Macho Madness
Member
Well the job number hit. It was another good one. I just wish wages were going up with it.
Help it's been two hours I feel like I have no idea what's going on in the political world.
Josh Greenman said:PRODUCE THE SCHLONG FORM GIRTH CERTIFICATE
Cruz ate another booger, this one so large it had a name.Help it's been two hours I feel like I have no idea what's going on in the political world.
lmaoAlso, best tweet of the night.
best
Looks like someone accidentally wiped the Neogaf servers. You know, like, with a cloth.
Also, best tweet of the night.
best
The way the GOP seems to be really embracing the convention strategy I am thinking it all but certain they will deny him the nomination even if he has the far and away most delegates. Trump supporters revolting and him running third party be damned.
I really don't think they care what they said at the debate. Trump said the same thing but he certainly will run third party if they deny him the nomination if he gets the most votes.Cruz, Kasich & Rubio are on tape and in writing(contract) that they will support Trump as the nominee. If he leads with the most wins, votes & delegates heading into the convention of not a majority but plurality no way they can deny him it.
Your friends might have contracted RINO virus, did they get their yearly empathy and nuance inoculations?The whole "release the secret off the record tapes" stuff from Cruz was beyond irritating. Cruz would probably flip if people released off the record stuff of him talking.
Anecdotal thing: I have several very conservative friends, and many of them say last night Cruz turned them off completely for, get this, being "obsessed with being far right." Cruz's whole "no democrat ever did anything good" schtick has made them hate Cruz.
As for the debate, I said it last night: I think Trump has a chance to be done. That was by far his worst debate, and I think it costs him Florida, and Inthink Kasich is a shoe-in for Ohio now.
The one thing in his favor is that Kasich is really far behind at this point, while Cruz will do nothing in northern states.
Cenk loves hearing himself talk and in the worst way. I can't listen to that network even if I agree with them.So when Hillary invokes the names of black people who've been unfairly killed, she's pandering.
When Bernie discusses black inequality, he's trying to win their vote because he means it.
Thanks TYT
All of the other candidates said they'd support Trump after dissing him all night long. This party has absolutely no moral, ethical or political compass whatsoever. It's unreal. They truly are not capable of rational thought and last night's debate is proof. People will say republicans can be smart but stand by their ideals blah blah. Bullshit. They are unbelievably inept and have no place in modern day politics.
People think Trump did badly? I thought he killed it. He established dominance early by declaring he has the largest dick on stage and no one could take him down without looking weak themselves.
If you want to argue everyone looked bad I'll agree with that, but you can't say Trump did worse than a little kid and a guy who ate a booger.
Big ratings for debate
bad for Trump
Is that what we've come to? Is that now the standard on who wins these things? Not commanding the stage with a demonstrable wealth of knowledge on the facts, policy, and connecting with the moderators/audience. Is it really just being the person who says the most macho thing of the night? I guess so..
If that's the case, Rubio should just whip his dick out at the next one of these things and challenge Trump to a sword fight.
Your friends might have contracted RINO virus, did they get their yearly empathy and nuance inoculations?
Y2Kev said:Trump "has a chance to be done" is hedging so good an options trader would be proud.
People think Trump did badly? I thought he killed it. He established dominance early by declaring he has the largest dick on stage and no one could take him down without looking weak themselves.
If you want to argue everyone looked bad I'll agree with that, but you can't say Trump did worse than a little kid and a guy who ate a booger.
Really shocked at all the articles saying Trump lost. I thought he did well???
The sad part is Trump did fine in the face of all those attacks by Fox. You can't out troll the master.
Really shocked at all the articles saying Trump lost. I thought he did well???
Is that what we've come to? Is that now the standard on who wins these things? Not commanding the stage with a demonstrable wealth of knowledge on the facts, policy, and connecting with the moderators/audience. Is it really just being the person who says the most macho thing of the night? I guess so..
If that's the case, Rubio should just whip his dick out at the next one of these things and challenge Trump to a sword fight.
I thought he looked bad the last 30 mins. The prolonged Trump University attack clearly took a lot out of him. It was the first time all election he looked meek and, dare I say it, low energy.
It happened so late in the debate I doubt it matters though. Until the Trump University attack he was arguably having his best debate performance. He was asserting dominance pretty easily.
Fox is a mouthpiece for the GOP. I agree that it signals a desire for a brokered convention.Fox News was prepared. They hit him good. Trump University, the videos of him waffling, asking for specific names, the actual facts on his budget numbers, etc.
They could just as well hit Cruz/Rubio on a lot of those same things, and they didn't.
I really think they want a brokered convention and a Romney pick.
Fox is a mouthpiece for the GOP. I agree that it signals a desire for a brokered convention.
The question is if it will happen. Then, if it does happen, will RMoney or whoever it is actually stand a chance. Don't some states have a way that can forbid candidates from going third party? In other words does Trump really have a plan B?
That too... If they wait until the convention that gives him very little time to put together a third party runeven if they deny trump he has no time to run third party.
I really want to see a brokered convention now. Trump v Rubio v Cruz v R-money. It'll be YUUUUUUGE
I just hope Sanders can be mature enough to not throw a hissy fit and then explore a third party run himself. His behavior lately is just not acceptable in terms if respecting the party. I don't trust his sensibilities and regard for the outcome of the GE.I really want to see a brokered convention now. Trump v Rubio v Cruz v R-money. It'll be YUUUUUUGE
They should nominate Hillary.
