Lag theory stands. Nate tweeted it when state polling was up and national was down. This is despite him being on the record against the theory.I'm more concerned with state polls, not national.
So there is an 11 point gap between the spreads of the Ras poll this morning (Trump +5) and that AP poll tonight (Hillary +6). That seems odd.
Rasmussen.So there is an 11 point gap between the spreads of the Ras poll this morning (Trump +5) and that AP poll tonight (Hillary +6). That seems odd.
Because Rasmussen is a borderline joke poll. Its republican bias is almost as blatant as LA Times. There's a reason why we have a chuckle about it every Thursday.So there is an 11 point gap between the spreads of the Ras poll this morning (Trump +5) and that AP poll tonight (Hillary +6). That seems odd.
That's right, kids. The way you do aggregates is to cherry pick the R leaners out and force the mean to D.Because Rasmussen is a borderline joke poll. Its republican bias is almost as blatant as LA Times. There's a reason why we have a chuckle about it every Thursday.
I asked someone to imagine how a Trump Justice Department would handle the BLM issue. Attorney General Rudolph Giuliani. His department would probably ignore BLM complaints and give winks/thumbs-up at local police departments.
Ass was +4Rasmussen.
AP/GfK has generic ballot at D+4. This margin would have saved Dems in fifteen seats in Nov 2014.
Got a fund raising email from Hillary. Subject line is "Rawhide" it's from Carville. BECAUSE OF COURSE IT IS.
Where are the usual suspects who only seem to show up for bad polls?AP/Gf
National LV
9/15-9/19
Hillary: 45 (+6)
Trump: 39
Johnson: 9
Wifi: 2
H2H:
Hillary: 50 (+6)
Trump: 44
Where are the usual suspects who only seem to show up for bad polls?
That is what I am asking, do they only have alerts for bad polls or something? Otherwise they are here lurking just waiting to panic.Why would they show up if it was a good poll?
Only won by 6 points in 2012Rep. Robert Pittenger, NC 9th Congressional District, for those wondering. Includes part of Charlotte. He's already trying to apologize and walk back his comments.
“It is a welfare state. We have spent trillions of dollars on welfare, and we’ve put people in bondage, so they can’t be all they’re capable of being.”
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/pol...#storylink=cpy
FuuuuuckPittenger also blamed welfare. I posted about it earlier in the OT thread on the shooting.
Video of him saying it is included in the article.The BBC interviewer had to be like "you stupid Americans."
That is what I am asking, do they only have alerts for bad polls or something? Otherwise they are here lurking just waiting to panic.
Please tell me he has a legitimate challenger
Donald Trump's campaign isn't alone in patronizing his own businesses: taxpayers are indirectly doing so, too.
Federal Election Commission records show that the U.S. Secret Service has paid the Trump campaign about $1.6 million to cover the cost of flying its agents with the candidate on a plane owned and operated by one of his companies.
Story Continued Below
Its standard practice for the agency which is tasked with protecting presidential candidates as well as presidents and other federal officials to reimburse presidential campaigns for the cost of traveling with the candidates.
In fact, the Secret Service has reimbursed the Clinton campaign, too: $2.6 million so far this cycle. The difference with Trump is that one of his companies, TAG Air, Inc., owns the plane, so the government is effectively paying him.
The Clinton campaign, by contrast, mostly has been chartering planes from a private company called Executive Fliteways in which the Clintons do not have any ownership interest.
The Secret Service could also end up paying Trump's hotels to put up his agents when the candidate stays there. But those expenses don't appear in FEC reports because the government pays them directly.
Rep. Robert Pittenger, NC 9th Congressional District, for those wondering. Includes part of Charlotte. He's already trying to apologize and walk back his comments.
I'm shocked at the generally positive reception to the Between Two Ferns Hillary segment.
Thread Here
Discuss the impact of the segment in here if you want.
There is absolutely no way anyone could walk back that comment.
AP/Gf
National LV
9/15-9/19
Hillary: 45 (+6)
Trump: 39
Johnson: 9
Wifi: 2
H2H:
Hillary: 50 (+6)
Trump: 44
#scampaign
There is absolutely no way anyone could walk back that comment.
It's fucking disgusting and you don't get to walk that back.
So it look like the race is back into the +5-7 range now? Seems quite a few new national polls hitting those numbers, although state polls still show a much different race
https://twitter.com/davidplouffe/status/778974010642051072
In Trump's mind he wins by merely showing up. The ratings are going to be big and he'll likely be talked about the most no matter what happens. He's a showman, that's all. That being said I'm feeling more confident that he won't attend the next debate. Hillary Clinton is a very good debater, and arguably the best debater out of the last 16 years of national elections. I think the contrast between the two candidates is going to be so stark that it'll be very hard for most of the media to play the "both sides" game. Yes some of that will happen regardless, and Trump being entertaining/funny will sway some folks...but overall you're going to see a professional and a clown.
If the media reaction is as bad as I think it can be, and if polls are as unanimous as I expect they'll be, Trump's only recourse will be to declare the process rigged and refuse to participate again unless his demands are met. In his mind he wins via default, so any perception of a loss=someone is cheating him.
The biggest danger I see for Clinton is that Trump's ceiling is so low, expectations wise. A lot of people are going to tune in to be entertained, and Trump will easily provide that. And his debate and speaking style makes it easy for him to repeat various things for 30-90 seconds effectively. If the question is on Syria for instance he can say "Syria is a mess, it was fine before Obama and Hillary ruined it. We're losing there, Russia is doing xyz. When I'm president we're going to have a winning strategy, ok. We're going to lead." He could potentially get away with that depending on what the media has to say, and depending on voter's reactions to Hillary's answers (does she dodge responsibility, does she refuse to criticize the president, etc).
His walkback is ridiculous. Jesus.
Is he on tv or something?
I don't see how that follows.So Palmer Luckey is funding a group that creates anti-Hillary memes and shitposts. Those stories about him stealing the Oculus tech aren't sounding so far-fetched.
Yeah it's really just a reversion to the mean if anything.My favorite thing about Hillary's bounce back to +5-7 is that the media has no narrative for it. It's just that the population flat out rejected the notions that the health scare or Deplorables comment hurt her. The analysis was wrong other than Hillary not being on the trail and helping focus the narrative on Trump's ridiculous comments and his foundation.
Nothing stops the Killary!
Also Jesus, the NC GOP *really* wants their state to go blue, doesn't it?