ahead of Ben Carson's 14%, though Carson's support has also declined from 19% in the previous poll.
Driving Trump's drop and Fiorina's rise: a debate in which 31% of Republicans who watched said Trump was the loser, and 52% identified Fiorina as the winner.
How do you get someone else to quit? Well, one way is to offer them an incentive. You could offer them money or the promise of a powerful position. That is what one camp is considering offering another candidate. How about a Vice Presidency or a seat on the Supreme Court?
You're right, I just checked and Politifact's profiles for Hillary and Bernie are about even.http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/20/politics/carly-fiorina-donald-trump-republican-2016-poll/
Fiorina crushed Trump in that debate, but then was found out to be horrible liar right afterward and that was the end of her.
It's interesting how Florina is seen as a liar and Carson/Trump as truth tellers when Florina lied slightly less than those dudes and how Sanders is seen as a truth teller whereas Hillary is a liar when Politifact rates them as exactly the same level of telling the truth.
I think assertive women can be believed to be liars much more easily.
Here's most of the polls of Florina shortly after the debate and showing how she had fallen to 2% right before the debate:
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/10/13/hey-what-happened-to-carly-fiorinas-bounce-in-the-polls/
You're right, I just checked and Politifact's profiles for Hillary and Bernie are about even.
Which makes it even better/more infuriating when you see all the Berniestans in Reddit and OT pledge their loyalty to Trump, who's had like 80% of his claims rated false. "I won't vote for Hillary because she's a lying bitch! Not like Trump who TELLS IT LIKE IT IS! Plus it'd be funny! Wackity-schmackity-doo!"
where did this OH poll come from? 538 weighted it so poorly on their site and no one mentioned it at all today
Sanders 45
Hillary 44
http://www.bw.edu/news/2016/cri-ohio-primary-election-poll
My god
GOP leaders, you must do everything in your power to stop Trump
THE UNTHINKABLE is starting to look like the inevitable: Absent an extraordinary effort from people who understand the menace he represents, Donald Trump is likely to be the presidential nominee of the Republican Party. At this stage, even an extraordinary effort might fall short. But history will not look kindly on GOP leaders who fail to do everything in their power to prevent a bullying demagogue from becoming their standard-bearer.
A few days ago we criticized Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus for his assertion that a Trump victory in November would silence the doubters. “Winning is the antidote to a lot of things,” Mr. Priebus had said. We argued that winning would not erase the bigotry and ugliness of Mr. Trump’s campaign, nor remove the dangers of a Trump presidency. On Wednesday, the GOP chairman, perhaps wanting to show that he can match Mr. Trump in eloquence, responded: “That is the stupidest editorial that I have ever seen.”
SurveyUSA said:Trump runs 20 points stronger among voters who watched The Apprentice TV show almost always when Trump was the host, compared to voters who almost never watched The Apprentice. Among viewers who almost always watched the show when Trump was the host, Trump leads Clinton by 24 points, 58% to 34%. Among voters who almost never watched The Apprentice when Trump was host, Clinton leads Trump by 15 points, 53% to 38%.
SurveyUSA has found the foundation of Trump's support
http://www.surveyusa.com/index.php/...om-regular-viewers-of-the-apprentice-tv-show/
SurveyUSA has found the foundation of Trump's support
http://www.surveyusa.com/index.php/...om-regular-viewers-of-the-apprentice-tv-show/
So it seems like we've hit the point where people are unskewing the polls/delegate counts?
Where?So it seems like we've hit the point where people are unskewing the polls/delegate counts?
Obama can be so great sometimes.He showed real leadership getting to the bottom of who was at fault in the Gary Bucey/Meatloaf feud.
Yes it was posted and then buried by a 9 page discussion of ethnic groups voting in blocks.
As opposed to the sure-fire general election success of a man who relies on voters who historically don't vote, is a self-described socialist, and could quite easily be portrayed as atheist as well.This posted yet?
With Donald Trump Looming, Should Dems Take a Huge Electability Gamble by Nominating Hillary Clinton?
https://theintercept.com/2016/02/24/...llary-clinton/
As opposed to the sure-fire general election success of a man who relies on voters who historically don't vote, is a self-described socialist, and could quite easily be portrayed as atheist as well.
As opposed to the sure-fire general election success of a man who relies on voters who historically don't vote, is a self-described socialist, and could quite easily be portrayed as atheist as well.
This posted yet?
With Donald Trump Looming, Should Dems Take a Huge Electability Gamble by Nominating Hillary Clinton?
https://theintercept.com/2016/02/24...ability-gamble-by-nominating-hillary-clinton/
To which I respond