I just hope Sanders can be mature enough to not throw a hissy fit and then explore a third party run himself. His behavior lately is just not acceptable in terms if respecting the party. I don't trust his sensibilities and regard for the outcome of the GE.
So in the end the wealth continues to stay at the top and the rest of us get to be thankful for whatever scraps we get. The illusion that we have any power in controlling our lives continues.
Detroit has a right to be mad as hell and the rest of us should be too. Our politicians are giving us just enough not to revolt and they do it with a smile the entire time.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/05/u...-donald-trump-will-reach-delegate-target.htmlIf the people in the rest of the nation vote as the Super Tuesday results suggest they would, Mr. Trump would easily amass a majority of delegates and avoid the contested convention that his opponents hope to force and win.
He could even do so without wins in Ohio and Florida, the two largest winner-take-all states, where he faces opponents in their home states.
Mr. Trump would amass so many delegates because the rules become more biased toward candidates who win, allowing him the chance to take an overwhelming share of delegates with just a minority of the vote. It becomes easy to win lopsided delegate margins starting March 15, when states are allowed to apportion their delegates on a winner-take-all basis. At the same time, the primary calendar doesnt become less favorable and may even become more advantageous to him, depending on which candidates stay in the race.
But the results so far also indicate he could still be defeated, suggesting Mr. Trump is far from winning a majority of the popular vote. He could be denied a majority of delegates if the field narrowed to Mr. Rubio.
If the remaining states vote as one would expect based on their demographics and the results so far, Mr. Trump will defeat Marco Rubio by a margin of 37 percent to 25 percent over the rest of the race. Ted Cruz would take third place over the rest of the primary season, with 22 percent of the vote. (These figures were calculated by weighting the candidates projected vote share in congressional districts by Mitt Romneys vote in 2012, to more appropriately reflect the importance of caucuses. The actual popular vote would be worse for Mr. Cruz.)
Mr. Trumps 12-point lead over Mr. Rubio would translate into a huge majority of the outstanding delegates. He would be favored to amass around two-thirds of the delegates that remain or around 1,100 additional delegates on top of the more than 300 delegates he already holds. That would easily be enough for Mr. Trump to clear the 1,237 delegates needed to win.
It would even be enough to withstand losses in both Ohio and Florida, two big winner-take-all states.
Its important to emphasize that these estimates arent predictions. They assume the rest of the country will vote as it has so far, and the race could easily change. Perhaps Mr. Rubio will fade after his showing on Super Tuesday. Maybe an organized stop Trump effort will have an effect.
But the estimates nonetheless make an important point: There wont be a contested convention if things keep going as they have been.
All it will do is split the GOP vote. No democrat will vote for Romney.
I don't see how the UAW not having a dominant vote is a bad thing for Chrysler or GM. The UAW is ran by people who make Donald Trump look like an honest actor. Union bosses are just about the worst humans on the planet and routinely prey upon their own constituency.
Case in point, the entire problem with the American auto industry stems from the UAW working in collaboration with automotive manufacturers to allow off-shoring of jobs with a caveat that if any U.S. factories closed the car companies had to keep paying the laid off workers 90% of their wages. All that really achieved was the construction of a perfect "union labor is lazy and overpaid" narrative for anti-labor politicians.
Strong unions ran by and for their constituency are a good thing. The United States hasn't had that kind of organized labor environment in over 30 years.
It will do more than demonstrate that. It will hand the Republicans the White House.I'm sure he will abide by the vote and not run third party. That said, if he did, it would only demonstrate why he never deserved the nomination in the first place.
EDIT: Apologies for double post, on phone.
The better Nate projects that Trump will reach a majority of delegates even if he loses FL and OH:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/05/u...-donald-trump-will-reach-delegate-target.html
that's not the point. The GOP knows its not going to win with this crowd. Hillary has this. The only one with a shot at the general is kasich and he has no traction in the primary.
The point of a third party run would be to avoid the inevitable collapse in turnout that would result from Trump leading the ticket. Those who would stay home rather than vote for trump or clinton might come out for romney and the republican downticket races would benefit from it.
All things considered, losing the presidency to stop a massive bleed in the house and senate is probably worth it in the long run.
I hope you're right!You should think of it as a good thing, really, because it's the end of the Republican Party for a decade.
The GOP is full of establishment politicians in the House, Senate, and state houses who have been silently accepting implicit racism in pursuit of their policy goals for many years. But they have to silently accept racism, because explicitly advocating it will lose them elections -- whatever problems America has, I think it's pretty clear from history that a majority of Americans are unwilling to elect an avowed racist.
So the GOP establishment has spent that time covering them from the other direction -- making sure that any candidate who DOES explicitly support racism fails to win party support. Because a lot of GOP politicians would lose primaries to these candidates! Because the business of the Republican Party is appealing to reactionaries.
But that's over now. If the Republican establishment can't keep Donald Trump from dominating the presidential primary, then nobody is safe. Every single Republican politician is facing a choice -- start explicitly refusing the Trump side of the party and pushing them out, or just start being openly racist in order to protect themselves from their own party base.
Obviously they're having trouble making up their minds, but enough of them are going to go in either direction that it's going to completely fracture their support. After this year, the mainstream American perspective will be that Republicans can't be allowed to govern.